If you want better Carry case quality
Choose Baseus Inspire XH1 Headphones. It scores 4.7 vs 1.7 for Carry case quality, with a 4.2 overall score.
EarFun Wave Life Wireless Headphones Review
Bottom Line
Choose the EarFun Wave Life for cheap, comfortable over-ears with huge battery life, strong EQ tools, and bass-friendly tuning. Skip them if you need consistently balanced sound, strong ANC, a 3.5mm jack, or a travel case.
Best for
Best for budget shoppers who want comfortable over-ear headphones with long battery life, useful app EQ, multipoint support, and bass-forward sound that can be tuned.
Not for
Not for listeners who need consistently balanced audio, strong noise cancellation against voices and traffic, premium materials, wear detection, a case, or a standard 3.5mm analog input.
Verdict
Reviewers consistently credit the EarFun Wave Life with unusual budget strengths: long battery life, lightweight comfort, useful app controls, customizable EQ, and strong value. Sound quality is the main tradeoff. Some reviewers got lively bass, clear highs, and even convincing wired or EQ-tuned playback, while others heard bloated bass, tinniness, muddy mids, and limited soundstage. ANC follows the same budget pattern: it can reduce low rumbles, but voices, traffic, and busier environments often remain audible. The missing case, short cable complaints, no 3.5mm jack, and absent wear detection make the package feel basic despite its strengths.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
61 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.07 (11%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.425 (41%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.419 (31%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.49 (15%)
-
Very negative below 1.51 (2%)
Pros highlights
-
Battery life is one of the strongest consensus positives, with nearly every review praising the long runtime.
-
EQ customization is a clear strength, repeatedly described as powerful, tunable, and capable of improving the sound.
-
Value for money is a major strength in most reviews, though one negative review says the low price still reflects the compromises.
-
Bass is the most polarizing part of the tuning: several reviewers liked the punch and rumble, while others found it boomy, muddy, or overdone.
-
Overall recommendation is mixed: several reviewers strongly recommend the low-price package, while Tom's Guide and one YouTube review advise against it.
-
Reviewer opinion on sound quality is sharply split, ranging from abysmal distortion complaints to praise for lively, EQ-improved playback.
Cons highlights
-
Background noise reduction is inconsistent: low hums are handled better than chatter, traffic, or busy multi-voice environments.
-
ANC is mixed-to-weak overall: it can reduce low-frequency rumble, but multiple reviewers found voices, traffic, or busy spaces still audible.
-
Midrange performance varies by tuning and reviewer, with some hearing clear vocals and others reporting muffled or recessed mids.
-
Treble earns mixed feedback, from crisp and clear after tuning to tinny, messy, or lacking brightness.
-
Build quality is mixed, from well-made or premium-for-price impressions to flimsy, rough, or basic plastic complaints.
-
Transparency mode is serviceable but uneven, ranging from usable and natural enough to average or barely helpful.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in LDAC, Stability, Equalizer customization, near average in Advanced software features, Audio-video sync accuracy, below average in 3.5mm analog input availability, Smudge resistance, Frequency response accuracy.
Comparison summary
61 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher3 (5%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts23 (38%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower35 (57%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm analog input availability | 1.5 | 3.8 | -2.3 |
| Smudge resistance | 1.0 | 3.1 | -2.1 |
| Frequency response accuracy | 1.8 | 3.7 | -1.9 |
| Carry case quality | 1.7 | 3.6 | -1.9 |
| Noise isolation (passive) | 2.0 | 3.9 | -1.9 |
| Smart Pause performance | 1.5 | 3.4 | -1.9 |
| Auto-play/wear detection | 1.5 | 3.2 | -1.7 |
| Wear detection auto-pause | 1.5 | 3.2 | -1.7 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better 3.5mm analog input availability
Choose OneOdio Studio Max 2. It scores 4.5 vs 1.5 for 3.5mm analog input availability, with a 3.8 overall score.
If you want better Included accessories
Choose Edifier WH950NB Gen 2 Wireless Headphones. It scores 4.7 vs 2.0 for Included accessories, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better Noise isolation (passive)
Choose Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones. It scores 4.5 vs 2.0 for Noise isolation (passive), with a 3.7 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Better: noise cancellation TechRadar says the Wave Life noise cancellation falls short beside Apple AirPods Max.
- Better: vocal impact and live music playback TechRadar finds the Sony Inzone H9 gives a favorite live performance more impact.
Wave Pro
- Better: sound quality Tom's Guide says EarFun's Wave Pro sounds much better than the Wave Life.
- Better: overall feature and performance step-up PCMag suggests spending more on the Wave Pro instead of choosing the Wave Life.
FAQ
Are the EarFun Wave Life headphones comfortable for long sessions?
Yes. Comfort is one of the strongest areas across the reviews, with repeated praise for the light weight, soft ear cups, and comfort over hours of listening.
How good is the sound quality?
Reviewer opinion is split. Some reviewers praised the bass, clarity, soundstage, and EQ-tuned playback, while others heard muddy bass, muffled mids, tinniness, and limited detail.
Do the EQ controls matter?
Yes. Multiple reviewers said the app and custom EQ can meaningfully improve the sound, although one reviewer still could not get the audio to a satisfying level.
How effective is the ANC?
ANC is budget-level and inconsistent. Reviewers generally found it better with low-frequency hums than with voices, traffic, chatter, or busier environments.
How is the battery life?
Battery life is a clear strength. Reviews repeatedly praised the long runtime, with several highlighting the 60-hour non-ANC and 37-hour ANC figures.
Are they good for calls?
Call quality is mostly acceptable. Reviewers reported clear or complaint-free voice calls, but some also noted echo, sibilance fuzz, or a lack of nuance.
Do they include a case or 3.5mm cable?
No. Several reviewers criticized the bare accessory package, the missing case or pouch, and the lack of a standard 3.5mm analog jack.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
Article Reviews
zdnet.com
- Review score
- 4.8
cultofmac.com
- Review score
- 4.0
tomsguide.com
- Review score
- 2.6
techradar.com
- Review score
- 3.6
Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider
Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...
Pros: Design and Aesthetics, Overall recommendation
Cons: Noise isolation (passive), Connectivity options
Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...
Pros: Battery, Charging
Cons: Value for money, Codec support
Choose the Aventho 100 for standout battery life, portable retro styling, strong ANC, and flexible wired/wireless use. Skip it if you dislike on-ear pressure or want a wide, consistently neutral...
Pros: Battery, Design and Aesthetics
Cons: Clamping force comfort, Soundstage width
Best for exceptional battery life, useful ANC, flexible EQ, and strong budget value. Skip it if refined, detailed sound or polished controls matter more than price.
Pros: Value for money, Sound quality
Cons: Button control usability, App