Compare Logitech MX Master 4 vs Logitech MX Master 3S

Logitech MX Master 4

Logitech MX Master 4

Overall score 3.7 / 5

Based on 69 scored reviews

vs
Logitech MX Master 3S

Logitech MX Master 3S

Overall score 4.2 / 5

Based on 63 scored reviews

How we score

Scorata scores summarize analyzed review evidence on a 1–5 scale; they are not laboratory measurements or a simple average of customer star ratings. Feature scores summarize the reviews covering that feature. The overall score averages feature scores within each review, then combines review averages. When both expert and customer evidence are available, those two groups receive equal weight. Products can have different review coverage, so small score gaps do not establish a winner.

Recommendations prioritize important features for the category, with a score of at least 3.5, a gap of at least 0.25 points and at least two supporting reviews per product. Features with widely varying scores or broad connectivity contexts are excluded from recommendations. These safeguards do not establish statistical significance.

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

The review evidence points to a tradeoff: feet quality versus battery life and charging convenience. Choose according to which strengths matter more to you; the overall score alone does not settle that choice.

Choose Logitech MX Master 4 for feet quality.

Choose Logitech MX Master 3S for battery life and charging convenience.

Why these recommendations?

Logitech MX Master 4

Where It Has the Edge

  • feet quality is 4.0 vs 2.0. The larger PTFE feet are praised for smooth, controlled gliding and are seen as an improvement over the...

Logitech MX Master 3S

Where It Has the Edge

  • battery life is 4.9 vs 3.9. Battery endurance is a major strength, with many reviewers getting weeks to roughly two months between charges and...
  • charging convenience is 5.0 vs 3.0. The front USB-C port lets the mouse keep working while it charges, a practical detail reviewers repeatedly appreciate.
  • 2.4GHz connectivity is 5.0 vs 3.5. Logi Bolt is praised for providing a stable, low-latency connection and is often preferred over Bluetooth when reliability...
Logitech MX Master 4 3.7 overall score
Logitech MX Master 3S 4.2 overall score

Compare features

Scores are out of 5. Missing scores mean missing review evidence, not a missing feature.

Scored on both products

Battery and charging

Battery life
Logitech MX Master 4
3.9

Battery life is repeatedly praised as excellent, with reviewers reporting weeks of daily use and very little charge loss. Quick top-ups further reduce the chance of being interrupted by a dead mouse.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.9

Battery endurance is a major strength, with many reviewers getting weeks to roughly two months between charges and finding Logitech’s long-life claim believable in real use.

Charging convenience
Logitech MX Master 4
3.0

USB-C charging is convenient because the mouse remains usable while plugged in, avoiding the downtime associated with bottom-charging designs.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

The front USB-C port lets the mouse keep working while it charges, a practical detail reviewers repeatedly appreciate.

Replaceable battery support
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

The home-replaceable battery is praised as a meaningful longevity improvement and helps counter the usual disposable feel of sealed wireless mice.

Logitech MX Master 3S
2.0

The sealed, non-user-replaceable battery raises longevity concerns for buyers who want an easily serviceable mouse.

Rechargeable battery
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

The rechargeable design is easy to live with because the battery lasts for weeks and can be topped up over USB-C while the mouse is still in use.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

The built-in rechargeable battery holds up well in long-term use and avoids the hassle of disposable cells.

Charging speed
Logitech MX Master 4
4.3

Charging speed is another convenience: reviewers report that the mouse tops up quickly, complementing its already long battery life.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Fast charging earns near-universal praise because a very short top-up can restore hours of use, making a depleted battery a minor inconvenience.

Ownership and support

Reliability
Logitech MX Master 4
2.9

Hardware reliability is generally strong in current testing, but software quirks and inherited concerns about switches and the scroll wheel keep long-term confidence from being absolute.

Logitech MX Master 3S
3.7

Reliability is mixed over the long term: many users report years of dependable use, while others encounter wireless glitches, software resets, or button failures.

Hand support
Logitech MX Master 4
3.0

The raised body, thumb cradle, and palm support are repeatedly credited with reducing strain during desk work. The right-handed shape is the main accessibility limitation.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

The sculpted body and thumb rest provide excellent support for the hand and wrist during prolonged desk use.

