The Paper, Season 2

The Paper, Season 2 Feature Scores

Explore all 43 feature scores for The Paper, Season 2, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

43 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    13 (30%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    17 (40%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    5 (12%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    5 (12%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    3 (7%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.8
    12 reviews strong consensus
    supporting cast performance: 4.8, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    The supporting cast is one of the clearest strengths, with Lisa Gilroy, Sabrina Impacciatore, Tim Key, Jon Lovitz, Melvin Gregg, and others repeatedly singled out for laughs and scene-stealing energy.
  • 4.8
    9 reviews strong consensus
    renewal interest: 4.8, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Interest in another season is notably high. Multiple reviewers explicitly want Season 3 or several more seasons, even when they acknowledge flaws in the current run.
  • 4.0
    24 reviews low consensus
    humor: 4.0, 24 reviews, low consensus
    Comedy is the biggest fault line. Many reviewers call Season 2 funnier, sharper, or laugh-out-loud effective, while others find the broad farce scattershot, safe, or simply not funny enough.
  • 4.0
    18 reviews low consensus
    franchise connection: 4.0, 18 reviews, low consensus
    Season 2 is generally seen as more confident outside The Office’s shadow, but reviewers disagree on how fully it has escaped familiar archetypes, callbacks, and relationship patterns.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    bingeability: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The season is widely described as easy to keep watching; multiple reviewers call it an easy binge, and one said they simply did not want to stop.
  • 3.9
    15 reviews low consensus
    cast chemistry: 3.9, 15 reviews, low consensus
    Chemistry is one of the season’s biggest divides. Many reviewers find the ensemble increasingly comfortable and Ned and Mare warm or natural together, while others see little spark or feel the romance weakens once they become a couple.
  • 3.9
    11 reviews low consensus
    entertainment value: 3.9, 11 reviews, low consensus
    Most reviewers find the season pleasant, charming, or genuinely funny, with several calling it a strong comfort watch. A smaller group sees it as merely fine or too forgettable to rise above crowded comedy competition.
  • 3.8
    18 reviews low consensus
    character development: 3.8, 18 reviews, low consensus
    Season 2 gets credit for moving relationships forward, giving Mare growth, and deepening several recurring characters. Detractors argue that some arcs remain stagnant or recycle the same relationship conflicts.
  • 4.0
    7 reviews low consensus
    character likability: 4.0, 7 reviews, low consensus
    Many reviewers find the newsroom increasingly warm, likable, and easy to spend time with, though a few actively dislike major characters or find certain romantic behavior toxic.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    main cast performance: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The leads are a major asset, with Domhnall Gleeson praised as a strong comic anchor and the central performances helping carry the season even when stories wobble.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    season finale quality: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The finale is praised as hopeful and memorable, with Esmeralda’s undercover material singled out as one of the season’s funniest moments.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    world-building: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    New characters and a broader newsroom ecosystem help the season feel like its own populated comedy world rather than a thin extension of Dunder Mifflin.
  • 3.8
    9 reviews low consensus
    theme depth: 3.8, 9 reviews, low consensus
    The local-journalism premise gives the comedy real substance for many reviewers, especially around ethics, resources, and public trust. Others think the show retreats into safe sitcom territory just as those ideas become interesting.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    acting quality: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Performances are generally viewed as a strength: the cast is described as solid and increasingly comfortable, with the second season giving several actors more room to settle into their roles.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    finale satisfaction: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The finale is viewed positively for giving the investigation a workable conclusion while ending the romance on a hopeful, continuation-friendly note.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    audience appeal: 5.0, 1 review
    One reviewer calls the series an underrated gem that deserves more attention, suggesting strong appeal for viewers willing to invest in its character-driven newsroom comedy.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    episode length: 5.0, 1 review
    The roughly 20–25 minute episodes are praised for keeping jokes moving without making the newsroom stories feel crammed.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    media scrutiny portrayal: 5.0, 1 review
    The season earns praise for a well-articulated debate about public shaming and how media judgment can spill from private behavior into public consequences.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    screenplay quality: 5.0, 1 review
    One strongly positive review credits the season’s smart writing with consistently delivering the laughs.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    spin-off quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The season is praised as a worthwhile successor to The Office because it increasingly develops its own comic identity rather than functioning only as a nostalgia extension.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    sports storyline quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The Joe Burrow-related episode thread is singled out as absolutely hilarious, giving the season’s sports material a strong comic payoff.
