The Lowdown, Season 2

The Lowdown, Season 2 Feature Scores

Explore all 54 feature scores for The Lowdown, Season 2, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

54 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    36 (67%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    14 (26%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    2 (4%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    2 (4%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.9
    19 reviews strong consensus
    acting performance: 4.9, 19 reviews, strong consensus
    The ensemble is the clearest strength, with Hawke’s physical comedy, Gilpin’s emotional agility, and Jones’s restraint drawing especially enthusiastic praise.
  • 4.9
    16 reviews strong consensus
    supporting cast performance: 4.9, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Guest actors make small roles vivid, funny, and sometimes devastating. Jones, Gilpin, Schneider, and Plimpton receive especially strong notices.
  • 4.8
    18 reviews strong consensus
    main cast performance: 4.8, 18 reviews, strong consensus
    Hawke remains a magnetic, physically committed lead, while Gilpin and Jones supply sharply different energies. Armstrong holds her own in the family scenes.
  • 4.8
    15 reviews strong consensus
    entertainment value: 4.8, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    The prevailing response is exuberant: funny, strange, and highly watchable. Even the major dissenter finds enjoyment with tempered expectations.
  • 4.8
    17 reviews strong consensus
    humor: 4.8, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    Physical comedy, dry reactions, and absurd local encounters consistently land. Gilpin’s exasperation and Hawke’s clumsy confidence are especially fruitful.
  • 4.9
    11 reviews strong consensus
    cast chemistry: 4.9, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Hawke and Gilpin find an immediate rhythm of attraction, exasperation, and slapstick. Jones’s quiet presence gives the family scenes an equally compelling counterweight.
  • 4.9
    11 reviews strong consensus
    casting quality: 4.9, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Gilpin and Jones fit the eccentric world exceptionally well, while memorable character actors excel in unexpected roles.
  • 4.8
    12 reviews strong consensus
    character development: 4.8, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    The season gives Lee’s flaws deeper roots and lets Ginger, Francis, and the supporting characters exist beyond their usefulness to his investigation.
  • 4.8
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Family relationships: 4.8, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    The arrival of Lee’s estranged father turns the season into a layered study of neglect, resentment, and imperfect reconciliation. The father-son scenes frequently rival or surpass the central mystery.
  • 4.5
    16 reviews moderate consensus
    story quality: 4.5, 16 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most find an engaging conspiracy strengthened by richer character work. The chief objection is that the core mystery feels thinner and less tightly connected than before.
  • 4.8
    8 reviews strong consensus
    emotional impact: 4.8, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    The season can be unexpectedly moving and sometimes devastating. Brief supporting stories and quieter father-son moments carry particular force.
  • 4.6
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    writing quality: 4.6, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most praise the three-dimensional characters, sharp comedy, and integration of personal and social stakes. The main criticism is an underdeveloped mystery padded with detours.
  • 4.7
    8 reviews strong consensus
    genre satisfaction: 4.7, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    The mixture of loose hangout comedy and sun-drenched noir is a major draw. A weaker investigative throughline makes the blend less satisfying for one critic.
  • 4.6
    9 reviews low consensus
    tonal consistency: 4.6, 9 reviews, low consensus
    The prevailing view celebrates how naturally absurd comedy and painful drama coexist. A dissenting account finds sharper shifts that fail to gel.
  • 4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    directing quality: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Harjo’s assured handling of character, tone, and place earns strong praise, especially when the story slows down for intimate family scenes.
  • 4.6
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Atmosphere: 4.6, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Sun-drenched Tulsa grit, oddball encounters, and a relaxed hangout feel give the season a distinctive identity. Even the principal detractor recognizes its beatnik energy.
  • 4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    world-building: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Tulsa feels full of lived-in spaces, local quirks, and strongly individual people. The setting rewards wandering beyond the main investigation.
  • 4.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    dialogue quality: 4.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Singing dialogue, sarcastic retorts, and recurring verbal jokes make conversations a major source of pleasure.
  • 4.4
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    theme depth: 4.4, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Truth-seeking, responsibility, institutional corruption, and inherited family failures give the season substance. One critic finds the looser plotting too shallow to fulfill that promise.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    villain quality: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The new sheriffs, judges, and guards provide distinct, genuinely menacing obstacles beneath the comedy.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews low consensus
    character appeal: 4.4, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Lee remains an engaging, brilliantly realized mess for most critics, and Ginger makes an immediate impression. His self-absorption becomes exhausting for the strongest dissenter.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    drama quality: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The family material gives the shaggy mystery substantial emotional weight, with the father-son story repeatedly singled out as a high point.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    renewal interest: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The expandable world and emotionally rich characters leave enthusiastic critics eager for more seasons.
  • 4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    trauma portrayal: 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Old parental wounds remain legitimate even as Lee repeats some of the damage himself. The quieter scenes give that inherited pain weight without easy sentimentality.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    romance quality: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Lee and Ginger’s attraction works through friction, exasperation, and reluctant trust. Their banter keeps the tentative romance lively without smoothing away his flaws.