Setup ease
Logitech MX Master 4
3.1

Basic Bluetooth or Bolt pairing is usually described as quick and easy. The main setup complaints center on Logi Options+, permissions, and software troubleshooting rather than the wireless pairing itself.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Pairing and configuration are generally straightforward, whether using Bluetooth, Bolt, or Options+.

Double-click reliability
Logitech MX Master 4
2.0

Current reviews do not report widespread double-click failures on the MX Master 4, but reviewers familiar with older models remain cautious about switch longevity.

Logitech MX Master 3S
1.0

One long-term owner reported unwanted double-clicks and missed single clicks, a serious concern for precision work.

Multi-device support
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

Support for up to three paired devices is a major productivity benefit for users who move between computers or tablets. Reviewers especially value it in mixed Mac/PC setups.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Three-device support is consistently treated as a major productivity advantage for users juggling desktops, laptops, tablets, or work and personal machines.

Plug-and-play support
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

Opinions on plug-and-play support are mixed and depend heavily on workflow, preferences, or how deeply the mouse is customized.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Basic pointing and scrolling work well without special software, so the mouse remains usable even before customization is installed.

Value for money
Logitech MX Master 4
3.7

Reviewers generally think the premium price is justified for people who will use its productivity features every day. Value is much weaker for casual users and many MX Master 3S owners who do not need the new haptics or Action Ring.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.4

Most reviewers think the premium is justified for serious productivity use, especially when discounted. Budget users and people who only need basic pointing and scrolling are less likely to see the value.

Macro support
Logitech MX Master 4
2.5

Smart Actions and macro-style automation can reduce repetitive work and expand the mouse beyond simple button remaps. Power users appreciate the flexibility, while others find the software constraints limiting.

Logitech MX Master 3S
2.0

Macro capability is limited compared with dedicated gaming mice, and users who rely heavily on mouse-based macros may find the available controls insufficient.

Warranty
Logitech MX Master 4
2.0

Warranty coverage is viewed as short for an expensive productivity mouse, especially by reviewers concerned about long-term scroll-wheel or switch wear.

Logitech MX Master 3S
1.5

One account was sharply negative after a scroll-wheel problem reportedly was not covered to the user’s satisfaction.

Other features

Repairability
Logitech MX Master 4
3.9

Reviewers praise the easier-to-disassemble construction and home-replaceable battery as a meaningful repairability improvement. Switch-level repairs may still require professional work.

Logitech MX Master 3S
1.5

Repairing a failed click switch can require disassembly, soldering, and tools that many owners will not have, making self-repair inconvenient.

Feet quality
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

The larger PTFE feet are praised for smooth, controlled gliding and are seen as an improvement over the previous generation.

Logitech MX Master 3S
2.0

The feet are adequate for desk work but draw criticism from reviewers accustomed to lighter gaming mice with faster, smoother skates.

Onboard memory
Logitech MX Master 4
3.0

The lack of onboard profile memory frustrates power users who want custom mappings to travel with the mouse without relying on Logi Options+ on every computer.

Logitech MX Master 3S
1.0

The lack of onboard memory is a serious weakness for power users because custom profiles depend on Logi Options+ being available and running on each machine.

Sustainability
Logitech MX Master 4
3.0

Reviewers welcome the recycled plastics, low-carbon aluminum, recycled cobalt, and more recyclable construction. Sustainability is treated as a positive extra rather than the primary reason to buy.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Reviewers who mention sustainability respond positively to recycled materials, reduced disposable-battery use, and Logitech’s environmental positioning.

USB-C connectivity
Logitech MX Master 4
3.1

The shift to a USB-C Bolt receiver and USB-C charging is welcomed for modern laptops and tablets. Reviewers also appreciate being able to charge while continuing to work.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

USB-C charging is consistently appreciated for modern convenience and the sensible front-facing port placement.

Handedness options
Logitech MX Master 4
2.8

The mouse is designed around right-handed use, and reviewers repeatedly call the lack of a left-handed version a meaningful limitation.

Logitech MX Master 3S
1.0

The lack of a left-handed version is one of the clearest limitations. Its sculpted body and thumb controls effectively exclude left-handed users.

