Xiaomi Watch 2

Xiaomi Watch 2 Review

Brand: Xiaomi
Released: February 25, 2024
Updated: 5 months ago
3.7
Overall review score
176
Review insights
55
Scored features
11
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Xiaomi Watch 2 if you want an affordable Wear OS watch with a strong display, app support, and comfort. Skip it if daily charging, inconsistent heart-rate data, or missing LTE and advanced health features are dealbreakers.

Best for

Best for Android users who want an affordable Wear OS smartwatch with Google apps, third-party apps, strong display quality, and comfortable everyday wear. It also suits casual fitness users who value GPS, sleep tracking, and broad workout modes more than medical-grade precision.

Not for

Not for users who need LTE, advanced health features such as ECG or temperature tracking, reliable heart-rate precision, or multi-day battery life with everything enabled. It is also a weaker fit for iPhone users or anyone who dislikes proprietary chargers.

Verdict

Reviewers frame the Xiaomi Watch 2 as a budget Wear OS watch that gets the big everyday pieces right: a bright AMOLED display, comfortable lightweight body, broad Google and third-party app access, fast charging, and unusually strong value. The tradeoff is consistency. Battery life ranges from decent two-day use in lighter setups to daily charging with fuller tracking enabled, and health/fitness accuracy is uneven: GPS and sleep often impress, while heart-rate and calorie/recovery data draw notable complaints. The older Wear OS version, missing LTE, limited size options, and proprietary charger keep it from feeling fully polished, but the feature set remains compelling for the price.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

55 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    12 (22%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    22 (40%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    12 (22%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    9 (16%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.6
    10 reviews strong consensus
    value for money: 4.6, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Value for money was the strongest consensus point: reviewers repeatedly called it affordable, good value, or a bargain for Wear OS.
  • 4.0
    7 reviews low consensus
    smartphone notifications: 4.0, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Notification handling was polarized: several reviewers found replies and mirroring reliable, while one highlighted Wear OS notification delays.
  • 4.6
    6 reviews strong consensus
    display quality: 4.6, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Display quality was one of the strongest areas, with multiple reviewers praising the AMOLED panel, clarity, and screen appearance.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    comfort: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Comfort was a consistent strength, with reviewers praising the light body for daily wear, workouts, and sleep.
  • 4.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    sleep tracking accuracy: 4.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Sleep tracking was generally one of the better health features, with several reviewers saying it was detailed or matched their experience, though one noted it was not perfectly precise.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    third-party app support: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Third-party app support was a major advantage, with multiple reviewers praising access to Google Play apps and big-name services.

Cons highlights

  • 3.2
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    battery life: 3.2, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Battery life was the biggest split: one review praised two days, but several others found one-day endurance or daily charging disappointing.
  • 3.2
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    operating system experience: 3.2, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Operating system experience was mixed: Wear OS gave strong app access, but reviewers criticized the older Wear OS 3.5 base and uncertain update path.
  • 2.1
    4 reviews strong consensus
    cross-platform compatibility: 2.1, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Cross-platform compatibility was a weakness because the watch is Android-focused and loses potential or support outside that ecosystem.
  • 3.1
    4 reviews strong consensus
    fitness tracking accuracy: 3.1, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Fitness tracking accuracy was mixed: basic tracking worked well for some reviewers, but others found workout data rudimentary or inconsistent in accuracy and usefulness.
  • 1.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    LTE connectivity: 1.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    LTE connectivity was a repeated drawback because the standard Watch 2 lacks cellular support and pushes untethered users toward the Pro model.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    heart rate accuracy: 2.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Heart-rate accuracy was split sharply: one tester saw close agreement with a Garmin reference, while others reported unreliable or inconsistent readings.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in onboard music storage, third-party app support, voice assistant quality, near average in sleep tracking accuracy, comfort, below average in recovery insights, calorie tracking usefulness, activity auto-detection.

Comparison summary

55 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    16 (29%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    14 (25%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    25 (45%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
recovery insights 1.5 3.9 -2.4
calorie tracking usefulness 1.5 3.3 -1.8
activity auto-detection 2.0 3.7 -1.7
onboard music storage 4.5 2.9 +1.6
wellness insights 2.5 4.0 -1.5
cross-platform compatibility 2.1 3.5 -1.4
third-party app support 4.6 3.2 +1.4
charging convenience 1.9 3.3 -1.4

Consider This Instead

If you want better battery life

Choose Ticwatch Atlas. It scores 4.6 vs 3.2 for battery life, with a 3.8 overall score.

Compare

If you want better smartphone notifications

Choose Ticwatch Pro 5 Enduro. It scores 4.6 vs 4.0 for smartphone notifications, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

If you want better heart rate accuracy

Choose Apple Watch Ultra 2. It scores 4.8 vs 2.7 for heart rate accuracy, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

If you want better charging convenience

Choose Google Pixel Watch 4. It scores 4.6 vs 1.9 for charging convenience, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Similar: GPS performance GSMArena found the Watch 2 GPS performance on par with the Xiaomi Watch 2 Pro.
  • Worse: software smoothness Wareable found the standard Watch 2 software slicker than the Watch 2 Pro experience.
  • Better: heart rate accuracy The long-term reviewer found Apple watch readings more realistic than the Watch 2 in similar conditions.
  • Compared: heart rate accuracy In real-time heart-rate comparison, the Watch 2 stayed close to the Garmin Epix Pro (Gen 2).

FAQ

Is the Xiaomi Watch 2 good value for money?

Yes. Reviewers repeatedly called it affordable, good value, or a bargain for a Wear OS watch with Google apps and third-party support.

How long does the battery last?

Battery life depends heavily on settings. Some reviewers reached around two days, but others found it closer to one day with fuller tracking, always-on display, or heavier use.

Does the Xiaomi Watch 2 support LTE?

No. Reviewers repeatedly treated LTE as a missing feature and pointed users who want phone-free connectivity toward other models.

How accurate is the health and fitness tracking?

The evidence is mixed. GPS and sleep tracking were often praised, but heart-rate accuracy, calorie figures, recovery suggestions, and some workout data drew complaints.

Is the display good outdoors?

Yes. Multiple reviewers praised the AMOLED screen for clarity, brightness, and visibility in sunny or outdoor conditions.

Does it work with iPhone?

Reviewers treated it as primarily Android-focused. One review said iPhone use limits its full potential, while others described Android-only compatibility.

Is charging convenient?

Charging is fast, but reviewers disliked the proprietary magnetic puck and orientation-sensitive pin design.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Smartwatches to Consider

#1 Coros Nomad
4.4

Best for long battery life, accurate GPS and useful offline maps at a strong price. Skip it if you need payments, richer apps, a built-in LED flashlight or polished smartwatch...

Pros: mapping and navigation, value for money

Cons: smartwatch features, contactless payments

#2 Garmin Forerunner 170 Music
4.3

Best for accurate run tracking, deep Garmin coaching and phone-free Spotify in a light package. Skip it if you need full maps, triathlon mode, Apple Music support or the strongest...

Pros: value for money, GPS accuracy

Cons: mapping and navigation, third-party app support

#3 Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.

Pros: value for money, battery life

Cons: heart rate accuracy, third-party app support

#4 Garmin Forerunner 70
4.3

Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...

Pros: battery life, value for money

Cons: mapping and navigation, smartwatch features