Best Nintendo Video Games for quest design

quest design Decision Dashboard

Safest pick

Donkey Kong Bananza

4.5 feature score

Balances feature score, supporting reviews, and overall product strength.

Most evidence

Pokémon Legends: Z-A

11 supporting reviews

Has the broadest review evidence for this feature.

Best overall product

Pokémon Pokopia

4.2 overall score

Strongest overall product among items with scored evidence for this feature.

See ranked products
Narrow by brand

Showing Nintendo only. Switch back to all brands anytime.

#1 Pokemon LeafGreen and FireRed Versions
4.5

Kanto’s item-gated route chains and the Sevii Islands give exploration a pleasing cause-and-effect structure, with detours that reward paying attention.

Pros: boss design, side character depth

Cons: monetization fairness, originality

#2 Donkey Kong Bananza
4.5

Quest design was praised where side quests kept layers busy and consistently rewarded players.

Pros: gameplay mechanics, world interactivity

Cons: economy and resource balance, enemy variety

#3 Hyrule Warriors: Age of Imprisonment
3.9

Quest design was mixed, with useful rewards and side stories offset by repetitive or hollow side objectives.

Pros: animation quality, multiplayer design

Cons: save system reliability, companion AI

#4 Pokémon Pokopia
3.6

Quest design ranged from rewarding app-based goals to occasional chaotic quest completion and unclear sequencing.

Pros: protagonist appeal, faithfulness to franchise

Cons: map and navigation design, aiming precision

#5 Pokémon Legends: Z-A
3.4

Quest design was mixed: many reviewers liked silly or worthwhile side quests, while others found battle and fetch quests basic or uneven.

Pros: crash stability, gameplay mechanics

Cons: AI behavior, monetization fairness

#6 Mario Tennis Fever
3.0

Quest quality is mixed: some missions feel playful and freeing, while others are thin pretexts for moving between tennis challenges. The structure rarely develops into a deep RPG-style quest system.

Pros: facial animations, load times

Cons: exploration quality, puzzle design