Adults, Season 2

Adults, Season 2 Feature Scores

Explore all 58 feature scores for Adults, Season 2, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

58 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    45 (78%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    6 (10%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    5 (9%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    2 (3%)

Pros

Sort
  • 5.0
    10 reviews strong consensus
    cast chemistry: 5.0, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    This is the clearest point of agreement: the ensemble’s rapport, warmth, and ability to bounce off one another are repeatedly described as the show’s secret sauce.
  • 4.8
    12 reviews strong consensus
    humor: 4.8, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    The season is consistently very funny, mixing physical comedy, cringe, wordplay, escalating farce, and rapid-fire jokes that repeatedly land.
  • 4.9
    9 reviews strong consensus
    episode structure: 4.9, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Episode construction is a major strength, especially the real-time Raccoon countdown and other classic sitcom setups that escalate simple problems into layered ensemble chaos.
  • 5.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    main cast performance: 5.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The core five are repeatedly described as having no weak link, with confident comic timing, natural interplay, and performances that make heightened stories feel lived-in.
  • 4.9
    8 reviews strong consensus
    character development: 4.9, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Season 2 is widely praised for giving the ensemble clearer wants, more vulnerability, and deeper individual arcs, with Anton and Paul Baker receiving especially noticeable growth.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    renewal interest: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Appetite for more episodes is extremely strong, with repeated calls for Season 3 and, in some cases, several more seasons beyond it.
  • 4.8
    7 reviews strong consensus
    entertainment value: 4.8, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Across critics and fan-style reviews, Season 2 is described as fun, sharply improved, and highly entertaining, with several calling it among the best current comedies.
  • 4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    writing quality: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The writing is one of Season 2’s biggest improvements, praised as observant, incisive, tightly comic, and better at tying jokes to character and emotion.
  • 4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    plot originality: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Familiar sitcom devices get fresh twists, from the drug-trip countdown to meta flourishes and strong episode hooks. The season feels inventive even when it borrows classic structures.
  • 4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    emotional impact: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The season’s heart registers alongside the jokes: breakups, vulnerability, and character growth can be unexpectedly moving and even tear-inducing.
  • 4.7
    6 reviews strong consensus
    character likability: 4.7, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Season 2 makes the group much easier to love and root for, even while preserving the cringey, selfish, or frustrating behavior that drives the comedy.
  • 4.3
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    romance quality: 4.3, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    The romantic material is mostly a strength, especially the sexually fluid Anton-Paul Baker arc and the amicable Issa-Paul breakup. The main criticism is that some payoff arrives too late or with too little buildup.
  • 4.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    genre satisfaction: 4.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Season 2 settles confidently into hangout-sitcom form and is repeatedly positioned among the strongest current TV comedies.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews strong consensus
    theme depth: 4.6, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Beneath the farce is thoughtful material about quarter-life uncertainty, friendship, avoidance, work, aging, and the fear of growing into an unstable future.
  • 4.5
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    supporting cast performance: 4.5, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Guest stars are mostly a strong addition and often used very effectively, though the cameo quality is not uniformly successful.
  • 4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    cultural representation: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Season 2’s Gen Z voice is widely praised as more specific, authentic, and less stereotyped, including sexual-fluidity representation that feels natural to the characters.
  • 4.1
    9 reviews low consensus
    realism: 4.1, 9 reviews, low consensus
    The emotional and social behavior often feels highly relatable and lived-in, even when plots become absurd. The recurring realism complaint is visual: Toronto does not always convincingly pass for Queens.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    dialogue quality: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Sharp dialogue and careful wordplay are singled out, with jokes landing through punch lines, rhythm, and character-specific verbal habits.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    finale satisfaction: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The final minutes landed very well for viewers who liked the romantic payoffs and the way the ending positioned the group for another season.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    rewatch value: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The season inspires immediate repeat viewing, with full rewatches starting soon after finishing and clear interest in returning again.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    story quality: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Season 2 makes its messier, escalating storylines land while adding a more emotionally involving through-line across the season.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    tone consistency: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The season is notably assured and consistent, balancing edginess, heart, cringe, and rapid comedy without losing its identity.
  • 4.3
    4 reviews low consensus
    episode pacing: 4.3, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Most episodes move briskly and stay focused, with fast stories and sharp timing. One corporate C-word plot was the notable exception, criticized for running out of steam.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    audience appeal: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The available audience signals are very strong, including near-perfect audience scoring and reported viewing growth in the second season.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    plot twists: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The Billie-Samir turn still lands as a surprise even when the pairing has been suspected, giving the finale an effective jolt.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    practical effects quality: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The mix of practical animals, puppetry, and other creature techniques in Raccoon was noticed positively and helped the episode’s chaos feel tactile.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    acting quality: 5.0, 1 review
    One review calls the performances excellent across the board, emphasizing how well the actors complement one another.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    bingeability: 5.0, 1 review
    One viewer watched the entire season in a single late-night session, a strong sign that the short run and momentum make it easy to consume at once.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    casting quality: 5.0, 1 review
    Raven Simone’s casting was singled out as an especially inspired match for Anton’s family storyline.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    CGI quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The animated animal effects look surprisingly strong, with a favorable comparison to creature effects in a much larger film production.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    cliffhanger effectiveness: 5.0, 1 review
    The ending is praised for leaving the relationships in a place that creates immediate interest in a third season.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    continuity: 5.0, 1 review
    Season 2 is praised for building naturally and consistently on the foundation established in the first season.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    critic appeal: 5.0, 1 review
    Critical reception is exceptionally strong, including a perfect Rotten Tomatoes critic score at the time it was cited.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    episode length: 5.0, 1 review
    The roughly half-hour, get-in-get-out format can work extremely well, keeping compact continuing arcs focused and energetic.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    ethical sensitivity: 5.0, 1 review
    The sexual-fluidity representation is praised for feeling organic and for not reducing characters to a single identity trait.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    fourth-wall narration: 5.0, 1 review
    The meta and fourth-wall touches are viewed as a strength when they push the familiar hangout-sitcom premise into something more self-aware and distinctive.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    modern political framing: 5.0, 1 review
    The progressive framing lands without feeling preachy or lazy, keeping social awareness inside the comedy rather than above it.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    screenplay quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The scripted material is described as stellar, with comedy and character beats working together rather than competing for attention.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    sexual content level: 5.0, 1 review
    The raunchiness works best when it supports candid, realistic conversations instead of feeling glossy or sanitized.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    special effects quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The creature work in Raccoon holds up unusually well for a streaming sitcom and supports the episode’s escalating chaos.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    suspense: 5.0, 1 review
    Raccoon turns a comedy premise into an effective ticking-clock setup, using the approaching acid trip to create genuine countdown tension.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    character balance: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Varied pairings help the ensemble feel broad and connected, though Samir and Billie sometimes slip behind the heavier Paul Baker-Issa-Anton focus.
  • 4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    pilot episode quality: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The added origin episode improves on the original pilot and can be very effective, but its character logic is inconsistent and its laughs are lighter than the season’s best material.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    accountability handling: 4.5, 1 review
    Anton’s workplace mistake and apology are treated as a comic accountability arc that one viewer found funny without losing the point that he had to make amends.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    cinematography: 4.5, 1 review
    The season looks more polished than before, with filming choices that make the visual presentation feel like a clear step up.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    drama quality: 4.5, 1 review
    The quieter relationship material works because the show can slow down just enough to make emotional distance and awkwardness feel recognizable without abandoning the comedy.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    editing quality: 4.5, 1 review
    The editing is credited with selecting strong takes and helping preserve the show’s frenetic, ad-lib-like comic energy.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    production design: 4.5, 1 review
    The sets are described as more inviting in Season 2, helping the production feel richer without changing the show’s basic housebound identity.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    sound design: 4.5, 1 review
    The censor-beep choice in the workplace episode was judged to make the joke funnier, giving the audio gag a clear comic payoff.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    visual style: 4.5, 1 review
    The visual presentation earns praise for sequences such as Anton’s workplace montage, which felt more assured and thoughtfully assembled.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    costume design: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Wardrobe reactions are mixed: Anton’s more glamorous looks draw praise, while a leather club outfit comes across as impractical and distracting.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.4
    7 reviews low consensus
    season length: 2.4, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Eight episodes are the season’s most repeated structural limitation, leaving less room for romance, side characters, and low-stakes hanging out. The counterpoint is that the tighter order keeps episodes focused.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    character consistency: 2.0, 1 review
    The new origin episode creates some friction with established character logic, especially where earlier traits and choices do not fully line up.
  • 2.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    season pacing: 2.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The broader season can feel rushed and slow at the same time: key romances could be seeded earlier, while the short run crowds story into the edges.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    world-building: 2.5, 1 review
    The eight-episode format limits how far the sitcom universe can expand through longer guest arcs and recurring side characters.
  • 2.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    season finale quality: 2.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The finale is one of the more uneven episodes: the HOA plot is comparatively weak, though the character and relationship payoffs improve the closing stretch.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    language level: 3.0, 1 review
    The show’s handling of the C-word and a censored slur prompted a mixed reaction: the joke worked, but the difference in treatment also felt jarring.
  • 3.0
    1 review
    plot clarity: 3.0, 1 review
    The premiere’s anything-goes comic confidence sometimes comes at the expense of coherence, although the chaos can still work in the episode’s favor.

