NHL 27 Review

Publisher: Electronic Arts
Released: September 11, 2026
Updated: 2 months ago
2.9
Overall review score
330
Review insights
63
Scored features
41
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose NHL 27 if you skipped recent entries or want sharper on-ice play, smarter tactics, and authentic arenas. Skip it at full price if you own NHL 26 or expect deep Connected Franchise systems, polished commentary, and major mode changes.

Best for

Best for hockey fans returning after a few years away, offline Franchise players who value authentic arenas, and players who appreciate more deliberate skating and tactical team behavior.

Not for

Not ideal for recent NHL owners seeking a major overhaul, newcomers who need strong tutorials, or competitive players frustrated by paid progression and a limited Connected Franchise structure.

Verdict

NHL 27 improves the parts that happen between the boards more convincingly than the parts surrounding them. Skating, puck battles, defensive tools, goalie behavior, and team playbooks can make games feel more deliberate and authentic, while rebuilt NHL arenas, licensed goal songs, and strong rink audio create a much better sense of place. The problem is consistency. AI and playbooks impress some players and barely register for others, commentary is frequently repetitive or mismatched, character visuals remain dated, and Connected Franchise arrives without the long-term depth many expected. For lapsed players, the accumulated refinements make this a solid return point. For NHL 26 owners, the familiar modes, rough presentation details, and aggressive monetization make the full-price upgrade difficult to justify.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

63 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    18 (29%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    6 (10%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    15 (24%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    11 (17%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    13 (21%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.4
    23 reviews low consensus
    atmosphere: 4.4, 23 reviews, low consensus
    Arena atmosphere is one of the clearest strengths, with authentic goal songs, lighting, chants, jumbotrons, and team-specific details making NHL rinks feel alive. A few sources still find intros repetitive or generic.
  • 4.0
    21 reviews low consensus
    gameplay mechanics: 4.0, 21 reviews, low consensus
    The best mechanical changes improve passing, puck battles, checking, skating penalties, goalie fatigue, and tactical play. Opinions split sharply on whether those refinements are meaningful enough or are undermined by legacy problems.
  • 4.8
    8 reviews strong consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.8, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Music is one of the most consistently praised elements. Authentic goal songs, arena staples, and hockey-linked tracks fit the sport far better than many previous generic soundtracks.
  • 4.1
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    core gameplay loop: 4.1, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    The underlying hockey remains a strong point for many players, with satisfying goals, physical play, and a generally enjoyable on-ice foundation. Even harsher critics acknowledge flashes of good hockey.
  • 3.6
    7 reviews low consensus
    movement feel: 3.6, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Skating can feel crisp, deliberate, and natural, but some players dislike the slower pace or inconsistent heaviness. The reduced abuse of old pivot mechanics is generally seen as a realism gain.
  • 3.7
    5 reviews low consensus
    fun factor: 3.7, 5 reviews, low consensus
    The game can still be exciting and satisfying on the ice, especially when skating, passing, and scoring click. Frustrating pacing, controls, and difficulty keep that enjoyment from being universal.

Cons highlights

  • 3.4
    28 reviews low consensus
    AI behavior: 3.4, 28 reviews, low consensus
    Team AI is one of the most divisive upgrades. Some players see smarter positioning, situational pressure, and useful playbook identities, while others find teammates lost, teams too similar, or the advertised tactics barely visible.
  • 2.6
    24 reviews low consensus
    commentary quality: 2.6, 24 reviews, low consensus
    The new booth is highly inconsistent. Some like the fresher personalities and situational energy, but repeated lines, flat delivery, bad pronunciations, and mismatched calls are among the most common complaints.
  • 2.2
    22 reviews low consensus
    innovation: 2.2, 22 reviews, low consensus
    Most sources see NHL 27 as refinement rather than reinvention. The strongest additions are playbooks, Connected Franchise, and presentation upgrades, but the broader package often feels too close to recent entries.
  • 2.6
    20 reviews low consensus
    multiplayer design: 2.6, 20 reviews, low consensus
    Connected Franchise is a popular idea but a polarizing implementation. Playing leagues with friends is appealing, yet missing CPU teams, drafts, progression, and long-term depth leave many calling it incomplete.
  • 1.7
    19 reviews moderate consensus
    value for money: 1.7, 19 reviews, moderate consensus
    Full-price value is the biggest consensus problem. Lapsed players may find enough improvements to justify returning, but recent owners are repeatedly advised to wait for a sale or skip the annual upgrade.
  • 2.6
    17 reviews low consensus
    graphics quality: 2.6, 17 reviews, low consensus
    Visual quality is sharply mixed. Ice, lighting, and some arena work impress, but face scans, crowds, coaches, and character models are repeatedly described as dated or inconsistent.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Video Games, this product is above average in camera behavior, aiming precision, HUD clarity, near average in atmosphere, gameplay mechanics, below average in collectibles, originality, load times.

