10 Things I Hate About You

10 Things I Hate About You Feature Scores

Explore all 62 feature scores for 10 Things I Hate About You, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

62 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    20 (32%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    26 (42%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    11 (18%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (6%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.8
    14 reviews strong consensus
    lead performance: 4.8, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Ledger's easy charm and Stiles's prickly vulnerability anchor the film. Her emotional poem reading is a particular standout, although some find the early characterization stiff.
  • 4.8
    10 reviews strong consensus
    cast chemistry: 4.8, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    The playful friction and tenderness between Stiles and Ledger make their pairing convincing. One comparison still prefers the romantic leads in She's All That.
  • 4.6
    13 reviews strong consensus
    acting performance: 4.6, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    A charismatic, expressive cast repeatedly elevates the familiar material. Even less enthusiastic assessments often find the performers likable and capable.
  • 4.6
    13 reviews strong consensus
    writing quality: 4.6, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Clever dialogue, distinct characters, and interlocking schemes are recurring strengths. The familiar premise and occasionally strained Shakespearean framework remain the principal writing objections.
  • 4.7
    10 reviews strong consensus
    genre satisfaction: 4.7, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    The film is frequently ranked among the strongest teen romantic comedies. Less enthusiastic responses see an enjoyable but conventional example of the genre.
  • 4.7
    9 reviews strong consensus
    supporting cast performance: 4.7, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Krumholtz's energetic geek, Janney's curt counselor, and the colorful teachers and father keep the supporting scenes lively. Several assessments treat these smaller performances as major highlights.
  • 4.6
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    emotional impact: 4.6, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    Kat's poem and the central romance can be unexpectedly moving, even on repeat viewings. Some instead find the big declarations overly sentimental.
  • 4.3
    18 reviews moderate consensus
    entertainment value: 4.3, 18 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most find an engaging, funny, and easy-to-watch romance carried by its cast. More reserved reactions describe a pleasant but ordinary experience constrained by formula.
  • 4.6
    10 reviews strong consensus
    message quality: 4.6, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    The film's strongest messages favor individuality, resistance to peer pressure, and love that allows people to remain themselves. Kat's independence and the humanity behind stereotypes give the comedy substance.
  • 4.3
    18 reviews strong consensus
    humor: 4.3, 18 reviews, strong consensus
    Witty exchanges, eccentric adults, and goofy physical gags sustain much of the appeal. Some crude jokes have aged poorly or feel more foolish than funny.
  • 4.4
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    rewatch value: 4.4, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    Repeat viewings often uncover more jokes and deepen appreciation for the poem and performances. Some revisits disappoint when nostalgia meets the conventional plotting and adolescent perspective.
  • 4.5
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    Poetry presentation: 4.5, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Kat's closing poem is often the film's emotional peak, with feelings that can resonate more deeply over time. A minority find the confession excessive rather than moving.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    nostalgia appeal: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The songs, fashions, and heightened school setting vividly recall late-1990s adolescence. For some, revisiting the romance recreates the feeling of being young rather than simply recognizing period details.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.4, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    The cheerful, inventive song choices reinforce the period atmosphere and characters' emotions. Viewers who dislike the pop selection may find it tiresome.
  • 4.5
    7 reviews strong consensus
    dialogue quality: 4.5, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Sharp banter and highly quotable exchanges are central pleasures. Literary references and comic put-downs generally feel lively rather than ponderous.
  • 4.2
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    character appeal: 4.2, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Kat's sharp tongue and independence, along with Michael's comic energy, give the cast lasting appeal. A few responses find the exaggerated rebellion or Cameron's entitlement harder to warm to.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews low consensus
    live performance sequences: 4.4, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Ledger's marching-band serenade is widely treated as a swoon-worthy signature scene. A sharp dissent finds it cringeworthy and distracted by apparent lip-sync problems.
  • 4.1
    15 reviews moderate consensus
    romance quality: 4.1, 15 reviews, moderate consensus
    Kat and Patrick's sparring, vulnerability, and mutual recognition give the central romance its appeal. The secondary couple is less compelling for some, while others want a more earned reconciliation and more time together.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews strong consensus
    theme depth: 4.4, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Identity, vulnerability, gender expectations, and the limits of stereotypes give the romance more substance than its lightweight premise suggests.
  • 4.0
    12 reviews low consensus
    Portrayal of women: 4.0, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Kat's independence and the refusal to simply erase her personality are widely appreciated. Her romantic softening, the hurried forgiveness, and Bianca's role in humiliating her sister remain points of disagreement.
  • 4.0
    13 reviews low consensus
    faithfulness to source material: 4.0, 13 reviews, low consensus
    The contemporary setting and revised gender politics often make Shakespeare feel accessible and emotionally immediate. Opinion differs on whether the loose adaptation is clever, strained, or too superficial for serious devotees.
  • 4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    casting quality: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The youthful, relatively unfamiliar cast feels particularly well chosen. The leads' chemistry and the actors' closeness help the school relationships come alive.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Cultural impact: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The serenade and rooftop band performance remain recognizable signature moments. The film's enduring cult following is tied to its emotional and comic appeal.
  • 3.8
    14 reviews low consensus
    character development: 3.8, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Many appreciate characters growing beyond their stereotypes without losing their identities. Others want more backstory or find Bianca's consequences and Kat's quick forgiveness insufficiently earned.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews low consensus
    visual style: 4.2, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Bright settings and energetic camera movement give the school a buoyant personality. The film's visual ambition divides opinion, with one appraisal finding the craftsmanship routine.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    runtime: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The compact running time makes the film an easy commitment and helps its light entertainment go down smoothly.
  • 4.1
    5 reviews low consensus
    directing quality: 4.1, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Junger's energetic blocking and handling of the actors often earn praise. A dissenting assessment finds the direction slack despite the cast's charm.
