Beats 360 Review

Brand: Beats
Released: September 22, 2026
Updated: 7 minutes ago
4.1
Overall review score
870
Review insights
92
Scored features
42
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose these for gym-ready over-ear comfort, strong ANC, long battery life and swappable cushions across iOS and Android. Skip them if wired listening, automatic pause, compact travel or fully adjustable EQ matters most.

Best for

Active listeners who want one premium over-ear pair for workouts, commuting and daily use, especially households that mix iPhone and Android devices.

Not for

Frequent flyers, console users and audio purists who need wired or lossless playback, automatic pause, compact folding or full manual EQ control.

Verdict

The Beats 360 stands out by making premium over-ear headphones genuinely practical for workouts. IPX4 protection, breathable and replaceable cushions, strong ANC, roughly 32-hour battery life, and excellent cross-platform support give it unusual day-to-day versatility. Comfort and build quality are widely praised, and most listening finds the sound cleaner and more balanced than older Beats, though bass and treble opinions vary and one test strongly disliked the tuning. The tradeoff is a surprisingly incomplete premium feature set: there is no 3.5mm or dependable USB-C audio path, no wear-detection auto-pause, and no manual EQ. That makes the 360 especially compelling for active wireless users, but less flexible for frequent flyers, console users and listeners who want wired lossless playback.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

92 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    38 (41%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    25 (27%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    7 (8%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    15 (16%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    7 (8%)

Pros

  • 5.0
    32 reviews strong consensus
    Water/sweat resistance rating: 5.0, 32 reviews, strong consensus
    IPX4 sweat and water resistance is a defining strength, making the 360 unusually suitable for workouts and light rain among premium over-ear headphones.
  • 4.9
    35 reviews strong consensus
    Replaceable pads/headband: 4.9, 35 reviews, strong consensus
    The modular cushion and headband system is the signature feature: parts swap quickly, support workout-to-office use and make both style changes and wear replacement unusually easy.
  • 5.0
    21 reviews strong consensus
    Ecosystem integration: 5.0, 21 reviews, strong consensus
    Ecosystem integration is a major strength: iPhone users get AirPods-like pairing and switching, while Android still receives Fast Pair, Find Hub and useful native controls.
  • 4.7
    30 reviews strong consensus
    Comfort during long use: 4.7, 30 reviews, strong consensus
    Long-session comfort is one of the strongest themes, helped by soft cushions, good weight distribution and a lighter-feeling headband. Larger heads may still notice clamp pressure.
  • 4.9
    17 reviews strong consensus
    Multi-platform compatibility: 4.9, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    Cross-platform compatibility is one of the 360’s best practical advantages, delivering a near-first-class experience on both iOS and Android.
  • 4.8
    22 reviews strong consensus
    Design and Aesthetics: 4.8, 22 reviews, strong consensus
    The redesign is widely praised as modern, sleek and distinctly customizable, with swappable colors giving the 360 more personality than most premium ANC headphones.

Cons

  • 1.3
    19 reviews strong consensus
    3.5mm analog input availability: 1.3, 19 reviews, strong consensus
    The lack of a 3.5mm analog path is a major recurring complaint, especially for airplane entertainment, consoles and battery-independent playback.
  • 1.4
    15 reviews strong consensus
    Auto-play/wear detection: 1.4, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Wear detection is one of the clearest weaknesses. The 360 does not sense when it is put on or removed, an omission repeatedly criticized at $350.
  • 1.5
    13 reviews strong consensus
    Wear detection auto-pause: 1.5, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Automatic pause is absent, so music keeps playing when the headphones come off unless the user stops it manually.
  • 1.1
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Built-in DAC and hi-res playback: 1.1, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Hi-res and lossless playback are major limitations: there is no wired lossless path and no high-resolution Bluetooth codec support.
  • 1.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    USB-C: 1.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    USB-C is primarily a charging connection rather than a dependable wired-audio option, a recurring frustration for travelers and lossless-audio users.
  • 2.0
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    Auto on/off reliability: 2.0, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Automatic power management is weak because the headphones do not reliably sleep when removed, creating avoidable battery-drain risk if left on.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Water/sweat resistance rating, Dolby Atmos with head tracking, Replaceable pads/headband, near average in Microphone quality for calls, Overall recommendation, below average in Detachable cable convenience, Built-in DAC and hi-res playback, 3.5mm analog input availability.

