Call My Agent! The Movie Review

Studio: Netflix
Released: September 10, 2026
Updated: 3 weeks ago
4.3
Overall review score
194
Review insights
41
Scored features
23
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose this affectionate film-industry farce for its sparkling leads and familiar ASK camaraderie. Skip if you want an entirely self-contained story, equally developed supporting characters, or consistently brisk pacing.

Returning fans who value the ASK ensemble and movie enthusiasts who enjoy affectionate filmmaking satire, witty chaos and celebrity self-parodies.

Not for

Viewers wanting every subplot resolved, an evenly brisk comedy, or complete context without watching the original series.

Verdict

Call My Agent! The Movie succeeds most when it reunites the former ASK colleagues around Andréa’s increasingly disastrous directing debut. Camille Cottin’s biting composure and Laure Calamy’s exuberant panic make a terrific double act, with George Clooney’s self-mocking cameo providing an especially memorable comic detour. The film also retains the original show’s affection for filmmaking and for colleagues who quarrel but come through for each other. Its feature-length shape is less assured: several critics find the middle sluggish, supporting favorites underused and the ending too convenient or abrupt. Some newcomers enjoy the self-contained movie-set farce, but others miss too much relationship history and insider context. Overall, it is an affectionate continuation rather than a bold reinvention, and that is mostly to its advantage.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

41 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    22 (54%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    14 (34%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    4 (10%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.4
    17 reviews strong consensus
    celebrity cameos: 4.4, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    George Clooney’s self-deprecating, disastrous meeting is the standout cameo, while French stars contribute playful self-parodies. Eva Longoria’s particularly brief appearance is seen as less worthwhile.
  • 4.4
    17 reviews moderate consensus
    humor: 4.4, 17 reviews, moderate consensus
    Fast insider jokes, exaggerated egos and Clooney’s awkward meeting make the film consistently amusing for many viewers. A few find the slapstick uneven or the movie much less funny than advertised.
  • 4.5
    15 reviews strong consensus
    entertainment value: 4.5, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    A largely delightful, funny return makes the old agency gang enjoyable company again. Even those finding some passages slow generally appreciate the warmth and film-set disorder.
  • 4.8
    11 reviews strong consensus
    faithfulness to source material: 4.8, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    The movie preserves the parent show’s wit, messy friendships and affection for cinema while finding a new reason to reunite its characters. It plays like an expanded installment rather than a reinvention.
  • 4.5
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    franchise continuity: 4.5, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    The closed agency stays closed, and the familiar group reconvenes through a different professional crisis rather than a reset. That generally feels true to the show, even though the old workplace routines are missed.
  • 4.5
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    acting performance: 4.5, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    Cottin, Calamy and the returning ensemble give the chaotic production its spark, with sharp timing and believable emotions. One assessment is notably cooler toward Laetitia Casta’s supporting work.

Cons highlights

  • 3.4
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    pacing: 3.4, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    The film often crackles with rapid exchanges, but several critics notice a slack middle section or stretched scenes. The energy generally improves when the set disasters escalate.
  • 3.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    ensemble balance: 3.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The focus on Andréa and Noémie works, but supporting favorites such as Gabriel, Hervé and Arlette sometimes get too little room to develop.
  • 3.1
    5 reviews strong consensus
    runtime: 3.1, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Two hours gives the reunion room for mishaps but cannot match a full season’s character depth. Some passages run long while several relationships feel compressed.

Use Cases

Best for

  • 4.8
    20 reviews strong consensus
    Returning fan viewing: 4.8, 20 reviews, strong consensus
    Returning viewers get the cast chemistry, escalating problems and lovingly familiar personalities they have missed. The film is particularly rewarding when you already know the relationships.
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Film-buff viewing: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    People who love films about filmmaking will enjoy the insider jokes, production headaches and underlying respect for movie crews, with or without a background in the show.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Original-language viewing: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The original French dialogue is recommended for its quick comic rhythm, with English subtitles offering a way to catch the overlapping jokes.

