Compare Hyperkin The Competitor vs Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.

Hyperkin The Competitor

Hyperkin The Competitor

Overall score 4.3 / 5

Based on 40 scored reviews

vs
Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.

Overall score 3.9 / 5

Based on 11 scored reviews

How we score

Scorata scores summarize analyzed review evidence on a 1–5 scale; they are not laboratory measurements or a simple average of customer star ratings. Feature scores summarize the reviews covering that feature. The overall score averages feature scores within each review, then combines review averages. When both expert and customer evidence are available, those two groups receive equal weight. Products can have different review coverage, so small score gaps do not establish a winner.

Recommendations prioritize important features for the category, with a score of at least 3.5, a gap of at least 0.25 points and at least two supporting reviews per product. Features with widely varying scores or broad connectivity contexts are excluded from recommendations. These safeguards do not establish statistical significance.

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

The review evidence points to a tradeoff: overall comfort and weight balance versus software customization and customization depth. Choose according to which strengths matter more to you; the overall score alone does not settle that choice.

Choose Hyperkin The Competitor for overall comfort and weight balance.

Choose Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E. for software customization and customization depth.

Why these recommendations?

Hyperkin The Competitor

Where It Has the Edge

  • overall comfort is 4.9 vs 3.8. Comfort is one of the clearest strengths: the broad DualSense-like shape, rounded grips, and light weight work well...
  • weight balance is 4.5 vs 3.7. The Competitor is notably light because it has no battery, and most impressions treat that as a comfort...
  • design and aesthetics is 4.8 vs 4.5. The DualSense-inspired shape and two-tone styling are a major part of the appeal, with the white, black, gold,...

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.

Where It Has the Edge

  • software customization is 5.0 vs 1.6. Software customization is deep, covering stick curves and dead zones, trigger behavior, button mapping, profiles, and other detailed...
  • customization depth is 5.0 vs 2.0. Modularity is one of the product's defining strengths, allowing fast stick/D-pad rearrangement, alternate modules, and extensive per-game customization.
  • trigger stop effectiveness is 5.0 vs 2.2. Physical trigger stops are highly effective, sharply reducing travel and making the triggers quick and easy to activate.
Hyperkin The Competitor 4.3 overall score
Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E. 3.9 overall score

Compare features

Scores are out of 5. Missing scores mean missing review evidence, not a missing feature.

Scored on both products

Other features

Onboard profile storage
Hyperkin The Competitor
1.5

There are no onboard profiles for switching between game-specific configurations, which limits the controller's pro-level flexibility.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Two personalized profiles can be stored on the controller and switched with dedicated controls, making different game setups easy to keep ready.

Bumper responsiveness
Hyperkin The Competitor
2.0

One speed-focused test found the bumpers could fail to actuate unless pressed firmly, slowing inputs compared with a standard Xbox pad.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Bumpers are consistently fast and clicky, with the mechanical shoulder controls contributing to the controller's immediate response.

Trigger stop effectiveness
Hyperkin The Competitor
2.2

The lack of trigger locks or hair-trigger stops is one of the clearest missing pro features. Players focused on fast shooter inputs may find the full travel slower than dedicated competitive controllers.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Physical trigger stops are highly effective, sharply reducing travel and making the triggers quick and easy to activate.

Hand fatigue over long sessions
Hyperkin The Competitor
5.0

The low weight repeatedly helps during multi-hour sessions, reducing wrist strain and keeping the controller from feeling tiring. Its textured grips also help maintain a relaxed hold.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
2.5

The substantial heft can wear on the hands over longer sessions; after a few hours, the weight is hard to ignore.

Analog trigger precision
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.9

The Hall triggers make throttle, braking, and other pressure-sensitive inputs easy to meter consistently. Racing use is where this precision stands out most clearly.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
3.0

The analog triggers work, but the lack of Hall effect trigger sensors is a missed opportunity for better precision and long-term reliability.

Grip texture
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.6

Textured rear surfaces provide useful traction without feeling overly abrasive. The grip is especially appreciated during long or intense sessions.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
3.0

Grip treatment is mixed. Rubberized side pads add purchase, but another take found the grips and removable panels too slick and sub-par.

Vibration quality
Hyperkin The Competitor
3.4

Rumble is inconsistent across impressions: some find it weak or too subtle, while others call it clean, satisfying, and well balanced. It is functional, but not a universally standout part of the controller.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Rumble is much improved over the earlier overly intense tuning, settling into a more traditional and deeply satisfying vibration feel.

