If you want better USB-C
Choose Sony WH-CH720N Wireless Headphones. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for USB-C, with a 3.8 overall score.
Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones Review
Bottom Line
Choose these for plush comfort, excellent ANC, physical controls, and compact travel use. Skip them if you need best-in-class codecs, wear detection, USB-C audio, longer battery life, or the richest feature set.
Best for
Best for travelers, commuters, and all-day listeners who value plush comfort, strong ANC, physical buttons, and a compact case more than advanced codec support.
Not for
Not for buyers who prioritize cutting-edge features, USB-C audio, LDAC/aptX support, automatic wear detection, sport resistance, or the longest battery life.
Verdict
The Bose QuietComfort Bluetooth Headphones land as comfort-first ANC headphones rather than spec-sheet leaders. Across reviews, the strongest agreement centers on excellent noise cancellation, easy physical controls, a compact case, and a light fit that works well for travel or long sessions. The tradeoff is that Bose keeps the feature set conservative: battery life is merely adequate, codec support and Bluetooth version lag newer rivals, there is no wear-detection pause, and USB-C audio is missing. Sound impressions vary by taste, with many enjoying the punchy, rich presentation while some reviewers criticize bass and treble emphasis. Sale pricing makes them much more compelling, but at full price their simplicity becomes both the appeal and the limitation.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
75 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.024 (32%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.431 (41%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.49 (12%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.411 (15%)
Pros highlights
-
Active noise cancellation was the clearest strength, with most reviewers calling it excellent, top-tier, brilliant, or world class despite a few caveats.
-
The carry case was consistently praised as compact, protective, manageable, sturdy, or well thought out.
-
Overall recommendations were mixed: many reviewers recommended them strongly, while SoundGuys considered them poor value or not worth upgrading to.
-
Sound quality split reviewers: several praised rich, fun, balanced audio, while SoundGuys criticized the tuning and some reviewers noted rivals sound better.
-
EQ customization was useful but limited, with several reviewers liking basic tweaks and others wanting more granular controls.
-
Value was highly mixed, with sale prices making them attractive to some reviewers while others preferred cheaper or more feature-rich alternatives.
Cons highlights
-
Features at launch were generally seen as modest or incremental rather than cutting edge.
-
Treble drew the most audio criticism, with some praise for detail but repeated concerns about peaks, harshness, or a lack of top-end sparkle.
-
Advanced features were a common weakness; reviewers repeatedly said the headphones lack bells, whistles, or flagship upgrades.
-
Sensors were a weakness because reviewers repeatedly missed wear-detection/auto-pause behavior.
-
Smart Pause performance was poor because multiple reviewers noted the headphones do not auto-pause when removed.
-
Wear detection auto-pause was a repeated weakness because the headphones do not pause when removed.
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Sound leakage, Portability/foldability, Carry case quality, near average in Equalizer customization, Midrange clarity, below average in Connectivity options, Bluetooth version, Built-in DAC and hi-res playback.
Comparison summary
75 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher27 (36%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts21 (28%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower27 (36%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connectivity options | 2.0 | 4.4 | -2.4 |
| Bluetooth version | 2.3 | 4.3 | -2.0 |
| Built-in DAC and hi-res playback | 2.0 | 4.0 | -2.0 |
| USB-C | 2.0 | 3.9 | -1.9 |
| Award recognition | 3.0 | 4.9 | -1.9 |
| LE Audio readiness | 1.5 | 3.3 | -1.8 |
| Sensors | 1.7 | 3.4 | -1.7 |
| Smart Pause performance | 1.7 | 3.4 | -1.7 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better Bluetooth version
Choose Marshall Monitor III A.N.C. Over-Ear Bluetooth Headphones. It scores 4.5 vs 2.3 for Bluetooth version, with a 4.2 overall score.
If you want better Sensors
Choose Cambridge Audio Melomania P100 Headphones. It scores 4.5 vs 1.7 for Sensors, with a 4.3 overall score.
If you want better Connectivity options
Choose Marshall Milton A.N.C.. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for Connectivity options, with a 4.3 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
- Better: battery life and price TechRadar says Cambridge offers much better battery life for less, though without Bose comfort.
- Better: overall performance SoundGuys says Sony is better in most ways, making Bose hard to recommend over it.
QuietComfort Ultra Headphones
- Better: ambition and performance tier What Hi-Fi? says the Ultra takes the range higher than the standard QuietComfort.
- Better: immersive audio and codecs PCMag says the standard model lacks the Ultra’s immersive modes and better codecs.
- Better: flagship tech TechRadar says the Ultra may suit buyers who want flagship technology.
FAQ
Are the Bose QuietComfort Headphones good for travel?
Yes. Reviewers repeatedly praised the light fit, compact folding design, protective case, and strong ANC for travel and commuting.
How good is the noise cancellation?
ANC was the strongest consensus point. Multiple reviewers called it excellent, brilliant, top-tier, or world class, though a few said rivals or the Ultra model can still have advantages.
Are they comfortable for long listening sessions?
Yes. Comfort was one of the most consistent strengths, with reviewers describing them as lightweight, soft, and easy to wear for hours.
How do they sound?
Sound impressions were mixed but generally positive. Many reviewers liked the rich, punchy sound, while others criticized the bass and treble tuning or wanted more detail.
Do they support high-end Bluetooth codecs?
No reviewer treated codec support as a strength. Several criticized the older Bluetooth stack and limited codec support compared with newer or competing headphones.
Do they auto-pause when removed?
No. Multiple reviewers specifically complained that they lack wear-detection auto-pause.
Are they a good value?
Value depends heavily on sale pricing. Some reviewers called them a strong buy at lower prices, while others preferred cheaper older Bose models or more feature-rich competitors.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
Article Reviews
trustedreviews.com
Bose has just announced the successor to its original QuietComfort Headphones, but how do the second generation compare?
whathifi.com
- Review score
- 3.8
techradar.com
- Review score
- 4.3
Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider
Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...
Pros: Design and Aesthetics, Overall recommendation
Cons: Noise isolation (passive), Connectivity options
Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...
Pros: Battery, Charging
Cons: Value for money, Codec support
Choose the Aventho 100 for standout battery life, portable retro styling, strong ANC, and flexible wired/wireless use. Skip it if you dislike on-ear pressure or want a wide, consistently neutral...
Pros: Battery, Design and Aesthetics
Cons: Clamping force comfort, Soundstage width
Best for exceptional battery life, useful ANC, flexible EQ, and strong budget value. Skip it if refined, detailed sound or polished controls matter more than price.
Pros: Value for money, Sound quality
Cons: Button control usability, App