Cast & Creators

  • Paul Baker
    4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Jack Innanen: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Innanen brings easy affability and surprising flexibility to Paul Baker, shifting convincingly from soft-boy warmth to frat-bro energy. His chemistry with Owen Thiele helps make the central romance work.
  • Anton
    4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Owen Thiele: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Thiele stands out for magnetism, emotional range, and the ability to move from anxiety or shame into sharp comedy almost instantly.
  • Issa
    4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Amita Rao: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Rao combines expressive physical comedy, high-energy charisma, and full commitment to material that could easily turn cringey. Her performance repeatedly turns awkwardness into one of the season’s biggest comic assets.
  • Samir
    4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Malik Elassal: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Elassal gives Samir a wholesome sincerity and strong straight-man timing, making his overthinking feel both goofy and emotionally affecting.
  • Billie
    5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Lucy Freyer: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Freyer balances awkward comedy with real emotion, carrying difficult cringe material while keeping Billie vulnerable and funny.
  • Creator
    4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Ben Kronengold: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Kronengold’s comic rhythm is sharp, and his work with Rebecca Shaw gives the sexually fluid relationship dynamics unusual clarity without over-explaining them.
  • Creator
    4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Rebecca Shaw: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Shaw’s joke construction is precise, and her work with Ben Kronengold steers the central romance through complicated feelings with restraint.
  • Writer
    5.0
    1 review
    Ananya Hegde: 5.0, 1 review
    Hegde’s Fake ID episode stands out as one of the strongest installments of the season.
  • Talia
    5.0
    1 review
    Raven-Symoné: 5.0, 1 review
    Raven-Symoné’s guest appearance is funny and memorable, with the casting itself feeling like an especially strong fit for Anton’s family storyline.
  • Writer
    5.0
    1 review
    Sanaz Toossi: 5.0, 1 review
    Toossi contributes a terrific episode in a season already praised for unusually strong writing.
  • Actor
    5.0
    1 review
    Zosia Mamet: 5.0, 1 review
    Mamet fully commits to an unhinged therapist guest role and earns some of the episode’s biggest laughs.