10 Things I Hate About You Movie Review

Released: March 31, 1999
Updated: 10 hours ago
4.1
Overall review score
356
Review insights
62
Scored features
22
Expert reviews
Content guidance
Scorata recommended age 14+

Crude sexual dialogue, a flashing incident, strong language, teenage drinking, and marijuana references make this better suited to older teens. There are also comic fights and discussions of sexual pressure and regret.

Official rating PG-13

Bottom Line

Choose it for witty teen romance, charismatic performances, and a memorable soundtrack. Skip it if crude sexual humor, a familiar paid-date plot, or a quickly forgiven deception would spoil the charm.

Fans of witty teen romantic comedies and coming-of-age stories, especially those drawn to independent characters and a nostalgic comfort watch. Bookish viewers may also enjoy the playful Shakespeare connections.

Families seeking restrained sexual humor and language, or adults who have little patience for adolescent romance. Serious Shakespeare enthusiasts may find the adaptation too loose.

Verdict

10 Things I Hate About You earns its enduring appeal through the people inside its familiar plot. Stiles and Ledger turn verbal sparring into a convincing attraction, while an eccentric supporting cast supplies some of the funniest moments. The soundtrack and energetic school setting give it a vivid late-1990s personality, and Kat's poem can still deliver an emotional jolt. Its modernization of Shakespeare often wins praise for allowing growth without demanding that the heroine abandon her identity. The limitations are just as recognizable: a predictable deception, an uneven secondary romance, some dated sexual jokes, and forgiveness that can arrive too easily. Most assessments find the performances and wit strong enough to carry those weaknesses, although nostalgic revisits do not work equally well for everyone.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

62 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    20 (32%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    26 (42%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    11 (18%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (6%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.3
    18 reviews moderate consensus
    entertainment value: 4.3, 18 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most find an engaging, funny, and easy-to-watch romance carried by its cast. More reserved reactions describe a pleasant but ordinary experience constrained by formula.
  • 4.3
    18 reviews strong consensus
    humor: 4.3, 18 reviews, strong consensus
    Witty exchanges, eccentric adults, and goofy physical gags sustain much of the appeal. Some crude jokes have aged poorly or feel more foolish than funny.
  • 4.1
    15 reviews moderate consensus
    romance quality: 4.1, 15 reviews, moderate consensus
    Kat and Patrick's sparring, vulnerability, and mutual recognition give the central romance its appeal. The secondary couple is less compelling for some, while others want a more earned reconciliation and more time together.
  • 4.8
    14 reviews strong consensus
    lead performance: 4.8, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Ledger's easy charm and Stiles's prickly vulnerability anchor the film. Her emotional poem reading is a particular standout, although some find the early characterization stiff.
  • 3.8
    14 reviews low consensus
    character development: 3.8, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Many appreciate characters growing beyond their stereotypes without losing their identities. Others want more backstory or find Bianca's consequences and Kat's quick forgiveness insufficiently earned.
  • 4.6
    13 reviews strong consensus
    acting performance: 4.6, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    A charismatic, expressive cast repeatedly elevates the familiar material. Even less enthusiastic assessments often find the performers likable and capable.

Cons highlights

  • 3.4
    11 reviews low consensus
    realism: 3.4, 11 reviews, low consensus
    Many find authentic adolescent feelings underneath the broad school stereotypes. Others object to artificial characterization, idealized settings, or Cameron's entitled romantic behavior.
  • 2.5
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    originality: 2.5, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    The paid-date plot and predictable reconciliation are persistent weaknesses. More positive responses appreciate how the characters complicate familiar stereotypes.
  • 2.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Consent and relationship ethics: 2.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Patrick's refusal to kiss a drunken Kat is appreciated. The paid deception, Cameron's sense of entitlement, and the ease of forgiveness prompt recurring discomfort.
  • 2.6
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    sexual content level: 2.6, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Sexual jokes can work as clever verbal sparring, but the teacher-flashing gag is repeatedly uncomfortable or dated. A family-focused assessment finds the overall sexual attitude objectionable.
  • 3.3
    4 reviews low consensus
    pacing: 3.3, 4 reviews, low consensus
    The brisk, lively rhythm usually keeps the film moving comfortably. The party and paintball sequences can drag, and one viewer wants the mutual romance to begin sooner.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    cultural representation: 3.3, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    The teacher's challenge to Kat's privileged perspective is often welcomed as unusually self-aware. Limited racial inclusion and potentially insensitive jokes temper that praise.

Use Cases

Best for

  • 4.4
    9 reviews low consensus
    Returning fan viewing: 4.4, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Fans often rediscover the chemistry, jokes, and emotional poem with pleasure. Some returns reveal weaker character development or less satisfying romantic payoffs than memory promised.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews low consensus
    Teen romantic comedy viewing: 4.4, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Witty sparring, charismatic leads, and a well-integrated romantic scheme make it a strong genre choice. The predictable setup and occasional weak subplot temper the enthusiasm.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Teen viewing: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Many value its relatable school emotions, intelligent dialogue, and independent heroine for teenage audiences. Others find the material objectionable or question how well its 1990s sensibility will connect today.

