Youth (2026)

Youth (2026) Feature Scores

Explore all 43 feature scores for Youth (2026), organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

43 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    30 (70%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    9 (21%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    3 (7%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.8
    16 reviews strong consensus
    theme depth: 4.8, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    The show’s strongest thematic idea is that growth does not end with youth: aging, desire, parenting, work, and self-definition are treated as ongoing and often contradictory.
  • 4.7
    15 reviews strong consensus
    humor: 4.7, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Comedy is the broadest point of agreement: reviewers repeatedly call the show very funny, mordant, biting, and laugh-out-loud effective, especially in its publishing satire and awkward social situations.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    main cast performance: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The lead ensemble is consistently praised, with Horgan’s comic presence and Aran Murphy’s naturalistic work giving the show much of its emotional credibility.
  • 4.5
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    realism: 4.5, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Reviewers repeatedly praise the specificity of everyday behavior, family friction, awkward sex, and midlife insecurity, although one excerpt finds the overall presentation slightly too glamorous.
  • 4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    romance quality: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Alex and Patrick’s relationship is a major draw, powered by warmth, bad timing, and strong chemistry that makes both characters’ hesitation understandable.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    writing quality: 4.6, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    Horgan’s scripts are repeatedly praised for sharp observation, comic precision, and honesty, even as a minority view finds the writing slightly softened and less biting than her best work.
  • 4.9
    5 reviews strong consensus
    tone consistency: 4.9, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    The series largely sustains a tricky blend of raunch, melancholy, cringe, and tenderness without losing its identity as a comedy.
  • 4.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    cast chemistry: 4.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Chemistry is one of the clearest strengths, especially in Alex’s romantic scenes with Patrick and the shifting warmth and strain of her friendship with Sam.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    menopause portrayal: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The menopause material is unusually frank and specific, treating physical changes, sexuality, and self-image as both funny and meaningful rather than background detail.
  • 4.2
    7 reviews low consensus
    story quality: 4.2, 7 reviews, low consensus
    The central midlife and mother-son stories are compelling and self-aware, though some side plots feel superfluous and the overall emotional core can occasionally get crowded.
  • 4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    emotional impact: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Cringe, tenderness, and midlife anxiety frequently sit beside the jokes, producing moments reviewers found wrenching, vulnerable, and emotionally recognizable.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    sexual content level: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The show is sexually frank and raunchy, but reviewers generally approve of how the sex scenes stay awkward, funny, and grounded rather than glossy.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    supporting cast performance: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The supporting players are widely seen as a strength, bringing comic energy and added texture even when a few side characters verge on caricature.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    acting quality: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Performances are a major strength, with the ensemble making relationships feel lived-in and Aran Murphy’s work bringing tenderness to Ruari.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    bingeability: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Short episodes, breezy momentum, and an addictive flow make the season unusually easy to consume in long stretches.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    cultural representation: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The show’s London social world feels naturally diverse, and its focus on complex women over 50 is welcomed as a broader, less stereotyped form of representation.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    dialogue quality: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Sharp lines, witty banter, and precise comic phrasing are repeatedly singled out as part of the show’s appeal.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    character balance: 4.5, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    The Alex-Ruari pairing is generally well balanced, with their parallel crises reinforcing each other, though some surrounding relationships feel less organically integrated.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    audience appeal: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The comedy is especially relatable for viewers navigating midlife, but its clear character work and humor are also described as accessible beyond that core audience.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    episode length: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The roughly 30-minute episodes are praised as snappy and particularly well suited to easy viewing.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    episode pacing: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The pacing is loose and light rather than urgent, with several reviewers finding the breezy movement a good fit for the material.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    visual style: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Phone screens and busy visual details reinforce Alex’s overloaded life, though one review finds the show’s polished glamour a little at odds with its claim to everyday realism.
  • 3.7
    5 reviews low consensus
    character development: 3.7, 5 reviews, low consensus
    The mother-son relationship grows in satisfying ways, but Ruari’s personal arc is also criticized as rushed and at times too simply resolved.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    casting quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The ensemble is viewed as a clear strength, with the cast itself described as great and the guest lineup adding extra texture.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    critic appeal: 5.0, 1 review
    Critical reception is strongly positive, with the series characterized as another major success for Horgan.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    entertainment value: 5.0, 1 review
    The series is described as a highly enjoyable, superlative comedy with strong momentum and plenty of comic payoff.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    plot originality: 5.0, 1 review
    The show’s fresh angle comes less from its basic dating premise than from how it reframes the empty nest and reinvention through a 50-year-old woman’s perspective.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    screenplay quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The scripts are praised for tight episodic construction, sharp comic beats, and a strong sense of narrative flow.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    season length: 5.0, 1 review
    Eight half-hour episodes make for a compact season that several reviewers describe as unusually easy to binge.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    season pacing: 5.0, 1 review
    The season’s flow is addictive enough that one reviewer found it easy to move from episode to episode almost without noticing.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    character likability: 4.5, 1 review
    Patrick’s appeal is carefully calibrated: he remains flawed, but reviewers find him likable and charming enough to make Alex’s attraction believable.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    editing quality: 4.5, 1 review
    Onscreen phone displays and rapid digital interruptions effectively communicate how Alex’s obligations pile up and collide.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    language level: 4.5, 1 review
    The foulmouthed dialogue fits the show’s candid comic voice and is treated as part of the fun rather than a drawback.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    release schedule: 4.5, 1 review
    The two-episode premiere is viewed as a smart launch choice because it establishes the show’s competing pressures before shifting to weekly episodes.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    directing quality: 4.0, 1 review
    The direction supports the show’s brisk half-hour rhythm and helps its observational comedy land consistently.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    episode structure: 4.0, 1 review
    The two-episode opening gives the overlapping family, work, and dating pressures enough room to establish themselves before the weekly rollout.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    genre satisfaction: 4.0, 1 review
    As a midlife comedy-drama it lands very well, though at least one reviewer places it just below Horgan’s best earlier work.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    production design: 4.0, 1 review
    Real London locations and polished interiors are used in ways that fit Alex’s publishing-world ambitions and professional setting.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    world-building: 4.0, 1 review
    Guest characters and the publishing-world ensemble add depth and color to the show’s wider social universe.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.0
    1 review
    accountability handling: 2.0, 1 review
    The show’s handling of Ruari’s wrongdoing draws criticism for making his rehabilitation too easy, softening a harder accountability arc.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    drama quality: 2.5, 1 review
    The dramatic side is less consistent than the comedy, with one critic arguing that the many complications can crowd out the emotional core.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    modern political framing: 2.5, 1 review
    The masculinity storyline is one of the shakier elements; its attempt to engage contemporary anxieties around young men is seen as less fully resolved than the midlife material.
  • 3.2
    3 reviews low consensus
    character consistency: 3.2, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Alex is praised as carefully balanced, but Sam and especially Ruari draw some criticism for inconsistent characterization or behavior that serves the plot.

