Blood oxygen readings were limited in coverage but strongly positive where tested against reference readings.
Pros: blood oxygen tracking, step counting accuracy
Cons: LTE connectivity, calorie tracking usefulness
Best 2025 Wearable Tech for blood oxygen tracking
Narrow by product type
Showing Wearable Tech only. Switch back to all Smartwatches anytime.
Release year
Blood oxygen readings were viewed positively where tested, with one reviewer reporting very small deviations and another calling results accurate enough.
Pros: pairing reliability, value for money
Cons: stress tracking, onboard music storage
Blood oxygen tracking received limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer saying it matched a comparison watch’s 96 percent reading impressively.
Pros: workout tracking variety, calorie tracking usefulness
Cons: LTE connectivity, ECG functionality
Blood oxygen evidence was limited but positive, tied to a redesigned sensor that improved stability during demanding outdoor use.
Pros: operating system experience, materials quality
Cons: contactless payments, onboard music storage
Blood oxygen tracking is treated as a welcome restored capability that makes the watch feel more complete as a health device.
Pros: ECG functionality, app ecosystem
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, recovery insights
Blood oxygen readings were limited in the review evidence but positive where compared directly, with one user finding pulse-ox results very close to a finger oximeter.
Pros: workout tracking variety, user interface
Cons: Wi-Fi connectivity, onboard music storage
Blood oxygen tracking drew limited but mostly positive evidence, with one reviewer matching an oximeter while another found it weaker during sleep.
Pros: third-party app support, heart rate accuracy
Cons: music controls, cross-platform compatibility
Blood oxygen tracking received limited but positive evidence as part of the BioTracker suite, which one reviewer said handled health vitals admirably.
Pros: Bluetooth connectivity, calorie tracking usefulness
Cons: ECG functionality, flashlight usefulness
Blood oxygen readings received limited direct evaluation, but TechAdvisor found the data aligned well with other devices.
Pros: value for money, battery life
Cons: contactless payments, stress tracking
PulseOx-related evidence centered on improved practicality, with one reviewer finding breathing-variation tracking no longer caused a notable overnight battery penalty.
Pros: stress tracking, customization options
Cons: menu navigation, companion app quality
Blood oxygen tracking appears as part of the watch's broader accurate health-monitoring package, but reviewers did not deeply test it as a standalone feature.
Pros: software smoothness, comfort
Cons: LTE connectivity, voice assistant quality
Blood oxygen tracking was treated as part of a basic health suite that appeared to work well in daily use.
Pros: software smoothness, menu navigation
Cons: contactless payments, stress tracking
Blood oxygen tracking was mentioned as an advanced capability, but reviewers provided little quality-focused testing beyond noting the sensor support.
Pros: comfort, value for money
Cons: contactless payments, Wi-Fi connectivity
Blood oxygen tracking was viewed as adequate but not cutting edge because reviewers noted the older Gen 4 sensor platform rather than Garmin’s newest hardware.
Pros: touchscreen responsiveness, health tracking accuracy
Cons: call handling, voice assistant quality
Blood oxygen tracking was consistently treated as a missing premium health feature, with reviewers noting it remains reserved for higher-end Apple Watches.
Pros: app ecosystem, operating system experience
Cons: cross-platform compatibility, ECG functionality
Blood oxygen tracking drew a clear caveat, with one reviewer repeatedly seeing lower SPO2 results than expected from other sensors.
Pros: LTE connectivity, pairing reliability
Cons: antioxidant index, blood oxygen tracking