Nothing Headphone (a)

Nothing Headphone (a) Review

Brand: Nothing
Released: March 5, 2026
Updated: 2 months ago
4.0
Overall review score
474
Review insights
85
Scored features
43
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for class-leading battery life, superb physical controls, deep EQ customization, and unusually strong value around $200. Skip it if you need flagship ANC, neutral stock tuning, automatic wear pause, a hard case, or reliably light all-day comfort.

Best for

Buyers around the $200 mark who prioritize huge battery life, tactile controls, deep EQ customization, and a bold design will get the most from these headphones. Android users also benefit from LDAC and easy Fast Pair setup.

Not for

Critical listeners wanting neutral stock tuning, travelers demanding flagship ANC, or anyone sensitive to clamp pressure and heat may prefer another model. They are also a poor fit if automatic wear pause or a protective hard case is essential.

Verdict

The Nothing Headphone (a) earns its strongest praise where midrange headphones often compromise: battery life, controls, software, and value. Reviewers repeatedly admire the tactile Roller and Paddle, the unusually capable Nothing X app, and battery endurance that can stretch to 75 hours with ANC or roughly 135 hours without it. Sound is fun and generally good for the money, but the stock tuning is divisive; bass can become boomy and some listeners hear sibilant or recessed regions, while the advanced EQ can fix much of that. ANC is effective for commuting and flights without reaching premium Sony/Bose levels. Comfort is the biggest fit-dependent tradeoff, with the 310g weight, firm clamp, warm pads, flimsy pouch, and missing wear detection repeatedly drawing criticism.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

85 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    32 (38%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    27 (32%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    12 (14%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    14 (16%)

Pros highlights

  • 5.0
    34 reviews strong consensus
    Battery: 5.0, 34 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life is the clearest consensus strength. Reviewers repeatedly call the 75-hour ANC figure and roughly 135-hour maximum class-leading, with real-world use generally supporting the claim.
  • 3.8
    31 reviews strong consensus
    Active noise cancellation: 3.8, 31 reviews, strong consensus
    ANC is widely considered good to very good for the price, especially on low-frequency travel noise. It usually trails premium Sony and Bose models and can let more voices or higher-frequency sounds through.
  • 4.9
    30 reviews strong consensus
    Button control usability: 4.9, 30 reviews, strong consensus
    The Roller, Paddle, and physical buttons are one of the strongest points of agreement. Reviewers repeatedly call them intuitive, tactile, distinctive, and easier to use than touch controls.
  • 4.8
    29 reviews strong consensus
    Value for money: 4.8, 29 reviews, strong consensus
    Value is a major strength across the review set. Reviewers repeatedly say the $199/£149 positioning delivers unusually strong battery, controls, features, and sound for the money.
  • 3.8
    27 reviews moderate consensus
    Comfort during long use: 3.8, 27 reviews, moderate consensus
    Long-session comfort is highly head-dependent. Many reviewers wore them for hours or flights comfortably, while others needed breaks because of pressure, weight, or heat.
  • 4.4
    19 reviews strong consensus
    Design and Aesthetics: 4.4, 19 reviews, strong consensus
    The retro-futuristic, transparent styling earns substantial praise for being distinctive and fashion-forward. It is deliberately bold, so buyers who prefer conventional headphones may not share that enthusiasm.