Profile management
Logitech MX Master 4
3.3

Per-application profiles are a major strength for creative and office workflows, letting the same controls behave differently in Photoshop, Final Cut, Excel, and other apps.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

App-specific profiles are a major customization strength, letting the same controls behave differently across editing, office, browser, and creative software.

Ecosystem integration
Logitech MX Master 4
3.3

Integration with Logi Options+, Flow, Adobe tools, and Logitech’s broader ecosystem can make the mouse unusually powerful for multi-device creative work. Plugin coverage is still uneven.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Logi Flow and integration with other Logitech devices are strong productivity features, especially for moving the pointer and clipboard across multiple computers.

Receiver quality
Logitech MX Master 4
3.4

The USB-C Logi Bolt receiver is generally praised for dependable pairing and modern laptop compatibility. Reviewers dislike that the Mac version omits it and that the mouse has nowhere to store it.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

The Bolt receiver is viewed as a strong connection option, especially for stable low-latency use in busy wireless environments.

2.4GHz connectivity
Logitech MX Master 4
3.5

Opinions on 2.4GHz connectivity are mixed and depend heavily on workflow, preferences, or how deeply the mouse is customized.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Logi Bolt is praised for providing a stable, low-latency connection and is often preferred over Bluetooth when reliability matters most.

Balance and weight distribution
Logitech MX Master 4
3.5

Reviewers are broadly positive about balance and weight distribution, with most comments emphasizing that it works well in everyday productivity use.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

The mouse’s weight distribution is praised for supporting a stable, planted feel during long desk sessions.

Motion latency
Logitech MX Master 4
3.5

Normal work feels responsive over Bluetooth or Bolt, but fast-paced gaming exposes the limitations of the 125 Hz report rate.

Logitech MX Master 3S
2.0

The low polling rate can create perceptible lag compared with high-refresh gaming mice, even though office use is usually acceptable.

Wired connectivity
Logitech MX Master 4
2.5

USB-C is for charging only, so the mouse remains wireless even while plugged in. Reviewers generally accept using it during charging but note that it cannot operate as a true wired mouse.

Logitech MX Master 3S
1.1

The USB-C port charges the mouse but does not provide true wired input. Reviewers who want a cable fallback or zero-interference mode see that as a clear limitation.

Scroll wheel resistance
Logitech MX Master 4
2.7

The wheel’s controlled resistance is generally praised, especially on the horizontal wheel. A few reviewers find the main wheel slightly loose when spun quickly.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.0

Wheel resistance is generally well judged, with praise for controlled tactile scrolling. Some reviewers find the thumb wheel heavier or differently tensioned than they prefer.

Windows compatibility
Logitech MX Master 4
3.7

Windows use is broadly straightforward, with strong customization and Bolt support. Older Windows 10 Bluetooth limitations are a caveat rather than a day-to-day issue for current systems.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Windows compatibility is strong, including full Options+ support and smooth multi-device workflows.

Free-spin scrolling
Logitech MX Master 4
3.8

MagSpeed free-spin scrolling is repeatedly praised for flying through long pages, spreadsheets, and timelines while retaining control. It is a signature feature many reviewers would not want to give up.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Free-spin mode is a major productivity benefit, letting users tear through long documents or timelines with far less effort than a conventional wheel.

Polling rate
Logitech MX Master 4
2.9

The 125 Hz polling rate is acceptable for productivity but widely viewed as dated and limiting for fast gaming. Several reviewers explicitly wished Logitech had raised it.

Logitech MX Master 3S
1.9

The 125Hz polling rate is one of the most repeated technical criticisms. It is adequate for office work, but reviewers see it as dated for high-refresh displays and fast gaming.

DPI range
Logitech MX Master 4
3.7

The 8,000-DPI ceiling is considered ample for productivity and high-resolution displays. Reviewers rarely see a need for more unless the mouse is being judged against gaming hardware.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.7

The 8,000-DPI ceiling is more than enough for productivity and helps on high-resolution or multi-monitor setups, though many users never need the upper range.