Platformer control precision
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.9

The softer, precise D-pad makes platforming and 2D directional movement easier than on sharper Xbox-style pads for several players. It is particularly strong when exact cardinal inputs matter.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
3.5

Platformer control is mixed because stick precision is excellent, but the D-pad's uncomfortable shape can make directional platforming less pleasant.

Competitive gaming suitability
Hyperkin The Competitor
3.7

Competitive opinions are mixed: some praise the wired connection and stable response for tournaments, while others reject the 250 Hz rate, long trigger travel, or D-pad quirks. It is capable, but not an obvious esports-first choice.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.9

Competitive play is a core strength thanks to low wired latency, fast mechanical buttons, rear inputs, Hall effect precision, and effective trigger stops.

Premium feel
Hyperkin The Competitor
3.7

Its light, sometimes hollow or toy-like feel keeps it below true premium pads, even though assembly quality is generally strong. At the price, most see that compromise as acceptable.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.8

Firmness, heft, and sturdy construction give the controller a convincing premium feel, even when the design itself stays understated.

Haptic feedback quality
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.0

Impulse-trigger feedback can add enjoyable gunfire or action feedback, but it is much simpler than DualSense haptics. Some players barely miss the richer effects, while others enjoy what is present.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Haptic feedback feels satisfying in normal play, with the revised rumble praised for being more controlled and enjoyable.

D-pad feel
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.0

D-pad opinions are sharply split. Some find it excellent, bouncy, soft, and ideal for 2D or fighting games, while others call it spongy, wobbly, harsh, or simply less enjoyable than preferred circular designs.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
3.0

D-pad feel is divisive. Some praise its crisp mechanical click, while others find the raised, blobby shape uncomfortable and indistinct under the thumb.

Fighting game suitability
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.7

Its split D-pad and symmetrical layout work very well for many fighting games, with several players praising reliable motion inputs and tournament-friendly wired play. Serious FGC users may still notice quick-direction misreads or prefer a different D-pad style.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
3.8

Fighting-game suitability is mixed. Some praise the mechanical D-pad and optional fight-focused layouts, while others find the D-pad shape uncomfortable enough to avoid for fighters.

Weight balance
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.5

The Competitor is notably light because it has no battery, and most impressions treat that as a comfort benefit. A minority associate the low mass with a cheaper feel, but balance in actual play is generally well liked.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
3.7

At around 300g, the controller has reassuring heft without a battery, but its weight becomes more noticeable during long play.

Learning curve
Hyperkin The Competitor
2.8

Xbox-first players may need time to adapt to symmetrical sticks and relocated controls, while PlayStation-first users tend to settle in quickly. Cross-platform muscle memory can cause mistakes at first.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
3.5

The extra lower buttons require a short adjustment period before they feel natural.

Input lag
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.4

Most hands-on experiences report responsive wired input with no noticeable lag, and several measurements are positive. One test strongly criticizes the roughly 4 ms/250 Hz behavior, so latency confidence depends on how demanding the player is.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Input lag is a major strength of the wired design, with near-zero latency and quick USB-C response repeatedly highlighted.

Material quality
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.0

The plastic shell is better than its budget positioning might suggest, but it is still clearly a hard-plastic controller rather than a luxury build. Texture and fit help it feel more substantial than the raw material choice implies.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.5

The sturdy black-plastic construction feels robust and appropriate for a premium wired controller.

Symmetrical stick layout
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.5

The symmetrical PlayStation-style layout is the defining appeal: fans of centered sticks often love finally having this option on Xbox, while committed offset-stick users remain unconvinced. It is a preference-driven strength rather than a universal upgrade.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

The magnetic modules make a symmetrical PlayStation-style stick layout quick and easy to adopt, and players who prefer that arrangement value the flexibility.

Bumper quality
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.7

Bumpers are a strength in most accounts, with crisp, bouncy, satisfying presses and little wobble. Several impressions rate them unusually highly for a budget controller.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

The bumpers have a satisfying clicky feel that matches the controller's strong mechanical-button quality.

Casual gaming suitability
Hyperkin The Competitor
2.3

For desk-based casual play it works well, but couch gaming exposes the wired-only drawback. Players who prioritize wireless freedom may find the tether inconvenient even if the controls themselves are easy to enjoy.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
2.5

Casual players may find the controller excessive for the money, especially if they mainly want drift-resistant sticks and can get that more cheaply elsewhere.

