Sendy Audio Apollo Pro

Sendy Audio Apollo Pro Review

Brand: Sendy Audio
Released: June 2, 2026
Updated: 3 months ago
4.4
Overall review score
112
Review insights
42
Scored features
6
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for spacious, detailed home listening, excellent comfort, and premium construction. Skip it for commuting, private shared-space use, built-in voice chat, or subwoofer-like bass impact.

Best for

Best for home listeners who want a warm, spacious planar sound, excellent long-session comfort, and precise imaging for music, films, or gaming.

Not for

Skip it for commuting, shared offices, treble-sensitive listening, built-in voice chat, or bass-heavy playback where strong physical slam is the priority.

Verdict

The Apollo Pro succeeds by combining unusually strong comfort with a spacious, organized planar presentation. Its bass reaches deep and stays controlled, the midrange sounds warm and natural, and instruments remain distinct without turning clinical. Build quality, zebrawood styling, the leather case, and the generous adapter set reinforce the premium impression. The tradeoffs are clear: physical bass slam is restrained, the open-back cups leak heavily and isolate almost nothing, and some listeners may find the upper treble energetic. The stock cable is good but heavy, while the unusual right-side connector narrows aftermarket choices. For quiet-room music, films, and gaming, it is a compelling and well-rounded option at its price.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

42 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    24 (57%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    10 (24%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    3 (7%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    3 (7%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (5%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Build quality: 4.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Build quality is repeatedly praised for solid metalwork, clean fitting, and reassuring adjustment hardware. Nothing feels loose or unfinished, and the construction competes well above its price.
  • 4.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Comfort during long use: 4.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Comfort is a standout strength, with several listeners able to wear it through multiple albums or all day. The fit stays secure without creating obvious pressure points.
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Ear cup padding quality: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The deep velvet pads are soft, breathable, and unusually comfortable. Their cushioning spreads pressure well and reduces heat compared with many synthetic-leather pads.
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Sound quality: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The overall sound is consistently described as natural, detailed, and enjoyable, with warmth that avoids muddiness. It stays musical rather than clinical, even when presenting plenty of information.
  • 4.7
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Weight comfort: 4.7, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Although the cups look large, the 354-gram frame feels lighter than expected. Good distribution keeps the headphone from dragging downward or creating a narrow hotspot.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Cable quality: 4.2, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The stock braided cable feels premium, durable, and low in handling noise. Its weight and unusual connector arrangement are the main practical drawbacks.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Cable quality, Carry case quality, Glasses and hat compatibility, near average in Ear cup padding quality, Immersive audio quality, below average in Travel friendliness, Integrated microphone, Sound leakage.

Comparison summary

42 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    24 (57%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    9 (21%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    9 (21%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Travel friendliness 1.0 3.9 -2.9
Integrated microphone 1.5 4.0 -2.5
Sound leakage 1.3 3.7 -2.5
Noise isolation (passive) 2.0 3.9 -1.9
Portability/foldability 2.0 3.6 -1.6
Cable quality 4.2 3.1 +1.2
Carry case quality 4.7 3.5 +1.1
3.5mm analog input availability 2.8 3.8 -1.0

Consider This Instead

If you want better Travel friendliness

Choose Meze Audio Strada. It scores 4.5 vs 1.0 for Travel friendliness, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Sound leakage

Choose Final Audio DX3000CL. It scores 4.7 vs 1.3 for Sound leakage, with a 4.3 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Audeze MM-100

  • Alternative: studio use versus relaxed listening The MM-100 is positioned as the more functional studio choice, while the Apollo Pro favors decorative design and spacious home listening.

Egret

  • Compared: bass authority versus soundstage The Egret emphasizes stronger planar bass and a composed midrange, while the Apollo Pro prioritizes openness and space.

FiiO FT7

  • Compared: midrange warmth and balance The FiiO FT7 follows a similar tonal shape but settles into a more neutral balance than the warmer Apollo Pro.

FAQ

Is the Apollo Pro comfortable for long sessions?

Yes. Its broad suspension headband, soft velvet pads, moderate weight, and gentle clamp are repeatedly described as exceptionally comfortable for several albums or all-day wear.

Does it have strong bass?

It extends deep and keeps bass clean and textured, but the physical punch is restrained. Bass-heads seeking subwoofer-like impact may prefer a more forceful dynamic-driver model.

Does it need a headphone amplifier?

It can reach practical levels from many capable dongles and portable sources. A cleaner, stronger amplifier can improve bass control and dynamic scale, and one listener preferred a powerful balanced setup.

Is it good for gaming?

Yes for positional and immersive gaming: the wide stage and accurate imaging make directional effects easy to locate. It has no built-in microphone, so multiplayer voice chat requires a separate mic.

Can it be used while commuting?

It is a poor commuting choice because the open-back cups leak heavily and isolate very little. It is designed primarily for quiet home or desk listening.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

stereolifemagazine.com

Sendy Audio's Apollo Pro is a new open-back planar magnetic headphone designed around a lightweight nano-diaphragm driver, wooden earcups and...

Review score
4.6
pragmaticaudio.com

A very pragmatic open-back planar from Sendy Audio — a supremely comfortable, warm-sounding guilty pleasure of a headphone that’s arguably...

Review score
4.4

Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider

#1 Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.5

Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...

Pros: Design and Aesthetics, Overall recommendation

Cons: Noise isolation (passive), Connectivity options

#2 Jabra Evolve3 85
4.5

Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...

Pros: Battery, Charging

Cons: Value for money, Codec support

#3 Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
4.5

Choose the Aventho 100 for standout battery life, portable retro styling, strong ANC, and flexible wired/wireless use. Skip it if you dislike on-ear pressure or want a wide, consistently neutral...

Pros: Battery, Design and Aesthetics

Cons: Clamping force comfort, Soundstage width

#4 Tribit QuietPlus 81
4.4

Best for exceptional battery life, useful ANC, flexible EQ, and strong budget value. Skip it if refined, detailed sound or polished controls matter more than price.

Pros: Value for money, Sound quality

Cons: Button control usability, App