Ha-Chan, Shake Your Booty! Movie Review

Brand: Sony Pictures
Released: September 25, 2026
Updated: 1 week ago
4.3
Overall review score
367
Review insights
41
Scored features
43
Expert reviews
Content guidance
Scorata recommended age 16+

Best suited to older teens because of sexual situations and open-relationship themes, strong language, grief and death, jealousy, and a stylized fight.

Official rating R

Bottom Line

Choose it for Rinko Kikuchi’s radiant performance, inventive dance fantasies, and warm cross-cultural perspective. Skip it if abrupt tonal swings, a long runtime, or messy late-story contrivances tend to pull you out of a film.

Best for

Viewers who like character-led dance films, magical realism, cross-cultural stories, and bittersweet comedies that mix grief with romance and exuberant musical fantasy.

Not for

Viewers who want restrained grief drama, tightly realistic plotting, or consistently polished ballroom technique may be frustrated by the film’s whimsy, tonal swings, and messy late-story choices.

Verdict

Ha-Chan, Shake Your Booty! turns bereavement into a colorful, eccentric dance through memory, desire, and recovery. Rinko Kikuchi is the near-unanimous standout, grounding Haru’s grief and impulsiveness with quiet charisma, comic timing, and emotional range. The ballroom fantasies, bright cinematography, lively soundtrack, and Japanese-Latin cultural texture give the film a distinctive personality, and several critics find its tonal daring exhilarating. The tradeoff is that the same ambition can make the movie feel overlong, tonally unstable, and narratively contrived, especially once Haru’s lies and jealousy take over. Even divided reactions tend to agree that Kikuchi and the film’s strongest dance sequences make the experience memorable.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

41 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    20 (49%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    13 (32%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    8 (20%)

Pros highlights

View all 33 pros
  • 4.9
    39 reviews strong consensus
    lead performance: 4.9, 39 reviews, strong consensus
    Rinko Kikuchi is the clearest consensus strength, praised for quiet charisma, comic precision, emotional range, and the ability to ground the film’s wildest turns.
  • 4.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    production design: 4.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Haru’s cozy, record-filled home and the broader colorful design create an inviting world that several critics wanted to step inside.
  • 4.8
    8 reviews strong consensus
    chemistry between characters: 4.8, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Haru’s connections with Luis and Fedir carry convincing warmth and attraction, with the central performers selling both intimacy and romantic tension.
  • 4.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    audience appeal: 4.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Its warm, crowd-pleasing energy makes it easy to recommend for viewers receptive to eccentric dance dramedies, though its quirks will not suit everyone.
  • 4.7
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    cinematography: 4.7, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Bright colors, elegant compositions, sweeping movement, and wide dance framing earn frequent praise, though one critic felt the camera sometimes falls out of step with the choreography.
  • 4.7
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    directing quality: 4.7, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Wladyka earns substantial praise for bold visual ideas, emotional warmth, and confident dance staging, even as some critics fault his handling of the film’s competing tones.

Cons highlights

View all 8 cons
  • 2.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    runtime: 2.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The roughly two-hour experience feels breezy to some, but multiple critics thought the story could benefit from trimming.
  • 2.9
    10 reviews low consensus
    story quality: 2.9, 10 reviews, low consensus
    The grief-and-recovery core is affecting, but reactions split over whether the increasingly busy plot enriches Haru’s journey or scatters its impact.
  • 2.9
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    pacing: 2.9, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    The movie can move with a lively cadence, but recurring chapter cards and an overlong feel are recurring drag points for some critics.
  • 3.0
    10 reviews low consensus
    character development: 3.0, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Haru is sympathetic and vivid, but several critics found her arc underwritten or abruptly pushed into behavior that feels less nuanced than the early character work.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews low consensus
    plot clarity: 3.3, 3 reviews, low consensus
    The central emotional path is understandable, but unanswered practical details and Haru’s abrupt choices sometimes make motivations or connective logic feel thin.

