Compare NuPhy Air75 V3 vs Epomaker RT100

NuPhy Air75 V3
Epomaker RT100

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

Choose NuPhy Air75 V3 for key stability and reliability.

Choose Epomaker RT100 for per-key lighting control and noise level.

Comparison Takeaways

NuPhy Air75 V3

Where It Has the Edge

  • key stability is 4.6 vs 2.5. Switch stability received positive evidence from one reviewer, who reported minimal wobble and no spring ping.
  • reliability is 4.1 vs 2.8. Reliability was generally positive, with comments about less glitchy firmware and out-of-box usability, but one long-term reviewer noted...
  • software quality is 4.4 vs 3.4. Software quality was broadly praised for NuPhy.io’s clean web-based interface, though one reviewer found the console merely fine...
  • key responsiveness is 4.8 vs 3.9. One reviewer strongly praised responsiveness, saying individual keystrokes were easy to feel and control.

Epomaker RT100

Where It Has the Edge

  • per-key lighting control is 4.0 vs 2.3. Per-key lighting control appears as a modern feature reviewers valued, though it is limited by opaque keycaps.
  • noise level is 4.8 vs 3.3. Noise level is a consistent strength for the Sea Salt Silent version, which reviewers found extremely quiet and...
  • key spacing is 4.3 vs 3.0. Key spacing is praised as roomy enough to avoid crowding while still compact enough to navigate efficiently.
  • switch options is 4.4 vs 3.4. Switch choice is a recurring strength: reviewers praised the range of stock options and the ability to choose...
Average score
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.2
Epomaker RT100
4.1
key stability
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.6

Switch stability received positive evidence from one reviewer, who reported minimal wobble and no spring ping.

Epomaker RT100
2.5

A spacebar rebound issue in one review hurt perceived key stability by creating accidental double spaces.

per-key lighting control
NuPhy Air75 V3
2.3

Per-key lighting control was a weakness because one reviewer explicitly found its absence disappointing.

Epomaker RT100
4.0

Per-key lighting control appears as a modern feature reviewers valued, though it is limited by opaque keycaps.

noise level
NuPhy Air75 V3
3.3

Noise level was mixed: one reviewer liked the muted sound, while others warned it is not the quietest mechanical option.

Epomaker RT100
4.8

Noise level is a consistent strength for the Sea Salt Silent version, which reviewers found extremely quiet and office-friendly.

reliability
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.1

Reliability was generally positive, with comments about less glitchy firmware and out-of-box usability, but one long-term reviewer noted small annoyances.

Epomaker RT100
2.8

Reliability is mixed, with strong connections in some reviews but repeated concerns about screen setup, app crashes, missing readings, and unstable mini-TV behavior.

key spacing
NuPhy Air75 V3
3.0

Key spacing had one mixed note: a reviewer’s speed and accuracy dipped briefly before adjustment.

Epomaker RT100
4.3

Key spacing is praised as roomy enough to avoid crowding while still compact enough to navigate efficiently.

switch options
NuPhy Air75 V3
3.4

Switch choice was mixed: reviewers appreciated having linear, tactile, and silent options, but several found the lineup limited or less adventurous than before.

Epomaker RT100
4.4

Switch choice is a recurring strength: reviewers praised the range of stock options and the ability to choose quieter, tactile, or more conventional linear switches.

cable quality
NuPhy Air75 V3
3.6

Cable quality had limited evidence and was described as decent, with a caveat that a braided cable might last longer.

Epomaker RT100
4.6

Cable quality is a surprisingly consistent strength, with reviewers praising the thick, themed, premium-feeling included cable.

software quality
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.4

Software quality was broadly praised for NuPhy.io’s clean web-based interface, though one reviewer found the console merely fine and another hit beta recognition trouble.

Epomaker RT100
3.4

Software quality is mixed: some reviewers found it stable or straightforward, while others found it clunky, finicky, slow, or unreliable for screen features.

latency
NuPhy Air75 V3
3.7

Latency evidence was generally positive for wired and dongle use, but one advanced software feature introduced input latency in testing.

Epomaker RT100
4.7

Latency evidence is mostly positive, with several reviewers reporting no discernible lag over 2.4GHz and acceptable wireless responsiveness.

key responsiveness
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.8

One reviewer strongly praised responsiveness, saying individual keystrokes were easy to feel and control.

Epomaker RT100
3.9

Key responsiveness is generally strong, especially on wireless and lighter gaming, though some silent-switch users reported false inputs or double spaces.

frame rigidity
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.6

Frame rigidity scored well thanks to comments about sturdiness, a thicker metal frame, and minimal flex.

Epomaker RT100
3.7

Frame rigidity is mixed: some reviewers found the chassis firm with no flex, while others noted flex or a gasket system that did not behave as expected.

portability
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.2

Portability was positive overall because the keyboard is slim and compact, but heavier weight, MacBook fit, and the tall knob created caveats.

