Tuner

Tuner Feature Scores

Explore all 39 feature scores for Tuner, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

39 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    22 (56%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    11 (28%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    4 (10%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (3%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (3%)

Pros

Sort
  • 5.0
    27 reviews strong consensus
    sound design: 5.0, 27 reviews, strong consensus
    The sound mix moves from muffled quiet to painful noise to put viewers inside Niki’s hearing. This immersive craft is one of the clearest strengths.
  • 4.9
    24 reviews strong consensus
    lead performance: 4.9, 24 reviews, strong consensus
    Woodall’s quiet, physically expressive lead turn wins broad praise for conveying skill and pain without much dialogue. A few find him too blank or miscast.
  • 5.0
    17 reviews strong consensus
    humor: 5.0, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    Harry’s banter and the contrast between the two tuners add welcome levity, though the laughs fade as the crime plot darkens.
  • 4.7
    29 reviews low consensus
    acting performance: 4.7, 29 reviews, low consensus
    The cast is widely praised for making the modest crime story engaging, though a few voices find the lead or supporting roles thinner than the premise deserves.
  • 4.7
    30 reviews moderate consensus
    entertainment value: 4.7, 30 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most call it a charming, absorbing watch built around an unusual skill. A smaller group finds the familiar caper too dull or contrived.
  • 4.9
    16 reviews strong consensus
    pacing: 4.9, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    Brisk editing and short montages keep the story moving for most; a few feel the middle or late stretch drags.
  • 5.0
    12 reviews strong consensus
    chemistry between characters: 5.0, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Woodall and Liu are often credited with natural romantic chemistry, and Woodall’s rapport with Hoffman gives the mentor bond warmth. A minority find the romance unconvincing.
  • 5.0
    12 reviews strong consensus
    emotional impact: 5.0, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    The mentor bond and Niki’s struggle to return to music give the ending a strong emotional pull for many viewers.
  • 4.8
    16 reviews moderate consensus
    editing quality: 4.8, 16 reviews, moderate consensus
    Quick cuts and rhythmic montages make piano tuning and safecracking lively. A few find the technique busy or intrusive.
  • 4.6
    25 reviews moderate consensus
    genre satisfaction: 4.6, 25 reviews, moderate consensus
    Its blend of romance, character drama, and heist suspense appeals to many, while viewers seeking a harder edged crime film may find the genre mix uneven.
  • 5.0
    9 reviews strong consensus
    soundtrack quality: 5.0, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Jazz and piano music enrich the setting, though specific song choices and original pieces draw occasional reservations.
  • 4.6
    14 reviews low consensus
    directing quality: 4.6, 14 reviews, low consensus
    Roher’s first narrative feature is admired for its assured blend of intimate drama and sensory suspense. Some find his later plotting or tonal shifts less controlled.
  • 4.6
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    romance quality: 4.6, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Niki and Ruthie’s shared musical passion makes their romance the heart of the film for many; a few find it rushed or thin.
  • 4.2
    23 reviews low consensus
    originality: 4.2, 23 reviews, low consensus
    The piano tuner who cracks safes is a fresh hook, even as familiar crime beats emerge later.
  • 4.4
    10 reviews low consensus
    character development: 4.4, 10 reviews, low consensus
    Niki’s lost musical ambitions and loyalty to Harry give the story a human center. Some find the supporting criminals too thinly drawn.
  • 4.5
    8 reviews strong consensus
    drama quality: 4.5, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    The personal stakes around Harry’s illness and Niki’s abandoned music career deepen the caper, though some prefer the gentler first half.
  • 4.5
    8 reviews strong consensus
    realism: 4.5, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Details of piano tuning feel convincing, though some viewers question the ease of the heists and late coincidences.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    dialogue quality: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The quick banter between Niki and Harry provides many of the early laughs, while occasional lines in the crime plot strike some as forced.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    supporting cast performance: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Hoffman and Liu draw especially strong support around Woodall, while some reviewers want more for the smaller roles.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews low consensus
    suspense: 4.4, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Clicks inside locks, sudden alarms, and escalating criminal pressure create suspense without constant action.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    friendship portrayal: 4.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The easy affection between Niki and Harry is a recurring highlight, making Niki’s risky attempt to help him emotionally credible.
  • 4.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    runtime: 4.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Its roughly two hour length moves smoothly for many viewers, though some think scenes could have been trimmed.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    tonal consistency: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The light romantic opening shifts toward violent crime; some praise the balance and others feel the turn jars.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    hearing-condition portrayal: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The film conveys the pain and isolation of hypersensitive hearing through its sound, making Niki’s condition central to the experience.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    production design: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    New York’s pianos, conservatory, wealthy homes, and street noise give the story a distinctive setting.
  • 3.6
    21 reviews low consensus
    screenplay quality: 3.6, 21 reviews, low consensus
    The script balances family loyalty, romance, and crime with deft setups, but its convenient final act is the most common complaint.
  • 4.0
    4 reviews low consensus
    visual style: 4.0, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Mechanical close ups and brisk city montages lend energy, although a few find the style too fussy.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews low consensus
    score quality: 4.0, 3 reviews, low consensus
    The jazzy score supports the film’s rhythm and musical setting, though a few find the cues intrusive.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    action sequences: 5.0, 1 review
    The film favors tightly staged break-ins over large action set pieces; some enjoy that scale, while others want more excitement.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Atmos audio quality: 5.0, 1 review
    This contribution earns a clear favorable response.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    theme depth: 5.0, 1 review
    The film’s strongest ideas concern lost vocation, found family, and the costs of using a gift for money.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    critic appeal: 4.0, 1 review
    Critical praise centers on the performances and immersive sound, with repeated reservations about familiar plotting.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    message quality: 4.0, 1 review
    The film connects talent, disability, and the pressure to earn a living, giving its light caper a thoughtful undertone.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.0
    1 review
    plot clarity: 1.0, 1 review
    The safecracking premise is easy to follow, but late coincidences and plot turns test plausibility for many.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    audio description accessibility: 2.0, 1 review
    The audio description is usable, but its quality is judged only functional.
  • 3.0
    3 reviews low consensus
    cinematography: 3.0, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Close views of keys, strings, and locks bring tactile detail, although a few viewers find the photography less distinctive than the sound.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    cultural representation: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The film’s New York Jewish and immigrant milieu adds texture for some viewers; a few question how fully it develops those cultural threads.
  • 3.3
    12 reviews low consensus
    ending satisfaction: 3.3, 12 reviews, low consensus
    Reactions to the final act split: some find its musical payoff moving, while others object to coincidences, abruptness, or unresolved threads.
  • 3.4
    19 reviews low consensus
    plot originality: 3.4, 19 reviews, low consensus
    The hearing driven safecracking idea stands out, while the overall criminal arc often follows recognizable patterns.

