Explore all 54 feature scores for The Lowdown, Season 2, organized into pros and cons.
Scores by Feature
Summary
54 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.036 (67%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.414 (26%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.42 (4%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.42 (4%)
Pros
Sort
-
The ensemble is the clearest strength, with Hawke’s physical comedy, Gilpin’s emotional agility, and Jones’s restraint drawing especially enthusiastic praise.
-
Guest actors make small roles vivid, funny, and sometimes devastating. Jones, Gilpin, Schneider, and Plimpton receive especially strong notices.
-
Hawke remains a magnetic, physically committed lead, while Gilpin and Jones supply sharply different energies. Armstrong holds her own in the family scenes.
-
The prevailing response is exuberant: funny, strange, and highly watchable. Even the major dissenter finds enjoyment with tempered expectations.
-
Physical comedy, dry reactions, and absurd local encounters consistently land. Gilpin’s exasperation and Hawke’s clumsy confidence are especially fruitful.
-
Hawke and Gilpin find an immediate rhythm of attraction, exasperation, and slapstick. Jones’s quiet presence gives the family scenes an equally compelling counterweight.
-
Gilpin and Jones fit the eccentric world exceptionally well, while memorable character actors excel in unexpected roles.
-
The season gives Lee’s flaws deeper roots and lets Ginger, Francis, and the supporting characters exist beyond their usefulness to his investigation.
-
The arrival of Lee’s estranged father turns the season into a layered study of neglect, resentment, and imperfect reconciliation. The father-son scenes frequently rival or surpass the central mystery.
-
Most find an engaging conspiracy strengthened by richer character work. The chief objection is that the core mystery feels thinner and less tightly connected than before.
-
The season can be unexpectedly moving and sometimes devastating. Brief supporting stories and quieter father-son moments carry particular force.
-
Most praise the three-dimensional characters, sharp comedy, and integration of personal and social stakes. The main criticism is an underdeveloped mystery padded with detours.
-
The mixture of loose hangout comedy and sun-drenched noir is a major draw. A weaker investigative throughline makes the blend less satisfying for one critic.
-
The prevailing view celebrates how naturally absurd comedy and painful drama coexist. A dissenting account finds sharper shifts that fail to gel.
-
Harjo’s assured handling of character, tone, and place earns strong praise, especially when the story slows down for intimate family scenes.
-
Sun-drenched Tulsa grit, oddball encounters, and a relaxed hangout feel give the season a distinctive identity. Even the principal detractor recognizes its beatnik energy.
-
Tulsa feels full of lived-in spaces, local quirks, and strongly individual people. The setting rewards wandering beyond the main investigation.
-
Singing dialogue, sarcastic retorts, and recurring verbal jokes make conversations a major source of pleasure.
-
Truth-seeking, responsibility, institutional corruption, and inherited family failures give the season substance. One critic finds the looser plotting too shallow to fulfill that promise.
-
The new sheriffs, judges, and guards provide distinct, genuinely menacing obstacles beneath the comedy.
-
Lee remains an engaging, brilliantly realized mess for most critics, and Ginger makes an immediate impression. His self-absorption becomes exhausting for the strongest dissenter.
-
The family material gives the shaggy mystery substantial emotional weight, with the father-son story repeatedly singled out as a high point.
-
The expandable world and emotionally rich characters leave enthusiastic critics eager for more seasons.
-
Old parental wounds remain legitimate even as Lee repeats some of the damage himself. The quieter scenes give that inherited pain weight without easy sentimentality.
-
Lee and Ginger’s attraction works through friction, exasperation, and reluctant trust. Their banter keeps the tentative romance lively without smoothing away his flaws.
-
Most see a more confident season that gets moving quickly while retaining its wandering charm. The main dissent finds long detours and too little investigative momentum.
-
Dangerous prison guards and volatile confrontations give the comedy a real edge. A pacing critique argues that long detours sometimes deflate that tension.
-
Small local details and natural performances make the characters’ lives feel observed rather than manufactured.
-
The recurring cast and new investigation provide a satisfying serialized framework. Individual detours work best when they preserve the underlying mystery.
-
Lee’s everyday unreliability sits alongside a more dependable instinct to help in a crisis. The wider community gives his crusade warmth and support.
-
Lee’s good intentions receive closer scrutiny as the season asks who pays for his pursuit of truth. His charisma no longer excuses every failure.
-
Guest performances add eccentricity and energy, with surprising character actors making even brief visits memorable.
-
The mix of Tulsa grit, human eccentricity, and loose noir storytelling retains a distinctive personality that feels unusual on television.
-
Tulsa feels textured by local personalities, history, and Native humor. Even the harshest critique acknowledges genuine insight into the region.
-
The mystery is frequently surprising, though one critic finds it less twisty than the first season.
-
The opening often feels energetic, but the extended Chili Franks detour divides opinion. Some find it unbearably tense; others feel it starts to drag.