Not ideal for

  • Family viewing
    1.0
    1 review
    Family viewing: 1.0, 1 review
    The sexual references, language, and substance-related material make it a poor fit for families seeking restrained teen entertainment.
  • Parent-of-teen viewing
    1.5
    1 review
    Parent-of-teen viewing: 1.5, 1 review
    A family-focused assessment advises parents against treating it as essential teenage viewing because of its sexual and behavioral content.

Cast & Creators

  • Patrick Verona
    4.6
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    Heath Ledger: 4.6, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Ledger brings easy charisma and surprising tenderness to Patrick, helping carry the romance. His serenade is a signature highlight for many, although one response finds the singing sequence awkward.
  • Kat Stratford
    4.6
    14 reviews strong consensus
    Julia Stiles: 4.6, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Stiles makes Kat's defiance, vulnerability, and emotional poem memorable. Her chemistry with Ledger earns repeated praise, with occasional reservations about stiffness or the character's romantic transformation.
  • Michael
    4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    David Krumholtz: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Krumholtz turns the geeky friend into an energetic scene-stealer. His comic charm and memorable line delivery can eclipse the nominal romantic lead.
  • Miss perky
    4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Allison Janney: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Janney's curt, eccentric counselor makes a strong impression in limited screen time, adding particularly enjoyable adult comedy.
  • Director
    4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Gil Junger: 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Junger's direction is praised for youthful energy, lively banter, and inventive staging. His handling of actors helps turn a familiar setup into engaging entertainment.
  • Writer
    4.3
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    Karen McCullah: 4.3, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    McCullah's screenplay work earns praise for sharp dialogue, lively characters, and revised gender archetypes. A dissenting response finds the adaptation's Shakespearean demands strained.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Movies, this product is above average in plot clarity, writing quality, joke originality, near average in faithfulness to source material, nostalgia appeal, below average in sound design, family friendliness, Drug and alcohol portrayal.

Comparison summary

56 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    33 (59%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    15 (27%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    8 (14%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
plot clarity 5.0 2.8 +2.2
sound design 2.0 4.0 -2.0
writing quality 4.6 2.9 +1.7
joke originality 4.0 2.2 +1.8
runtime 4.5 2.8 +1.7
dialogue quality 4.5 3.0 +1.5
editing quality 5.0 3.4 +1.6
family friendliness 1.0 2.5 -1.5

Consider This Instead

If you want better Drug and alcohol portrayal

Choose Dear You. It scores 4.5 vs 2.0 for Drug and alcohol portrayal, with a 4.5 overall score.

Compare

If you want better romance quality

Choose Fjord. It scores 4.8 vs 4.1 for romance quality, with a 3.8 overall score.

Compare

If you want better sound design

Choose The Social Network. It scores 4.5 vs 2.0 for sound design, with a 4.5 overall score.

Compare

If you want better realism

Choose Golden Arm. It scores 5.0 vs 3.4 for realism, with a 4.1 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

She’s All That

  • Better: romantic pairing The lead pairing is still great but falls a little short of the lovers in She’s All That.
  • Similar: recycled romantic plot Both use a concealed romantic scheme that turns into real affection and then unravels.

Clueless

  • Similar: high school setting The school-clique introduction recalls the familiar social setting of Clueless.

Robots

  • Similar: closing musical sequence Both films use a musical sequence at the end.

FAQ

Is it more than a typical teen romance?

Many assessments praise characters who grow beyond school stereotypes without losing their identities. The paid-date premise and romantic resolution remain familiar.

What stands out most?

Stiles and Ledger's chemistry, sharp banter, colorful supporting performances, and period soundtrack are recurring highlights.

Does it work for Shakespeare fans?

The modern setting and literary references often make the story accessible and engaging. Those seeking a substantial or faithful treatment of the original play may be less satisfied.

Does it hold up on a rewatch?

Many find new jokes and a deeper emotional connection to the poem. Others become more aware of the dated gags and quick forgiveness.

Is it suitable for younger children?

It is better suited to older teens because of crude sexual material, language, teenage drinking, and marijuana references. The supplied U.S. rating is PG-13.

What are the main drawbacks?

The predictable deception, less compelling secondary romance, and rushed reconciliation are recurring reservations. The teacher-flashing gag also draws criticism.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

thelowell.org

On the surface, 10 Things I Hate About You may seem like another cliche, Disney-style romantic comedy, but it’s much more than that. This...

Review score
4.7

Top Movies to Consider

#1 You Can See Everything
4.7

Choose this inventive, unsettling documentary for fearless questioning, dark humor, and unpredictable storytelling. Skip it if you want a short, straightforward exposé with definitive answers.

Pros: originality, humor

#2 Chronovisor
4.7

Best for a hypnotic, bookish mystery with tactile visuals and cerebral chills. Skip it if reading-heavy, attention-demanding storytelling sounds more exhausting than exciting.

Pros: Atmosphere, cinematography

Cons: audience appeal

#3 Remake
4.6

Best for an intimate, searching documentary that rewards focused attention and invites discussion. Skip it when devastating grief, addiction footage, and unresolved family tensions would be too much.

Pros: emotional impact, theme depth

#4 Halloween
4.6

Best for patient suspense, an unforgettable score, and an unsettling masked killer. Skip it for very young children or if you want to avoid intense scares; its restrained kills also...

Pros: directing quality, score quality

Cons: message quality