Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, Season 4 Feature Scores
Explore all 68 feature scores for Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, Season 4, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
68 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.08 (12%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.427 (40%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.414 (21%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.414 (21%)
-
Very negative below 1.55 (7%)
Pros
Sort
-
The main ensemble is one of the season’s clearest strengths, with repeated praise for the cast’s range across comedy, drama, horror, and adventure.
-
Costumes are repeatedly singled out as a strength, especially the elaborate fantasy looks and the show’s playful genre-specific wardrobe.
-
Effects are usually impressive, from dragons and creatures to large-scale space imagery, though a few reviewers call out weaker CGI moments.
-
Despite major disagreements about individual episodes, reviewers frequently describe Season 4 as fun, entertaining, or enjoyable when its experiments click.
-
Acting is broadly praised even when the surrounding episode is disliked, though a few reviewers object to deliberately hammy or exaggerated performances.
-
The crew’s chemistry is a major asset, especially when new pairings and alternate-character dynamics let familiar cast members play off each other differently.
-
Production design earns strong praise for giving wildly different episodes their own identity while keeping the Enterprise polished and recognizable.
-
Comedy is often a highlight, from Spock and Pike’s fantasy doubles to the stoner-style episode, but some parody-heavy installments are described as painfully unfunny.
-
The season’s suspense works best in its disaster and horror modes, where reviewers praise real tension, unease, and edge-of-your-seat momentum.
-
The season is visually ambitious and often striking, though isolated effects shots and some heavily stylized episodes draw criticism.
-
The episodic, mission-of-the-week structure is frequently praised, although some reviewers think the short streaming format gives the standalone approach too little room.
-
Practical work is well received, including creatures and the puppet execution, which several reviewers say looks excellent.
-
Several reviewers feel the season recaptures classic or traditional Star Trek structure and spirit, while one fantasy episode is criticized as barely feeling like Trek.
-
Interest in continuing is strong in the positive season reviews, with critics expressing excitement for what comes next and sadness that so few episodes remain.
-
CGI is generally praised as polished and ambitious, with occasional shots criticized for looking unconvincing.
-
The season premiere is generally viewed as a strong return to classic Trek-style adventure, with a few dissenting reactions to its execution.
-
Camera work and cinematography are consistently among the better-regarded craft elements, especially when episodes adopt distinct visual identities.
-
The score is a strong craft element, including praise for Nami Melumad’s symphonic work, even if not every episode’s musical support lands equally well.
-
Trelane and other antagonistic figures are generally enjoyed, with praise for personality and the way they support the episode’s conflict.
-
Franchise connections are split between praise for the Original Series feel and concern that existing canon is beginning to dominate the show.
-
The season can reach meaningful themes about identity, grief, ethics, and self-acceptance, but several reviewers think its genre conceits sometimes leave those ideas underexplored.
-
Character development is uneven: some arcs and spotlight episodes land well, while other reviewers find major threads underdeveloped or insufficiently lasting.
-
A supporting performance receives standout praise, especially Joe Morton’s guest turn.
-
Music is usually regarded positively, with praise for the season’s genre-shifting sound, though one critic feels a droning score sometimes carries weak material.
-
Emotional impact peaks when grief, identity, or loss receives room to breathe, though several reviewers say those moments are weakened by surrounding gimmicks.
-
Action ranges from tense, effective disaster storytelling to sequences some reviewers see as empty spectacle.
-
Character balance improves when neglected pairings receive attention, but some reviewers still think legacy characters can pull focus away from Pike’s crew.
-
One reviewer says the season leaves viewers hungry for more even after a binge.
-
One positive assessment says the episodic format still preserves consistent character arcs across episodes.
-
Una is described as solid, charismatic, and capable of making difficult situations feel manageable.
-
One reviewer finds worthwhile political themes in the season’s more overtly political material and sees room for deeper interpretation.
-
One reviewer welcomes the reduced emphasis on characters being sexually or romantically fixated on Spock.
-
One reviewer highlights a small world-building detail as a fun addition to the setting.
-
Twists receive mixed reactions, from a clever dinosaur-time-travel turn to character resolutions that some viewers found telegraphed.
-
Sound work is mixed: atmospheric design receives praise, while one fantasy episode is criticized for conspicuous ADR.
Cons
Sort
-
Clarity is a recurring weakness in the more fantastical episodes, where reviewers question unexplained rules, hand-waved setups, and shaky internal logic.
-
Dialogue draws some of the harshest criticism in weaker episodes, where it is called shallow, forced, ridiculous, or overly melodramatic.
-
The 10-episode season is widely seen as too short for this many tones, characters, and ideas, leaving several reviewers wanting a longer traditional TV run.
-
Lore use is contentious: callbacks can enrich the Trek setting, but some reviewers feel canon and legacy references are mishandled or used without enough purpose.
-
Continuity is a recurring concern, particularly when genre episodes appear to ignore earlier rules or when legacy connections feel forced.
-
One commenter strongly dislikes Pelia’s stylized accent and considers it unnecessary to the character.
-
One critique says past experiences do not meaningfully change current behavior, weakening the sense that characters face lasting consequences.
-
One critic sees the return to The Elysian Kingdom as an unnecessary sequel and questions why that story needed revisiting.
-
One commenter strongly criticizes Pelia’s casting, calling the character and casting choice a poor fit.
-
A strongly negative commenter says the season lacks enough substance to inspire a rewatch.
-
Ethical themes can feel authentically Trek-like, but reviewers also criticize how some mental-health and relationship material is handled.
