NHL 27 Review

Released: September 11, 2026
Updated: 3 days ago
2.9
Overall review score
330
Review insights
63
Scored features
41
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose NHL 27 if you skipped recent entries or want sharper on-ice play, smarter tactics, and authentic arenas. Skip it at full price if you own NHL 26 or expect deep Connected Franchise systems, polished commentary, and major mode changes.

Best for

Best for hockey fans returning after a few years away, offline Franchise players who value authentic arenas, and players who appreciate more deliberate skating and tactical team behavior.

Not for

Not ideal for recent NHL owners seeking a major overhaul, newcomers who need strong tutorials, or competitive players frustrated by paid progression and a limited Connected Franchise structure.

Verdict

NHL 27 improves the parts that happen between the boards more convincingly than the parts surrounding them. Skating, puck battles, defensive tools, goalie behavior, and team playbooks can make games feel more deliberate and authentic, while rebuilt NHL arenas, licensed goal songs, and strong rink audio create a much better sense of place. The problem is consistency. AI and playbooks impress some players and barely register for others, commentary is frequently repetitive or mismatched, character visuals remain dated, and Connected Franchise arrives without the long-term depth many expected. For lapsed players, the accumulated refinements make this a solid return point. For NHL 26 owners, the familiar modes, rough presentation details, and aggressive monetization make the full-price upgrade difficult to justify.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

63 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    18 (29%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    6 (10%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    15 (24%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    11 (17%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    13 (21%)

Pros

  • 4.4
    23 reviews low consensus
    atmosphere: 4.4, 23 reviews, low consensus
    Arena atmosphere is one of the clearest strengths, with authentic goal songs, lighting, chants, jumbotrons, and team-specific details making NHL rinks feel alive. A few sources still find intros repetitive or generic.
  • 4.8
    8 reviews strong consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.8, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Music is one of the most consistently praised elements. Authentic goal songs, arena staples, and hockey-linked tracks fit the sport far better than many previous generic soundtracks.
  • 4.0
    21 reviews low consensus
    gameplay mechanics: 4.0, 21 reviews, low consensus
    The best mechanical changes improve passing, puck battles, checking, skating penalties, goalie fatigue, and tactical play. Opinions split sharply on whether those refinements are meaningful enough or are undermined by legacy problems.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    environmental detail: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Arena detail is excellent, from real-world landmarks and lighting to ice wear, scratched glass, and team-specific presentation touches.
  • 4.1
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    core gameplay loop: 4.1, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    The underlying hockey remains a strong point for many players, with satisfying goals, physical play, and a generally enjoyable on-ice foundation. Even harsher critics acknowledge flashes of good hockey.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    haptic feedback integration: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    DualSense feedback is a standout, conveying skate strides, edge cuts, gliding, and impacts with unusually convincing tactile detail.

Cons

  • 1.2
    8 reviews strong consensus
    monetization fairness: 1.2, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Monetization is one of the weakest areas. HUT and World of CHEL are repeatedly criticized for letting money buy faster progression or stronger competitive positioning.
  • 1.7
    19 reviews moderate consensus
    value for money: 1.7, 19 reviews, moderate consensus
    Full-price value is the biggest consensus problem. Lapsed players may find enough improvements to justify returning, but recent owners are repeatedly advised to wait for a sale or skip the annual upgrade.
  • 1.6
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    bug frequency: 1.6, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Bugs range from minor pre-release roughness to severe replay, cutscene, UI, loading, and visual glitches. Several sources describe presentation problems as frequent enough to undercut the new broadcast focus.
  • 1.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    marketing accuracy: 1.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Several sources feel major features were oversold, especially team AI and Connected Franchise, creating a gap between pre-release promises and the shipped experience.
  • 1.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    polish: 1.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Polish is a consistent concern. Unfinished-feeling systems, glitches, sloppy presentation, and visual roughness often distract from otherwise solid hockey.
  • 2.2
    22 reviews low consensus
    innovation: 2.2, 22 reviews, low consensus
    Most sources see NHL 27 as refinement rather than reinvention. The strongest additions are playbooks, Connected Franchise, and presentation upgrades, but the broader package often feels too close to recent entries.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Video Games, this product is above average in camera behavior, aiming precision, HUD clarity, near average in commentary quality, gameplay mechanics, below average in collectibles, load times, originality.