USB-C convenience
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.8

A detachable USB-C connection makes cable replacement and storage easy, and at least one user appreciated being able to swap in a preferred cable.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.5

USB-C is a welcome modernization over the older connection and helps make the wired setup more current and convenient.

Cable length and quality
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.0

The detachable cable is usually long enough for couch use and easy to replace, but material quality varies by impression. Its rubbery, non-braided feel is the main complaint.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.3

The included cable is long enough for most setups, with the H.E. version extending the leash compared with an earlier model.

Trigger responsiveness
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.8

The triggers generally actuate cleanly and feel strong in shooters and everyday games. They provide reliable analog control even without short-stop hardware.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Trigger response is excellent when the physical locks are engaged, cutting travel and making presses faster for shooters and other quick-input games.

Overall satisfaction
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.5

The Competitor is widely liked as a comfortable, capable $50 Xbox/PC controller, especially by players who want a PlayStation-style layout. Lower-scoring takes mostly point to wired-only play, latency concerns, or a thin feature set rather than weak fundamentals.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.4

The controller earns strong praise for precision, build quality, customization, and mechanical inputs. Price, wired-only operation, size, and the D-pad are the main reservations.

Analog stick precision
Hyperkin The Competitor
5.0

Stick accuracy is a standout, with very small deadzones, strong centering, and precise aiming or directional input. Multiple hands-on tests describe the Hall sticks as exceptionally controlled.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.9

Stick precision is excellent, with Hall effect models delivering extremely accurate movement, aiming, and steering and earlier sticks also praised for precise control.

Included accessories
Hyperkin The Competitor
2.8

The package covers the basics, but documentation is a weak point. Extra stick caps and Game Pass offers add value, yet the lack of clear printed instructions frustrates some users.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
2.8

The package is mixed: Hall effect sticks and alternate caps add value, but the lack of a proper hard case and extra modules feels stingy at this price.

Stick drift resistance
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.9

Drift resistance is a major selling point, with the Hall sensors repeatedly praised for avoiding the wear pattern associated with conventional sticks. Long-term certainty is impossible, but confidence in drift resistance is very high.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Drift resistance is one of the strongest reasons to choose the H.E. version. Hall effect sticks are repeatedly credited with eliminating or greatly reducing drift risk.

Analog stick smoothness
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.9

Anti-friction rings and metal contact surfaces give the sticks a notably smooth glide and clean return to center. A few mentions of snapback do not outweigh the broader praise for fluid movement.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.9

Stick movement feels notably smooth and slick, with the Hall effect modules drawing especially strong praise for their feel.

Compatibility with PC
Hyperkin The Competitor
5.0

PC use is described as seamless and reliable, with straightforward wired setup and native-feeling controls.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

PC use is a strong fit; the controller was tested as a daily driver and described as a tremendous PC controller.

Compatibility with Xbox
Hyperkin The Competitor
5.0

Xbox compatibility is excellent thanks to official licensing, native prompts, and reliable plug-and-play behavior.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Xbox use is equally strong, with the controller praised as a tremendous Xbox pad and designed around the familiar Xbox control layout.

Consistency across sessions
Hyperkin The Competitor
5.0

Extended use remained positive for one repeat user, who kept returning to the controller and continued to regard the line as a favorite.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Long-term consistency looks strong, with the controller described as remaining reliable and precise through extended play.

Racing game suitability
Hyperkin The Competitor
5.0

Racing is a clear strength because the smooth Hall triggers allow fine throttle and brake control. Multiple players specifically call the controller excellent for driving games.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Racing performance is excellent, with Hall effect sticks providing especially precise steering in Forza.

Controls and connectivity

Software customization
Hyperkin The Competitor
1.6

There is no meaningful companion software for tuning curves, deadzones, profiles, or sensitivity. Players who expect software-driven pro customization see this as a major limitation.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Software customization is deep, covering stick curves and dead zones, trigger behavior, button mapping, profiles, and other detailed settings.

Customization depth
Hyperkin The Competitor
2.0

Customization is intentionally shallow: rear-button mapping and swappable caps are useful, but there are no deep profiles, turbo settings, trigger tuning, or stick-curve controls.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Modularity is one of the product's defining strengths, allowing fast stick/D-pad rearrangement, alternate modules, and extensive per-game customization.