Coating quality
Logitech MX Master 4
3.3

The move away from broad soft-touch rubber is generally seen as better for stain resistance and long-term appearance. A few reviewers prefer the softer old coating or dislike the new button texture.

Logitech MX Master 3S
2.3

The soft-touch coating feels good when new, but long-term feedback is consistently wary of staining, grime, discoloration, and surface wear. Lighter colors draw the most criticism.

Cross-platform compatibility
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

Reviewers value smooth use across Windows and macOS, especially with Flow and multi-device pairing. Cross-platform file transfer can still be hit-or-miss.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

The mouse works well across major desktop and mobile operating systems, which is especially useful for mixed-device work setups.

Cursor control
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

Cursor movement is repeatedly described as smooth, steady, and easy to control for detailed work. Weight can make rapid movements feel less agile.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Cursor movement is praised for staying smooth and precise during everyday productivity tasks.

Motion consistency
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

Reviewers frequently report steady tracking without skipping, shaking, or jerky motion, including on difficult surfaces.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Motion is generally smooth and consistent in precision work, although wireless interference can still affect isolated setups.

Premium feel
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

The mouse earns a premium feel from its construction, quiet switches, metal wheels, and polished haptics. The premium price and hard-plastic changes make that impression slightly less universal.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

The mouse is consistently described as substantial and premium, thanks to its metal wheels, solid construction, soft-touch surfaces, and overall finish.

Left and right click quality
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

The primary clicks are widely praised for being soft, quiet, and satisfying without feeling mushy. Several reviewers consider them an improvement over earlier MX Master models.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

The main buttons are widely praised for combining very low noise with useful tactile feedback, making them especially pleasant for office work.

Horizontal scrolling
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

The horizontal thumb wheel is widely appreciated for timelines, spreadsheets, and large canvases. A minority find it slow, imprecise, or hard to work into established habits.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.9

The thumb wheel is one of the most loved productivity features, particularly for spreadsheets, editing timelines, large canvases, and browser or app navigation.

Surface compatibility
Logitech MX Master 4
4.1

Reviewers repeatedly report reliable tracking on difficult surfaces such as wood and glass, making a mouse pad largely optional.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Darkfield tracking is a clear win, with reviewers repeatedly confirming reliable use on glass and other surfaces that trip up ordinary mice.

Gaming suitability
Logitech MX Master 4
2.9

Casual and slower-paced games are workable, but reviewers repeatedly warn that the weight and 125 Hz polling rate make this a poor fit for competitive or twitch-heavy gaming.

Logitech MX Master 3S
2.0

The MX Master 3S can handle casual games, but reviewers consistently discourage it for competitive play because of its weight, 125Hz polling, and productivity-first design.

USB receiver storage
Logitech MX Master 4
2.3

Reviewers criticize the continued lack of built-in storage for the Bolt receiver, an avoidable inconvenience on a premium travel-capable mouse.

Logitech MX Master 3S
1.5

The missing receiver-storage slot is a recurring travel annoyance because the small Bolt dongle is easy to misplace.

MacOS compatibility
Logitech MX Master 4
4.2

Mac users generally report strong compatibility and useful gesture integration, though Options+ setup and Apple Universal Control can introduce friction.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Mac support is excellent, with reviewers praising both reliable operation and useful app or gesture customization.

Scroll wheel quality
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

The MagSpeed wheel is one of the most celebrated parts of the mouse, combining controlled ratcheting with fast free-spinning navigation. A few reviewers noted minor looseness or long-term durability concerns.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.7

The MagSpeed wheel is one of the most celebrated parts of the mouse, especially for fast document navigation and smooth mode switching. A few long-term reports of looseness or rattling keep it from being flawless.

Device switching
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

Switching among paired devices is repeatedly described as easy and useful for multi-computer desks. Flow and Action Ring shortcuts can make multi-device workflows even faster, though Flow itself can be clunky.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.6

Switching among computers is usually fast and convenient, particularly for multi-device desks. The underside button placement is the main usability complaint.

Weight
Logitech MX Master 4
3.1

The roughly 150-gram body feels substantial and stable to some reviewers, but weight is one of the most common complaints. It hurts portability and makes fast gaming movements feel sluggish.

