If you want better tonal consistency
Choose Rose of Nevada. It scores 5.0 vs 3.3 for tonal consistency, with a 4.5 overall score.
Camp Movie Review
Bottom Line
Choose it for hypnotic visuals, a remarkable lead performance, and emotionally rich queer witchcraft. Skip it if you need brisk pacing, clear supernatural rules, or a conventional horror payoff.
Best for
Viewers drawn to queer arthouse horror, witchy coming-of-age stories, grief narratives, and movies that privilege mood and interpretation over conventional plot.
Not for
Viewers wanting a summer-camp slasher, frequent scares, fast pacing, clear supernatural rules, or a decisive third-act resolution.
Verdict
Camp is a visually intoxicating, emotionally sincere piece of queer arthouse horror built around grief, guilt, and the dangerous comfort of belonging. Zola Grimmer gives the loose narrative a compelling center, while Eily Sprungman’s cinematography, handmade animation, and the reverb-heavy music turn the camp into an unstable dream world. Avalon Fast’s refusal to explain the witchcraft or impose tidy moral judgments gives the film unusual thematic power. That same refusal is also its main limitation: the 111-minute runtime drags, dialogue can feel clunky or monotone, side characters vanish, and the ending withholds conventional resolution. It is strongest as a mood piece and emotional experience, not as a tightly constructed horror story.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
37 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.016 (43%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.412 (32%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.44 (11%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.45 (14%)
Pros
-
Soft focus, colored fog, analog textures, handheld movement, and glowing woodland imagery create the film’s most consistently admired strength. The photography makes even ordinary daylight feel enchanted and unstable.
-
The film’s grief, guilt, and hunger for absolution land with unusual tenderness and intensity. Its strongest moments make healing feel both comforting and potentially dangerous.
-
Zola Grimmer gives a remarkably controlled debut, conveying sorrow, guarded hope, and longing through restrained speech and expressive reactions. Even harsher assessments of the ensemble tend to single her out positively.
-
The handmade visual language is the film’s clearest triumph, blending Super 8 grain, colored fog, animation, ritual tableaux, and glowing natural light. It is consistently described as gorgeous, hypnotic, and otherworldly.
-
The film stands out through its handmade textures, moral ambiguity, and refusal to turn its coven into a familiar villainous force. Its raw, singular vision often matters more than narrative polish.
-
The film thoughtfully connects grief, female sexuality, faith, guilt, and chosen family. Its moral refusal to label healing as purely good or evil gives the material unusual depth.
Cons
-
The ending is intentionally unresolved and will be a major dividing point. Some appreciate its refusal of reassurance, while others find the missing payoff, dropped threads, and troubling implications frustrating.
-
Reality, dreams, memory, and witchcraft blur by design, leaving major questions unanswered. That ambiguity can be seductive, but it also makes the plot feel incoherent or nearly illegible to some viewers.
-
The deliberately lo-fi dialogue divides opinion. Some accept its monotone awkwardness as part of the dream state, while others find it clunky, airless, and emotionally flat.
-
At 111 minutes, the film pushes its sparse narrative close to the breaking point. Even positive reactions often suggest that trimming 10 to 15 minutes would strengthen the experience.
-
The meditative pace supports the dreamlike atmosphere, but it is the most repeated drawback. Long silences and meandering transitions frequently make the film feel overextended.
-
The screenplay contains potent ideas about guilt, faith, and female community, but it often abandons setups and underdevelops motivations. Its intuitive power is stronger than its structural discipline.
Cast & Creators
-
CinematographerSprungman’s cinematography is repeatedly identified as a defining achievement, transforming woods, daylight, memory, and ritual into a soft, unstable dreamscape. The work is described as gorgeous, razor-sharp, and masterful.
-
Writer-DirectorFast is praised for a fearless, personal vision and unusually strong command of mood, archetype, and handmade imagery. The approach remains raw and divisive, with some criticism of disjointed execution and insufficient narrative focus.
-
EmilyGrimmer’s debut is the film’s most consistently praised performance, balancing muted grief with guarded hope and a deep need for belonging. Her restrained expressions give the loose narrative a compelling emotional center.
-
ComposerRobin’s fuzzy, reverb-heavy score strengthens the film’s charmed and threatening atmosphere. Its noise, drift, and intensity help carry the story when the narrative becomes most abstract.
