Garmin Lily 2

Garmin Lily 2 Review

Brand: Garmin
Released: January 8, 2024
Updated: 5 months ago
3.7
Overall review score
234
Review insights
51
Scored features
15
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose Garmin Lily 2 if you want a discreet, comfortable wellness tracker with strong heart-rate, stress and Body Battery insights. Skip it if built-in GPS, fast charging, rich smartwatch apps or advanced training metrics matter most.

Best for

Best for casual exercisers and smaller-wrist users who want a stylish, discreet tracker with accurate heart-rate basics, strong stress tracking, Body Battery, safety tools, and multi-day battery life. It suits people who usually carry a phone during outdoor workouts.

Not for

Not for serious runners, advanced athletes, or buyers who want built-in GPS, onboard music, ECG, temperature tracking, fast charging, a bright color display, or deep smartwatch apps. iPhone users who rely on wrist replies should also be cautious.

Verdict

Reviewers consistently frame the Garmin Lily 2 as a stylish, lightweight wellness watch that feels more like jewelry than a sports watch. It earns its strongest praise for comfort, design, heart-rate accuracy, Body Battery, stress tracking, safety tools, and multi-day battery life. The tradeoff is that Garmin keeps the device simple: connected GPS requires a phone, smartwatch features are lean, on-watch controls can feel clunky, and the monochrome hidden display draws repeated complaints for brightness and responsiveness. Sleep tracking divides reviewers, with some finding it aligned with experience and others seeing undercounted sleep versus Apple Watch or Fitbit. Overall, the Lily 2 works best as an elegant daily tracker for casual activity, not as a full training watch.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

51 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    17 (33%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    13 (25%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    12 (24%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    9 (18%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.1
    13 reviews strong consensus
    battery life: 4.1, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Most reviewers found battery life close to Garmin’s multi-day claim, often four to five days, though one heavy-use YouTube review saw only about three and a half days.
  • 4.6
    12 reviews strong consensus
    style and design: 4.6, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Style and design are the product’s strongest consensus win: reviewers praise the elegant, jewelry-like look and discreet size.
  • 4.5
    10 reviews strong consensus
    heart rate accuracy: 4.5, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Heart-rate tracking receives broad praise, often matching or staying close to chest straps, Apple Watch, Polar, or Oura comparisons.
  • 4.7
    9 reviews strong consensus
    comfort: 4.7, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Comfort is one of the clearest strengths: reviewers repeatedly say the Lily 2 is light, discreet, and easy to wear day and night.
  • 3.9
    9 reviews strong consensus
    value for money: 3.9, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Value depends on priorities: reviewers justify the price for style and wellness, but criticize missing features at this price.
  • 3.7
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    display quality: 3.7, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Display opinions are mixed: visibility and contrast can be good, but several reviewers call the monochrome hidden screen flat or basic.

Cons highlights

  • 3.3
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    sleep tracking accuracy: 3.3, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    Sleep tracking is mixed: some reviewers found it aligned well, while others saw inaccurate sleep duration or not enough detail.
  • 3.3
    10 reviews strong consensus
    workout tracking variety: 3.3, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Workout variety is mixed: reviewers like the added profiles and dance modes, but often miss indoor cycling or sports options.
  • 3.3
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    GPS accuracy: 3.3, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Connected GPS works well when paired, but reviewers repeatedly note that phone dependence limits true GPS usefulness.
  • 1.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    body temperature tracking: 1.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Multiple reviewers treated the missing temperature sensor as a meaningful weakness for a female-focused wearable and period prediction.
  • 3.2
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    charging speed: 3.2, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Charging is acceptable in some reviews but often criticized as slower than Apple Watch-style fast charging and requiring planning for 24/7 wear.
  • 2.6
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    touchscreen responsiveness: 2.6, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Touchscreen responsiveness is a recurring concern, with several reviewers reporting slow response, missed taps, or frustration.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in stress tracking, reliability, cross-platform compatibility, near average in contactless payments, menu navigation, below average in brightness, button controls, blood oxygen tracking.

