If you want better Sound leakage
Choose Final Audio DX3000CL. It scores 4.7 vs 1.8 for Sound leakage, with a 4.3 overall score.
Grado Signature S750 Review
Bottom Line
Choose the S750 for revealing home listening, huge spatial detail, vivid mids, and flexible detachable cabling. Skip it if you need commuting isolation, plush long-session comfort, deep bass impact, or an easy-to-justify price.
Best for
Best for stationary audiophile listening where detail, vocal realism, precise imaging, and a wide open stage matter more than isolation or bass slam. It suits listeners willing to pair it with capable amplification.
Not for
Not ideal for commuters, shared spaces, bass-first listeners, or anyone sensitive to on-ear pressure and heavier headphones. Buyers expecting plush luxury, abundant accessories, or forgiving treble may also be disappointed.
Verdict
The Grado Signature S750 is a specialist headphone built around clarity, imaging, speed, and an unusually open presentation. Across the strongest hands-on reviews, vocals sound vivid, dense mixes stay easy to separate, and familiar recordings reveal small details with striking precision. Bass is usually tight rather than forceful, and treble can turn bright with hot recordings or louder playback. The larger compromise is physical: the 460 g on-ear design divides listeners sharply, with some wearing it for hours and others tiring quickly. Detachable cabling and solid aluminum construction are welcome upgrades, but sparse accessories and the $1,695 price weaken the luxury argument. Careful source matching and a personal fit audition matter.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
42 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.020 (48%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.410 (24%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.46 (14%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.45 (12%)
-
Very negative below 1.51 (2%)
Pros highlights
-
Build quality is usually a strength, thanks to aluminum construction, solid hardware, and careful finishing. Most reviewers describe it as rugged or beautifully built, although one felt some headband details looked and felt cheaper than expected.
-
Overall satisfaction is high because the S750 repeatedly delivers memorable, engaging sound. The strongest reservations center on physical comfort and premium-price ergonomics rather than the core audio performance.
-
Recommendations are strong for dedicated audiophile use, especially for listeners who prize detail, openness, and spatial precision. Fit, source matching, and price make an audition advisable before buying.
-
The S750 is consistently praised for exceptionally revealing, natural sound with strong musical engagement. Even the more critical takes on fit and hardware still describe the listening performance as a major strength.
-
Detachable mini-XLR cabling is widely treated as a major Grado improvement. Swappable lengths and balanced terminations make the S750 far easier to adapt to different amplifiers and listening positions.
-
A broad, open soundstage is one of the S750’s defining strengths, often described as huge, airy, lifelike, or extending well beyond the earcups. One reviewer found the stage less expansive, but still accurate and breathable.
Cons highlights
-
Long-session comfort is the biggest point of disagreement. Some listeners wore the S750 for hours comfortably, while others found the on-ear pressure, foam, weight, or fit tiring within a short period.
-
At about 460 g, the S750 is lighter than some Signature siblings but still feels heavy to several reviewers. The reduced mass helps versus larger models, yet weight can undermine stability and long-session comfort.
-
The new B cushions improve comfort for some listeners but are strongly fit-dependent. They can distribute pressure well, yet the flat on-ear foam felt poorly fitting or uncomfortable to others.
-
The Signature Gold cable is lighter and softer than older Grado designs, but cable ergonomics remain divisive. Critics still found it heavy, stiff, or awkwardly sized for common listening setups.
-
Sound leakage is an unavoidable downside of the open-back design and is serious enough to rule out many shared or public spaces. Quiet private listening is the intended environment.
-
Clamp is inconsistent across head shapes rather than universally comfortable. One reviewer found it overzealous and tiring, another described the design as firm, while another thought the fit was too loose.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Detail retrieval, Detachable cable convenience, Frequency response accuracy, near average in Amplifier scaling, Cable quality, below average in Travel friendliness, Noise isolation (passive), Included accessories.