Epomaker RT100
3.3

Portability is mixed: the plastic build and moderate weight help, but the protruding screen and near-full layout make travel less friendly.

volume control
NuPhy Air75 V3
3.1

Volume control was the most mixed feature: reviewers liked the knob’s usefulness and click feel, but repeatedly criticized wobble, looseness, and gimmicky behavior.

Epomaker RT100
3.8

Volume control is useful and often tactile, but the knob’s plasticky look and out-of-place design are repeated complaints.

battery life
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.5

Battery life was a major positive, repeatedly described as amazing or phenomenal, though one reviewer’s extrapolated testing fell below the rated claim.

Epomaker RT100
3.8

Battery life is mixed: some reviewers saw only a couple days with RGB or screen use, while others reported a week or more with lighter settings.

customization options
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.4

Customization options were strong across key remapping, knob actions, lighting, and software functions, despite one reviewer calling advanced options limited.

Epomaker RT100
3.7

Customization is a central appeal, especially with screen images, RGB, keys, and switches, but the mini TV layout and metrics are not customizable enough for several reviewers.

value for money
NuPhy Air75 V3
3.9

Value for money was mixed: reviewers often found the quality and features worth the price, while others called it expensive or a nice-to-have.

Epomaker RT100
4.6

Value for money is one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers repeatedly calling the RT100 feature-rich, reasonably priced, or hard to beat near $100-$120.

wireless performance
NuPhy Air75 V3
3.8

Wireless performance was mixed: some reviewers found Bluetooth and 2.4GHz stable, while others saw Bluetooth issues, dongle errors, or sporadic disconnections.

Epomaker RT100
4.4

Wireless performance is generally strong, especially over 2.4GHz, with reviewers reporting no obvious lag and easy device switching.

layout options
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.5

Layout options were praised, especially ISO and JIS support, and reviewers generally liked the practical 75% layout.

Epomaker RT100
4.0

Layout options are praised mainly through the compact full-size/number-pad layout, which suits office work and number-heavy use.

materials quality
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.2

Materials quality was mostly praised for aluminum, PBT, and non-cheap plastic, though one reviewer questioned whether aluminum was overrated for portability and price.

Epomaker RT100
3.7

Materials quality is generally solid for the price, especially PBT keycaps and thicker plastic, but the plastic volume knob drew criticism.

hot-swappable switches
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.1

Hot-swappable switch support was useful and positive, giving reviewers flexibility to change switches later.

Epomaker RT100
4.6

Hot-swappable switch support is a clear strength, repeatedly praised for repairability, flexibility, and broad 3-/5-pin compatibility.

typing comfort
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.6

Typing comfort was a repeated strength for long sessions, with reviewers describing it as comfortable and pleasant to use.

Epomaker RT100
4.3

Typing comfort is highly praised when users like the switch profile, but tall MDA caps and light switches are uncomfortable for some reviewers.

build quality
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.6

Build quality was consistently strong, with reviewers calling the board solid, premium-feeling, and resistant to flex.

Epomaker RT100
4.3

Build quality is mostly praised as sturdy, well constructed, and high quality for plastic, with a few caveats about knob or screen details.

legend visibility
NuPhy Air75 V3
2.8

Legend visibility was a drawback in one review because the RGB backlight did not shine through the installed keycaps.

Epomaker RT100
2.5

Legend visibility is mixed: large legends are easy to see, but cluttered number-row legends and non-shine-through caps hurt usability in some contexts.

typing feel
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.6

Typing feel was one of the clearest strengths, with reviewers describing it as premium, cushioned, softened, and acoustically pleasing.

Epomaker RT100
4.3

Typing feel is one of the strongest themes: most reviewers found the RT100 smooth, soft, satisfying, and enjoyable, with only switch-profile caveats.

media controls
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.1

Media controls had limited but positive evidence around the programmable knob’s tactile twist and press.

Epomaker RT100
3.9

Media controls are useful overall, though the knob design and feel range from excellent tactile feedback to cheap-looking plastic.

size and form factor
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.6

The size and form factor were viewed very positively as compact, low-profile, and suitable for work/play setups.

Epomaker RT100
4.4

Size and form factor are widely liked because the RT100 keeps a numpad while remaining more compact than a traditional full-size board.

desk space efficiency
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.3

Desk-space efficiency was positive because the compact 75% layout kept useful keys without becoming too wide.

Epomaker RT100
4.5

Desk space efficiency is a strong point for users who want numpad functionality without a sprawling full-size footprint.

backlight brightness
NuPhy Air75 V3
2.8

Backlight brightness had limited but negative evidence from one reviewer who noticed uneven brightness across rows.

Epomaker RT100
3.0

Backlight brightness received limited direct opinion, with one reviewer finding it not especially strong.

acoustics
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.6

Acoustics drew strong praise for creamy, muted, controlled low-profile sound, with only some disagreement about exact pitch character.

Epomaker RT100
4.8

Acoustics are a major strength, with reviewers praising deep thock, muted office-friendly sound, and strong stock sound profiles.

stabilizer quality
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.1

Stabilizer quality was mostly positive and rattle-free, although one reviewer still considered the stabilizers merely average rather than best-in-class.

