Withings ScanWatch 2

Withings ScanWatch 2 Review

Brand: Withings
Released: August 31, 2023
Updated: 5 months ago
3.5
Overall review score
301
Review insights
50
Scored features
19
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the Withings ScanWatch 2 for classic watch style, ECG-focused health tracking, and multi-week battery life. Skip it if you want built-in GPS, rich apps, calls, payments, or serious fitness-watch depth.

Best for

Best for people who want a stylish, low-distraction analog-looking watch with ECG, temperature, sleep, and general wellness tracking plus long battery life. It especially suits casual health tracking rather than athlete-level training.

Not for

Not for buyers who expect a full smartwatch experience with apps, calls, payments, music controls, built-in GPS, rich notifications, or advanced training metrics. It is also a weaker fit if you dislike subscriptions for deeper insights.

Verdict

The Withings ScanWatch 2 earns its strongest praise as a beautiful hybrid watch that hides capable health tracking behind a traditional face. Reviewers consistently liked the premium materials, ECG support, body-temperature tracking, and battery life that can stretch for weeks. The tradeoff is that the watch is deliberately limited: the tiny display makes notifications cramped, smart features are sparse, and workout tracking is better for casual activity than serious training. App impressions were mixed, especially around Withings+ and data presentation. Its best fit is someone who wants a low-distraction health watch, not a wrist computer.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

50 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    10 (20%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    20 (40%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    14 (28%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    6 (12%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.8
    16 reviews strong consensus
    style and design: 4.8, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Style and design were the strongest consensus points: reviewers repeatedly called it gorgeous, classic, premium, and one of the best-looking hybrids.
  • 4.7
    14 reviews strong consensus
    battery life: 4.7, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life was the clearest strength, with reviewers repeatedly reporting weeks of use and often calling the 30-day claim realistic or conservative depending on settings.
  • 3.6
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    companion app quality: 3.6, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    The companion app drew mixed reactions: reviewers liked its health focus and integrations, but criticized glitches, clutter, paywalled insights, and uneven data presentation.
  • 4.0
    11 reviews strong consensus
    body temperature tracking: 4.0, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers treated temperature tracking as a distinctive upgrade, useful for illness warnings, workout heat awareness, and recovery context, though some found its alerts or presentation limited.
  • 4.0
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    display quality: 4.0, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Display quality was polarizing: reviewers praised sharpness and readability, but the tiny monochrome screen limited notifications and fitness data at a glance.
  • 4.3
    10 reviews low consensus
    comfort: 4.3, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Comfort was usually strong for daytime wear, especially with the lighter case, but some reviewers found sleep wear or the stock strap uncomfortable.

Cons highlights

  • 2.5
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    smartwatch features: 2.5, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Smartwatch functionality was intentionally minimal; reviewers liked the calm hybrid approach but warned it lacks apps, calls, payments, music, and deep interaction.
  • 2.9
    13 reviews strong consensus
    value for money: 2.9, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Value was mixed: reviewers saw premium design and battery life, but many questioned the price because smart features, GPS, and app insights were limited.
  • 3.4
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    charging convenience: 3.4, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    Charging convenience varied by reviewer: some liked the secure newer cradle, while others found the proprietary cradle flimsy, fiddly, clunky, or inelegant.
  • 2.4
    11 reviews strong consensus
    GPS accuracy: 2.4, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    GPS was a common limitation because the watch relies on connected GPS; reviewers found that inconvenient or frustrating at this price, even when connected performance was acceptable.
  • 2.6
    11 reviews strong consensus
    smartphone notifications: 2.6, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Notifications were useful for quick alerts but widely limited by the tiny scrolling screen, inconsistency, and lack of reply or message history.
  • 3.1
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    sleep tracking accuracy: 3.1, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Sleep tracking was mixed: some reviewers found it comparable or strong, while others reported missed sleep, overestimation, or poor stage interpretation.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in ECG functionality, Bluetooth connectivity, body temperature tracking, near average in companion app quality, build quality, below average in music controls, GPS accuracy, reliability.

Comparison summary

50 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    14 (28%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    12 (24%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    24 (48%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
ECG functionality 4.6 2.6 +2.0
music controls 1.5 3.6 -2.1
GPS accuracy 2.4 4.1 -1.7
reliability 2.1 3.7 -1.6
third-party app support 1.5 3.2 -1.7
contactless payments 1.5 2.8 -1.3
menu navigation 2.6 3.8 -1.2
smartwatch features 2.5 3.6 -1.0

Consider This Instead

If you want better charging convenience

Choose Casio G-Shock GBD-H2000. It scores 4.8 vs 3.4 for charging convenience, with a 3.5 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Worse: scratch resistance Rick’s Reviews contrasted the sapphire glass Withings durability with an older Apple Watch that scratched quickly.
  • Better: accidental workout pausing WIRED noted wrist-flexing accidentally paused workouts, which the reviewer said never happened with Apple Watch.
  • Alternative: full smartwatch alternative Android Authority framed Apple Watch Series 10 as the full-smartwatch alternative for integration, apps, and display.
  • Alternative: hybrid watch alternatives Android Authority listed Garmin Vivomove Sport as a lower-cost hybrid alternative with useful training tools.

FAQ

Is the Withings ScanWatch 2 a full smartwatch?

No. Reviewers repeatedly described it as a hybrid watch with basic notifications, timers, alarms, and health tracking, but no app store, payments, calls, or rich on-watch interaction.

How good is the battery life?

Battery life was one of the strongest points across reviews. Most reviewers reported multiple weeks per charge, with lighter use approaching Withings’ 30-day claim.

Is the ScanWatch 2 good for serious fitness training?

It can track casual workouts, steps, heart rate, and connected-GPS activities, but reviewers said the workout data is basic and not ideal for serious athletes.

Does it have built-in GPS?

No. Reviewers repeatedly noted that outdoor route and distance tracking require a connected phone, which several considered frustrating at this price.

Are notifications useful on the ScanWatch 2?

They are useful for quick glances, but reviewers often found them cramped, slow, inconsistent, or too limited for longer messages.

Is the ECG feature useful?

Yes. Reviewers generally praised the ECG feature as simple, health-focused, and useful for sharing heart data with a doctor.

Is Withings+ necessary?

Most reviewers did not treat Withings+ as essential. Several criticized the subscription or said the added insights did not feel worth the monthly cost.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Smartwatches to Consider

#1 Coros Nomad
4.4

Best for long battery life, accurate GPS and useful offline maps at a strong price. Skip it if you need payments, richer apps, a built-in LED flashlight or polished smartwatch...

Pros: mapping and navigation, value for money

Cons: smartwatch features, contactless payments

#2 Garmin Forerunner 170 Music
4.3

Best for accurate run tracking, deep Garmin coaching and phone-free Spotify in a light package. Skip it if you need full maps, triathlon mode, Apple Music support or the strongest...

Pros: value for money, GPS accuracy

Cons: mapping and navigation, third-party app support

#3 Amazfit Active 3 Premium
4.3

Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.

Pros: value for money, battery life

Cons: heart rate accuracy, third-party app support

#4 Garmin Forerunner 70
4.3

Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...

Pros: battery life, value for money

Cons: mapping and navigation, smartwatch features