Wildwood

Wildwood Feature Scores

Explore all 71 feature scores for Wildwood, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

71 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    43 (61%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    20 (28%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    8 (11%)

Pros

Sort
  • 5.0
    52 reviews strong consensus
    animation quality: 5.0, 52 reviews, strong consensus
    Fluid puppet movement, expressive faces, and enormous coordinated sequences make the stop-motion work a near-universal highlight. Many responses describe it as a new benchmark for the medium.
  • 5.0
    46 reviews strong consensus
    practical effects quality: 5.0, 46 reviews, strong consensus
    The physical puppets and miniature environments achieve remarkable fluidity and tactile detail. The scale of the handmade coordination is repeatedly as astonishing as the finished illusion.
  • 5.0
    28 reviews strong consensus
    production design: 5.0, 28 reviews, strong consensus
    Portland streets, elaborate forest societies, and tiny material details create a vast world with distinct spaces. The design is consistently admired even by viewers disappointed in the story.
  • 4.9
    31 reviews strong consensus
    action sequence quality: 4.9, 31 reviews, strong consensus
    The final battle is the most consistent showpiece, admired for its scale, clear staging, and consequential danger. Inventive chases and escapes add excitement well before the climax.
  • 5.0
    20 reviews strong consensus
    cinematography: 5.0, 20 reviews, strong consensus
    Lush light, purposeful compositions, and sweeping camera movement make the miniature world feel cinematic. The action remains remarkably clear even at its largest scale.
  • 4.6
    30 reviews moderate consensus
    world-building: 4.6, 30 reviews, moderate consensus
    The forest's many societies and meticulously realized spaces are a major attraction. A minority find the lore generic, compressed, or less convincing than the environments look.
  • 4.6
    22 reviews strong consensus
    acting performance: 4.6, 22 reviews, strong consensus
    The vocal ensemble is generally praised for naturalism, emotional range, and commitment. Familiar celebrity delivery distracts a few viewers, but most find the characters convincingly inhabited.
  • 4.9
    10 reviews strong consensus
    visual style: 4.9, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Rich textures, vibrant colors, and an organic handmade look distinguish the film. Its images repeatedly inspire admiration beyond the expectations of stop-motion.
  • 4.7
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    score quality: 4.7, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    The sweeping music is widely praised for matching environments, lifting action, and deepening quieter emotion. An isolated upbeat cue during a terrifying moment strikes one viewer as misplaced.
  • 4.5
    24 reviews low consensus
    emotional impact: 4.5, 24 reviews, low consensus
    Many viewers describe tears, stunned silence, and a lasting feeling of wonder. Others admire the imagery without feeling that the characters' emotional stakes rise to the same height.
  • 4.6
    15 reviews moderate consensus
    villain quality: 4.6, 15 reviews, moderate consensus
    Alexandra's grief often makes her a tragic, frightening antagonist with understandable pain. Reservations focus on unclear plans or one-note motives that the performance must overcome.
  • 4.7
    9 reviews strong consensus
    Location authenticity: 4.7, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Portland's landmarks, eccentric street life, seasonal colors, and surrounding wilderness give the film a strong sense of place. The setting is repeatedly enjoyed as an affectionate local love letter.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    critic appeal: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The supplied reception reports and reaction videos describe emphatically positive early critical notices. These reports chiefly reflect enthusiasm for the animation's ambition and scale.
  • 4.5
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    Grief portrayal: 4.5, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Alexandra's loss is often praised for giving the fantasy tragic weight and human complexity. A smaller group finds the broader treatment of grief less convincing or less fully developed.
  • 4.9
    6 reviews strong consensus
    character design: 4.9, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Expressive faces, distinctive creatures, and carefully chosen silhouettes give the characters personality. The designs retain a handmade edge instead of aiming only for cuteness.
  • 4.8
    7 reviews strong consensus
    genre satisfaction: 4.8, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The elaborate setting and serious stakes revive the pleasures of a grand dark-fantasy adventure. Even a viewer usually resistant to fantasy finds the film effective.
  • 4.8
    7 reviews strong consensus
    marketing appeal: 4.8, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The trailers generate exceptional anticipation through striking imagery, emotional hints, and preserved mysteries. The studio-themed promotional artwork also earns appreciation.
  • 4.3
    18 reviews low consensus
    theme depth: 4.3, 18 reviews, low consensus
    Grief, growing up, and accepting a changed world give the fantasy substantial meaning for many viewers. Others find too many ideas competing for attention or too little lasting insight beneath the spectacle.
  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    ending satisfaction: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The final act often brings the character journeys and spectacle together with a strongly satisfying payoff. Even responses uncertain about the earlier sections frequently admire the landing.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Atmosphere: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The forest combines awe, unease, and inviting handmade warmth. Its gothic shadows retain a sense of magic even when the story grows brutal.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    costume design: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The tiny clothes are admired for both craftsmanship and storytelling. Distinct outfits clarify the forest's factions and communicate something about the people wearing them.
  • 4.3
    10 reviews strong consensus
    humor: 4.3, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Character-based jokes and restrained comic relief usually land without deflating the drama. Some animal gags feel familiar, and individual jokes work better for parts of the audience than others.