  • 3.8
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    Family relationships: 3.8, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    The sisters' growing understanding and their father's underlying affection provide warmth beneath the jokes. Bianca's involvement in the deception and overly restrictive parenting draw criticism.
  • 4.2
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    cinematography: 4.2, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Moving long takes, inventive angles, and revealing tracking shots earn strong praise. Another assessment finds the clean photography competent but visually unremarkable.
  • 3.7
    9 reviews low consensus
    story quality: 3.7, 9 reviews, low consensus
    The familiar plot works best when its interconnected schemes support lively character moments. Critics of the story find it flimsy, tired, or too eager to contain emotional complexity in a conventional happy ending.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    world-building: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Small background details and distinctive peripheral characters make the school feel like a social world extending beyond the main romance.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    audience appeal: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The film is expected to connect strongly with its teenage target audience, and one later response finds it still accessible rather than dated.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    film framing: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Dynamic reframing within long takes adds energy and reveals background activity. The frequent close-ups receive a more qualified endorsement.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    physical comedy: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The arrow mishap, face-drawing gag, and Bianca's retaliatory punch provide memorable comic payoffs.
  • 3.7
    5 reviews low consensus
    fatherhood portrayal: 3.7, 5 reviews, low consensus
    The overprotective father is often funny, affectionate, and increasingly relatable to older viewers. His extreme restrictions and caricatured paranoia also attract criticism.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Atmosphere: 5.0, 1 review
    The supporting characters and student cliques create an especially convincing high school atmosphere.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    editing quality: 5.0, 1 review
    Cuts are praised for maximizing emotional effect while letting elegantly staged scenes breathe.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    plot clarity: 5.0, 1 review
    The intersecting schemes and relationships fit together logically without feeling tacked on.
  • 3.6
    5 reviews low consensus
    ending satisfaction: 3.6, 5 reviews, low consensus
    The poem and happy resolution satisfy several viewers. Others think Kat forgives the deception too quickly or Bianca escapes meaningful consequences.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    creative collaboration: 4.5, 1 review
    The cast's close offscreen rapport is credited with making the film's relationships feel less manufactured.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    friendship portrayal: 4.5, 1 review
    Mandella supports Kat while retaining her own wish to enjoy ordinary school milestones, giving their friendship room for different personalities.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    accent authenticity: 4.0, 1 review
    Ledger's distinctly Australian delivery adds an amusing flavor to his dialogue.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    comic timing: 4.0, 1 review
    Memorable lines benefit from funny delivery, including Michael's discovery of the drawing on his face.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    dance choreography: 4.0, 1 review
    Stiles's dancing is favorably compared with her work in Save the Last Dance.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    joke originality: 4.0, 1 review
    The White Rastas clique is singled out as a funny and original twist on period fashion and school stereotypes.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    title appeal: 4.0, 1 review
    The connection between the title and Kat's final list of grievances earns an appreciative recognition of its cleverness.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.0
    1 review
    family friendliness: 1.0, 1 review
    A family-focused assessment rejects the combination of sexual material, language, substance use, and disrespectful adult portrayals.
  • 2.5
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    originality: 2.5, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    The paid-date plot and predictable reconciliation are persistent weaknesses. More positive responses appreciate how the characters complicate familiar stereotypes.
  • 2.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Consent and relationship ethics: 2.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Patrick's refusal to kiss a drunken Kat is appreciated. The paid deception, Cameron's sense of entitlement, and the ease of forgiveness prompt recurring discomfort.
  • 2.6
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    sexual content level: 2.6, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Sexual jokes can work as clever verbal sparring, but the teacher-flashing gag is repeatedly uncomfortable or dated. A family-focused assessment finds the overall sexual attitude objectionable.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Drug and alcohol portrayal: 2.0, 1 review
    The handling of drinking and drugs contributes to a negative assessment of the film's values and suitability for families.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Hairstyling: 2.0, 1 review
    The elaborate prom bun feels distinctly dated and earns an explicit thumbs-down.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    language level: 2.0, 1 review
    One family-focused assessment treats the foul language as part of the film's objectionable approach to teenage behavior.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    sound design: 2.0, 1 review
    One appraisal admires how audio editing helps convey emotion. Another finds repeated mismatches between singing and lip movements distracting.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    character screen time: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Some want more time with the central couple once their romance becomes mutual. Janney's brief counselor appearances also leave a desire for additional scenes.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    Location authenticity: 2.5, 1 review
    The unusually sunny, bright-blue depiction of Seattle strikes one viewer as an idealized and unconvincing version of the city.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    ensemble balance: 3.0, 1 review
    Krumholtz can dominate shared scenes so thoroughly that Gordon-Levitt fades beside him. That imbalance makes the supporting friend especially memorable.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    lighting quality: 3.0, 1 review
    The lighting is clean and functional, though it contributes little that feels especially inspired or memorable.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    value for money: 3.0, 1 review
    The musical and teacher scenes nearly justify admission on their own, though weaker stretches prevent an unqualified value recommendation.
  • 3.3
    4 reviews low consensus
    pacing: 3.3, 4 reviews, low consensus
    The brisk, lively rhythm usually keeps the film moving comfortably. The party and paintball sequences can drag, and one viewer wants the mutual romance to begin sooner.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    cultural representation: 3.3, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    The teacher's challenge to Kat's privileged perspective is often welcomed as unusually self-aware. Limited racial inclusion and potentially insensitive jokes temper that praise.
  • 3.4
    11 reviews low consensus
    realism: 3.4, 11 reviews, low consensus
    Many find authentic adolescent feelings underneath the broad school stereotypes. Others object to artificial characterization, idealized settings, or Cameron's entitled romantic behavior.