-
ClaraWordsworth gives Clara an alluring presence and shines in the supporting ensemble. Her chemistry with Grimmer adds warmth, danger, and romantic charge to Emily’s sense of belonging.
-
RosieMoore is singled out as a strong supporting presence, bringing naturalism and bright, welcoming energy to Rosie. Her performance helps make the coven feel intimate rather than merely ominous.
View all 37 feature scores and cast & creators
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in originality, plot originality, world-building, near average in visual style, pacing, below average in ending satisfaction, dialogue quality, audience appeal.
Comparison summary
37 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher21 (57%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts10 (27%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower6 (16%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| originality | 4.7 | 3.3 | +1.4 |
| plot originality | 4.5 | 3.1 | +1.4 |
| ending satisfaction | 2.2 | 3.5 | -1.3 |
| world-building | 5.0 | 3.7 | +1.3 |
| romance quality | 4.5 | 3.3 | +1.2 |
| emotional impact | 4.9 | 3.8 | +1.1 |
| realism | 4.5 | 3.3 | +1.2 |
| animation quality | 4.8 | 3.6 | +1.2 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better runtime
Choose Leviticus. It scores 4.5 vs 2.3 for runtime, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better ending satisfaction
Choose Honeyjoon. It scores 4.8 vs 2.2 for ending satisfaction, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better acting performance
Choose Romería. It scores 5.0 vs 3.8 for acting performance, with a 4.5 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
I Saw the TV Glow
- Similar: trippy coming-of-age themes Both films use destabilizing visuals to express trauma, guilt, and belonging.
- Similar: trauma and identity impact The reviewer says the film affected them in a similarly personal and destabilizing way.
- Better: handling of loss and dissociation The reviewer finds a similar concept handled with much greater confidence elsewhere.
The Craft
- Similar: witchy coming-of-age mood It is recommended as a lonelier, rougher, more emotionally unstable alternative.
- Similar: coven-centered storytelling The premise is described as a dreamier, mumblecore-inflected version of the witch classic.
- Compared: witchy coming-of-age premise The film is framed as a psychedelic, artful variation on a familiar witch story.
Honeycomb
- Older model: filmmaking confidence Fast’s second feature is viewed as a major step forward from the debut.
FAQ
Is Camp a traditional summer-camp slasher?
No. It is a slow, dreamlike coming-of-age horror film centered on grief, witchcraft, and female friendship rather than killings, chase scenes, or jump scares.
Is Camp scary?
Its horror comes from atmosphere, moral unease, ritual imagery, and emotional dread. Viewers seeking intense scares or a large body count may find it too gentle and abstract.
Why is the story so ambiguous?
Dreams, memories, reality, and supernatural events intentionally blur together to mirror Emily’s grief and dissociation. The film leaves the witchcraft and ending open to interpretation.
How is Zola Grimmer’s performance?
Her debut is one of the film’s strongest elements. She conveys Emily’s sorrow, guarded hope, and need for belonging through a restrained but expressive performance.
Does the 111-minute runtime feel long?
Often, yes. The meditative rhythm supports the atmosphere, but several critics felt the sparse story would be stronger with roughly 10 to 15 minutes removed.
Who is Camp best for?
It is best for viewers who enjoy queer arthouse horror, dreamy visuals, found-family themes, and unresolved storytelling. Those needing a brisk plot or tidy payoff should approach cautiously.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
phantasmag.com
- Review score
- 4.5
theholofiles.com
Top Movies to Consider
Best for pristine archival footage, immersive sound, and a surprisingly tense look at Disneyland’s construction. Skip it if you want a comprehensive, deeply critical history; several reviewers found the 78–79-minute...
Pros: plot clarity, realism
Cons: plot originality, runtime
Best for a profound, formally inventive meditation on grief, memory, and the ethics of filming family. Skip it if intensely personal addiction material, a 114-minute runtime, or occasional repetition will...
Pros: plot originality, ending satisfaction
Cons: runtime, pacing
Best for joyful music, rare footage, candid interviews, and a layered Maurice White portrait. Skip it if you want a tightly focused, unconventional reappraisal that lingers on performances instead of...
Pros: ending satisfaction, drama quality
Cons: runtime, originality
Best for a tender, accessible portrait that lets Oliver’s poetry, friends, and archival voice carry the experience. Skip it if you want a brisk, deeply investigative biography; the calm rhythm...
Pros: romance quality, faithfulness to source material
Cons: none