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    suspense: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    High stakes, sudden losses, and credible danger make the outcome feel uncertain. The strongest responses stay tense because even appealing characters seem vulnerable.
  • 4.0
    30 reviews low consensus
    story quality: 4.0, 30 reviews, low consensus
    The rescue quest is absorbing and emotionally rich for many, but less satisfying than the imagery for others. Familiar plotting and underdeveloped motivations keep the narrative from matching the craft in the most critical responses.
  • 4.0
    25 reviews low consensus
    character development: 4.0, 25 reviews, low consensus
    The leads' growth and Alexandra's complexity earn considerable praise, but this is also a major point of disagreement. Skeptical responses find Prue passive, Curtis underwritten, or the supporting cast too dependent on archetypes.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    entertainment value: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The strongest responses find the adventure magical, absorbing, and worth savoring despite its imperfections. The overall experience can exceed already high expectations.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews low consensus
    directing quality: 4.4, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The direction usually earns strong praise for balancing intimate moments with enormous action. A dissenting response sees visual mastery without an equally convincing authorial perspective.
  • 4.5
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    audience appeal: 4.5, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    The film can cross generations through its wonder and emotional stakes. Its eccentric look and unexpectedly dark material may still narrow its mainstream reach.
  • 4.5
    5 reviews strong consensus
    faithfulness to source material: 4.5, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The adaptation preserves the novel's world and local spirit while making changes to character emphasis and structure. Readers who favor those changes find a stronger, more self-contained film.
  • 4.5
    5 reviews low consensus
    rewatch value: 4.5, 5 reviews, low consensus
    The richest responses want another viewing to absorb more visual detail and revisit the emotion. A less engaged viewer doubts the story would draw them back often.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    casting quality: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The actors are repeatedly described as exceptionally well matched to their roles. The supporting creatures are a particular casting strength.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    lead performance: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The two young leads are praised for vivid emotion and an unusually convincing sense of humanity. Their performances help anchor the oversized adventure.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    lighting quality: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Golden daylight and moody nighttime colors give the environments depth and atmosphere. The lighting repeatedly earns praise as a major visual pleasure.
  • 4.0
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    violence level: 4.0, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Many approve of the brutality for giving war and loss consequences. Others find it excessive or object to abrupt graphic moments, making this one of the film's clearest viewing caveats.
  • 4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    creature design: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The animals combine expressive detail with an occasionally uncanny edge. Their physical character helps the woodland society feel distinctive and alive.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The songs add warmth, grandeur, and local flavor alongside the orchestral score. The closing music is especially appreciated for reinforcing the themes.
  • 3.8
    14 reviews low consensus
    writing quality: 3.8, 14 reviews, low consensus
    The screenplay earns praise for genuine feeling, lively dialogue, and accessible mythology. Critics of it find conventional plotting, underwritten characters, and structural roughness beneath the remarkable visuals.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    sound design: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The carefully constructed soundscape makes the miniature world feel immersive. Its detail complements both intimate movement and the enormous action.
  • 4.1
    5 reviews low consensus
    CGI quality: 4.1, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Many viewers find the digital additions nearly indistinguishable from the practical animation. Others feel the largest effects weaken the tactile illusion, even when the blending is technically polished.
  • 3.7
    19 reviews low consensus
    pacing: 3.7, 19 reviews, low consensus
    Opinions range from effortless chapter-to-chapter flow to a dragging middle or rushed exposition. The large cast and many factions give the film much to juggle before its powerful final act.
  • 3.9
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    character appeal: 3.9, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Prue inspires strong affection in some responses but feels less memorable than the world around her in others. The colorful animal companions help sustain interest.
  • 3.9
    6 reviews low consensus
    message quality: 3.9, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Hope, compassion, and the difficult balance between holding on and letting go resonate strongly with many viewers. Others find the coming-of-age message weak or insufficiently memorable.
  • 3.8
    8 reviews low consensus
    tonal consistency: 3.8, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Most positive responses value the balance of darkness, wonder, and restrained comedy. Abrupt musical or comic shifts weaken that balance for some viewers.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    end-credit scenes: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The glimpse of the stop-motion process adds appreciation for the enormous physical undertaking. It can reinforce the film's tangible magic without breaking immersion.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    supporting cast performance: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The supporting inhabitants add distinctive color and personality. Their individual qualities help the world feel populated beyond the central quest.
