Withings ScanWatch Nova

Withings ScanWatch Nova Review

Brand: Withings
Released: December 5, 2023
Updated: 5 months ago
4.0
Overall review score
180
Review insights
47
Scored features
13
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the ScanWatch Nova if you want a luxury-looking hybrid with excellent battery life and deep health tracking. Skip it if you need a full smartwatch, built-in GPS, rich notifications, or low price.

Best for

Best for people who want a stylish analog-looking watch with discreet health tracking, ECG, SpO2, temperature trends, steps, sleep data, and weeks-long battery life. It especially suits buyers who value classic watch design more than app-heavy smartwatch features.

Not for

Not for serious athletes or smartwatch-first users who need built-in GPS, detailed workout analytics, third-party apps, payments, replies, music controls, or a large interactive screen. Price-sensitive buyers may also find better feature depth elsewhere.

Verdict

Reviewers consistently frame the Withings ScanWatch Nova as a luxury analog-style watch first and a smartwatch second. Its strongest appeal is the combination of premium design, weeks-long battery life, and broad health tracking through ECG, SpO2, heart rate, temperature, sleep, and steps. The tradeoff is clear: its small OLED display, limited interaction, lack of built-in GPS, thin third-party app support, and high price make it less compelling for users who expect an Apple Watch-like experience. Fitness feedback is useful but uneven, with auto-detection and connected GPS drawing repeated caveats. The Nova works best as a discreet health companion for people who value classic watch styling more than full smartwatch depth.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

47 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    17 (36%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    18 (38%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    7 (15%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    5 (11%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.8
    12 reviews strong consensus
    battery life: 4.8, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life was one of the strongest points, with reviewers repeatedly reporting weeks of use and little battery anxiety.
  • 4.8
    11 reviews strong consensus
    style and design: 4.8, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Style and design were the most consistent strengths, with reviewers praising its analog look, elegance, premium feel, and compliment-worthy appearance.
  • 4.2
    10 reviews strong consensus
    band quality: 4.2, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Bands were often praised for comfort, flexibility, quality, and included tools, though some reviewers found adjustment imperfect or only liked the metal band best.
  • 4.6
    8 reviews strong consensus
    comfort: 4.6, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Comfort was a major strength across reviews, especially for all-day and overnight wear, with lighter models and comfortable bands helping.
  • 4.1
    8 reviews strong consensus
    ECG functionality: 4.1, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    ECG functionality was usually praised as easy, useful, or medically meaningful, though one reviewer noted setup delays and another found it movement-sensitive.
  • 4.5
    7 reviews strong consensus
    companion app quality: 4.5, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The companion app was repeatedly praised as clear, efficient, user-friendly, powerful, and good at presenting health and activity data.

Cons highlights

  • 3.3
    9 reviews strong consensus
    value for money: 3.3, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Value was mixed: reviewers often called it expensive, but some felt the design, build, battery life, and health tools could justify the price.
  • 2.8
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    charging convenience: 2.8, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Charging convenience split reviewers: the newer cradle was praised by one reviewer, but several others called the charger cheap, inelegant, or lacking wireless convenience.
  • 2.9
    7 reviews low consensus
    smartphone notifications: 2.9, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Notifications were a major tradeoff: some reviewers had no issues or found them readable, but several disliked the limited, non-interactive alert experience.
  • 2.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    smartwatch features: 2.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Smartwatch features were consistently limited, with reviewers framing the Nova as a health-focused hybrid rather than a full smartwatch.
  • 2.7
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    workout tracking variety: 2.7, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Workout variety was mixed: one reviewer found options limited, another called workout tracking less comprehensive, while another appreciated broad automatic activity support.
  • 1.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    third-party app support: 1.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Third-party app support was a weakness, with reviewers telling app-focused buyers to look elsewhere or comparing it unfavorably with full smartwatches.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in ECG functionality, calorie tracking usefulness, app ecosystem, near average in comfort, build quality, below average in GPS accuracy, workout tracking variety, Bluetooth connectivity.

Comparison summary

47 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    22 (47%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    9 (19%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    16 (34%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
GPS accuracy 2.0 4.1 -2.1
workout tracking variety 2.7 4.3 -1.6
ECG functionality 4.1 2.6 +1.5
calorie tracking usefulness 4.8 3.2 +1.6
Bluetooth connectivity 2.2 3.7 -1.5
third-party app support 1.8 3.2 -1.4
mapping and navigation 2.0 3.4 -1.4
smartwatch features 2.3 3.6 -1.3

Consider This Instead

If you want better fit

Choose Garmin Lily 2. It scores 4.7 vs 3.5 for fit, with a 3.7 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Bluetooth connectivity

Choose Xiaomi Watch 2. It scores 4.8 vs 2.2 for Bluetooth connectivity, with a 3.7 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: long-term replacement The reviewer liked the Nova Brilliant but probably would not replace an Apple Watch with it.
  • Alternative: daily wearable preference The reviewer did not feel the need to return to the Apple Watch after using the Nova.
  • More expensive: price and appearance The reviewer says the Nova is cheaper than a comparable stainless steel Apple Watch and better looking.
  • More expensive: price The Brilliant model is described as cheaper than Apple Watch Ultra 2.
  • Worse: case size The Brilliant version is described as smaller next to the Apple Watch Ultra 2.
  • Worse: formal style The Nova is preferred over the Apple Watch Ultra 2 for wearing with formal clothing.

FAQ

Is the Withings ScanWatch Nova a full smartwatch?

No. Reviewers repeatedly describe it as a health-focused hybrid with basic notifications, alarms, timers, and small-screen alerts rather than a full smartwatch with apps, replies, payments, or rich interaction.

How good is the battery life?

Battery life is one of the strongest points. Reviewers reported weeks of use, low battery anxiety, and enough endurance for continuous health and sleep tracking, though heavy workouts can reduce runtime.

Is it good for serious fitness tracking?

It is better as a health tracker than a serious training watch. Reviews praised general accuracy but criticized the lack of built-in GPS, limited workout depth, and occasional auto-detection or mapping issues.

How accurate are the health sensors?

Reviewers generally found health tracking accurate, especially heart rate and ECG-related features. Blood oxygen and temperature tracking were considered useful, though SpO2 sometimes required retries and temperature usefulness was more mixed.

Is the ScanWatch Nova comfortable enough for all-day wear?

Most reviewers found it comfortable for daily and overnight wear, helped by lighter models and soft bands. Fit can still depend on the strap, and one reviewer struggled to size the metal bracelet properly.

Is the high price justified?

Reviewers were split. Many called it expensive, but several felt the premium watch design, long battery life, build quality, and health tracking could justify the cost for the right buyer.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Top Smartwatches to Consider

#1 Coros Nomad
4.4

Best for long battery life, accurate GPS and useful offline maps at a strong price. Skip it if you need payments, richer apps, a built-in LED flashlight or polished smartwatch...

Pros: mapping and navigation, value for money

Cons: smartwatch features, contactless payments

#2 Garmin Forerunner 170 Music
4.3

Best for accurate run tracking, deep Garmin coaching and phone-free Spotify in a light package. Skip it if you need full maps, triathlon mode, Apple Music support or the strongest...

Pros: value for money, GPS accuracy

Cons: mapping and navigation, third-party app support

#3 Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.

Pros: value for money, battery life

Cons: heart rate accuracy, third-party app support

#4 Garmin Forerunner 70
4.3

Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...

Pros: battery life, value for money

Cons: mapping and navigation, smartwatch features