If you want better activity auto-detection
Choose Garmin vivomove Trend. It scores 5.0 vs 4.0 for activity auto-detection, with a 3.9 overall score.
Garmin Approach S70 Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Garmin Approach S70 if you want elite golf mapping, battery life, and coaching in a daily wearable. Skip it if you only need basic yardages, dislike paid extras, or want Apple/Samsung-level smartwatch polish.
Best for
Best for serious golfers who want a premium golf-first watch with detailed maps, shot-planning help, long battery life, and useful health/wellness data in one device.
Not for
Not for golfers who only need basic yardages or users who mainly want a polished Apple/Samsung-style smartwatch experience with richer notifications and lower setup friction.
Verdict
Reviewers broadly frame the Garmin Approach S70 as the most complete golf-first smartwatch in this set: its AMOLED display, detailed course maps, fast GPS, long battery life, and Virtual Caddie/PlaysLike guidance earn repeated praise. The biggest tradeoff is that the S70 behaves more like a premium Garmin golf tool than a polished Apple or Samsung-style smartwatch. Notifications, touch-heavy course navigation, charging convenience, paid contour data, and the high price all draw caveats. The evidence is strongest for serious golfers who will use the advanced course-planning and wellness features, not casual players who only want front, middle, and back yardages.
Product generations
Garmin Approach- Garmin Approach S44
- Garmin Approach S50
- Garmin Approach S62
- Garmin Approach S70This product
Feature Scorecards
Summary
45 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.020 (44%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.415 (33%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.49 (20%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.41 (2%)
Pros highlights
-
Display quality is the clearest consensus strength, with reviewers repeatedly praising the AMOLED screen as beautiful, crisp, bright, and golf-changing.
-
Value depends heavily on use case: many reviewers justify the price for serious golfers, while others say it is too expensive for basic yardages.
-
Coaching features are a signature strength, especially PlaysLike, Virtual Caddie, tempo help, and shot-planning guidance, though paid features reduce value for some.
-
Battery life is one of the strongest consensus wins, with reviewers reporting multi-day or multi-round use and very little drain.
-
Mapping and navigation are major strengths, with detailed hole maps, PinPointer, dispersion views, and wrist-based planning repeatedly praised.
-
GPS and yardage accuracy are a major strength, with reviewers praising fast locks, accurate yardages, and highly precise on-course distances.
Cons highlights
-
Charging convenience is the main hardware annoyance, with proprietary charging, USB-C adapter needs, and awkward face-down charging drawing criticism.
-
Notifications are useful but divisive: reviewers liked getting alerts, yet several found them distracting, limited, or poorly ordered.
-
Smartwatch features are versatile but not best-in-class, with reviewers praising breadth while preferring dedicated smartwatch platforms for everyday use.
-
Operating system experience is mixed: one reviewer found it intuitive, while others preferred competing smartwatch platforms or criticized the OS.
-
Touchscreen responsiveness is mixed, ranging from nice and responsive to fiddly and frustrating on course.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Smartwatches, this product is above average in mapping and navigation, app ecosystem, size options, near average in activity auto-detection, button controls, below average in software smoothness, fitness tracking accuracy, cross-platform compatibility.
Comparison summary
45 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher22 (49%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts13 (29%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower10 (22%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| software smoothness | 2.0 | 4.0 | -2.0 |
| mapping and navigation | 4.9 | 3.4 | +1.5 |
| fitness tracking accuracy | 2.5 | 4.1 | -1.6 |
| app ecosystem | 5.0 | 3.6 | +1.4 |
| size options | 4.5 | 3.1 | +1.4 |
| third-party app support | 4.5 | 3.2 | +1.3 |
| fit | 5.0 | 3.9 | +1.1 |
| recovery insights | 5.0 | 3.9 | +1.1 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better fitness tracking accuracy
Choose Garmin MARQ Gen 2. It scores 4.6 vs 2.5 for fitness tracking accuracy, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better touchscreen responsiveness
Choose Garmin Approach S50. It scores 4.9 vs 3.3 for touchscreen responsiveness, with a 4.0 overall score.
If you want better smartphone notifications
Choose Garmin Forerunner 165. It scores 5.0 vs 2.9 for smartphone notifications, with a 4.3 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Better: display quality The S70 screen is praised as close, but the Apple Watch Ultra is still framed as slightly better for screen quality.
- Worse: display quality The S70 is described as a major display upgrade over the Approach S62.
Apple Watch Series 8
- Worse: battery life The S70 is favored for multi-round battery life versus an Apple Watch Series 8 round-tracking setup.
FAQ
Is the Garmin Approach S70 worth the price?
Reviewers generally say it can justify the high price for golfers who will use the AMOLED maps, Virtual Caddie, PlaysLike data, health metrics, and long battery life. Several also say cheaper watches make more sense for basic yardages.
How good is the S70 display outdoors?
The AMOLED display is one of the strongest points in the reviews. Reviewers repeatedly praised its brightness, clarity, color, and visibility in sun or glare.
Is the Virtual Caddie actually useful?
Most reviewers liked it, especially once it had enough shot data to learn distances, dispersion, and tendencies. The main caveats are that some functionality depends on good shot data, and some advanced golf features add subscription or sensor costs.
How long does the battery last?
Battery life gets strong consensus praise. Reviewers reported multi-day use, multiple rounds, and very low battery drain during golf compared with typical smartwatches.
Can it replace an Apple Watch or Samsung smartwatch?
It can work as a daily wearable, but reviewers were mixed on smartwatch polish. Golf, battery, health, and fitness features are strong, while notifications, app polish, and everyday smartwatch convenience lag dedicated smartwatch platforms.
What are the main drawbacks?
The repeated concerns are price, paid extras such as green contours, proprietary or awkward charging, touch controls that can be fiddly on course, and weaker notification handling than mainstream smartwatches.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Lets Play Thru
- Review score
- 5.0
YouTube - Breaking Eighty | Honest Golf Reviews
- Review score
- 3.0
YouTube - Lets Play Thru
- Review score
- 4.6
Article Reviews
menshealth.com
- Review score
- 4.3
Top Smartwatches to Consider
Best for long battery life, accurate GPS and useful offline maps at a strong price. Skip it if you need payments, richer apps, a built-in LED flashlight or polished smartwatch...
Pros: mapping and navigation, value for money
Cons: smartwatch features, contactless payments
Best for accurate run tracking, deep Garmin coaching and phone-free Spotify in a light package. Skip it if you need full maps, triathlon mode, Apple Music support or the strongest...
Pros: value for money, GPS accuracy
Cons: mapping and navigation, third-party app support
Good if you want premium running features, long battery life, and maps for under $200. Skip it if you need flawless heart-rate data, multiband GPS, LTE, or richer app support.
Pros: value for money, battery life
Cons: heart rate accuracy, third-party app support
Best for accurate running metrics, excellent coaching tools, a bright AMOLED display, and dependable battery life. Skip it if you need offline maps, music storage, contactless payments, multi-band GPS, or...
Pros: battery life, value for money
Cons: mapping and navigation, smartwatch features