  • 3.8
    6 reviews low consensus
    plot clarity: 3.8, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Some viewers appreciate economical exposition and clearly established stakes. Others struggle with the antagonist's plan or find the mythology compressed and unevenly explained.
  • 3.8
    5 reviews low consensus
    editing quality: 3.8, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Several responses admire the ambitious assembly and clear action, while others notice choppy transitions or occasional roughness. The complex interwoven journey does not flow equally well for everyone.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews low consensus
    plot twists: 4.0, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Revelations about the villain and family can add surprising emotional layers. One response finds the major family bombshell disappointingly inert.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    dialogue quality: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The dialogue is appreciated for lively exchanges and welcome restraint. Characters have room to breathe rather than constantly rushing through jokes.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    AI-assisted production: 5.0, 1 review
    The handmade production is celebrated as a forceful alternative to generative shortcuts. Its appeal comes from visible care and human invention.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Family relationships: 5.0, 1 review
    Tender bonds between Prue, her parents, and her brother give the adventure some of its most affecting moments.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    nostalgia appeal: 5.0, 1 review
    The dark handmade fantasy can restore the sense of wonder associated with childhood Laika films. Its unsettling moments are part of that nostalgic connection.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    special effects quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The effects contribute to a strongly praised overall technical package, supporting the film's ambitious fantasy spectacle.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    value for money: 5.0, 1 review
    The visuals alone are judged worth a cinema ticket, with the scale and artistry providing a strong reason to see the film on a large screen.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    family friendliness: 3.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The film offers broad fantasy appeal but combines it with unusually dark material. Its family-friendly reputation needs to be weighed against the violence and older-skewing themes.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Animal presence: 4.5, 1 review
    The colorful animal allies and enemies add personality to the adventure rather than serving as mere background decoration.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    cast chemistry: 4.5, 1 review
    The large voice cast works as a cohesive ensemble, making the unusual inhabitants feel part of the same world.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    comic timing: 4.5, 1 review
    Curtis's comic timing is handled well, giving his awkwardness an enjoyable rhythm.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    drama quality: 4.5, 1 review
    The heavy scenes work because the film has solid heart and treats its emotional stakes seriously.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    franchise continuity: 4.5, 1 review
    Changes to the novel help this adaptation feel complete as a standalone feature. It does not depend on another film to make its journey feel finished.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    mystery quality: 4.0, 1 review
    The unfolding mystery helps sustain curiosity as the adventure develops.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    ensemble balance: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Some viewers find the large cast impressively well managed. Others want more emotional development from supporting groups that occupy substantial time.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    scares: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The villain and uncanny opening create effective menace. Compared with Coraline, one response finds the overall story less frightening.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.6
    17 reviews moderate consensus
    originality: 2.6, 17 reviews, moderate consensus
    Familiar quest structures, fairy-tale characters, and genre touchstones are a recurring concern. Some find the execution fresh enough to renew those patterns, while others see an overly derivative story.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    character screen time: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The ensemble's size creates uneven opportunities: Curtis can occupy substantial time without enough independent purpose, while the eagle can feel underused.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    joke originality: 2.5, 1 review
    Some anthropomorphic-animal gags feel overfamiliar, particularly when articulate creatures briefly revert to ordinary animal behavior for a punch line.
  • 2.8
    3 reviews low consensus
    friendship portrayal: 2.8, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Prue's growing respect for Curtis can be touching. Less enthusiastic responses want more shared scenes and a better-developed bond between them.
  • 2.9
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    age appropriateness: 2.9, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Responses distinguish purposeful darkness from broad young-child suitability. Some approve of the violence in context, while others find it excessive or caution that the film needs older viewers.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    marketing accuracy: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The trailers can make the story seem more fragmented than it is, while another response feels they undersell the finished film. The eventual experience does not always match the preview's emphasis.
  • 3.1
    10 reviews low consensus
    runtime: 3.1, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Some viewers find the long journey fully absorbing and would cut nothing. Others feel the middle, detours, or extended set pieces need trimming.
  • 3.4
    7 reviews low consensus
    family dynamics: 3.4, 7 reviews, low consensus
    The family's loving bonds provide affecting stakes, but the parents' behavior and development divide opinion. Some find them complicated and sympathetic; others find a key reaction implausible or their roles underwritten.