Comparison summary

63 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    18 (29%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    9 (14%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    36 (57%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
collectibles 1.0 3.9 -2.9
load times 1.0 3.7 -2.7
originality 1.0 3.7 -2.7
onboarding experience 1.0 3.7 -2.7
animation quality 1.5 4.0 -2.5
learning curve 1.0 3.5 -2.5
value for money 1.7 3.8 -2.0
tutorial quality 1.0 3.4 -2.4

Consider This Instead

If you want better graphics quality

Choose Forza Horizon 6. It scores 4.8 vs 2.6 for graphics quality, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better bug frequency

Choose Marathon. It scores 5.0 vs 1.6 for bug frequency, with a 3.8 overall score.

Compare

If you want better polish

Choose Forza Horizon 5. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for polish, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

NHL 26

  • Worse: on-ice refinement The combined gameplay refinements make NHL 27 feel more polished on the ice than NHL 26.
  • Worse: overall upgrade NHL 27 is judged slightly better than NHL 26, but only marginally so.
  • Worse: overall gameplay, AI, and presentation The reviewer says NHL 27's reworked physics, AI, and presentation clearly outperform NHL 26.

Madden NFL 27

  • Better: franchise mode depth NHL 27's franchise offering is described as much less ambitious than Madden NFL 27's.

NHL 14

  • Better: Connected Franchise depth Connected Franchise is judged less complete than the comparable mode in NHL 14.

FAQ

Is NHL 27 a big upgrade over NHL 26?

Not for most returning players. The strongest changes are presentation, team playbooks, AI tuning, and on-ice refinements, while many major modes remain very similar.

Is the gameplay better?

Often, yes. Several sources praise skating, puck battles, defense, goalie behavior, and situational AI, but passing, difficulty, and teammate behavior still draw criticism.

Is Connected Franchise worth buying the game for?

Probably not by itself. Playing leagues with friends is appealing, but the lack of CPU teams, drafts, long-term progression, and other franchise systems makes the mode feel unfinished to many players.

How good is the presentation?

The arenas, lighting, goal songs, crowd audio, and rink-specific details are major strengths. Commentary, face scans, repeated animations, and presentation bugs are much less consistent.

Is NHL 27 beginner-friendly?

Not especially. Difficulty and control options can be flexible, but onboarding and training are repeatedly criticized for failing to teach important techniques.

Should I pay full price?

The consensus leans no for NHL 26 owners. Players returning after several years may get more value, while many recent owners are better served waiting for a sale.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

gameinformer.com

NHL 27 (PlayStation 5) Review – 6.5/10: It’s evident NHL 27 is a leap year for the franchise as it doesn’t innovate on the modes and...

Review score
2.9
lootlevelchill.com

NHL 27 features great gameplay and looks fantastic in every element of its presentation, however, there are few changes to make it stand out...

Review score
3.5
impulsegamer.com

At long last I can finally declare Electronic Arts (‘EA’) made an NHL title that looks, feels, and plays like actual hockey. Away with you...

Review score
4.2

Top Video Games to Consider

#1 Hades II
4.6

Good if you want fast, tactical roguelite combat with huge progression depth, striking art, and standout music. Skip it if repetition, resource micromanagement, or a less emotionally satisfying sequel story...

Pros: skill tree depth, dialogue quality

Cons: emotional impact, economy and resource balance

#2 Valheim
4.5

Good if you want a beautiful, demanding survival sandbox built around exploration, building, progression, and memorable co-op. Skip it if long resource runs, harsh death recovery, and deliberate pacing sound...

Pros: core gameplay loop, movement feel

Cons: economy and resource balance, map and navigation design

#3 Donkey Kong Bananza
4.5

Best for joyful destruction, dense exploration, and a charming DK-Pauline adventure. Skip it if camera quirks, frame-rate dips, easy bosses, or premium Switch 2 pricing are dealbreakers.

Pros: gameplay mechanics, world interactivity

Cons: economy and resource balance, enemy variety

#4 It Takes Two
4.5

Best for joyful, inventive co-op with a partner, especially on couch. Skip it if divorce themes, uneven story tone, or Switch visual compromises would distract you.

Pros: core gameplay loop, movement feel

Cons: character development, dialogue quality