Edifier WH950NB Gen 2 Wireless Headphones

Edifier WH950NB Gen 2 Wireless Headphones Review

Brand: Edifier
Released: May 21, 2025
Updated: 5 months ago
4.2
Overall review score
123
Review insights
57
Scored features
4
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose the WH950NB Gen 2 for strong value, long battery life, comfortable padding, useful app control and effective everyday ANC. Skip it if heavy-bass clarity, simple onboard controls or guaranteed all-day comfort on larger heads matters most.

Best for

Best for value-focused listeners who want long battery life, effective everyday ANC, app-based EQ control, a good case, and comfortable padding for commuting, desk work, or travel.

Not for

Not for listeners who prioritize heavy-bass clarity at louder volumes, simple physical controls, flagship ANC, or a flexible headband that disappears during very long sessions.

Verdict

Reviewer evidence frames the Edifier WH950NB Gen 2 as a value-focused over-ear that gets unusually close to premium territory. ANC, battery life, app control, accessories, case quality, and comfort padding draw repeated praise, and one reviewer even reached for it before a Sony XM6. The tradeoff is that refinement is uneven: bass can crackle or feel overdone in some listening, onboard controls are frustrating, and the rigid steel headband can create clamp discomfort over long sessions. Sound is generally engaging with clear mids, treble, and separation, but spatial and gaming modes are less convincing. The strongest case is not perfection; it is how much everyday performance reviewers heard and felt for the money.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

57 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    21 (37%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    32 (56%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    3 (5%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Battery: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery life drew some of the strongest praise across reviews, including long weekly use and strong remaining charge after hours.
  • 4.7
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Value for money: 4.7, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Value for money was one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly comparing performance favorably against the price.
  • 4.6
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Overall recommendation: 4.6, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Overall recommendations were strongly positive, especially for value-focused buyers.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Aesthetics / discreet profile: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers consistently liked the understated, stylish, premium-looking design.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Design and Aesthetics: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Design was praised as sleek, understated, stylish, and elegant.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Ear cup padding quality: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Ear cup and pad comfort drew consistent praise for plushness, softness, and a comfortable seal.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in LDAC, Included accessories, Carry case quality, near average in Battery, Aesthetics / discreet profile, below average in Button control usability, Maximum volume clarity, Bass performance.

Comparison summary

57 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    23 (40%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    31 (54%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    3 (5%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Button control usability 2.0 4.2 -2.2
Maximum volume clarity 2.5 4.1 -1.6
LDAC 4.3 3.2 +1.1
Included accessories 4.7 3.6 +1.1
Carry case quality 4.5 3.5 +1.0
Portability/foldability 4.5 3.6 +0.9
USB-C 4.8 3.9 +0.9
Preset EQ profile quality 4.4 3.5 +0.8

Consider This Instead

If you want better ANC background noise level

Choose JBL Tour One M3 Headphones. It scores 5.0 vs 4.2 for ANC background noise level, with a 4.2 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Button control usability

Choose Apple AirPods Max 2. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for Button control usability, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Beats Studio 3

  • Similar: active noise cancellation The Edifier ANC was described as rivaling the Beats Studio 3.
  • Worse: battery life The Edifier was presented as offering more battery life than the Beats Studio 3.

Sony XM6

  • Worse: daily preference The reviewer said they reached for the Edifier before the Sony XM6.
  • Better: noise cancellation benchmark The Sony XM6 remained the benchmark for noise cancellation, even though the Edifier was praised for value.

Apple Airpods (3rd Gen)

  • Worse: call clarity The Edifier call experience was better than the reviewer's usual Apple Airpods call issues.

FAQ

Is the Edifier WH950NB Gen 2 good for noise cancellation?

Yes for everyday ANC. Reviewers praised it for reducing commute, treadmill, fan, airplane, and other low-frequency noise, though it was not described as fully erasing the world like the top Sony or Bose options.

How is the battery life?

Battery life was one of the clearest strengths. Reviewers called it a big win, fantastic, and legit, with fast charging also viewed as useful for quick top-ups.

Are these headphones comfortable for long sessions?

Mostly, but with a caveat. Several reviewers praised the padding, glasses comfort, and all-day wear, while one Gen 2 review warned that the rigid steel headband can create clamp pressure after hours.

How does the sound quality compare with the bass?

Overall sound was praised as clear, engaging, and detailed, with good separation and treble. Bass was more mixed: some reviewers liked its punch, while one found heavy-bass tracks crackly at louder volumes.

Is the Edifier app useful?

Yes. Reviewers liked the app for EQ customization, mode control, ANC adjustment, hearing-protection settings, and easier control than the onboard buttons.

Are the controls easy to use?

The app controls were praised, but the physical buttons were a weak spot. One reviewer said the limited four-button layout made mode changes and skipping tracks frustrating and confusing.

Are they good for calls and work?

Yes. Microphone performance was praised for smooth calls and strong voice separation from background noise, although one reviewer noted occasional ambient noise slipping through.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider

#1 Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.5

Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...

Pros: Design and Aesthetics, Overall recommendation

Cons: Noise isolation (passive), Connectivity options

#2 Jabra Evolve3 85
4.5

Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...

Pros: Battery, Charging

Cons: Value for money, Codec support

#3 Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
4.5

Choose the Aventho 100 for standout battery life, portable retro styling, strong ANC, and flexible wired/wireless use. Skip it if you dislike on-ear pressure or want a wide, consistently neutral...

Pros: Battery, Design and Aesthetics

Cons: Clamping force comfort, Soundstage width

#4 Tribit QuietPlus 81
4.4

Best for exceptional battery life, useful ANC, flexible EQ, and strong budget value. Skip it if refined, detailed sound or polished controls matter more than price.

Pros: Value for money, Sound quality

Cons: Button control usability, App