Cast & Creators

  • Haru
    4.9
    39 reviews strong consensus
    Rinko Kikuchi: 4.9, 39 reviews, strong consensus
    Kikuchi is the overwhelming performance standout, balancing grief, comic awkwardness, desire, anger, and quiet vulnerability while keeping Haru sympathetic through the film’s strangest turns.
  • Director
    4.3
    30 reviews low consensus
    Josef Kubota Wladyka: 4.3, 30 reviews, low consensus
    Wladyka’s direction is often praised for confidence, warmth, visual invention, and ambitious genre mixing, though several critics feel his tonal swings and late-story choices overreach.
  • YOU
    Hiromi
    4.8
    8 reviews strong consensus
    YOU: 4.8, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    YOU is a consistent comic standout as Hiromi, bringing brash energy, timing, and a scene-stealing frankness to Haru’s support system.
  • Cinematographer
    4.6
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    Daniel Satinoff: 4.6, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Satinoff’s cinematography is widely praised for color, composition, immersion, and fluid movement, though one critic feels the camera does not always synchronize well with the dancing.
  • Fedir
    4.3
    12 reviews strong consensus
    Alberto Guerra: 4.3, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Guerra brings charm, screen presence, and convincing chemistry with Kikuchi, though one viewer found his dancing insufficiently sharp for a professional-dancer character.
  • Luis
    4.5
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Alejandro Edda: 4.5, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Edda is praised for warmth, charm, and emotional presence, helping make Haru’s attachment to Luis convincing despite limited screen time; one review also specifically praises the depth he brings in its credited role.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in sexual content level, editing quality, dialogue quality, near average in tonal consistency, visual style, below average in rewatch value, story quality, friendship portrayal.

Comparison summary

41 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    26 (63%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    11 (27%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    4 (10%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
sexual content level 4.5 2.9 +1.6
editing quality 5.0 3.5 +1.5
dialogue quality 4.5 3.0 +1.5
cultural representation 4.6 3.6 +1.1
originality 4.7 3.4 +1.3
makeup quality 5.0 3.6 +1.4
plot originality 4.0 2.9 +1.1
world-building 5.0 3.8 +1.2

Consider This Instead

If you want better rewatch value

Choose Best of the Best. It scores 4.8 vs 2.5 for rewatch value, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

If you want better screenplay quality

Choose The Invite. It scores 4.8 vs 3.7 for screenplay quality, with a 4.5 overall score.

Compare

If you want better entertainment value

Choose The Incomer. It scores 4.8 vs 4.4 for entertainment value, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better tonal consistency

Choose Rose of Nevada. It scores 5.0 vs 3.6 for tonal consistency, with a 4.5 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Emilia Pérez

  • Similar: musical-fantasy texture Its musical flights of fancy are compared to Emilia Pérez for their impromptu, deliberately unpolished texture.

Everything Everywhere All at Once

  • Compared: surreal crow imagery The crow quirk is briefly likened to Everything Everywhere All at Once before the reviewer says it finds its own fit.

I Play Rocky

  • Better: staying power The critic expects I Play Rocky to have more lasting impact later in the year.

FAQ

Is Ha-Chan, Shake Your Booty! mainly a dance movie?

Dance is central to Haru’s emotional life, but the film is equally a grief dramedy with romance, magical realism, and cross-cultural comedy.

How is Rinko Kikuchi’s performance?

Her performance is the clearest critical consensus strength, with repeated praise for its emotional range, quiet charisma, comic timing, and ability to ground the film’s stranger turns.

Are the dance sequences a highlight?

Usually. Several critics praise their energy, imagination, and storytelling, especially the street dance-fight, though a minority find some dancing technically loose or the camera insufficiently connected to it.

Does the movie handle grief seriously?

Yes, but through a deliberately whimsical lens. The mix of sorrow, comedy, fantasy, sexuality, and dance is moving for many critics and tonally distracting for others.

Is the romance satisfying?

Haru and Fedir have convincing attraction and chemistry, but reactions become more mixed once lies, jealousy, and open-relationship complications drive the plot.

Is it appropriate for younger viewers?

The film contains adult sexual situations and relationship themes, strong language, death and grief, jealousy, and some stylized fighting. The verified U.S. rating is R.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

themoviestate.com

Ha-Chan, Shake Your Booty! explores grief in a whimsical, quirky, and hilariously absurd way, thanks to Rinko Kikuchi’s star performance.

Review score
4.2

Top Movies to Consider

#1 Disneyland Handcrafted
4.8

Best for pristine archival footage, immersive sound, and a surprisingly tense look at Disneyland’s construction. Skip it if you want a comprehensive, deeply critical history; several reviewers found the 78–79-minute...

Pros: plot clarity, realism

Cons: plot originality, runtime

#2 Barbara Forever
4.8

Best for an intimate, inventive archival portrait with strong emotional and cultural impact. Skip it if substantial nudity or an occasionally wandering biographical structure will frustrate you.

Pros: chemistry between characters, emotional impact

Cons: runtime, plot clarity

#3 Chronovisor
4.8

Best for an audacious, text-driven conspiracy thriller with gorgeous 16mm atmosphere and mounting dread. Skip it if long stretches of reading, deliberate repetition, and an intentionally austere narrative sound more...

Pros: story quality, plot clarity

Cons: chemistry between characters, sound design

#4 Halloween
4.8

Best for slow-burn suspense, iconic synth music, and shadow-soaked filmmaking that still feels influential. Skip it if you need fast pacing, polished sound, consistently natural dialogue, or modern gore-heavy kills.

Pros: chemistry between characters, directing quality

Cons: sound design, dialogue quality