Mayday

Mayday Feature Scores

Explore all 48 feature scores for Mayday, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

48 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    15 (31%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    17 (35%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    11 (23%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    5 (10%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.7
    31 reviews strong consensus
    chemistry between characters: 4.7, 31 reviews, strong consensus
    Reynolds and Branagh’s odd-couple chemistry is repeatedly called the heart of the film, carrying the comedy, emotional beats, and long stretches of the story.
  • 4.7
    35 reviews strong consensus
    action sequences: 4.7, 35 reviews, strong consensus
    The action is one of the clearest consensus wins, with fluid fights, inventive chases, strong aerial work, and several set pieces ranked among the year’s best.
  • 4.8
    17 reviews strong consensus
    cinematography: 4.8, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    The camerawork is widely praised as fluid, inventive, and unusually cinematic for streaming, especially in fights, aerial scenes, long takes, and moving POV shots.
  • 4.6
    23 reviews strong consensus
    genre satisfaction: 4.6, 23 reviews, strong consensus
    As a throwback buddy action-comedy, the film strongly satisfies its target audience with banter, chases, fights, heart, and nostalgic genre energy.
  • 4.4
    41 reviews moderate consensus
    entertainment value: 4.4, 41 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most reviewers find Mayday highly entertaining, funny, and easy to enjoy, with only a small minority calling it forgettable or disappointing.
  • 4.8
    10 reviews strong consensus
    acting performance: 4.8, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Performances are a major strength, especially Branagh’s comic-action turn. Reynolds earns praise when restrained, though several critics find his familiar persona limiting.
  • 4.6
    11 reviews strong consensus
    directing quality: 4.6, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Goldstein and Daley are widely praised for energetic, confident staging and smart tonal control, though one dissenting review sees the storytelling as undercooked.
  • 4.6
    9 reviews strong consensus
    pacing: 4.6, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Most reviews praise the brisk momentum and constant forward motion, though a few find the opening awkward or the overall film somewhat too long.
  • 4.2
    21 reviews moderate consensus
    message quality: 4.2, 21 reviews, moderate consensus
    The humanist message about propaganda, patriotism, and seeing people beyond national stereotypes is often praised, though some critics consider it simplistic or obvious.
  • 4.1
    28 reviews low consensus
    lead performance: 4.1, 28 reviews, low consensus
    Branagh is the consistent standout and often scene-stealer. Reynolds is more divisive, praised when subdued but criticized when he falls back on his usual wisecracking persona.
  • 4.1
    32 reviews moderate consensus
    humor: 4.1, 32 reviews, moderate consensus
    The comedy usually lands through Branagh’s deadpan work, visual gags, and lead banter, but Reynolds fatigue and some broad third-act silliness divide reviewers.
  • 4.4
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    visual style: 4.4, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    Reviewers admire the cinematic scale, kinetic camera placement, and distinctive action imagery, although some dislike the overly clean digital sheen.
  • 4.5
    7 reviews strong consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.5, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The Springsteen-heavy ’80s soundtrack is repeatedly praised for fitting the story, period setting, and themes without feeling like empty nostalgia.
  • 4.1
    15 reviews strong consensus
    emotional impact: 4.1, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Many reviewers are surprised by the film’s warmth, friendship, and family material, although a few find the sentimentality underdeveloped or unearned.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    cultural representation: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The film earns praise for humanizing Soviet citizens and complicating simple U.S.-versus-Russia binaries, though some critics still find parts of its cultural framing simplified.
  • 4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    audience appeal: 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers see strong appeal for fans of buddy comedies, throwback action, and Ryan Reynolds’ style, with several calling it a potential theatrical crowd-pleaser.
  • 3.8
    16 reviews low consensus
    supporting cast performance: 3.8, 16 reviews, low consensus
    Supporting actors are generally liked, especially Bakalova and Dorociński, but several reviews complain that Bakalova, Morse, and their subplots are underused.
  • 3.8
    15 reviews low consensus
    character development: 3.8, 15 reviews, low consensus
    Nikolai and Troy get meaningful growth and a believable friendship, but some critics find Troy or the supporting family arcs thin, rushed, or underdeveloped.
  • 4.0
    5 reviews low consensus
    production design: 4.0, 5 reviews, low consensus
    High production values and period atmosphere impress many reviewers, though one critic finds the sets too pristine and artificial to feel believable.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    practical effects quality: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Practical stunt work and hand-to-hand sequences are praised for adding physicality, clarity, and old-school action appeal.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    editing quality: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Action editing is praised for seamlessly blending performers, stunt doubles, and set-piece momentum without losing clarity.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    suspense: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The pursuit structure creates credible tension and an enjoyable cat-and-mouse momentum, especially as the heroes race toward asylum and safety.
  • 3.6
    9 reviews low consensus
    story quality: 3.6, 9 reviews, low consensus
    The central escape-and-friendship story is engaging for most reviewers, but detractors find it basic, thin, or unable to capitalize fully on its strong premise.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    special effects quality: 4.0, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    Effects are generally considered polished and impressive, though a few conspicuous CGI moments undermine the illusion.
  • 3.6
    7 reviews low consensus
    tonal consistency: 3.6, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Most reviewers think comedy, action, and emotion are blended smoothly, while detractors point to abrupt transitions, an identity crisis, or over-the-top third-act silliness.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    sexual content level: 5.0, 1 review
    One content-focused review approves of the complete absence of sex or nudity.
  • 3.6
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    theme depth: 3.6, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    The political and humanist ideas add welcome substance, but reviewers disagree on whether they feel thoughtful and resonant or merely surface-level.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    drama quality: 4.5, 1 review
    The more serious moments are praised for subtlety, giving the action-comedy enough dramatic weight without overwhelming its lighter tone.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    ending satisfaction: 4.5, 1 review
    The ending receives praise for landing on a gracious thematic note about service and recognition rather than just spectacle.
  • 3.5
    3 reviews low consensus
    dialogue quality: 3.5, 3 reviews, low consensus
    The central banter is often praised as funny and lively, but one strongly negative review finds the dialogue forgettable.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    costume design: 4.0, 1 review
    One review specifically praises Reynolds’ crisp Navy look, helping sell the Top Gun-style pilot persona.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    critic appeal: 4.0, 1 review
    The broad critical response is described as positive, and the reviewer citing the aggregate agrees that critics largely got the favorable verdict right.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.5
    8 reviews low consensus
    rewatch value: 2.5, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Rewatch interest is split: some see an easy repeat-watch comfort movie, while others expect to forget it quickly or never revisit it.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    violence level: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The film contains abundant fights, gunfire, injuries, and bloody action; family-focused reviewers see that level as a meaningful drawback for younger or sensitive viewers.
  • 2.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    language level: 2.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Profanity and coarse language are flagged as meaningful content concerns, particularly for families and sensitive viewers.
  • 2.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    plot originality: 2.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The buddy-road-movie structure is repeatedly described as familiar, predictable, and derivative even when reviewers enjoy how individual scenes are executed.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    age appropriateness: 2.0, 1 review
    The movie’s bloody violence, coarse language, and mature material make it better suited to teens and adults than younger children.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    family friendliness: 2.0, 1 review
    The buddy-adventure tone is accessible, but violence, profanity, and mature content lead family-focused reviewers to advise against it for kids or sensitive viewers.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    score quality: 2.0, 1 review
    The original score makes little impression in the one review that addresses it, which remembers the licensed songs but not the score.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    world-building: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The Cold War setting can feel convincing through locations and period detail, but one harsh review says the world never feels believable as 1980s Soviet Russia.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    historical accuracy: 2.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Period authenticity is mixed: some reviewers feel the setting convincingly evokes 1987, while others say the dialogue, visuals, or atmosphere never fully feel like the era.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    plot clarity: 2.5, 1 review
    One reviewer finds the plot increasingly confusing and frustrating when its logic is examined closely, despite the otherwise straightforward escape setup.
  • 2.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    CGI quality: 2.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Digital effects draw mixed reactions: most shots are convincing or good enough, but a few green-screen and cartoonish moments noticeably break immersion.
  • 3.0
    7 reviews low consensus
    runtime: 3.0, 7 reviews, low consensus
    The nearly two-hour length works for some because of strong momentum, but several reviewers think the movie drags or would be better closer to 90 minutes.
  • 3.2
    3 reviews low consensus
    value for money: 3.2, 3 reviews, low consensus
    As part of an existing streaming subscription, the movie is often seen as worthwhile entertainment, though one critic says it is not worth subscribing solely to watch.
  • 3.2
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    originality: 3.2, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    The movie rarely reinvents its genre, but several reviewers think inventive staging, camera work, and thematic reframing give familiar material fresh energy.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews low consensus
    realism: 3.3, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Aerial work and some locations look highly convincing, but realism is inconsistent; one reviewer rejects the period world and character behavior as fundamentally unbelievable.
  • 3.4
    7 reviews low consensus
    screenplay quality: 3.4, 7 reviews, low consensus
    The screenplay earns praise for smart genre writing and balanced character beats, but detractors call it safe, by-the-numbers, or even half-baked.

