1348 Ex Voto

1348 Ex Voto Review

Publisher: Dear Villagers
Released: March 12, 2026
Updated: 2 months ago
2.0
Overall review score
759
Review insights
72
Scored features
46
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose 1348 Ex Voto if atmospheric medieval scenery, strong voice performances, and a short linear adventure matter more than mechanical polish. Skip it if unreliable targeting, rough performance, repetitive combat, or an underdeveloped second-half story will outweigh those strengths.

Best for

Best for players who value atmospheric medieval settings, striking environments, strong voice performances, and a short linear campaign enough to tolerate rough mechanics.

Not for

Not for players who need responsive combat, dependable targeting, stable performance, deep exploration, or a consistently polished narrative-action experience.

Verdict

1348 Ex Voto has the visual identity and performances of a far more accomplished game: medieval Italy is frequently gorgeous, and Alby Baldwin and Jennifer English give the central relationship conviction. The problem is that the action holding the campaign together rarely matches that standard. Across the reviews, lock-on behavior, dodging, group combat, boss balance, frame-rate stability, bugs, and basic traversal repeatedly turn intended tension into friction. The story also divides critics: a few found its devotion-and-betrayal arc deeply affecting, while many thought the relationship and social themes were too thinly developed for the late twists to land. Its low price and brief runtime soften the commitment, but the consensus still points to a striking historical adventure whose strongest artistic ideas are trapped inside under-refined systems.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

72 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    3 (4%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    5 (7%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    8 (11%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    38 (53%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    18 (25%)

Pros highlights

  • 3.7
    35 reviews low consensus
    graphics quality: 3.7, 35 reviews, low consensus
    Visual quality is split between gorgeous environments and much rougher close-up character work. The scenery can be striking, but texture issues, clipping, facial problems, and performance compromises keep the package from looking consistently polished.
  • 4.5
    28 reviews strong consensus
    environmental detail: 4.5, 28 reviews, strong consensus
    The environments are the most universally praised part of the package, with detailed villages, forests, mountains, ruins, chapels, vineyards, and lighting that frequently look far beyond the game's small-team scale.
  • 4.3
    26 reviews moderate consensus
    voice acting: 4.3, 26 reviews, moderate consensus
    Voice acting is the clearest non-visual strength. Alby Baldwin and Jennifer English are repeatedly praised for giving conviction and emotional credibility to material that many reviewers otherwise find underwritten.
  • 4.4
    17 reviews strong consensus
    art direction: 4.4, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    The medieval Italian aesthetic is one of the clearest strengths, with striking lighting, countryside vistas, chapels, ruins, and period-inspired architecture giving the game a distinctive visual identity.
  • 4.0
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    atmosphere: 4.0, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    The best stretches create a convincing plague-era mood through lighting, scenery, sound, and bleak environmental cues. Technical problems and repetitive combat can puncture that atmosphere at key moments.
  • 3.9
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    soundtrack quality: 3.9, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    The orchestral score is generally well received and helps sell the somber period atmosphere, even if repetitive combat cues or mixing occasionally compete with dialogue.

Cons highlights

  • 1.9
    39 reviews low consensus
    combat system: 1.9, 39 reviews, low consensus
    Sword fighting is the central point of disagreement. A few reviewers enjoy its one-on-one parry-and-guard rhythm, but the dominant view is that shallow tactics, broken targeting, unreliable dodges, and group encounters undermine it.
  • 1.4
    35 reviews strong consensus
    polish: 1.4, 35 reviews, strong consensus
    Across launch and pre-release builds, reviewers repeatedly describe the game as underbaked or unfinished. Glitches, rough transitions, animation problems, and inconsistent systems make the lack of final refinement hard to ignore.
  • 2.1
    35 reviews low consensus
    narrative quality: 2.1, 35 reviews, low consensus
    The opening rescue premise earns interest, but the broader consensus is that the second half becomes disjointed or underdeveloped and the climax does not earn its twists. A notable minority loved the story.
  • 2.0
    29 reviews low consensus
    writing quality: 2.0, 29 reviews, low consensus
    The writing draws praise from a minority for its earnest themes and performances, but most reviewers criticize blunt exposition, thin character work, abandoned ideas, and a late twist that feels poorly earned.
  • 2.0
    27 reviews moderate consensus
    exploration quality: 2.0, 27 reviews, moderate consensus
    Exploration is limited by strongly linear spaces and sparse interaction. Hidden paths and collectibles can reward curiosity, but many reviewers wanted more freedom and more meaningful reasons to leave the main route.
  • 1.5
    26 reviews strong consensus
    controls responsiveness: 1.5, 26 reviews, strong consensus
    Input feel is a recurring problem, with delayed attacks, unreliable dodges and parries, finicky traversal prompts, and occasional moments where Aeta simply does not respond as expected.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Video Games, this product is above average in voice acting, visual effects quality, near average in environmental detail, art direction, below average in fun factor, performance optimization, sandbox freedom.