Logitech MX Master 3S
3.6

Weight is divisive: some users enjoy the solid, premium heft, while others find 141g tiring or too heavy for frequent lifting and fast movements.

Portability
Logitech MX Master 4
3.1

The large, heavy body is repeatedly described as a desk-first design rather than a travel mouse. Some reviewers still carry it, but compact-mouse users will find it cumbersome.

Logitech MX Master 3S
2.7

Portability is only middling because the mouse is large and bulky, though some users still carry it daily. Compact alternatives are easier to travel with.

Scroll wheel precision
Logitech MX Master 4
4.1

Reviewers praise the main wheel for combining fast navigation with precise stopping and controlled ratcheting. Minor looseness at high speed is the main reservation.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.6

The main wheel earns strong marks for moving cleanly between precise notched scrolling and rapid free-spin behavior.

Grip texture
Logitech MX Master 4
4.1

Textured plastic and rubberized side areas generally provide secure grip, though opinions on the new button texture are mixed.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.5

The rubberized texture is widely liked for feeling soft, secure, and grippy, although a few long-term users dislike how the coating ages or turns tacky.

Switch feel
Logitech MX Master 4
4.1

The quiet switches are widely praised for a soft, satisfying action suited to shared workspaces rather than a sharp gaming-style click.

Logitech MX Master 3S
3.8

Switch feel divides opinion: many appreciate the softer, quiet tactile action, while others miss the firmer feedback of older or gaming-focused mice.

Connection stability
Logitech MX Master 4
3.8

Most reviewers report stable wireless use without dropouts or interference. Isolated software and Universal Control problems keep the experience from being universally trouble-free.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.0

Wireless stability is mostly good, especially with Logi Bolt, but not spotless. A minority of testers report Bluetooth hiccups, interference, stutters, or imperfect tracking.

Wireless latency
Logitech MX Master 4
2.7

Opinions on wireless latency are mixed and depend heavily on workflow, preferences, or how deeply the mouse is customized.

Logitech MX Master 3S
2.9

Latency is usually fine for desk work, but some reviewers notice or warn about lag, interference, or the limits of the low polling rate compared with gaming mice.

Glide smoothness
Logitech MX Master 4
3.9

Despite its weight, the widened feet and smooth skates let the mouse glide easily and predictably across desks. This helps preserve precise control in normal work.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.0

Glide is generally smooth for office work, but heavier weight and mediocre feet draw criticism from reviewers comparing it with fast gaming mice.

Comfort and build

Switch durability
Logitech MX Master 4
3.3

Switch longevity is a lingering concern because earlier MX units developed click failures for some owners. The current model’s quieter switches feel good, but long-term confidence is not universal yet.

Logitech MX Master 3S
1.0

Long-term switch durability is a concern because multiple reports describe flaky clicking or a button failing after extended use.

Size
Logitech MX Master 4
3.4

The MX Master 4 is a large mouse, which suits many medium-to-large hands but can feel bulky or oversized to others. Its size is a recurring tradeoff alongside its ergonomic support.

Logitech MX Master 3S
1.8

The large body is a poor fit for some smaller hands and travel-focused users, even though it suits the mouse’s supportive desk-first design.

Materials quality
Logitech MX Master 4
3.8

Materials generally feel solid and premium, with the new textured plastics praised for better aging and stain resistance. Some reviewers still prefer the softer feel of the previous rubberized shell.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Materials receive strong praise for feeling refined and substantial, particularly the metal scroll wheels and soft-touch contact surfaces.

Grip comfort
Logitech MX Master 4
3.8

The sculpted body and thumb rest create a secure, relaxed grip for many reviewers. The fit is less convincing for people who prefer vertical or much smaller mice.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Reviewers repeatedly praise how secure and comfortable the mouse feels in hand, helped by the thumb rest and rubberized contact areas.

Ergonomic design
Logitech MX Master 4
3.8

The sculpted right-handed shape earns widespread praise for supporting the palm and wrist through long work sessions. Comfort is less universal for people who prefer vertical mice or a smaller, lighter shape.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.9

The sculpted right-handed shape receives unusually strong praise for wrist position, palm support, and everyday comfort. It is one of the product’s clearest strengths.