Cast & Creators

  • Nikolai Ustinov
    4.9
    44 reviews strong consensus
    Kenneth Branagh: 4.9, 44 reviews, strong consensus
    Branagh is the near-unanimous standout, earning praise for deadpan comedy, unexpected action credibility, warmth, and the emotional depth he gives Nikolai.
  • Director
    4.5
    28 reviews strong consensus
    John Francis Daley: 4.5, 28 reviews, strong consensus
    Daley is widely praised with Goldstein for confident action-comedy direction, inventive camera work, and strong pacing, though one dissenting review finds the storytelling undercooked.
  • Director
    4.5
    28 reviews strong consensus
    Jonathan Goldstein: 4.5, 28 reviews, strong consensus
    Goldstein is widely praised with Daley for confident action-comedy direction, inventive camera work, and strong pacing, though one dissenting review finds the storytelling undercooked.
  • Troy Kelly
    3.8
    44 reviews low consensus
    Ryan Reynolds: 3.8, 44 reviews, low consensus
    Reynolds divides reviewers: his charm and restrained straight-man work often fit the movie well, while critics tired of his familiar sarcastic persona see it as the film’s biggest limitation.
  • Cinematographer
    4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Barry Peterson: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Peterson’s cinematography is repeatedly praised for fluid motion, cinematic scale, and action images that keep the film visually propulsive.
  • Alexander Volkov
    4.1
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Marcin Dorociński: 4.1, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Dorociński is generally praised for making Volkov a credible, intense threat without leaning too hard into a cartoonish Soviet villain, though one review finds him merely serviceable.
  • Anna Ustinov
    3.9
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    Maria Bakalova: 3.9, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Bakalova is consistently liked in her limited screen time and brings strength or poignancy to Anna, but several reviewers argue the role is underused.
  • Harold
    3.5
    3 reviews low consensus
    David Morse: 3.5, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Morse is liked in his small role as Troy’s father, but reviewers repeatedly wish the character had more to do and one calls him completely sidelined.