Screenshot button usefulness
Hyperkin The Competitor
2.0

The lack of a dedicated capture control is a noticeable downgrade for users who frequently save clips or screenshots.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

The Share button is prominent and easy to locate alongside the other Xbox function controls.

Companion app quality
Hyperkin The Competitor
1.6

There is effectively no companion app for sensitivity, curves, profiles, or other deep settings. Several players see that absence as a meaningful disadvantage against similarly priced rivals.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.5

ThrustmapperX gives broad access to controller tuning, making it a capable companion for players who want to fine-tune inputs.

Face button travel
Hyperkin The Competitor
2.8

The ABXY buttons sit a little farther apart and can require extra thumb travel. Some players adapt quickly, while others find the spacing unnatural.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

The face buttons use very short actuation travel, helping inputs register quickly and giving the controls a snappy feel.

Button noise
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.2

The face buttons are often quieter and softer than expected, though one comparison finds them noticeably noisier than a high-end SCUF. Noise is generally modest for the price.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
2.0

The mechanical buttons are satisfyingly clicky but can be loud enough to bother a roommate in the same room.

Back button placement
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.9

The two rear buttons usually fall naturally under the middle or ring fingers, making them easy to reach without changing grip. Placement earns some of the strongest praise on the controller.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
3.4

Rear-button placement is polarizing: it fits some hands naturally, while smaller-handed users can struggle with the central position or trigger buttons accidentally.

Onboard audio controls
Hyperkin The Competitor
3.5

The dedicated mute button is useful and easy to reach, but the lack of onboard game/chat or master-volume controls disappoints users who expect richer audio control.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Dedicated onboard volume controls beside the headset jack are a welcome convenience that keeps common audio adjustments off external menus.

Back button usefulness
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.5

Rear buttons are a practical upgrade for actions such as jump, reload, parry, or stick-click functions, and the physical locks solve accidental presses for many players. A few users still trigger them unintentionally or simply do not need them.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
3.3

Rear-button usefulness depends heavily on hand fit. They can provide a competitive edge, but some players find them less intuitive or prone to accidental presses.

Button remapping options
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.6

On-controller remapping is simple and fast, with no software required for the rear buttons. Weak printed instructions are the main reason setup feels confusing in a few cases.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
3.7

Remapping is powerful when it works, with rear buttons and other inputs configurable through software or onboard controls. One customer, however, could not get the desired keyboard mapping to function.

Button quality
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.2

Button feel ranges from pleasantly springy and tactile to slightly soft or smooshy, but the overall balance is positive. Most inputs feel dependable rather than premium or microswitch-crisp.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Mechanical buttons are one of the controller's clearest strengths, with clicky, tactile, satisfying presses that feel robust and fast.

Face button responsiveness
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.6

Face buttons generally register quickly and spring back well, including during rapid tapping. Their smaller size and spacing can feel different, but responsiveness itself is strong.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Face buttons are consistently praised for crisp, immediate response, with short actuation that makes inputs feel fast and precise.

Programmable button support
Hyperkin The Competitor
5.0

Two programmable rear controls add real utility for jump, reload, parry, or other actions without leaving the sticks. They are one of the most valued extras at this price.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Four programmable rear inputs add meaningful competitive flexibility and can be customized to suit different games.

Ownership and support

Ease of setup
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.2

Basic use is straightforward plug-and-play on Xbox and PC. The main setup frustration comes from sparse instructions for changing caps or programming rear buttons.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
1.0

One customer had a very poor setup experience, reporting repeated failed attempts to make the desired controller-to-keyboard mapping work.

Value for money
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.4

At about $50, it is usually seen as strong value because Hall Effect sticks, rear buttons, and solid build are included without pro-controller pricing. A few critics find the price less compelling where feature-richer rivals cost similar money.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
2.8

Value is one of the biggest tradeoffs. The controller can feel worth it for its performance and customization, but the high price, paid add-ons, and wired-only design draw repeated criticism.

Comfort and build

Start and Select button design
Hyperkin The Competitor
2.1

Menu, View, and Share controls are a recurring weak spot because they sit too flat, too small, or too far from the thumbs. They can be easy to miss by feel, especially at first.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

The View and Menu controls are more prominent than on some related Thrustmaster designs, making them easier to find in play.

