If you want better Wear detection auto-pause
Choose Sennheiser MOMENTUM 4 Wireless Headphones. It scores 4.8 vs 2.5 for Wear detection auto-pause, with a 4.1 overall score.
Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 Headphones Review
Bottom Line
Choose the Melomania P100 for audiophile-leaning sound, marathon battery life, strong value, and repairable parts. Skip it if you need class-leading ANC, lightweight comfort, compact travel, or a polished transparency mode.
Best for
Best for listeners who prioritize sound quality, long battery life, wired and Bluetooth flexibility, physical buttons, EQ control, and repairable parts over the strongest possible ANC.
Not for
Not for buyers who need the lightest over-ear fit, compact folding travel design, top-tier Bose/Sony-style noise cancellation, spatial audio, touch controls, or polished wear detection.
Verdict
The Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 lands as a value-focused over-ear with unusually strong reviewer consensus around sound quality, battery life, build and repairability. Most reviewers heard clean, detailed, spacious audio with controlled bass and strong codec support, and the battery life repeatedly stood out as class-leading. The tradeoff is that its ANC is good rather than best-in-class, and comfort depends on fit: some reviewers loved the long-wear feel, while others found the clamp, weight or headband tiring. The software and EQ are useful, but missing or imperfect extras such as spatial audio, touch controls, wear detection behavior and transparency clarity keep it from feeling fully premium.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
85 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.033 (39%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.439 (46%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.413 (15%)
Pros highlights
-
Value for money was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly saying the P100 competes above its price.
-
Reviewers broadly praised the P100’s sound as detailed, clean, spacious and high-value, though What Hi-Fi and PCMag wanted more energy or EQ help.
-
Overall recommendations were strongly positive, with most reviewers calling the P100 high-value, competitive or easy to recommend, despite some caveats.
-
Bass was usually described as punchy, controlled and substantial without overwhelming other frequencies, with only one What Hi-Fi comparison finding it short on kick.
-
Design was generally praised as attractive, stylish and well put together, though a few reviewers found the headband shape or bulk less flattering.
-
Battery life was the strongest consensus feature, repeatedly described as epic, class-leading, insane, benchmark-setting or outstanding.
Cons highlights
-
Stability was weak for active use: reviewers reported looseness, popping with movement, slipping, or suitability mainly for stationary listening.
-
Wind and movement noise handling was a recurring concern, with several reviewers hearing wind, popping, footstep or left/right ANC artifacts.
-
ANC background noise was a concern in quieter use, with static or clicking mentioned by multiple reviewers.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in aptX, Cable quality, Voice prompts/feedback, near average in Sound quality, Overall recommendation, below average in Touch control responsiveness, Spatial audio, Stability.
Comparison summary
85 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher40 (47%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts32 (38%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower13 (15%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| aptX | 4.6 | 3.1 | +1.5 |
| Cable quality | 4.6 | 3.1 | +1.5 |
| Touch control responsiveness | 2.5 | 3.9 | -1.4 |
| Voice prompts/feedback | 4.9 | 3.7 | +1.2 |
| Sensors | 4.5 | 3.3 | +1.2 |
| Auto on/off reliability | 4.4 | 3.2 | +1.2 |
| Sustainability and repairability | 4.7 | 3.7 | +1.0 |
| Sound leakage | 4.8 | 3.6 | +1.2 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better Stability
Choose Marshall Milton A.N.C.. It scores 4.8 vs 2.9 for Stability, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better Touch control responsiveness
Choose JLab Epic Lux Lab Edition Wireless Headphones. It scores 4.6 vs 2.5 for Touch control responsiveness, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better Clamping force comfort
Choose Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones. It scores 4.8 vs 3.7 for Clamping force comfort, with a 4.2 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Better: noise cancellation Crutchfield places P100 noise cancellation a notch below Sony WH-1000XM5.
- Better: LDAC support PCMag prefers Sony WH-1000XM5 for LDAC support because the P100 lacks LDAC.
- More expensive: price What Hi-Fi says the P100 undercuts the official Sony WH-1000XM5 benchmark price.
- More expensive: sound quality and price Techaeris says AirPods Max can match the sound, but the P100 costs much less.
- Compared: updated tuning and comfort What Hi-Fi says the P100 SE appears to target the original P100's comfort and sound limitations.
FAQ
How good does the Melomania P100 sound?
Reviewers mostly praised the sound as clean, detailed, spacious and balanced, with controlled bass and clear vocals. The main caveat is that What Hi-Fi and PCMag wanted more default punch or energy.
Is the ANC class-leading?
No. Reviewers generally found ANC good or very effective for the price, especially for low-frequency noise, but several said Bose, Sony or AirPods Max still cancel noise better.
How strong is battery life?
Battery life is the strongest consensus point. Reviews repeatedly highlighted up to 60 hours with ANC and up to 100 hours without ANC as class-leading or benchmark-level.
Are the headphones comfortable for long sessions?
Comfort is mixed. Some reviewers wore them for hours comfortably, while others found the clamp, weight, headband or pressure points tiring.
Can they be used wired?
Yes. Reviews mention USB-C digital audio and USB-C-to-3.5mm analog support, with several praising the flexibility and hi-res wired playback quality.
Is the app useful?
Yes, mainly for EQ, ANC settings, firmware updates and wear detection toggles. Reviewers especially liked the seven-band EQ, though the broader feature set was not as advanced as some premium rivals.
Are they good for travel?
They suit travel because of battery life, passive isolation and solid ANC, but the large case and non-folding design make them less ideal for packing light.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
Article Reviews
whathifi.com
- Review score
- 4.1
Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider
Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...
Pros: Design and Aesthetics, Overall recommendation
Cons: Noise isolation (passive), Connectivity options
Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...
Pros: Battery, Charging
Cons: Value for money, Codec support
Choose the Aventho 100 for standout battery life, portable retro styling, strong ANC, and flexible wired/wireless use. Skip it if you dislike on-ear pressure or want a wide, consistently neutral...
Pros: Battery, Design and Aesthetics
Cons: Clamping force comfort, Soundstage width
Best for exceptional battery life, useful ANC, flexible EQ, and strong budget value. Skip it if refined, detailed sound or polished controls matter more than price.
Pros: Value for money, Sound quality
Cons: Button control usability, App