  • 3.5
    8 reviews low consensus
    writing quality: 3.5, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Writing is strongly polarized: supporters call it clever, sharp, and smart, while critics describe it as unfocused, overly safe, or lacking a clear thesis.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    genre satisfaction: 3.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    For supporters, this is a warm workplace sitcom with real ideas and strong laughs; detractors argue that too many jokes miss for the show to fully satisfy as a comedy.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    cliffhanger effectiveness: 4.0, 1 review
    The unresolved Ned-and-Mare ending is treated as a useful setup for another season, leaving their relationship in a deliberately unsettled place rather than closing it off.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    critic appeal: 4.0, 1 review
    Early critical reaction is described as largely positive, especially around the comedy and stronger identity, but the same coverage acknowledges notably harsh dissent.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    drama quality: 4.0, 1 review
    The central relationship is handled as an intentional balancing act, with the season taking risks by moving Ned and Mare forward quickly and then testing the relationship.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    editing quality: 4.0, 1 review
    The quicker mockumentary cutaways are specifically praised for improving comic timing and helping short reaction moments land more effectively.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    emotional impact: 4.0, 1 review
    Alongside the satire, the season is praised as heartfelt, giving its newsroom comedy a warmer emotional layer.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    episode pacing: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Pacing is contested: one reviewer likes how quickly episodes move, while another finds the episodes sluggish and underpowered.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    episode structure: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The best episodes are praised for starting with simple workplace problems and escalating naturally into chaos. A harsher take says the story-of-the-week structure feels empty when the larger mission fades.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    character consistency: 1.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Ned’s characterization is a sore point for some critics, who find his ethics, competence, and behavior contradictory enough to make the season’s central relationship harder to trust.
  • 1.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    rewatch value: 1.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Rewatchability is a clear weakness in the more skeptical reviews, which see the season as pleasant comfort viewing but far below The Office’s repeat-viewing pull.
  • 2.4
    12 reviews moderate consensus
    character balance: 2.4, 12 reviews, moderate consensus
    The oversized ensemble is a recurring frustration. The cast is frequently praised, but romance-heavy plots and limited episode space leave several supporting characters sidelined or fighting for attention.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    accountability handling: 1.0, 1 review
    The season draws sharp criticism for treating fabricated quotes and manipulated photos too lightly, with one reviewer especially bothered by the lack of meaningful repercussions.
  • 1.0
    1 review
    plot clarity: 1.0, 1 review
    One major criticism is that the central relationship becomes so ambiguous that the reviewer cannot tell what direction the show wants the audience to follow.
  • 2.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    season length: 2.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The ten-episode season is repeatedly seen as too short for such a large ensemble, forcing the show to choose between romance, journalism, and supporting characters.
  • 2.6
    7 reviews low consensus
    tone consistency: 2.6, 7 reviews, low consensus
    The show’s blend of warmth, cringe, and broad farce works for some reviewers but feels wobbly or over-sanitized to others, especially when darker or more bizarre behavior lacks a sharp comic payoff.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    dialogue quality: 2.0, 1 review
    At least one critic finds the season short on memorable, quotable lines even when the writing is otherwise clever or likable.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    release schedule: 2.0, 1 review
    The all-at-once episode drop is criticized as making the season easier to consume quickly but also easier to forget.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    plot originality: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Some critics applaud the season for moving past stale will-they-won’t-they formulas, while others feel it still recycles too many familiar Office-style patterns.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    realism: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The journalism portrayal sharply divides reviewers: one calls it an accurate picture of digital-era news, while another finds its ethics and newsroom behavior badly divorced from reality.
  • 3.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    season pacing: 3.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Season-level momentum is mixed: one reviewer thinks the back half improves substantially, while another feels the final stretch stumbles after a strong run.
  • 3.3
    16 reviews low consensus
    story quality: 3.3, 16 reviews, low consensus
    Storytelling reactions range from praise for a stronger investigative spine and relationship progression to complaints about half-baked arcs, random weekly plots, and a central romance that absorbs too much oxygen.

