Mean Girls

Mean Girls Feature Scores

Explore all 53 feature scores for Mean Girls, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

53 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    12 (23%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    21 (40%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    13 (25%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    7 (13%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.7
    24 reviews strong consensus
    supporting cast performance: 4.7, 24 reviews, strong consensus
    The Plastics, Janis, Damian, and the adult characters supply many of the most memorable comic moments. Meadows’ performance is widely admired, though one source finds his flirting awkward.
  • 4.7
    16 reviews strong consensus
    dialogue quality: 4.7, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Sharp barbs, oddball exchanges, and endlessly quoted lines are among the film’s most consistent strengths. The dialogue remains memorable even for viewers who dislike other parts of the movie.
  • 4.4
    30 reviews moderate consensus
    humor: 4.4, 30 reviews, moderate consensus
    Caustic satire, clever barbs, and deadpan supporting performances produce many of the strongest reactions. Dated stereotypes, occasional slapstick, and a softer final act limit the comedy for some viewers.
  • 4.5
    15 reviews strong consensus
    acting performance: 4.5, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    The ensemble is a major strength, with memorable comic turns across the students and adults. A dissenting retrospective finds the leads weaker than the supporting players.
  • 4.4
    24 reviews moderate consensus
    lead performance: 4.4, 24 reviews, moderate consensus
    Lohan usually earns praise for charm, restraint, and keeping Cady sympathetic through her transformation. A dissenting retrospective finds her limited and unconvincing, and another dislikes her screen impression.
  • 4.6
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    rewatch value: 4.6, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    The quotable scenes and recognizable social dynamics often retain their appeal over many viewings. One retrospective warns that revisiting it exposes more dated material and weaker performances than nostalgia suggests.
  • 4.9
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Cultural impact: 4.9, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Catchphrases, memes, and enduring references make the film a major pop-culture touchstone. Several sources credit it with reshaping expectations for teen comedies.
  • 4.5
    13 reviews strong consensus
    theme depth: 4.5, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    The satire explores insecurity, popularity, peer pressure, and the damage of cruelty with unusual insight for a teen comedy. Its relevance often extends to adult social life.
  • 4.2
    23 reviews low consensus
    screenplay quality: 4.2, 23 reviews, low consensus
    Fey’s sharp dialogue and social observation are repeatedly credited with making a familiar premise distinctive. Messy structure, moralizing, and dated stereotypes are the main objections.
  • 4.2
    15 reviews moderate consensus
    character development: 4.2, 15 reviews, moderate consensus
    Cady’s slide into popularity and the Plastics’ insecurities give familiar archetypes surprising depth. The main dispute is whether her final redemption feels earned.
  • 4.4
    9 reviews strong consensus
    audience appeal: 4.4, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    The school satire appeals to teens, nostalgic adults, and viewers who recognize clique behavior beyond the classroom. Some find its lessons especially useful, while one retrospective recommends it with reservations.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews low consensus
    genre satisfaction: 4.4, 8 reviews, low consensus
    The film frequently ranks among the strongest teen comedies of its era. A sharply negative assessment finds it bland beside more daring high-school films.
  • 4.3
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    entertainment value: 4.3, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most sources find an enjoyable, energetic comedy that remains fun to revisit. A few are less enthusiastic, especially when dated jokes or moralizing interrupt the enjoyment.
  • 4.0
    16 reviews low consensus
    realism: 4.0, 16 reviews, low consensus
    Many recognize their own school experiences in the clique politics, outsider anxiety, and petty behavior. Dissenting accounts question the smart-versus-popular stereotype and Cady’s credibility.
  • 4.0
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    directing quality: 4.0, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Waters often earns credit for natural comic timing and sympathetic characters. Some find the filmmaking visually ordinary or the staging too convenient for the jokes.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    emotional impact: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Cady’s awkward first days and the pressures on the girls evoke strong personal recognition. The humor gains weight from those uncomfortable, familiar feelings.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    friendship portrayal: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Janis and Damian feel like convincing friends, while Cady’s shifting loyalties show how social pressure can distort relationships. The friendships are valued for including jealousy and manipulation rather than simple idealization.
  • 4.1
    5 reviews low consensus
    chemistry between characters: 4.1, 5 reviews, low consensus
    The ensemble works well together, with particular affection for Janis and Damian’s believable friendship. The adult romance charms some viewers but feels awkward to another.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    creative collaboration: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The combination of Fey’s script, Waters’ direction, and Lohan’s rapport with the director helps the performances and character development work.
  • 3.6
    15 reviews low consensus
    message quality: 3.6, 15 reviews, low consensus
    The anti-cruelty and self-acceptance lessons resonate strongly with many viewers. Others see contradictions in a film that condemns bullying while using appearance-based mockery for laughs.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    drama quality: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The social conflicts create effective dramatic fireworks. The blend of comedy and hurt helps make the characters’ experiences memorable.
  • 3.8
    5 reviews low consensus
    casting quality: 3.8, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Most assessments celebrate the ensemble and Lohan’s fit as Cady. Reservations focus on Meadows’ adult flirtation and Aaron looking too old for high school.
  • 3.9
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    visual style: 3.9, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    The glossy presentation and animal-world fantasies have fans. Another assessment finds too little visual invention beyond those fantasy sequences.
  • 3.7
    6 reviews low consensus
    originality: 3.7, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The distinctive comic voice refreshes familiar teen-movie material for many sources. Others see a standard formula or lazy cultural stereotypes.
  • 3.6
    6 reviews low consensus
    costume design: 3.6, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Snappy early-2000s styling helps make the characters memorable, and the costume design earns especially strong praise. Cady’s low-cut wardrobe and an unconvincing Halloween costume attract criticism.