-
The season’s rhythm feels compressed and uneven to several reviewers, with back-to-back gimmick episodes creating fatigue and serialized arcs feeling disrupted.
-
Tone is a major weakness for detractors, especially when serious grief or character work is paired with broad parody or comedy.
-
Romance is divisive: some pairings have chemistry, but other reviewers dislike the Kirk/La’An direction or feel existing romantic arcs have run their course.
-
Writing quality is sharply divided: reviewers praise inventive standalone ideas and character beats, but repeatedly criticize thin plotting, gimmicks, and weak resolutions.
-
One critic is disappointed that LGBT representation has receded since the first season, especially while heterosexual relationships remain prominent.
-
One review criticizes an important emotional scene for being cut too short.
-
One commenter misses Star Trek’s older reputation for inspiring scientific and professional curiosity and feels this season offers less of that quality.
-
One commenter feels the Princess Bride-style fourth-wall reference makes the fantasy episode less immersive.
-
One reviewer finds it odd that fantasy magic can function aboard the Enterprise, weakening the internal power rules.
-
One critic thinks the prequel function is becoming too eager to position the series for a hypothetical Kirk-era continuation.
-
Some episodes ask for a heavy suspension of disbelief, and reviewers are less satisfied when emotional stories lack a grounded framework.
-
Stories are the main fault line: strong standalone adventures can be compelling, but several gimmick-heavy episodes are criticized as thin, pointless, or weakly resolved.
-
Genre-hopping is the season’s biggest divide: some reviewers love the fearless variety, while others find the fantasy, puppet, soap, and parody swings exhausting or un-Trek-like.
-
Drama is inconsistent: performers can sell emotional material, but soap-opera framing and weak character drama sometimes undercut otherwise serious ideas.
-
The darker episodes use violence and body horror effectively for some reviewers, while others feel gore becomes spectacle without enough story support.
-
Direction ranges from nimble comic staging to choices some reviewers call uninspired, making the execution as variable as the season’s concepts.
-
Runtime works when an episode has enough story to fill the hour, but thinner comedy installments are criticized for stretching limited plots.
-
Episode pacing varies widely: the real-time disaster story uses relentless momentum effectively, while weaker episodes are said to sag or rush their final acts.
-
Screenplay reactions are mixed, with some scripts faulted at the concept level while stronger episodes benefit from clearer structure and sharper character turns.
-
One commenter describes the approaching end as bittersweet, simultaneously sad to lose more Trek and ready for this series to conclude.
-
Audience appeal looks polarized: some see broad, accessible fun and familiar TOS flavor, while others think the gimmick-heavy direction alienates viewers.
-
The season earns credit for inventive time-bending and genre concepts, though some later riffs are described as derivative or insufficiently fresh.
Cast & Creators
-
La’AnChong is repeatedly singled out for carrying La’An’s dramatic material with intensity, charm, and a compelling sense of character.
-
PikeMount earns praise for both comic versatility and Pike’s heavier emotional material, with reviewers also highlighting his effortless command presence.
-
SpockPeck remains one of the cast’s most praised performers, balancing thoughtful Spock work with confident comedy and alternate-character material.
-
PeliaKane is praised as a standout whose wild comic energy and emotional range elevate Pelia’s material.
-
ScottyQuinn’s Scotty work is warmly received, with reviewers saying he shines, fits the crew naturally, and handles both comedy and character beats well.
-
UhuraGooding is repeatedly described as a season standout, with viewers praising the strength and consistency of her performances.
-
Prince DashingWesley is called a scene-stealer in the fantasy episode and earns additional praise for his acting as Kirk.
-
Una Chin-RileyRomijn earns praise for Una’s authority and charisma, as well as for strong scene work opposite Demore Barnes.
-
TrelaneDarby receives strong praise for Trelane, especially the playful, childlike energy he brings to the cosmic trickster.
-
WriterWolkoff receives praise alongside Dana Horgan for finding a deeper message inside the deliberately cheesy soap-opera format.
-
ChiversHall’s performance is praised for bringing touching nuance to both versions of Chivers in the soap-opera episode.
-
KorBarnes is praised as an excellent scene partner in Kor’s tense exchanges with Una.
-
Christine ChapelBush is praised for making the most of Chapel’s material even when the surrounding episode receives a more muted response.
-
ActorMorton is a major guest-performance highlight, praised as a wonderful presence who brings nuance and depth to the admiral role.
-
OrtegasNavia is named among the performers whose characters are highlights whenever they appear.
-
ComposerMelumad’s score receives emphatic praise for an expansive, symphonic sound that lifts the action.
-
ActorFoley’s guest appearance is described as a neat addition to the season’s comedy.
-
DirectorGorskaya’s comic direction is praised for keeping a parody-heavy episode fleet-footed and fun.
-
WriterReaction to Horgan’s writing is sharply split: one critic attacks the soap-opera episode’s choices, while another credits her and Bill Wolkoff with finding a meaningful message.
-
CreatorGoldsman is credited with having delivered funny and poignant material, but one reviewer criticizes the showrunners for overusing gimmicks while core characters stagnate.
-
ProducerMyers is credited with having delivered funny and poignant material, but one reviewer criticizes the showrunners for overusing gimmicks while core characters stagnate.
-
CreatorOne critic argues that Kurtzman took the wrong lesson from earlier comedy successes and pushed the series too far toward gimmick-heavy episodes.
-
WriterOne reviewer strongly criticizes Johnson’s script, describing the execution as lazy and uninspired.