Use Cases

Best for

Sort
  • 4.9
    12 reviews strong consensus
    Theater viewing: 4.9, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    The intricate imagery, immense battles, and rich sense of scale repeatedly earn a strong big-screen recommendation. Cinema viewing gives the visual detail room to register.
  • 4.8
    11 reviews strong consensus
    Adult viewing: 4.8, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Adults get substantial themes of grief, responsibility, and lost innocence alongside the spectacle. Several viewers particularly value the return to the darker fantasy adventures of their childhoods.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Teen viewing: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Teens interested in fantasy are a strong fit for the epic action and themes of leaving childhood behind. The intensity favors viewers ready for a darker adventure.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Family viewing: 4.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Families with older children can share a richly imaginative adventure with plenty to discuss. Recommendations vary sharply with tolerance for bloody violence and disturbing themes.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews low consensus
    Coming-of-age viewing: 4.4, 5 reviews, low consensus
    The strongest responses value the painful gap between imagining heroism and living with its consequences. One dissent rejects the use of violence as proof of maturity.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Craftsmanship enthusiasts: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Animation enthusiasts can find exceptional pleasure in the coordinated puppets, physical sets, and ambitious scale. Understanding the process can make the visual achievement even more astonishing.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Returning fan viewing: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Established Laika fans are strongly encouraged to see the studio stretch its craft to a much larger scale. Adults who grew up with its earlier films may especially enjoy the return to unsettling wonder.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Fantasy-fan viewing: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The enchanted societies, dangerous quests, and immense battles strongly reward a taste for dark fantasy. Familiar genre patterns are a limitation for some, but the world remains deeply immersive.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Bibliophile viewing: 5.0, 1 review
    A reader finds the adaptation brings the novel's imagined spectacle to life and exceeds expectations. The changes strengthen its emotional weight rather than merely reproducing the page.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Discussion viewing: 5.0, 1 review
    The challenging family choices and mature ideas invite conversation after the film. Families comfortable with the intensity can use it to discuss grief, courage, and growing up.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Focused viewing: 5.0, 1 review
    The dense visual detail and layered story reward undivided attention. Looking away risks missing the pleasures that make the film distinctive.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Inspirational viewing: 5.0, 1 review
    The emotional journey offers a moving sense of courage and possibility despite loss. Its strongest endorsement comes from the combination of wonder and hard-earned growth.

Conditional or not ideal for

Sort
  • Children's viewing
    2.1
    18 reviews strong consensus
    Children's viewing: 2.1, 18 reviews, strong consensus
    The dark opening, bloody battles, and consequential deaths make this a poor default choice for young children. Older children may find it rewarding, but comfort with intense fantasy matters.
  • Scare-sensitive viewing
    2.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Scare-sensitive viewing: 2.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The frightening imagery, graphic battle deaths, and threats to children can be demanding for sensitive viewers. The unsettling material has weight and consequences rather than functioning as harmless fantasy peril.
  • Background viewing
    1.0
    1 review
    Background viewing: 1.0, 1 review
    This is a poor choice for distracted viewing: its detailed imagery and layered story demand more attention than a background watch allows.