  • 3.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    cinematography: 3.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Specific camera moves and the bathroom transition draw admiration. Another assessment finds the lighting competent but the overall visual storytelling short on spark.
  • 3.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    editing quality: 3.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Clear editing and the bathroom transition work well, while the split-screen phone scene stands out. One assessment finds the editing functional without adding much visual excitement.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    romance quality: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The crush subplot adds engaging romance without requiring contrived heartbreak. Its relatively reasonable handling receives favorable notice.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    sound design: 3.7, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    The disc’s clean dialogue and solid front-channel output work well, while the bus sound enhances a celebrated comic scene. A separate critique notes a mismatch between a vomit sound and the visible action.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    soundtrack quality: 3.7, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    The song selection earns praise for supporting the tone and providing a lively soundtrack. One retrospective likes a few moments but finds the overall collection repetitive and boring.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    4K video quality: 4.5, 1 review
    The 4K disc adds pleasing texture and stronger colors while preserving a light film-grain structure. Warm skin tones and occasionally borderline blacks keep the transfer from being flawless.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    world-building: 4.5, 1 review
    Cady’s outsider perspective gives the school’s cliques and rituals a useful anthropological frame.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    dance choreography: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The Jingle Bell Rock sequence is a favorite comic set piece for one source. Another finds its staging contrived to produce the necessary mishap.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.1
    8 reviews low consensus
    cultural representation: 2.1, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Several retrospective assessments criticize the racial stereotypes and reductive treatment of Africa. A more enthusiastic defense considers the jokes inoffensive, so views differ sharply on how well this material has aged.
  • 2.3
    4 reviews strong consensus
    marketing accuracy: 2.3, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The trailer can undersell the wit or overemphasize slapstick that is unlike the rest of the film. Other criticism targets inflated claims of sociological importance and marketing that narrowed its perceived appeal.
  • 2.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    language level: 2.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Retrospective assessments flag slurs and insensitive dialogue as dated. Affection for the comedy does not eliminate those reservations.
  • 2.5
    3 reviews low consensus
    sexual content level: 2.5, 3 reviews, low consensus
    The original’s relative restraint is appreciated beside the remake. Other sources object to the sexualized school dance and the coach’s involvement with a student.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    age appropriateness: 2.0, 1 review
    The edgy PG-13 material prompted a specific caution against showing it to younger children.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    Atmos audio quality: 2.0, 1 review
    The 4K release disappoints by retaining the earlier 5.1 mix rather than adding an Atmos upgrade. Its existing audio still earns separate praise for clarity.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    family friendliness: 2.0, 1 review
    One assessment finds the film edgy even within PG-13 limits and cautions families about younger children watching it.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    product placement: 2.0, 1 review
    The cafeteria’s conspicuous Coke products draw a mocking complaint about brand saturation.
  • 2.8
    4 reviews low consensus
    plot clarity: 2.8, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Some praise understandable misunderstandings that arise naturally from the characters. Others find Cady’s changes of allegiance and the handling of consequences messy or insufficiently logical.
  • 2.8
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    plot originality: 2.8, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    The film uses recognizable teen-comedy plotting, which some find overly familiar. An enthusiastic assessment praises its avoidance of the genre’s usual contrivances.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    runtime: 2.5, 1 review
    One assessment would welcome trimming, suggesting the film carries more material than it needs.
  • 2.9
    10 reviews low consensus
    ending satisfaction: 2.9, 10 reviews, low consensus
    The crown-sharing reconciliation is heartfelt and insightful for some viewers. Others find the finale sappy, rushed, or inconsistent with the sharper satire that precedes it.
  • 2.8
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    voiceover effectiveness: 2.8, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    The narration can clarify Cady’s intelligence and outsider perspective. Other accounts find it assumptive or too eager to explain what the audience already understands.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Bonus features: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The original film’s commentary earns praise for being interesting and funny. The 4K disc’s new featurette draws strong criticism for centering the remake cast and adding little value.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    violence level: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The sudden bus accident works as a surprising comic resolution for one source. Another criticizes its treatment as a fake-out that does not follow through.
  • 3.1
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    story quality: 3.1, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    The familiar infiltration story works for some viewers. Others find awkward plotting, implausible developments, or strong individual scenes that do not form a cohesive whole.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    production design: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The bathrooms feel like authentic places for school gossip and scheming. A separate critique dislikes the cluttered poster arrangement in a room.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews low consensus
    faithfulness to source material: 3.3, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Some praise the transformation of a nonfiction guide into sharp social comedy. One assessment disputes the adaptation claim, arguing that the film borrows little beyond terms and a few details.
  • 3.3
    8 reviews low consensus
    tonal consistency: 3.3, 8 reviews, low consensus
    The mixture of light comedy and darker social themes works well for many viewers. Others find the film uneven or feel its sentimental third act compromises the sharper tone.
  • 3.3
    9 reviews low consensus
    pacing: 3.3, 9 reviews, low consensus
    The early setup and phone-call comedy can move briskly, and some find the film gains laughs as it goes. Others want trimming or feel the momentum weakens near the conclusion.