Build quality
Logitech MX Master 4
3.8

Build quality is widely described as sturdy, precise, and premium. A few isolated quality-control blemishes prevent a completely flawless consensus.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.6

Build quality is generally excellent, with reviewers calling the body solid, well engineered, and durable. The main caveats come from coating wear and isolated switch or wheel failures.

Shape comfort
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

The familiar sculpted shape is one of the mouse’s strongest qualities and fits many reviewers naturally. A few prefer the older shape or a vertical mouse.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.6

The tall, sculpted shape fits many medium-to-large hands extremely well and is frequently described as natural or glove-like. Smaller hands are the common exception.

Hand size compatibility
Logitech MX Master 4
3.5

Large-hand users often report an excellent fit, while some reviewers note that the size can be too much for smaller hands. Personal hand size matters more here than on compact mice.

Logitech MX Master 3S
2.8

Fit depends heavily on hand size. Medium-to-large hands tend to love the shape, while smaller-handed users often find the mouse too large or harder to reach comfortably.

Aesthetic design
Logitech MX Master 4
3.9

Most reviewers like the refined, modern appearance and desk presence, though the large sculpted styling is not universally attractive.

Logitech MX Master 3S
3.3

The design looks professional and refined to many reviewers, but opinions are mixed on the conservative colors and how visibly pale finishes collect dirt.

Long-session comfort
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

The supportive shape is repeatedly praised for staying comfortable through long workdays and editing sessions. Size, weight, and personal grip preference can still make it less suitable for some hands.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.4

Comfort over long work sessions is a standout strength for many users, with several reporting reduced strain or all-day ease. The main exceptions are people sensitive to the mouse’s size or weight.

Palm grip comfort
Logitech MX Master 4
3.9

Palm-grip users are especially well served by the large sculpted body, which supports the hand comfortably over long sessions.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.0

Palm grip is the mouse’s natural fit and is usually very comfortable, though users may need to adjust hand position to keep both support and button reach.

Durability over time
Logitech MX Master 4
3.5

Long-term impressions are encouraging for the new materials, but reviewers remain cautious about scroll-wheel and switch longevity based on prior models. The repairable battery design helps the ownership outlook.

Logitech MX Master 3S
3.5

Long-term durability is mixed: several owners say the mouse holds up for years, while others report coating wear, rattling scroll wheels, or click problems after extended use.

Controls and connectivity

DPI customization
Logitech MX Master 4
3.0

Pointer sensitivity can be tuned broadly in Options+, including fine DPI steps and workflow-specific settings. Reviewers value the ability to dial in precision for editing.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Fine sensitivity adjustment is a useful strength for matching the mouse to different displays, workloads, and personal pointer-speed preferences.

Button customization
Logitech MX Master 4
3.6

Button remapping is a major strength, with extensive per-app assignments and workflow-specific controls. The payoff is highest for users willing to spend time configuring the mouse.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Deep button remapping is a major strength, especially because controls can change by application and be tailored to creative or office workflows.

Programmable buttons
Logitech MX Master 4
3.8

The many programmable controls are repeatedly praised for letting users move common commands off the keyboard. Their value rises sharply for editing and other repetitive professional workflows.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

The programmable controls are repeatedly praised for turning common shortcuts and app commands into faster, more efficient mouse actions.

Software quality
Logitech MX Master 4
3.9

Logi Options+ unlocks deep remapping, app profiles, haptics, and workflow tools, which many reviewers value. The app is also a recurring pain point because of setup problems, resource use, occasional instability, and dependence for advanced features.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.9

Logi Options+ is generally praised as polished, powerful, and useful for tailoring the mouse to real workflows. The strongest feedback highlights app-specific control rather than basic pointer settings.

Software stability
Logitech MX Master 4
4.5

Software stability is mixed: many reviewers run Options+ without trouble, while others report setup loops, resource problems, or past kernel panics. Advanced features therefore carry some software risk.

Logitech MX Master 3S
3.6

Options+ stability is inconsistent across reviewers: several find it dependable, while others report unresponsiveness or settings temporarily reverting.