Cast & Creators

  • Patrick
    5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Rupert Friend: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Friend is a standout romantic presence: reviewers repeatedly praise his charm and the easy, fizzy chemistry he brings to Patrick’s scenes with Alex.
  • Alex
    4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Sharon Horgan: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Horgan’s work is praised for making midlife feel uncannily recognizable while still landing as sharp, funny comedy.
  • Ruarí
    5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Aran Murphy: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Murphy is praised for a beautifully unforced performance, with reviewers highlighting both his naturalism and the emotional nuance he brings to Ruari.
  • Actor
    4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Anne Reid: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Reid’s supporting turn is part of an ensemble repeatedly credited with adding comic texture and extra depth.
  • Actor
    4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Harriet Walter: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Walter’s guest appearance is included among the supporting performances praised for making the wider ensemble more enjoyable and layered.
  • Sam
    5.0
    1 review
    Sharlene Whyte: 5.0, 1 review
    Whyte is described as fascinating to watch, especially in the way Sam can pivot quickly between close-friend warmth and sharper boss energy.
  • Michael
    5.0
    1 review
    Tim McInnerny: 5.0, 1 review
    McInnerny’s Michael is singled out for a generous, sensitive performance that keeps the older love interest from becoming a simple joke.
  • Actor
    4.5
    1 review
    Damian Lewis: 4.5, 1 review
    Lewis’s exaggerated version of himself is used as a comic cameo and singled out as part of the show’s laugh-out-loud material.
  • Director
    4.5
    1 review
    Dawn Shadforth: 4.5, 1 review
    Shadforth’s direction supports the brisk half-hour format and is tied to the show’s consistent delivery of sharp observational comedy.
  • Grayson
    4.0
    1 review
    Freddie Fox: 4.0, 1 review
    Fox’s cameo is credited with adding extra depth to the show’s colorful publishing-world ensemble.