Cast & Creators

  • Writer
    4.6
    21 reviews strong consensus
    Tina Fey: 4.6, 21 reviews, strong consensus
    Fey’s sharp script and restrained, warm teacher performance are repeatedly praised. Reservations concern narrative structure and moral framing rather than her comic timing.
  • Regina George
    4.7
    16 reviews strong consensus
    Rachel McAdams: 4.7, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    McAdams makes Regina vividly nasty, funny, and difficult to look away from. Her original portrayal is repeatedly favored over the remake’s interpretation.
  • Katie
    4.4
    24 reviews moderate consensus
    Lindsay Lohan: 4.4, 24 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most sources credit Lohan’s charm, vulnerability, and comic restraint with anchoring Cady’s transformation. A few find her performance limited or less sympathetic than intended.
  • Karen
    4.5
    12 reviews strong consensus
    Amanda Seyfried: 4.5, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Seyfried’s dry, effortless portrayal of Karen’s dimness is a frequent highlight. Comparisons with the remake favor the precision of her original comic performance.
  • Mr. Duvall
    4.5
    13 reviews strong consensus
    Tim Meadows: 4.5, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Meadows’ deadpan timing, small gestures, and sudden exasperation repeatedly steal scenes. One source finds his flirtation awkward despite liking his response to the Burn Book chaos.
  • Actor
    4.6
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Amy Poehler: 4.6, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Poehler’s overeager mother supplies memorable laughs and earns consistent praise for her energetic comic performance.
  • Janis Ian
    4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Lizzy Caplan: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Caplan’s pinpoint sarcasm and ability to combine hurt with revenge make Janis a standout. Her comic exchanges with Damian are particularly appreciated.
  • Director
    4.2
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    Mark Waters: 4.2, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Waters earns praise for handling character growth, comic timing, and a talented ensemble. A dissenting assessment finds the filmmaking competent but visually uninspired.
  • Gretchen
    4.3
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    Lacey Chabert: 4.3, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Chabert usually earns praise for Gretchen’s anxious, self-absorbed comedy and quotable lines. One retrospective finds her performance shaky beside the strongest supporting players.
  • Damian
    4.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Daniel Franzese: 4.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Franzese’s lively delivery and distinctive characterization make Damian a memorable comic presence. His friendship scenes with Janis are especially effective.
  • Producer
    4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Lorne Michaels: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    These assessments single out the film as a successful producing contribution, especially compared with weaker entries in Michaels’ film output.
  • Costume Designer
    5.0
    1 review
    Mary Jane Fort: 5.0, 1 review
    Fort’s costume design receives emphatic praise as an impeccable element of the film’s presentation.
  • Actor
    4.5
    1 review
    Ana Gasteyer: 4.5, 1 review
    Gasteyer’s contribution is praised as part of an adult ensemble that adds just the right comic spice.
  • Actor
    3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Neil Flynn: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    One assessment appreciates the affection in Flynn’s portrayal of Cady’s father. A retrospective exchange is split, with one host liking him and another finding him irritating.
  • Aaron
    1.5
    1 review
    Jonathan Bennett: 1.5, 1 review
    One retrospective finds Bennett’s performance wooden and ranks him below the stronger ensemble players.