Ergonomics
Hyperkin The Competitor
5.0

Rounded grip ends and familiar PlayStation-like proportions make the controller especially comfortable for people who dislike sharper DualSense corners. Button reach is generally easy, with the layout preference itself being the main variable.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
3.0

The bulky shape favors big-handed players and can feel unwieldy for others, so the ergonomics are not universally accommodating.

Overall comfort
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.9

Comfort is one of the clearest strengths: the broad DualSense-like shape, rounded grips, and light weight work well for long sessions. Players who already like symmetrical PlayStation-style controllers tend to feel at home quickly.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
3.8

Comfort is best with larger hands: the chunky body can feel very comfortable there, while smaller hands may need time to adapt.

Size suitability for different hand sizes
Hyperkin The Competitor
2.3

The full-size DualSense-like body works best for medium-to-large or adult hands. Smaller hands and younger players may find it bulky or need time to adjust.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
3.1

The controller's large, chunky body strongly favors bigger hands. Smaller-handed players can adapt, but several found the size less natural or more cumbersome.

Durability
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.5

Sturdy construction, metal stick hardware, a removable cable, and Hall sensors inspire good longevity confidence. Early extended-use impressions report no serious wear or structural problems.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Durability is a major strength. The controller and its magnetic modules are described as sturdy, dependable, and capable of holding up through heavy use.

Build quality
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.6

Construction is consistently described as solid and sturdy, with little creaking or flex despite the light body. It rarely feels genuinely cheap, though several comments stop short of calling it premium.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.9

Build quality is a standout strength, repeatedly described as sturdy, solid, reliable, and even 'bombproof.' The modular parts still feel secure rather than flimsy.

Design and aesthetics
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.8

The DualSense-inspired shape and two-tone styling are a major part of the appeal, with the white, black, gold, and purple treatments drawing frequent praise. The look is distinctive for an Xbox controller even when the imitation is obvious.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.5

The understated black design feels mature and premium, although mixed matte and glossy surfaces create a little visual inconsistency.

Performance

Wired performance
Hyperkin The Competitor
3.1

Wired operation is the product's biggest tradeoff. Some players value the reliable connection, no charging, and predictable latency, while many couch gamers see the lack of wireless as the controller's main weakness.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.0

Wired performance is excellent for latency and competitive response, but the tether remains restrictive and inconvenient for living-room use.

FPS performance
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.5

Shooter performance is generally strong thanks to precise sticks, useful rear buttons, and responsive triggers. Still, the missing hair triggers and 250 Hz ceiling keep it from being a universal recommendation for highly competitive FPS play.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.7

Shooter performance is strong, helped by precise sticks, short trigger travel, and fast buttons; several accounts found aiming or reaction-heavy play easier.

Hall effect stick performance
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.8

Hall Effect sticks are one of the most consistently praised technical features, combining smooth movement, accuracy, and strong centering. They help the controller feel more advanced than its price suggests.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.9

The Hall effect sticks are the headline upgrade, bringing excellent precision, smooth feel, strong tracking, and much better long-term drift resistance.

D-pad accuracy
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.4

Directional accuracy is mostly strong, including diagonals and complex motions, but very rapid back-and-forth inputs can occasionally misread. That makes it better for general 2D play than for every tournament-level fighting-game player.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
4.5

The D-pad performs accurately even when its shape is disliked; functionally, it was described as matching the high performance of the other inputs.

Evidence available for one product

Battery and charging

Battery life
Hyperkin The Competitor
5.0

Because it has no battery, there is nothing to recharge or run flat mid-session. Players who favor wired pads see that as a practical reliability advantage.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.No score yet

Other features

Accessibility features
Hyperkin The CompetitorNo score yet
Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

The modular layout is especially helpful for accessibility, letting players quickly rearrange stick and D-pad positions around different needs and preferences.

Analog stick tension
Hyperkin The Competitor
3.0

One take finds the stick tension fairly high: it contributes to a snappy feel but can make camera movement feel slower or more effortful.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.No score yet
Compatibility with PlayStation
Hyperkin The Competitor
1.0

Despite its PlayStation-like shape, it is not a PS5 controller and is explicitly unsuitable for PlayStation hardware.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.No score yet
Control placement
Hyperkin The CompetitorNo score yet
Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

The main inputs and rear buttons are positioned clearly and comfortably, keeping key controls easy to reach.

