Matchmaking quality was positively mentioned by reviewers who found matchmaking smooth or issue-free.
Pros: level design, remake/remaster quality
Cons: soundtrack quality, mission design
Best 2025 Video Games for matchmaking quality
Matchmaking quality ranges from slow beta searches to quick or stable matchmaking in later impressions.
Pros: content variety, gameplay mechanics
Cons: learning curve, user interface design
Standard co-op and multiplayer can take time to find a match. Invasion queues are quicker in some accounts and become instantaneous during a described surge in players.
Pros: overall quality, level design
Cons: innovation, mission design
Matchmaking is mixed: some praise smooth lobbies and strong online setup, while others criticize missing crossplay or older versions with no matchmaking.
Pros: content variety, value for money
Cons: cross-play support, competitive balance
Matchmaking experiences vary considerably: some players find opponents quickly, while others report long waits, repeat opponents, thin regional pools, or severe connection filtering problems.
Pros: remake/remaster quality, combat system
Cons: content variety, character customization
Playing with randoms can be inconsistent, although Gauntlet's reassignment ideas and objective-focused teammates can produce good matches.
Pros: fun factor, battle mode quality
Cons: multiplayer design, replay value
Matchmaking is one of the most divided topics. The ability to use more open lobbies is welcomed, but uneven skill mixes, team balance, and abrupt shifts in match quality frustrate...
Pros: multiplayer design, level design
Cons: fun factor, narrative quality
Matchmaking quality was limited because finding a partner could still be a challenge.
Pros: co-op experience, content variety
Cons: writing quality, narrative quality
matchmaking was criticized for review-period friction and repetitive map selection.
Pros: multiplayer design, sound design
Cons: narrative quality, map and navigation design
Matchmaking quality depends heavily on who fills the squad. Coordinated friends are preferred, while random teammates can make runs miserable even when the technical act of matchmaking works reliably.
Pros: fun factor, loot system
Cons: difficulty balance, quest design
Matchmaking quality was one of the weakest areas, with many reviewers reporting failed, unreliable, or frustrating random matchmaking despite one positive wait-time note.
Pros: co-op experience, fun factor
Cons: difficulty balance, social features
Later coverage criticized matchmaking as exploitable, especially around aggression-based or PvE-leaning lobbies.
Pros: sound design, combat system
Cons: voice acting, menu usability
One review criticized online waits, saying matchmaking took longer than the races.
Pros: battle mode quality, content variety
Cons: learning curve, competitive balance
Matchmaking quality was criticized in one review for a confusing, finicky multiplayer setup.
Pros: combat system, narrative quality
Cons: difficulty balance, endgame content
Online matchmaking is a clear limitation: players are restricted to people already on their friends list rather than being able to find public matches.
Pros: fun factor, graphics quality
Cons: learning curve, bug frequency
One Switch reviewer found matchmaking and lobby compatibility frustrating enough to call the process migraine-inducing.
Pros: fun factor, economy and resource balance
Cons: progression system, user interface design