Comparison summary
42 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher19 (45%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts10 (24%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower13 (31%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Travel friendliness | 1.3 | 3.9 | -2.6 |
| Noise isolation (passive) | 1.5 | 3.9 | -2.4 |
| Included accessories | 1.5 | 3.6 | -2.1 |
| Portability/foldability | 1.5 | 3.6 | -2.1 |
| Sound leakage | 1.8 | 3.7 | -1.9 |
| Clamping force comfort | 2.5 | 4.0 | -1.5 |
| Workout heat and sweat buildup | 1.5 | 3.0 | -1.5 |
| Ear cup padding quality | 3.2 | 4.4 | -1.2 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better Included accessories
Choose Audio-Technica ATH-ADX7000. It scores 4.6 vs 1.5 for Included accessories, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better Comfort during long use
Choose Meze Audio Strada. It scores 4.8 vs 3.3 for Comfort during long use, with a 4.4 overall score.
If you want better Clamping force comfort
Choose Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones. It scores 4.8 vs 2.5 for Clamping force comfort, with a 4.5 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
HP100 SE
- Compared: weight The S750 is 10 percent lighter than the HP100 SE.
- More expensive: price The S750 costs less than the flagship HP100 SE.
Grado SR60e
- Older model: overall listening experience The reviewer moved from the affordable Grado SR60e to the S750 as a substantial listening upgrade.
S950
- More expensive: price The S750 is positioned below the S950 in Grado's Signature pricing ladder.
FAQ
What does the Grado Signature S750 sound like?
It is consistently described as highly detailed, open, fast, and precise, with vivid mids and excellent imaging. The presentation is more revealing than warm or forgiving.
Does the S750 have strong bass?
Bass is usually described as tight, articulate, and controlled rather than heavy. Most reviewers warn bass-first listeners may want more impact, though one heard substantial sub-bass when recordings called for it.
Is the S750 comfortable for long listening sessions?
Comfort is highly personal. Some reviewers wore the B-cushion on-ear design for hours, while others experienced pressure, heat, weight, or fatigue quickly.
Does the S750 need a headphone amplifier?
It is relatively easy to drive, but several reviewers heard better resolution or overall performance with capable amplification. One source pairing sounded more closed and constrained, so system matching matters.
Is the S750 good for commuting or travel?
No. Its open-back design leaks sound, offers little isolation, and the 460 g on-ear fit can be unstable when moving.
How flexible is the cable setup?
The detachable mini-XLR system is widely praised because owners can use different cable lengths and balanced terminations. The standard package is still sparse, with complaints about cable practicality and the lack of a case.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
trackingangle.com
I Walked Into a Pair of Grado's New S2 Signature S750 Headphones – new S2 50mm driver completely re-engineered
- Review score
- 4.4
bestofhighend.com
Grado Labs Signature S750 review: Brooklyn-built open-back headphones with exceptional clarity, a wide natural soundstage and lean sub-bass.
- Review score
- 4.5
the-ear.net
Aesthetically, the S750 is still very much a Grado… but again it’s a Grado that hints at a modernity that has usually not been present up to...
- Review score
- 3.8
trustedreviews.com
These unapologetically premium open-back headphone specialises in revelation, stripping recordings back to their raw truth
- Review score
- 4.3
techradar.com
Grado's new B cushion brings you closer to the music for a superb soundtrack, but for me, comfort is key
- Review score
- 3.6
Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider
Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...
Pros: Design and Aesthetics, Overall recommendation
Cons: Noise isolation (passive), Connectivity options
Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...
Pros: Battery, Charging
Cons: Value for money, Codec support
Choose the Aventho 100 for standout battery life, portable retro styling, strong ANC, and flexible wired/wireless use. Skip it if you dislike on-ear pressure or want a wide, consistently neutral...
Pros: Battery, Design and Aesthetics
Cons: Clamping force comfort, Soundstage width
Best for exceptional battery life, useful ANC, flexible EQ, and strong budget value. Skip it if refined, detailed sound or polished controls matter more than price.
Pros: Value for money, Sound quality
Cons: Button control usability, App