Epomaker RT100
4.2

Stabilizers are mostly good out of the box, with multiple reviewers hearing little rattle, though one noted ticks needing light tuning.

durability
NuPhy Air75 V3
3.4

Durability was mixed: reviewers cited PBT and long-term build confidence, but also scratch-prone surfaces and disassembly damage risk.

Epomaker RT100
3.5

Durability evidence is mostly positive for keycaps, but one reviewer worried the protruding mini screen could be vulnerable to impact.

RGB customization
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.4

RGB customization was positively covered through software-based control of backlighting and effects.

Epomaker RT100
4.3

RGB customization is considered useful and reasonably flexible through the driver, with both per-key control and effect customization mentioned positively.

extra gaming features
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.1

Extra gaming features were positively noted through SOCD and key toggles, with one reviewer confirming SOCD worked in testing.

Epomaker RT100
4.0

Extra gaming features have limited evidence, but NKRO was appreciated as useful for macros and gamers.

gaming performance
NuPhy Air75 V3
3.9

Gaming performance was considered capable for casual or secondary gaming, while reviewers still framed the board as productivity-first.

Epomaker RT100
4.0

Gaming performance is good for casual and light competitive play, but intense FPS use can suffer with the soft Sea Salt switches.

compatibility
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.6

Compatibility was a major strength, especially for Mac users, Windows toggling, iPad use, and Magic Keyboard-like layout familiarity.

Epomaker RT100
4.5

Compatibility is positive where discussed, especially dual OS support and broad wired/Bluetooth/2.4GHz device support.

design aesthetics
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.6

Design aesthetics were strongly praised, with reviewers describing the board as gorgeous, Apple-like, clean, premium, and exceptionally aesthetic.

Epomaker RT100
4.6

Design aesthetics are a major consensus strength: reviewers liked the retro-futuristic styling, colorways, and distinctive mini-TV personality.

ergonomics
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.5

Ergonomics scored well through finger-guiding keycaps, adjustable typing angles, and low-profile comfort for faster typing.

Epomaker RT100
4.4

Ergonomics are generally positive due to soft mounting, comfortable key profiles, typing angle choices, and carpal-tunnel-friendly spacing in one review.

keycap quality
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.3

Keycap quality was mostly praised for PBT material, durability, and feel, with one longer-term reviewer seeing slight shine begin to appear.

Epomaker RT100
4.3

Keycap quality is widely praised for thick PBT construction, feel, texture, and styling, though a few reviewers disliked the height or printing choices.

RGB lighting quality
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.0

Lighting quality was generally liked for smooth effects and soft visuals, though one reviewer noticed uneven brightness and another treated lighting as preference-based.

Epomaker RT100
4.0

RGB lighting quality is generally liked for visible, vibrant effects, although some reviewers noted subdued underglow or non-shine-through keycaps limiting usefulness.

switch feel
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.4

Reviewers mostly praised the switch feel as smooth, tactile, buttery, or standard-profile-like, though one reviewer noted some scratchiness.

Epomaker RT100
4.4

Reviewers broadly liked the switch feel, especially Wisteria, Flamingo, and Sea Salt options, but silent Sea Salts divided users who disliked their mushy or overly soft bottom-out.

connectivity
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.2

Connectivity was mostly praised for physical toggles and dongle storage, but some reviewers reported dongle or general connection issues.

Epomaker RT100
4.2

Connectivity is a consistent strength across wired, Bluetooth, and 2.4GHz, although one reviewer had cable-specific wired finickiness.

sound dampening
NuPhy Air75 V3
4.6

Sound dampening was a major strength, with gasket, foam, and silicone changes repeatedly credited for reducing hollowness.

Epomaker RT100
4.6

Sound dampening is widely praised; foam, gasket-style structure, and case design reduce hollowness, pinging, and harshness.

actuation consistency
NuPhy Air75 V3No score yet
Epomaker RT100
2.5

One reviewer raised a possible consistency concern, describing actuation as inconsistent across the keyboard despite otherwise liking the board.

ease of switch replacement
NuPhy Air75 V3No score yet
Epomaker RT100
4.4

Switch replacement is usually easy, though one internal-access review found pulling and installing switches harder because of plate flexibility.

macro customization
NuPhy Air75 V3No score yet
Epomaker RT100
3.8

Macro customization is useful but split: reviewers acknowledged macro support, while software friction made it less intuitive in some cases.

polling rate
NuPhy Air75 V3
3.9

The 1000Hz wired and 2.4GHz polling was treated as good enough for casual or some gaming, not as a competitive-gaming strength.

Epomaker RT100No score yet
profile management
NuPhy Air75 V3No score yet
Epomaker RT100
4.5

Profile management was directly praised in one review as intuitive inside the Epomaker driver workflow.

rapid trigger support
NuPhy Air75 V3No score yet
Epomaker RT100
2.0

Rapid-trigger style play was a weak point in one review because the Sea Salt switches made fast, precise FPS inputs harder.