  • 4.2
    6 reviews low consensus
    season pacing: 4.2, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Most see a more confident season that gets moving quickly while retaining its wandering charm. The main dissent finds long detours and too little investigative momentum.
  • 4.2
    6 reviews low consensus
    suspense: 4.2, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Dangerous prison guards and volatile confrontations give the comedy a real edge. A pacing critique argues that long detours sometimes deflate that tension.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    realism: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Small local details and natural performances make the characters’ lives feel observed rather than manufactured.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    episode structure: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The recurring cast and new investigation provide a satisfying serialized framework. Individual detours work best when they preserve the underlying mystery.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    friendship portrayal: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Lee’s everyday unreliability sits alongside a more dependable instinct to help in a crisis. The wider community gives his crusade warmth and support.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    accountability handling: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Lee’s good intentions receive closer scrutiny as the season asks who pays for his pursuit of truth. His charisma no longer excuses every failure.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    guest appearances: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Guest performances add eccentricity and energy, with surprising character actors making even brief visits memorable.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    originality: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The mix of Tulsa grit, human eccentricity, and loose noir storytelling retains a distinctive personality that feels unusual on television.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    cultural representation: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Tulsa feels textured by local personalities, history, and Native humor. Even the harshest critique acknowledges genuine insight into the region.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    plot twists: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The mystery is frequently surprising, though one critic finds it less twisty than the first season.
  • 3.8
    6 reviews low consensus
    episode pacing: 3.8, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The opening often feels energetic, but the extended Chili Franks detour divides opinion. Some find it unbearably tense; others feel it starts to drag.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    continuity: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The new case picks up naturally from the first season and carries forward earlier threads without letting them dominate.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews low consensus
    ensemble balance: 4.0, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Most find that the actors complement one another without derailing the story. A dissenting view argues that too many returning and new characters stretch the season thin.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews low consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.0, 3 reviews, low consensus
    The country selections are often praised as evocative and among television’s best. One critic finds the near-constant music intrusive despite appreciating individual choices.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Indigenous portrayal: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Native storytelling and humor contribute warmth and specificity rather than feeling like an obligation. The local perspective is part of the show’s appeal.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    cinematography: 5.0, 1 review
    Oklahoma is beautifully photographed, giving the shifting mix of comedy, mystery, and drama a strong sense of place.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    visual style: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The throwback Oklahoma look and confident noir references create a recognizable style. Their polish does not fully compensate for weaker substance in the most critical account.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    action sequence quality: 4.5, 1 review
    A nighttime escape turns motion-triggered floodlights into an inventive comic obstacle, making the gunfire sequence memorable for more than its danger.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    critic appeal: 4.5, 1 review
    The early reception is enthusiastically positive, with the opening described as a terrific start. That approval remains an early-season assessment.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    editing quality: 4.5, 1 review
    Transitional fades help connect the shifting encounters and country soundtrack into an evocative whole.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    media scrutiny portrayal: 4.5, 1 review
    The story examines whether getting the facts right also means doing good. Journalism’s consequences become more personal without turning the conversations into lectures.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    mystery payoff: 4.5, 1 review
    One assessment finds that the mystery builds to a payoff that keeps viewers guessing.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    costume design: 4.0, 1 review
    Denim, sideburns, and throwback styling contribute to the affectionate atmosphere of an Oklahoma vintage shop.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    plot clarity: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Most find the mystery controlled and gradually revealed. One strong dissent says the detours leave viewers lost and weaken the connective story.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    modern political framing: 3.5, 1 review
    Institutional corruption and racism remain central concerns, though one account finds the new season less urgently topical than the first.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.0
    1 review
    score quality: 2.0, 1 review
    One critic finds the original score overused, as though it is compensating for weaknesses in the plotting.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    sexual content level: 2.0, 1 review
    The foot-fetish bargain draws criticism for its degrading effect, rather than simply for the presence of sexual material.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    season length: 3.0, 1 review
    One preview questions whether eight episodes provide enough room for the intertwined mysteries and family story, while remaining hopeful about their resolution.
  • 3.2
    5 reviews low consensus
    character screen time: 3.2, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Most praise the room given to the ensemble, including returning faces. Others find the expanded cast thinly justified or wish compelling performers had larger parts.