Cast & Creators

  • Actor
    4.8
    13 reviews moderate consensus
    Sabrina Impacciatore: 4.8, 13 reviews, moderate consensus
    Impacciatore is the season’s most frequently praised performer, repeatedly called hilarious, fearless, impeccable, or a knockout. One critic finds the Esmeralda performance too cartoonish and grating, making her broad style the clearest point of disagreement.
  • Actor
    5.0
    8 reviews strong consensus
    Lisa Gilroy: 5.0, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Gilroy is one of the most consistently praised additions, bringing manic energy, sharp comic instincts, and an HR character that multiple reviewers call a standout.
  • Actor
    4.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Domhnall Gleeson: 4.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Gleeson is repeatedly praised as the season’s anchor, bringing earnestness, warmth, and an increasingly comfortable comic touch to Ned.
  • Actor
    5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Chelsea Frei: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Frei is praised for fully owning Mare, giving the character warmth and dimension beyond the romance, and standing among the season’s strongest lead performances.
  • Actor
    4.5
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Tim Key: 4.5, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Key is repeatedly described as a comic asset and even a secret weapon, with strong chemistry and elevated work; the recurring complaint is that the season simply does not use him enough.
  • Actor
    4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Eric Rahill: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Rahill emerges as a standout supporting performer, with reviewers especially praising his distinctive line delivery and the comedy generated by Travis’s side stories.
  • Actor
    4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Gbemisola Ikumelo: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Ikumelo earns strong notices as part of the memorable supporting ensemble, with Adelola singled out by one reviewer as a major reason the season works.
  • Actor
    4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Jon Lovitz: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Lovitz’s guest work is praised as a fun, snappy, scene-stealing addition that fits naturally into the show’s growing ensemble.
  • Actor
    5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Andy Richter: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Richter fits comfortably into the expanded ensemble, and his guest moments are enjoyable enough that one reviewer hopes he returns.
  • Actor
    5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Melvin Gregg: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Gregg is praised for elevated supporting work and for getting more room to stretch within the newsroom ensemble.
  • Creator
    4.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Greg Daniels: 4.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Daniels draws mixed but engaged reactions: one critic admires the boldness of the season’s central romantic idea, while another says he has struck gold again with the series.
  • Actor
    4.5
    1 review
    Alex Edelman: 4.5, 1 review
    Edelman is part of a supporting group credited with delivering some of the season’s funniest side plots when the ensemble gets room to play.
  • Actor
    4.5
    1 review
    Duane Shepard Sr.: 4.5, 1 review
    Shepard is included among the supporting players responsible for some of the season’s funniest side material.
  • Actor
    4.5
    1 review
    Oscar Nuñez: 4.5, 1 review
    Nuñez is part of a supporting group credited with some of the season’s funniest side plots when the show gives them space.
  • Actor
    4.0
    1 review
    Ramona Young: 4.0, 1 review
    Young is praised for throwing herself into Nicole’s wildest material and adding energy to the supporting ensemble.
  • Creator
    3.0
    1 review
    Michael Koman: 3.0, 1 review
    Koman receives credit for helping pursue an ambitious central romance idea, even though the reviewer praising the boldness remains mixed on how well that idea ultimately lands.