Use Cases

Best for

Sort
  • 4.4
    9 reviews low consensus
    Returning fan viewing: 4.4, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Fans often rediscover the chemistry, jokes, and emotional poem with pleasure. Some returns reveal weaker character development or less satisfying romantic payoffs than memory promised.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews low consensus
    Teen romantic comedy viewing: 4.4, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Witty sparring, charismatic leads, and a well-integrated romantic scheme make it a strong genre choice. The predictable setup and occasional weak subplot temper the enthusiasm.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Teen viewing: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Many value its relatable school emotions, intelligent dialogue, and independent heroine for teenage audiences. Others find the material objectionable or question how well its 1990s sensibility will connect today.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Coming-of-age viewing: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The school romance explores vulnerability and growing beyond stereotypes while trying to preserve a sense of self. Those emotional changes give it particular value as a coming-of-age story.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews low consensus
    Bibliophile viewing: 4.2, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Literary references and the accessible Shakespeare adaptation make it appealing to bookish viewers. Serious devotees seeking a substantial treatment of the original play may be disappointed.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Newcomer viewing: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    First-time viewers who enjoy teen comedies receive clear recommendations, with the cast and period charm providing the main attractions.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Comfort viewing: 5.0, 1 review
    Its familiar characters, witty exchanges, and uplifting romance make it a cherished comfort watch.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Craftsmanship enthusiasts: 5.0, 1 review
    Energetic blocking, moving long takes, and purposeful editing reward attention to how cinematic technique shapes emotion.