Comparison summary

63 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    19 (30%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    8 (13%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    36 (57%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
collectibles 1.0 4.1 -3.1
originality 1.0 3.7 -2.7
load times 1.0 3.7 -2.7
microtransaction impact 1.0 3.5 -2.5
value for money 1.7 3.8 -2.1
onboarding experience 1.0 3.5 -2.5
animation quality 1.5 4.0 -2.5
learning curve 1.0 3.5 -2.5

Consider This Instead

If you want better battle pass value

Choose EA Sports FC 27. It scores 5.0 vs 1.0 for battle pass value, with a 3.6 overall score.

Compare

If you want better bug frequency

Choose Marathon. It scores 5.0 vs 1.6 for bug frequency, with a 3.8 overall score.

Compare

If you want better polish

Choose Forza Horizon 5. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for polish, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

NHL 26

  • Worse: on-ice refinement The combined gameplay refinements make NHL 27 feel more polished on the ice than NHL 26.
  • Worse: overall upgrade NHL 27 is judged slightly better than NHL 26, but only marginally so.
  • Worse: overall gameplay, AI, and presentation The reviewer says NHL 27's reworked physics, AI, and presentation clearly outperform NHL 26.

Madden NFL 27

  • Better: franchise mode depth NHL 27's franchise offering is described as much less ambitious than Madden NFL 27's.

NHL 14

  • Better: Connected Franchise depth Connected Franchise is judged less complete than the comparable mode in NHL 14.

FAQ

Is NHL 27 a big upgrade over NHL 26?

Not for most returning players. The strongest changes are presentation, team playbooks, AI tuning, and on-ice refinements, while many major modes remain very similar.

Is the gameplay better?

Often, yes. Several sources praise skating, puck battles, defense, goalie behavior, and situational AI, but passing, difficulty, and teammate behavior still draw criticism.

Is Connected Franchise worth buying the game for?

Probably not by itself. Playing leagues with friends is appealing, but the lack of CPU teams, drafts, long-term progression, and other franchise systems makes the mode feel unfinished to many players.

How good is the presentation?

The arenas, lighting, goal songs, crowd audio, and rink-specific details are major strengths. Commentary, face scans, repeated animations, and presentation bugs are much less consistent.

Is NHL 27 beginner-friendly?

Not especially. Difficulty and control options can be flexible, but onboarding and training are repeatedly criticized for failing to teach important techniques.

Should I pay full price?

The consensus leans no for NHL 26 owners. Players returning after several years may get more value, while many recent owners are better served waiting for a sale.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

gameinformer.com

NHL 27 (PlayStation 5) Review – 6.5/10: It’s evident NHL 27 is a leap year for the franchise as it doesn’t innovate on the modes and...

Review score
2.9
lootlevelchill.com

NHL 27 features great gameplay and looks fantastic in every element of its presentation, however, there are few changes to make it stand out...

Review score
3.5
impulsegamer.com

At long last I can finally declare Electronic Arts (‘EA’) made an NHL title that looks, feels, and plays like actual hockey. Away with you...

Review score
4.2

Top Video Games to Consider

#1 Well Dweller
4.7

Best for fluid traversal, rewarding exploration, striking art, and forgiving quality-of-life features. Skip it if you want deep combat, radical genre innovation, or consistently demanding bosses.

Pros: difficulty balance, boss design

Cons: innovation, sandbox freedom

#2 Hades II
4.5

Best for superb combat, inventive builds, and richly voiced characters. Skip it if repeated runs, resource gathering, or visually busy battles outweigh the appeal of steady progress.

Pros: overall quality, combat system

Cons: pacing, grind level

#3 Valheim
4.5

Good if you want a beautiful, demanding survival sandbox built around exploration, building, progression, and memorable co-op. Skip it if long resource runs, harsh death recovery, and deliberate pacing sound...

Pros: town-building system, exploration quality

Cons: grind level, fast travel convenience

#4 Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
4.5

Choose Clair Obscur if you want a story-rich RPG with thrilling timed combat, gorgeous art, and standout music. Skip it if poor maps, tight parry timing, or occasional bugs and...

Pros: narrative quality, combat system

Cons: map and navigation design, menu usability