Cast & Creators

  • Niki
    4.9
    33 reviews strong consensus
    Leo Woodall: 4.9, 33 reviews, strong consensus
    His restrained, physically expressive Niki draws wide praise, though a few viewers find the character too blank or the casting unpersuasive.
  • Harry
    5.0
    22 reviews strong consensus
    Dustin Hoffman: 5.0, 22 reviews, strong consensus
    His warmth, comic timing, and easy rapport with Woodall make Harry a favorite; several viewers wish he had more screen time.
  • Ruthie
    4.9
    12 reviews strong consensus
    Havana Rose Liu: 4.9, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Her driven but vulnerable Ruthie is a frequent standout, lending the romance personality and emotional weight.
  • Director
    4.8
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    Daniel Roher: 4.8, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    His narrative debut is admired for its pace, sound led perspective, and blend of genres, with late plot choices dividing opinion.
  • Marla
    4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Tovah Feldshuh: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The performances and craft in this area draw a clear response.
  • Writer
    5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Robert Ramsey: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The performances and craft in this area draw a clear response.
  • Sound Designer
    5.0
    1 review
    Johnnie Burn: 5.0, 1 review
    The performances and craft in this area draw a clear response.
  • Uri
    4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Lior Raz: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    This contribution earns a clear favorable response.
  • Writer
    4.0
    1 review
    Robert Ramsay: 4.0, 1 review
    His classically structured script gives the character relationships shape, though some later turns draw reservations.