Conditional or not ideal for

Sort
  • Family viewing
    1.0
    1 review
    Family viewing: 1.0, 1 review
    The sexual references, language, and substance-related material make it a poor fit for families seeking restrained teen entertainment.
  • Parent-of-teen viewing
    1.5
    1 review
    Parent-of-teen viewing: 1.5, 1 review
    A family-focused assessment advises parents against treating it as essential teenage viewing because of its sexual and behavioral content.
  • Emotion-sensitive viewing
    2.0
    1 review
    Emotion-sensitive viewing: 2.0, 1 review
    The affectionate Ledger scenes can feel overwhelming when already tearful, making this a less comfortable choice in that mood.
  • Music lover viewing
    2.5
    1 review
    Music lover viewing: 2.5, 1 review
    Suitability depends strongly on taste for the pop soundtrack; viewers who dislike that musical style may find it exhausting.
  • Adult viewing
    2.8
    3 reviews low consensus
    Adult viewing: 2.8, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Adults who connect with the characters' vulnerability can find lasting resonance. Others feel the very adolescent romance has lost its appeal as they have grown older.

Cast & Creators

  • Patrick Verona
    4.6
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    Heath Ledger: 4.6, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Ledger brings easy charisma and surprising tenderness to Patrick, helping carry the romance. His serenade is a signature highlight for many, although one response finds the singing sequence awkward.
  • Kat Stratford
    4.6
    14 reviews strong consensus
    Julia Stiles: 4.6, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Stiles makes Kat's defiance, vulnerability, and emotional poem memorable. Her chemistry with Ledger earns repeated praise, with occasional reservations about stiffness or the character's romantic transformation.
  • Michael
    4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    David Krumholtz: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Krumholtz turns the geeky friend into an energetic scene-stealer. His comic charm and memorable line delivery can eclipse the nominal romantic lead.
  • Miss perky
    4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Allison Janney: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Janney's curt, eccentric counselor makes a strong impression in limited screen time, adding particularly enjoyable adult comedy.
  • Director
    4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Gil Junger: 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Junger's direction is praised for youthful energy, lively banter, and inventive staging. His handling of actors helps turn a familiar setup into engaging entertainment.
  • Writer
    4.3
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    Karen McCullah: 4.3, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    McCullah's screenplay work earns praise for sharp dialogue, lively characters, and revised gender archetypes. A dissenting response finds the adaptation's Shakespearean demands strained.
  • Writer
    4.3
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    Kirsten Smith: 4.3, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Smith's writing helps give the characters wit, emotional specificity, and room to resist stereotypes. Some find the attempt to fit Shakespeare into the school setting awkward.
  • Cameron James
    4.0
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    Joseph Gordon-Levitt: 4.0, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Gordon-Levitt's sincere, awkward Cameron is frequently charming. Some find him overshadowed by his scene partners or too familiar in this type of role.
  • Actor
    4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Larry Miller: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Miller's overprotective father supplies hysterical rules and contributes to an unforgettable supporting ensemble.
  • Joey Donner
    4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Andrew Keegan: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Keegan's supporting work is praised as memorable, with the face-drawing gag retaining a particularly long comic afterlife.
  • Actor
    4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Daryl Mitchell: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Mitchell contributes memorable teacher comedy, including an appreciated rap-style Shakespeare delivery.
  • Casting Director
    5.0
    1 review
    Donna Morong: 5.0, 1 review
    Morong's contribution to the youthful casting is part of a selection praised as groundbreaking.
  • Casting Director
    5.0
    1 review
    Gail Goldberg: 5.0, 1 review
    Goldberg shares credit for the fresh-faced casting praised as a groundbreaking choice for the film.
  • Bianca Stratford
    5.0
    1 review
    Larisa Oleynik: 5.0, 1 review
    Oleynik's portrayal of the popular Bianca is praised as exceptionally effective.
  • Casting Director
    5.0
    1 review
    Marcia Ross: 5.0, 1 review
    Ross shares in the praise for choosing a fresh-faced cast that proved exceptionally effective.
  • Cinematographer
    4.5
    1 review
    Mark Irwin: 4.5, 1 review
    Irwin's cinematography contributes inventive angles and moving shots that give the school setting visual interest.