Cons highlights

  • 3.4
    21 reviews low consensus
    Bass performance: 3.4, 21 reviews, low consensus
    Bass is one of the most divisive traits: many enjoy its punch and sub-bass weight, while others find the default tuning boomy, muddy, or overly dominant.
  • 2.0
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Carry case quality: 2.0, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    The drawstring pouch is one of the most repeated complaints. Reviewers generally see it as flimsy or inadequate protection compared with a proper hard case.
  • 2.9
    10 reviews low consensus
    Clamping force comfort: 2.9, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Clamping force is a recurring comfort concern. Some find the grip secure and well judged, but several describe it as too firm during extended wear.
  • 3.2
    9 reviews low consensus
    Microphone quality for calls: 3.2, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Call quality is inconsistent across tests. Some reviewers hear clear, usable speech, while others report muffling, compression, or poor intelligibility in noisier conditions.
  • 3.4
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    Weight comfort: 3.4, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    At roughly 310g, the headphones are lighter than their predecessor but still heavier than many rivals, so some reviewers remain aware of the weight over time.
  • 2.1
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Workout heat and sweat buildup: 2.1, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Heat buildup is a recurring comfort weakness. The synthetic pads and closed design can make ears or the sides of the head warm, especially during longer sessions or workouts.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Water/sweat resistance rating, LDAC, Voice prompts/feedback, near average in Active noise cancellation, Sound quality, below average in Replaceable earpads, Sustainability and repairability, Replaceable pads/headband.

Comparison summary

85 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    33 (39%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    23 (27%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    29 (34%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Replaceable earpads 1.5 3.8 -2.3
Sustainability and repairability 1.5 3.8 -2.3
Replaceable pads/headband 1.5 3.7 -2.2
Headband padding quality 2.0 4.0 -2.0
Xbox compatibility 2.0 4.0 -2.0
Sensors 1.5 3.4 -1.9
Smart Pause performance 1.5 3.4 -1.9
Carry case quality 2.0 3.5 -1.6

Consider This Instead

If you want better Sustainability and repairability

Choose CMF Headphone Pro. It scores 4.8 vs 1.5 for Sustainability and repairability, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Replaceable pads/headband

Choose Nothing Headphone (1) Pro. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for Replaceable pads/headband, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Portability/foldability

Choose SoundPEATS Cove Pro. It scores 5.0 vs 2.3 for Portability/foldability, with a 3.8 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Headphone (1)

  • Better: detail and accuracy The Headphone (1) remains slightly more resolving and accurate.
  • Worse: sound quality This reviewer prefers the cheaper model's sound to the Headphone (1).
  • Worse: comfort The newer model is much more comfortable than the predecessor.

Bose QuietComforts

  • Better: noise cancellation ANC blocks only about three quarters as much as the Bose in this cafe test.

FAQ

How long does the battery last?

Reviewers repeatedly support the headline endurance: about 75 hours with ANC and roughly 135 hours without it. Fast charging is also a major strength.

How good is the noise cancellation?

ANC is generally good for the price and handles low-frequency travel noise well, but most reviewers place it below flagship Sony and Bose models.

Is the sound very bass-heavy?

The stock tuning often leans bassy and can become boomy on some tracks. The advanced EQ and Balanced preset can rein it in substantially.

Are they comfortable for long sessions?

Comfort is mixed. Many reviewers wear them for hours, but the roughly 310g weight, firm clamp, and warm pads cause fatigue for others.

Do they pause automatically when you take them off?

No. Wear detection and automatic pause are missing, and several reviewers call that omission surprising.

Do they include a hard case?

No. They come with a drawstring pouch, which reviewers commonly criticize as flimsy and less protective than a proper case.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider

#1 Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.5

Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...

Pros: Design and Aesthetics, Overall recommendation

Cons: Noise isolation (passive), Connectivity options

#2 Jabra Evolve3 85
4.5

Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...

Pros: Battery, Charging

Cons: Value for money, Codec support

#3 Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
4.5

Choose the Aventho 100 for standout battery life, portable retro styling, strong ANC, and flexible wired/wireless use. Skip it if you dislike on-ear pressure or want a wide, consistently neutral...

Pros: Battery, Design and Aesthetics

Cons: Clamping force comfort, Soundstage width

#4 Tribit QuietPlus 81
4.4

Best for exceptional battery life, useful ANC, flexible EQ, and strong budget value. Skip it if refined, detailed sound or polished controls matter more than price.

Pros: Value for money, Sound quality

Cons: Button control usability, App