Use Cases

Best for

Sort
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Noir fan viewing: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Offbeat noir enthusiasts get a richly atmospheric mystery with sharp banter, eccentric characters, and a delightfully fallible investigator.
  • 4.3
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Returning fan viewing: 4.3, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Familiar characters and the established Tulsa atmosphere remain major attractions. The stronger emphasis on digressions may disappoint fans who preferred the first season’s tighter mystery.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Newcomer viewing: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    A new case and strong cast make this a viable entry point with limited prior knowledge. Its loose, crowded storytelling can still feel scattered at first.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Thriller fan viewing: 4.5, 1 review
    The early pursuit and murder sharply raise the stakes, giving the comic investigation a dangerous thriller edge.

Conditional or not ideal for

  • Weekly episodic viewing
    2.5
    1 review
    Weekly episodic viewing: 2.5, 1 review
    The slower, less focused storytelling may weaken the pull between weekly installments for viewers who need steady investigative progress.
  • Cinephile viewing
    3.0
    1 review
    Cinephile viewing: 3.0, 1 review
    The nods to classic noir and Western drama offer cinematic appeal, though one critic finds that the borrowed style outpaces the substance.

Cast & Creators

  • Ginger
    4.9
    16 reviews strong consensus
    Betty Gilpin: 4.9, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Gilpin matches Hawke’s manic energy while giving Ginger a distinct mixture of exasperation, fear, and reluctant attraction. Her reactions and ability to combine comedy with hurt repeatedly stand out.
  • Lee Raybon
    4.9
    14 reviews strong consensus
    Ethan Hawke: 4.9, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Hawke makes Lee a twitchy, physically comic, and emotionally exposed lead without losing his charisma. Even a critic frustrated by the character admires the commitment of the performance.
  • Creator
    4.9
    14 reviews strong consensus
    Sterlin Harjo: 4.9, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Harjo’s affectionate Tulsa world and deft shifts between absurdity and emotional intimacy draw strong praise. His handling of the family material gives the new case additional weight.
  • Lee Sr.
    4.8
    13 reviews strong consensus
    Tommy Lee Jones: 4.8, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Jones brings restraint, sly humor, and accumulated hurt to Lee’s estranged father. His quieter exchanges with Hawke provide some of the season’s strongest moments.
  • Chili Franks
    5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Paul Schneider: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Schneider makes an eccentric guard unnervingly vivid and surprisingly human. The character’s emotional vulnerability helps his brief storyline land hard.
  • Actor
    4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Martha Plimpton: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Plimpton makes a powerfully intimidating adversary, with her frightening presence and casting against expectations earning particular praise.
  • Francis
    4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Ryan Kiera Armstrong: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Armstrong gives Francis independent emotional stakes and holds her own opposite Hawke and Jones. Her anger and warmth feel natural rather than overplayed.
  • Casting Director
    5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Angelique Midthunder: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Midthunder’s casting is credited with another exceptionally well-matched ensemble, including the ideal choice of Jones for Lee’s father.
  • Actor
    5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Austin Amelio: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Amelio combines wiry menace with unexpected physical comedy, making his supporting role a standout.
  • Johnny
    5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Rafael Casal: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Casal makes a strong impression in a supporting role, with his scenes singled out as consistent scene-stealers.
  • Actor
    4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    John Hawkes: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Hawkes is a welcome presence whose corrupt judge delivers effective menace.
  • Sam
    4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Kaniehtiio Horn: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Horn remains compelling in her appearances, though the wish for a larger role accompanies the praise.
  • Marty
    4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Keith David: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    David’s dry reactions remain a highlight, and his returning character receives welcome, interesting material.
  • Abel Bell
    4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Josh Fadem: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Fadem’s expanded role is welcomed, giving him more to contribute this season.
  • Cyrus
    4.5
    1 review
    Killer Mike: 4.5, 1 review
    Killer Mike helps turn the rupidoop conversation into one of the premiere’s funniest exchanges.
  • Ray
    4.5
    1 review
    Michael Hitchcock: 4.5, 1 review
    Hitchcock finds humor in small moments and makes brief appearances count.