Comparison summary

72 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    2 (3%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    4 (6%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    66 (92%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
fun factor 1.5 4.3 -2.8
performance optimization 1.3 3.8 -2.5
sandbox freedom 1.5 4.2 -2.7
frame rate stability 1.3 3.7 -2.4
lore depth 1.3 4.0 -2.7
controls responsiveness 1.5 3.8 -2.3
world interactivity 1.4 3.9 -2.5
gameplay mechanics 1.5 4.1 -2.6

Consider This Instead

If you want better frame rate stability

Choose Atomfall. It scores 5.0 vs 1.3 for frame rate stability, with a 3.6 overall score.

Compare

If you want better level design

Choose Crimson Desert. It scores 5.0 vs 1.8 for level design, with a 3.5 overall score.

Compare

If you want better value for money

Choose Saros. It scores 5.0 vs 1.9 for value for money, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: combat refinement The combat is described as resembling Kingdom Come: Deliverance but with noticeably less refinement.
  • Compared: visuals and performance The reviewer uses Kingdom Come: Deliverance as another medieval action-game reference point for visuals and performance.

Hellblade

  • Better: overall feel and quality The reviewer says it resembles Hellblade superficially but falls short of it across the experience.
  • Similar: cinematic action-adventure style The reviewer frames the game as a blend that includes Hellblade's cinematic action-adventure sensibility.

A Plague Tale games

  • Similar: cinematic medieval adventure style The reviewer also compares its overall style to the A Plague Tale games.

FAQ

Is the sword combat good?

It can feel satisfying in one-on-one fights when parries and guard breaks click, but most reviewers criticize the lock-on system, dodging, group encounters, and shallow tactical depth.

How does the game perform?

Performance is a major concern in the reviewed builds. PC coverage repeatedly reports stutter and heavy frame-rate drops, while PS5 reviews note a 30 FPS cap and additional dips.

Is the story worth playing for?

The opening premise and performances win praise, but most reviewers find the second half underdeveloped or disjointed. A smaller group loved the story and its emotional turns.

How long is the campaign?

Reviewers generally finished in roughly five to ten hours, making it a compact linear adventure rather than a long RPG.

What does the game do best?

Its strongest consensus wins are the medieval Italian environments, lighting, atmosphere, and the lead voice performances by Alby Baldwin and Jennifer English.

Are there strong accessibility options?

No. Reviewers call the accessibility selection limited; some builds lack difficulty settings, and one PC review also criticizes the lack of customizable keybinds.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

xpnnetwork.com

1348 Ex Voto is one of those games that makes a stunning first impression. Its opening hours paint a plague‑stricken Tuscany with a level of...

Review score
2.6
clouddosage.com

1348 Ex Voto pairs a beautiful 14th-century setting with great voice acting, but struggles with frustrating combat and technical issues.

Review score
2.0

Top Video Games to Consider

#1 Well Dweller
4.7

Best for fluid traversal, rewarding exploration, striking art, and forgiving quality-of-life features. Skip it if you want deep combat, radical genre innovation, or consistently demanding bosses.

Pros: difficulty balance, boss design

Cons: innovation, sandbox freedom

#2 Hades II
4.6

Good if you want fast, tactical roguelite combat with huge progression depth, striking art, and standout music. Skip it if repetition, resource micromanagement, or a less emotionally satisfying sequel story...

Pros: combat system, progression system

Cons: originality

#3 Valheim
4.5

Good if you want a beautiful, demanding survival sandbox built around exploration, building, progression, and memorable co-op. Skip it if long resource runs, harsh death recovery, and deliberate pacing sound...

Pros: town-building system, exploration quality

Cons: grind level, fast travel convenience

#4 Donkey Kong Bananza
4.5

Best for joyful destruction, dense exploration, and a charming DK-Pauline adventure. Skip it if camera quirks, frame-rate dips, easy bosses, or premium Switch 2 pricing are dealbreakers.

Pros: fun factor, world interactivity

Cons: frame rate stability, boss design