Button quality
Logitech MX Master 4
3.2

Buttons generally feel solid, quiet, and satisfying, with the new thumb control easier to actuate. Some side controls can feel clunky or be triggered accidentally.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.0

Most reviewers like the substantial, responsive feel of the controls, although some dislike the softer main-switch feel and isolated failures hurt confidence.

Button count
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

The large number of physical controls is a productivity advantage for power users. Some reviewers find the mouse overly busy or complex until muscle memory develops.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.5

The control count is generally seen as generous for productivity, offering enough programmable inputs for power users without overwhelming the layout.

Software usability
Logitech MX Master 4
4.5

Options+ can be intuitive for basic remapping, but deeper workflow setup is not universally simple. Several reviewers find the configuration process clunky, limited, or more involved than a mouse should require.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Options+ is generally easy to understand and configure, making deep customization accessible without feeling overly technical.

Button placement
Logitech MX Master 4
3.9

Button placement is usually praised as easy to reach and improved over older models, though a few reviewers needed time to adapt to shifted side controls or disliked the gesture-button position.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.3

Most controls fall naturally under the fingers and thumb, but the hidden thumb-rest button and underside device-switch button can require an awkward reach.

Gesture controls
Logitech MX Master 4
3.9

Gesture controls remain useful for desktop switching, Mission Control, and navigation, but opinions vary on whether they beat familiar keyboard or trackpad gestures.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.0

Gesture controls can be powerful once configured, but they are more useful to workflow-heavy users than to people who prefer simple mouse behavior.

Bluetooth support
Logitech MX Master 4
3.9

Bluetooth pairing is generally straightforward and reliable, including on Macs where several reviewers used it without the Bolt receiver. Some users still prefer the receiver for maximum consistency.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.0

Bluetooth is easy and reliable for most reviewers, though a few users report occasional connection trouble and prefer the Bolt receiver when stability matters most.

Performance

Productivity performance
Logitech MX Master 4
3.9

Reviewers consistently describe the mouse as a productivity powerhouse, especially for editing, spreadsheets, office work, and repetitive workflows. Its programmable controls can meaningfully reduce keyboard trips once configured.

Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

This is where the MX Master 3S earns its reputation: reviewers repeatedly describe it as an exceptional work mouse that speeds up editing, spreadsheets, coding, and everyday desk workflows.

Sensor performance
Logitech MX Master 4
4.2

The 8,000-DPI Darkfield sensor is consistently praised for accurate tracking and excellent surface versatility. It is more than sufficient for productivity even if gaming specs have moved far beyond it.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.8

The Darkfield sensor is repeatedly praised for smooth, accurate performance and unusually broad surface support.

Click noise
Logitech MX Master 4
4.3

Near-silent primary clicks are one of the most consistently praised refinements, especially for offices and shared rooms. Secondary and wheel clicks can still be noticeably louder.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.8

Quiet Clicks are one of the most universally praised upgrades, making the mouse far less distracting in offices, calls, recording setups, and late-night work.

Wireless performance
Logitech MX Master 4
3.7

Wireless performance is broadly praised as dependable, with the revised antenna and Bolt receiver delivering smooth day-to-day use. The underlying 125 Hz report rate still limits gaming responsiveness.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.0

Wireless performance is good for most office use, but a few testers encountered stutters or interference that feel out of place on a premium mouse.

Tracking and training

Accuracy and tracking precision
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

Tracking is consistently described as smooth and precise across productivity and creative work, including fine editing. The heavy body can still make the pointer feel less agile in fast movement.

Logitech MX Master 3S
4.3

Tracking is usually described as smooth and highly precise across normal productivity work and high-resolution displays. A small number of wireless-interference reports create some inconsistency.

Evidence available for one product

Other features

Acceleration control
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

Scroll and pointer acceleration controls add useful tuning for people who want faster movement without giving up precision, though this is mainly a power-user benefit.

Logitech MX Master 3SNo score yet
Cable quality
Logitech MX Master 4No score yet
Logitech MX Master 3S
2.0

The included charging cable is a weak point in one detailed assessment, where its thin, non-braided construction felt cheap beside the premium mouse.

Click consistency
Logitech MX Master 4No score yet
Logitech MX Master 3S
1.0

Long-term click consistency is a concern because one owner reported missed single clicks, unintended double-clicks, and unreliable dragging.