-
The new case picks up naturally from the first season and carries forward earlier threads without letting them dominate.
-
Most find that the actors complement one another without derailing the story. A dissenting view argues that too many returning and new characters stretch the season thin.
-
The country selections are often praised as evocative and among television’s best. One critic finds the near-constant music intrusive despite appreciating individual choices.
-
Native storytelling and humor contribute warmth and specificity rather than feeling like an obligation. The local perspective is part of the show’s appeal.
-
Oklahoma is beautifully photographed, giving the shifting mix of comedy, mystery, and drama a strong sense of place.
-
The throwback Oklahoma look and confident noir references create a recognizable style. Their polish does not fully compensate for weaker substance in the most critical account.
-
A nighttime escape turns motion-triggered floodlights into an inventive comic obstacle, making the gunfire sequence memorable for more than its danger.
-
The early reception is enthusiastically positive, with the opening described as a terrific start. That approval remains an early-season assessment.
-
Transitional fades help connect the shifting encounters and country soundtrack into an evocative whole.
-
The story examines whether getting the facts right also means doing good. Journalism’s consequences become more personal without turning the conversations into lectures.
-
One assessment finds that the mystery builds to a payoff that keeps viewers guessing.
-
Denim, sideburns, and throwback styling contribute to the affectionate atmosphere of an Oklahoma vintage shop.
-
Most find the mystery controlled and gradually revealed. One strong dissent says the detours leave viewers lost and weaken the connective story.
-
Institutional corruption and racism remain central concerns, though one account finds the new season less urgently topical than the first.
Cons
Sort
-
One critic finds the original score overused, as though it is compensating for weaknesses in the plotting.
-
The foot-fetish bargain draws criticism for its degrading effect, rather than simply for the presence of sexual material.
-
One preview questions whether eight episodes provide enough room for the intertwined mysteries and family story, while remaining hopeful about their resolution.
-
Most praise the room given to the ensemble, including returning faces. Others find the expanded cast thinly justified or wish compelling performers had larger parts.
Use Cases
Best for
Sort
-
Offbeat noir enthusiasts get a richly atmospheric mystery with sharp banter, eccentric characters, and a delightfully fallible investigator.
-
Familiar characters and the established Tulsa atmosphere remain major attractions. The stronger emphasis on digressions may disappoint fans who preferred the first season’s tighter mystery.
-
A new case and strong cast make this a viable entry point with limited prior knowledge. Its loose, crowded storytelling can still feel scattered at first.
-
The early pursuit and murder sharply raise the stakes, giving the comic investigation a dangerous thriller edge.
Conditional or not ideal for
-
Weekly episodic viewingThe slower, less focused storytelling may weaken the pull between weekly installments for viewers who need steady investigative progress.
-
Cinephile viewingThe nods to classic noir and Western drama offer cinematic appeal, though one critic finds that the borrowed style outpaces the substance.
Cast & Creators
-
GingerGilpin matches Hawke’s manic energy while giving Ginger a distinct mixture of exasperation, fear, and reluctant attraction. Her reactions and ability to combine comedy with hurt repeatedly stand out.
-
Lee RaybonHawke makes Lee a twitchy, physically comic, and emotionally exposed lead without losing his charisma. Even a critic frustrated by the character admires the commitment of the performance.
-
CreatorHarjo’s affectionate Tulsa world and deft shifts between absurdity and emotional intimacy draw strong praise. His handling of the family material gives the new case additional weight.
-
Lee Sr.Jones brings restraint, sly humor, and accumulated hurt to Lee’s estranged father. His quieter exchanges with Hawke provide some of the season’s strongest moments.
-
Chili FranksSchneider makes an eccentric guard unnervingly vivid and surprisingly human. The character’s emotional vulnerability helps his brief storyline land hard.
-
ActorPlimpton makes a powerfully intimidating adversary, with her frightening presence and casting against expectations earning particular praise.
-
FrancisArmstrong gives Francis independent emotional stakes and holds her own opposite Hawke and Jones. Her anger and warmth feel natural rather than overplayed.
-
Casting DirectorMidthunder’s casting is credited with another exceptionally well-matched ensemble, including the ideal choice of Jones for Lee’s father.
-
ActorAmelio combines wiry menace with unexpected physical comedy, making his supporting role a standout.
-
JohnnyCasal makes a strong impression in a supporting role, with his scenes singled out as consistent scene-stealers.
-
ActorHawkes is a welcome presence whose corrupt judge delivers effective menace.
-
SamHorn remains compelling in her appearances, though the wish for a larger role accompanies the praise.
-
MartyDavid’s dry reactions remain a highlight, and his returning character receives welcome, interesting material.
-
Abel BellFadem’s expanded role is welcomed, giving him more to contribute this season.
-
CyrusKiller Mike helps turn the rupidoop conversation into one of the premiere’s funniest exchanges.
-
RayHitchcock finds humor in small moments and makes brief appearances count.