Comparison summary

51 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    17 (33%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    14 (27%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    20 (39%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
brightness 2.4 4.2 -1.8
button controls 2.2 3.9 -1.7
blood oxygen tracking 1.8 3.5 -1.7
touchscreen responsiveness 2.6 4.0 -1.4
body temperature tracking 1.7 3.1 -1.4
Bluetooth connectivity 2.2 3.7 -1.5
materials quality 2.5 4.0 -1.5
watch face quality 2.5 3.8 -1.3

Consider This Instead

If you want better brightness

Choose Garmin Venu Sq 2. It scores 4.7 vs 2.4 for brightness, with a 3.7 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Bluetooth connectivity

Choose Withings ScanWatch 2. It scores 5.0 vs 2.2 for Bluetooth connectivity, with a 3.5 overall score.

Compare

If you want better charging speed

Choose Garmin Instinct 3. It scores 4.7 vs 3.2 for charging speed, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

If you want better mapping and navigation

Choose Samsung Galaxy Watch 6. It scores 4.9 vs 2.3 for mapping and navigation, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: charging speed Trusted Reviews says Apple Watch charges faster, though it needs daily top-ups.
  • Better: iPhone ecosystem fit NextPit recommends Apple Watch SE instead for iPhone users unless aesthetics are the priority.
  • Worse: battery life The Lily 2 caused less battery anxiety than the reviewer’s Apple watch.
  • Cheaper: price The reviewer says the Lily 2 costs more than Fitbit Sense in the same general category.
  • Better: feature set TechAdvisor says Forerunner 165 offers more features for the same price but in a bulkier build.

FAQ

Does the Garmin Lily 2 have built-in GPS?

No. Reviewers repeatedly note that it uses connected GPS from a paired phone, which can work accurately but requires carrying the phone for maps, distance, and route data.

Is the Lily 2 comfortable enough for sleep tracking?

Yes. Comfort is one of the strongest themes, with reviewers saying it is light, discreet, and easy to wear overnight.

How accurate is heart-rate tracking?

Heart-rate accuracy is broadly praised. Multiple reviewers compared it with chest straps, Apple Watch, Polar, or Oura devices and found it reliable for most casual workouts, with some struggles during intense intervals.

How good is sleep tracking?

Sleep tracking is mixed. Some reviewers found sleep times and scores aligned with their experience, while others said it undercounted sleep or lacked the detail they wanted.

How long does the battery last?

Most reviewers got around four to five days, matching Garmin’s claim fairly well. Heavy use, high brightness, workouts, and Pulse Ox can reduce that.

Is Garmin Pay useful on the Lily 2?

Garmin Pay is praised as useful on Classic models, but several reviewers warn that bank support can be limited depending on region.

Is it a good sports watch for serious training?

No reviewer positions it as a serious training watch. It is better for casual exercise and wellness because it lacks built-in GPS, recovery time, onboard music, and some advanced sport profiles.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Smartwatches to Consider

#1 Coros Nomad
4.4

Best for long battery life, accurate GPS and useful offline maps at a strong price. Skip it if you need payments, richer apps, a built-in LED flashlight or polished smartwatch...

Pros: mapping and navigation, value for money

Cons: smartwatch features, contactless payments

#2 Garmin Forerunner 170 Music
4.3

Best for accurate run tracking, deep Garmin coaching and phone-free Spotify in a light package. Skip it if you need full maps, triathlon mode, Apple Music support or the strongest...

Pros: value for money, GPS accuracy

Cons: mapping and navigation, third-party app support

#3 Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.

Pros: value for money, battery life

Cons: heart rate accuracy, third-party app support

#4 Garmin Forerunner 70
4.3

Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...

Pros: battery life, value for money

Cons: mapping and navigation, smartwatch features