Profile switching
Logitech MX Master 4No score yet
Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Automatic profile changes can work smoothly within Logitech’s ecosystem, reducing manual switching when moving between paired devices or setups.

Responsiveness
Logitech MX Master 4
3.8

Day-to-day pointer response is generally immediate and smooth, with little reported lag in productivity use. Gaming-focused reviewers are less impressed by the low polling rate.

Logitech MX Master 3SNo score yet
Sleep mode
Logitech MX Master 4No score yet
Logitech MX Master 3S
2.5

Wake behavior is mostly fine, but one test found that resuming from full sleep occasionally needed an extra click or two.

Switch quality
Logitech MX Master 4
4.1

Switch quality is generally viewed as high because the primary clicks are quiet, tactile, and pleasant. Durability is the unresolved question.

Logitech MX Master 3SNo score yet

Battery and charging

Battery indicator
Logitech MX Master 4
4.3

The relocated battery/status light is a small but welcome refinement, with reviewers finding it easier to see from normal desk angles.

Logitech MX Master 3SNo score yet

Controls and connectivity

Button responsiveness
Logitech MX Master 4No score yet
Logitech MX Master 3S
3.1

Button response is generally good when new, but long-term reports of missed clicks and switch failures create a notable reliability concern.

Haptic controls
Logitech MX Master 4
3.4

Haptics feel polished and satisfying to many reviewers, especially with the Action Ring and supported creative apps. Others see them as a pleasant gimmick rather than a reason to upgrade.

Logitech MX Master 3SNo score yet
Side button quality
Logitech MX Master 4
3.7

Side buttons are usually considered easy to find and useful, especially after Logitech separated or repositioned them. Some reviewers needed time to adapt or found the spacing imperfect.

Logitech MX Master 3SNo score yet

Comfort and build

Claw grip comfort
Logitech MX Master 4
4.3

The shape also works well for claw grip according to reviewers who tried multiple grip styles, though the large body remains a preference issue.

Logitech MX Master 3SNo score yet
Fingertip grip comfort
Logitech MX Master 4
4.0

Fingertip use is possible despite the size, but the weight and large shell make it less naturally suited to that grip than lighter mice.

Logitech MX Master 3SNo score yet

Ownership and support

Dongle-free setup
Logitech MX Master 4No score yet
Logitech MX Master 3S
5.0

Bluetooth makes dongle-free use practical, and at least one Mac-focused reviewer found the lack of a receiver unproblematic because pairing remained easy and broad.

Firmware reliability
Logitech MX Master 4
3.2

Firmware reliability has a notable blemish: at least one long-term reviewer reports the thumb button still fails during click-and-drag after many months without a patch.

Logitech MX Master 3SNo score yet
Replacement parts availability
Logitech MX Master 4No score yet
Logitech MX Master 3S
4.0

Some mechanical issues appear repairable with inexpensive parts, which is a modest positive for owners willing to service the mouse.

Reviews Comparing These Products

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Other Top Mice to Consider

#1 Logitech MX Anywhere 3S
4.5

Best for travel, quiet shared spaces, precise any-surface tracking, and multi-device productivity. Skip it if you have large hands, want all-day palm support, or need a gaming-focused mouse.

Pros: portability, click noise

Cons: hand size compatibility, dongle-free setup

#2 Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.4

Choose it if you want a premium MMO/productivity mouse with 12 adjustable side buttons, strong battery life, and Stream Deck integration. Skip it if you need an ultralight FPS mouse,...

Pros: button customization, MMO gaming suitability

Cons: FPS gaming suitability

#3 Turtle Beach Kone II
4.3

Choose the Kone II if you want a large, ergonomic mouse with deep customization and strong sensor performance. Skip it if you have small hands, need an ambidextrous mouse, or...

Pros: value for money, button customization

Cons: fingertip grip comfort, portability

#4 Turtle Beach Kone II Air
4.3

Good if you want a large, ergonomic wireless mouse with long battery life and deep customization. Skip it if you have small hands, prioritize ultralight FPS speed, or want the...

Pros: battery life, software usability

Cons: weight, FPS gaming suitability