Microphone passthrough quality
Hyperkin The Competitor
1.0

One wired-headset test found microphone output metallic, tinny, and unpleasant enough to warn buyers who depend on the controller's 3.5 mm mic path.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.No score yet
Paddle quality
Hyperkin The Competitor
5.0

The rear paddles/buttons feel simple, effective, and easy to reach when used for high-value actions. Their lockouts add practicality for players who do not always want them active.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.No score yet
Polling rate
Hyperkin The Competitor
3.5

The 250 Hz polling rate is the most debated technical spec: some call it stable and adequate, while others consider it stingy or substandard beside 1000 Hz rivals. It is unlikely to bother casual players but may matter to latency-focused competitors.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.No score yet
Repairability
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.5

The detachable USB cable is easy to replace if the wire fails, giving the controller a practical advantage over fixed-cable designs.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.No score yet
Retro gaming suitability
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.5

The PlayStation-style D-pad and wired responsiveness make it a strong fit for retro and arcade games. Its layout is especially appealing when analog sticks are secondary.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.No score yet
Steering precision
Hyperkin The CompetitorNo score yet
Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
5.0

Hall effect sticks are particularly effective for racing, giving fine, confident steering control in Forza.

Thumbstick grip
Hyperkin The Competitor
3.5

The rubberized, textured stick rims provide usable grip, though one comparison finds them less sticky and secure than first-party Xbox or DualSense sticks.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.No score yet
Trigger smoothness
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.8

Hall Effect triggers are repeatedly described as smooth, pleasant, and easy to modulate. Their long travel remains noticeable, but the motion itself is a strength.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.No score yet
Wireless connectivity
Hyperkin The CompetitorNo score yet
Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
1.1

Wireless connectivity is the clearest missing feature. Multiple accounts criticize the controller for remaining wired-only at a premium price.

Performance

Audio jack quality
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.0

Headphone output through the 3.5 mm jack is generally fine to good, including one clean Dolby Atmos test. The bigger audio concern is microphone quality rather than listening quality.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.No score yet

Controls and connectivity

Brand software support
Hyperkin The Competitor
1.6

Hyperkin provides little to no software support for deeper controller tuning. That simplicity suits plug-and-play users, but it is a clear weakness for players expecting pro-style configuration tools.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.No score yet

Ownership and support

Connection reliability
Hyperkin The Competitor
4.8

Wired connectivity is consistently stable, with no dropouts or mid-game battery failures. Reliability is one reason several players are willing to accept the tether.

Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.No score yet
Firmware update support
Hyperkin The CompetitorNo score yet
Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
1.0

Firmware support drew a severe complaint from one customer, who called the firmware useless during failed mapping attempts.

Upgrade value
Hyperkin The CompetitorNo score yet
Thrustmaster eSwap X2 H.E.
2.6

Upgrade value is limited for owners of earlier eSwap models because the new Hall effect modules can often be bought separately. New buyers get the strongest case for choosing the H.E. version.

Other Top Video Game Controller to Consider

#1 Asus ROG Raikiri II
4.3

Best for precise TMR sticks, fast trigger stops, low-latency 2.4GHz play, and deep tuning. Skip it if you want a cheaper all-rounder, softer buttons for long sessions, or painless console-only...

Pros: face button travel, trigger responsiveness

Cons: Start and Select button design, button label visibility

#3 GameSir Cyclone 2 Wireless Controller
4.2

Choose the GameSir Cyclone 2 if you want a low-cost PC/Switch/mobile controller with precise sticks, deep customization, and a dock. Skip it if Xbox/PS5 support, premium buttons, or flawless dock/battery...

Pros: hand fatigue over long sessions, macro support

Cons: compatibility with Xbox, compatibility with PlayStation

#4 GameSir G8 Plus MFi
4.2

Best for console-like comfort, precise Hall controls, reliable wired play, and iPhone or iPad mini support. Skip it if you need pocketable hardware, Switch compatibility, polished software, or dependable mobile...

Pros: d-pad accuracy, analog stick precision

Cons: gyro aiming performance, brand software support

#5 Turtle Beach Rematch
4.2

Best for bold styling, comfort, long wireless battery life, or strong budget wired value. Skip it if you need consistent premium materials, quiet buttons, Switch wake support, or full rumble/NFC...

Pros: analog stick precision, analog stick smoothness

Cons: Switch wake support, Amiibo/NFC support