Cast & Creators

  • Alexandra
    4.9
    23 reviews strong consensus
    Carey Mulligan: 4.9, 23 reviews, strong consensus
    Mulligan is a frequent standout, giving Alexandra both poisonous menace and wounded vulnerability. Her performance often supplies more depth than even skeptical responses find in the character's written motives.
  • Director
    4.8
    23 reviews strong consensus
    Travis Knight: 4.8, 23 reviews, strong consensus
    Knight is widely credited with extraordinary visual ambition, fluid action, and a convincing handmade world. A dissenting view argues that the direction lacks a distinctive perspective on the page despite the technical accomplishment.
  • Cinematographer
    4.9
    11 reviews strong consensus
    Caleb Deschanel: 4.9, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Deschanel's photography is repeatedly praised for lush lighting, expressive movement, and clear action. The camera makes miniature spaces feel expansive and emotionally immediate.
  • Composer
    4.9
    11 reviews strong consensus
    Dario Marianelli: 4.9, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Marianelli's sweeping score moves between folk, rock, and orchestral colors while supporting intimate grief and enormous battles. It is repeatedly singled out as a major emotional and atmospheric strength.
  • Prue
    4.7
    16 reviews strong consensus
    Peyton Elizabeth Lee: 4.7, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Lee makes Prue determined, emotionally convincing, and recognizably adolescent. Her energy and restrained vulnerability help maintain the heroine's appeal even when the script gives her too little depth.
  • Curtis
    4.6
    15 reviews strong consensus
    Jacob Tremblay: 4.6, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Tremblay makes Curtis earnest, funny, and endearing, with several responses highlighting his comic timing. His performance often compensates for reservations about the character's subplot.
  • Writer
    4.7
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Chris Butler: 4.7, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Butler's strongest notices praise a heartfelt adaptation that makes dense mythology accessible and deepens the characters. His work is most valued when the fantasy remains grounded in human feeling.
  • Brendan the Bandit King
    4.6
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Mahershala Ali: 4.6, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Ali gives the bandit leader a strong, humane presence. His performance is often enjoyed even when the character is considered an overly familiar archetype.
  • Septima
    4.3
    12 reviews strong consensus
    Awkwafina: 4.3, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Awkwafina's rat is widely enjoyed for comic energy and unexpected emotional weight. A dissenting response finds her recognizable voice distracting.
  • Actor
    4.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Jake Johnson: 4.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Johnson gives the father warmth and a touching sense of pain. His vocal work earns praise even where the parents' decisions divide opinion.
  • Maksim
    4.3
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    Tom Waits: 4.3, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Waits's growling voice gives the coyote menace and a memorable personality. Most notices admire the fit, though one response finds the contribution unexpectedly unremarkable.
  • the General
    4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Angela Bassett: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Bassett brings commanding authority and warmth to the giant eagle. Her contribution is warmly received, although one response wishes she had more time.
  • Actor
    4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Maya Erskine: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Erskine brings warmth and nuance to the mother. Particularly positive responses value how the performance gains depth after the family revelation.
  • Costume Designer
    5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Deborah Cook: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Cook's costumes help distinguish the forest's societies and reveal character through tiny details. The clothing feels purposeful within the world rather than merely decorative.
  • Production Designer
    5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Nelson Lowry: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Lowry's lush production design turns the forest and Portland into expansive, richly detailed spaces. The scale and specificity are praised as new heights for his work.
  • Actor
    4.0
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    Charlie Day: 4.0, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Day adds a lively contrasting coyote voice to the ensemble. Most responses enjoy his contribution, while one finds the familiar delivery distracting.
  • Iphigenia
    4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Tantoo Cardinal: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Cardinal provides a grounding presence amid the spectacle. One response particularly credits her with making a major emotional moment genuinely moving.
  • Owl Rex
    4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Richard E. Grant: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Grant's theatrical owl is a particular delight, combining memorable personality with a voice that suits the character.
  • Actor
    4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Jemaine Clement: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Clement's voice blends into his character and contributes to the distinctive ensemble. His work is appreciated for serving the role without distracting celebrity recognition.
  • Actor
    5.0
    1 review
    Amandla Stenberg: 5.0, 1 review
    Stenberg gives the rebel ensemble a lively, memorable presence.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Rachel Fannan: 4.5, 1 review
    Fannan's alluring songs are praised for adding grandeur to the atmosphere of mystery and gathering darkness.