Cast & Creators

  • Andrea
    4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Camille Cottin: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Cottin makes Andréa an arresting, sharp-witted center to the film, still formidable even when her new job exposes her weaknesses.
  • Noemie
    4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Laure Calamy: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Calamy is a scene-stealing Noémie, combining comic exuberance with growth and warmth. One critic finds the more cartoonish demands of her storyline difficult to sell.
  • Actor
    4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    George Clooney: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Clooney gamely plays a pricked-ego version of himself in an awkward meeting that repeatedly emerges as a comedy highlight.
  • Writer
    4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Fanny Herrero: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Herrero’s return brings the series’ sharp show-business jokes and recognizable characters into a new story without simply restarting the agency.
  • Hervé
    4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Nicolas Maury: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Maury slips comfortably back into Hervé and makes the direct-to-camera opening one of the comic highlights.
  • Writer
    4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Lison Daniel: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Daniel’s co-writing helps sustain brisk insider jokes and a lightly irreverent comic voice.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in dialogue quality, writing quality, faithfulness to source material, near average in acting performance, runtime, below average in genre satisfaction, ending satisfaction, supporting cast performance.

Comparison summary

40 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    29 (73%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    8 (20%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    3 (8%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
genre satisfaction 2.0 3.9 -1.9
dialogue quality 4.7 3.0 +1.6
writing quality 4.5 3.0 +1.5
faithfulness to source material 4.8 3.6 +1.2
film-industry satire 4.4 3.2 +1.3
message quality 5.0 3.6 +1.4
character development 4.2 3.1 +1.1
story quality 4.3 3.3 +1.0

Consider This Instead

If you want better supporting cast performance

Choose The Invite. It scores 4.9 vs 3.5 for supporting cast performance, with a 4.5 overall score.

Compare

If you want better ending satisfaction

Choose Dear You. It scores 5.0 vs 2.5 for ending satisfaction, with a 4.5 overall score.

Compare

If you want better audience appeal

Choose Honeyjoon. It scores 4.8 vs 3.9 for audience appeal, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better genre satisfaction

Choose What They Had. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for genre satisfaction, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Mirzapur The Movie

  • Similar: prior-series familiarity needed for sequel viewing Both screen continuations assume a basic familiarity with their originating series.

FAQ

Do I need to watch the original series first?

Not necessarily: some first-time viewers follow and enjoy the film, helped by a brief recap. Others find the established character relationships hard to appreciate without the show.

Does it feel like the TV series?

Yes. The wit, affectionate rivalry, returning characters and celebrity self-parodies are familiar, though the agency setting is replaced by a troubled movie shoot.

Who stands out in the cast?

Camille Cottin and Laure Calamy are the central comic duo, and Liliane Rovère supplies a moving late moment.

Are the celebrity cameos worth watching?

George Clooney’s awkward, self-deprecating scene is a recurring favorite. Other guest appearances are fun, though some are too brief to leave an impression.

Is it consistently funny and fast-paced?

The rapid dialogue and film-set disasters work well for most, but critics also notice sluggish passages and some overstretched scenes.

Does the ending resolve everything?

No. Some relationships and consequences are compressed, and the final stretch feels abrupt or too easy to a few critics.

Should I watch in French with subtitles?

That is a recommended option: the quick, overlapping French exchanges are especially lively in the original audio.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

movieloon.blog

Synopsis: A follow-up to the French series Call My Agent! / Dix pour cent ("10%" a reference to the percentage agents take from clients). The...

Review score
4.1

Top Movies to Consider

#1 You Can See Everything
4.7

Choose this inventive, unsettling documentary for fearless questioning, dark humor, and unpredictable storytelling. Skip it if you want a short, straightforward exposé with definitive answers.

Pros: originality, humor

#2 Possible Love
4.7

Extraordinary performances and richly observed relationships make this a rewarding, emotionally forceful drama. Its nearly three-hour length and slow opening demand patience and undivided attention.

Pros: class commentary, character development

#3 Chronovisor
4.7

Best for a hypnotic, bookish mystery with tactile visuals and cerebral chills. Skip it if reading-heavy, attention-demanding storytelling sounds more exhausting than exciting.

Pros: Atmosphere, cinematography

Cons: audience appeal

#4 Remake
4.6

Best for an intimate, searching documentary that rewards focused attention and invites discussion. Skip it when devastating grief, addiction footage, and unresolved family tensions would be too much.

Pros: emotional impact, theme depth