Comparison summary

90 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    36 (40%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    26 (29%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    28 (31%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Water/sweat resistance rating 5.0 2.3 +2.7
Detachable cable convenience 1.0 4.0 -3.0
Built-in DAC and hi-res playback 1.1 3.9 -2.8
3.5mm analog input availability 1.3 3.7 -2.5
Connectivity options 2.0 4.4 -2.4
USB-C 1.7 4.0 -2.3
Smart Pause performance 1.0 3.3 -2.3
Gaming performance 2.0 4.3 -2.3

Consider This Instead

If you want better 3.5mm analog input availability

Choose Nothing Headphone (a). It scores 5.0 vs 1.3 for 3.5mm analog input availability, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Value for money

Choose CMF Headphone Pro. It scores 4.8 vs 4.3 for Value for money, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Travel friendliness

Choose Marshall Milton A.N.C.. It scores 4.8 vs 2.9 for Travel friendliness, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

studio pros

  • Worse: sound quality The Beats 360 are judged cleaner and better defined than the studio pros.
  • Worse: comfort The new cushions are judged deeper, wider and more comfortable than the Studio Pros.
  • Worse: sound quality The Beats 360 were judged cleaner with clearer bass than the Studio Pros.

AirPods Max 2

  • Better: overall performance outside workouts Outside workouts, the reviewer considers AirPods Max 2 the stronger overall option.
  • Worse: comfort and bulk The Beats 360 are judged more comfortable and less bulky than AirPods Max 2.

FAQ

Are the Beats 360 good for workouts?

Yes. IPX4 sweat resistance, breathable Performance Knit cushions and a generally secure fit make workouts a core strength, though very explosive movement and long sessions can still cause shifting or heat.

How do the Beats 360 sound?

Most testing finds them clean, energetic and more balanced than older Beats headphones, with strong detail and a wide stage. Bass strength is more divisive and can change with cushion choice and Spatial Audio.

Can the Beats 360 play audio over a cable?

The supplied coverage overwhelmingly reports Bluetooth-only listening: there is no 3.5mm input, and USB-C is used for charging rather than a dependable wired-audio path.

Do the Beats 360 have automatic pause when removed?

No. They lack wear detection, so playback does not automatically pause when you take them off and they may remain powered on until you intervene.

Do the Beats 360 work well with Android?

Yes. Android support includes Fast Pair, Find Hub, Audio Switch and the Beats app, making the experience unusually complete for an Apple-owned headphone.

How long does the battery last?

The main figure is about 32 hours with ANC, and multiple real-world tests found endurance strong. Fast Fuel adds roughly one hour from five minutes of charging, while Transparency mode can reduce runtime.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider

#1 Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.5

Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...

Pros: Volume output, Carry case quality

Cons: Connectivity options, Noise isolation (passive)

#2 Jabra Evolve3 85
4.5

Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...

Pros: Frequency response accuracy, Clamping force comfort

Cons: Volume output, aptX

#3 Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
4.5

Choose the Aventho 100 for standout battery life, portable retro styling, strong ANC, and flexible wired/wireless use. Skip it if you dislike on-ear pressure or want a wide, consistently neutral...

Pros: Codec support, aptX

Cons: Wear detection auto-pause, Wind noise handling

#4 Tribit QuietPlus 81
4.4

Best for exceptional battery life, useful ANC, flexible EQ, and strong budget value. Skip it if refined, detailed sound or polished controls matter more than price.

Pros: Maximum volume clarity, Microphone quality for calls

Cons: Idle static noise, Instrument separation