If you want better cast chemistry
Choose Reacher, Season 4. It scores 4.7 vs 3.9 for cast chemistry, with a 3.8 overall score.
The Paper, Season 2 Review
Bottom Line
Choose it for a warmer, faster workplace comedy with strong cast chemistry and sharper laughs. Skip it if overloaded office romances, broad farce, or uneven journalism satire outweigh the charm.
Best for
Best for viewers who enjoy workplace mockumentaries, character-driven romances, broad ensemble comedy, and a local-journalism setting, especially those who already liked the first season.
Not for
Less suited to viewers seeking Office-level rewatchability, consistently sharp media satire, subtle comedy, or equal development across a large ensemble.
Verdict
Season 2 is a clear step forward for many critics: the cast looks more comfortable, the jokes move faster, and the Toledo Truth Teller finally feels like a workplace with its own comic identity. Domhnall Gleeson, Chelsea Frei, Sabrina Impacciatore, Lisa Gilroy, and the supporting ensemble draw repeated praise, while the journalism setting gives the show more substance than a generic office romance. The tradeoff is consistency. Reviewers split sharply on Ned and Mare, the broad farce, and whether the journalism satire is insightful or frustratingly safe. The ten-episode format also leaves strong supporting characters underused. The result is an easy, often very funny binge that still has not fully solved its balance and tone problems.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
43 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.013 (30%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.417 (40%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.45 (12%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.45 (12%)
-
Very negative below 1.53 (7%)
Pros
-
The supporting cast is one of the clearest strengths, with Lisa Gilroy, Sabrina Impacciatore, Tim Key, Jon Lovitz, Melvin Gregg, and others repeatedly singled out for laughs and scene-stealing energy.
-
Interest in another season is notably high. Multiple reviewers explicitly want Season 3 or several more seasons, even when they acknowledge flaws in the current run.
-
Comedy is the biggest fault line. Many reviewers call Season 2 funnier, sharper, or laugh-out-loud effective, while others find the broad farce scattershot, safe, or simply not funny enough.
-
Season 2 is generally seen as more confident outside The Office’s shadow, but reviewers disagree on how fully it has escaped familiar archetypes, callbacks, and relationship patterns.
-
The season is widely described as easy to keep watching; multiple reviewers call it an easy binge, and one said they simply did not want to stop.
-
Chemistry is one of the season’s biggest divides. Many reviewers find the ensemble increasingly comfortable and Ned and Mare warm or natural together, while others see little spark or feel the romance weakens once they become a couple.
Cons
-
Ned’s characterization is a sore point for some critics, who find his ethics, competence, and behavior contradictory enough to make the season’s central relationship harder to trust.
-
Rewatchability is a clear weakness in the more skeptical reviews, which see the season as pleasant comfort viewing but far below The Office’s repeat-viewing pull.
-
The oversized ensemble is a recurring frustration. The cast is frequently praised, but romance-heavy plots and limited episode space leave several supporting characters sidelined or fighting for attention.
-
The season draws sharp criticism for treating fabricated quotes and manipulated photos too lightly, with one reviewer especially bothered by the lack of meaningful repercussions.
-
One major criticism is that the central relationship becomes so ambiguous that the reviewer cannot tell what direction the show wants the audience to follow.
-
The ten-episode season is repeatedly seen as too short for such a large ensemble, forcing the show to choose between romance, journalism, and supporting characters.
Cast & Creators
-
ActorImpacciatore is the season’s most frequently praised performer, repeatedly called hilarious, fearless, impeccable, or a knockout. One critic finds the Esmeralda performance too cartoonish and grating, making her broad style the clearest point of disagreement.
-
ActorGilroy is one of the most consistently praised additions, bringing manic energy, sharp comic instincts, and an HR character that multiple reviewers call a standout.
-
ActorGleeson is repeatedly praised as the season’s anchor, bringing earnestness, warmth, and an increasingly comfortable comic touch to Ned.
-
ActorFrei is praised for fully owning Mare, giving the character warmth and dimension beyond the romance, and standing among the season’s strongest lead performances.
-
ActorKey is repeatedly described as a comic asset and even a secret weapon, with strong chemistry and elevated work; the recurring complaint is that the season simply does not use him enough.
-
ActorRahill emerges as a standout supporting performer, with reviewers especially praising his distinctive line delivery and the comedy generated by Travis’s side stories.
View all 43 feature scores and cast & creators
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other TV Shows, this product is above average in episode length, screenplay quality, spin-off quality, near average in story quality, humor, below average in accountability handling, rewatch value, character consistency.
Comparison summary
43 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher14 (33%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts16 (37%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower13 (30%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| accountability handling | 1.0 | 3.6 | -2.6 |
| rewatch value | 1.5 | 3.9 | -2.4 |
| character consistency | 1.0 | 3.0 | -2.0 |
| plot clarity | 1.0 | 2.9 | -1.9 |
| episode length | 5.0 | 3.2 | +1.8 |
| dialogue quality | 2.0 | 3.5 | -1.5 |
| screenplay quality | 5.0 | 3.5 | +1.5 |
| spin-off quality | 5.0 | 3.8 | +1.2 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better character consistency
Choose Slow Horses, Season 6. It scores 5.0 vs 1.0 for character consistency, with a 4.6 overall score.
If you want better plot clarity
Choose Emily in Paris season 5. It scores 5.0 vs 1.0 for plot clarity, with a 3.5 overall score.
If you want better rewatch value
Choose Bridgerton, Season 4. It scores 5.0 vs 1.5 for rewatch value, with a 3.9 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
The Office
- Better: rewatch value The reviewer says the season lacks The Office's repeat-viewing pull.
- Similar: central romance Ned and Mare are compared favorably to Jim and Pam at their best.
- Compared: overall tone The review contrasts the season's safer Parks and Recreation-like tone with The Office.
Parks and Recreation
- Similar: overall tone The season is said to feel closer to a sanitized Parks and Recreation than to The Office.
FAQ
Is Season 2 better than Season 1?
Many reviewers call it funnier, faster, and more confident, but not everyone agrees. Some still prefer Season 1’s storylines or think the second season repeats unresolved structural problems.
Does it still feel like The Office?
The mockumentary DNA and workplace-comedy echoes remain obvious, but many reviewers think Season 2 establishes a stronger identity of its own. Others still see familiar Office archetypes and recycled beats.
Is Ned and Mare’s romance the main focus?
Yes. Their relationship drives much of the season, and reviewers are sharply split: some find the chemistry warm and refreshing, while others think the romance lacks spark or crowds out better material.
Is the season consistently funny?
No. Several critics call it one of the funniest comedies around and praise the bigger swings, while others find the humor scattershot, too safe, or simply not funny enough.
Does the journalism storyline matter more this season?
Generally yes. The newspaper, ethics, investigations, funding pressure, and local-news mission receive more attention, though critics disagree on whether that material is insightful or too tame and unrealistic.
Is it easy to binge?
Most reviewers who address bingeability say yes, helped by short episodes and strong character momentum. One criticism is that the all-at-once release can also make the season easier to forget.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
Article Reviews
vulture.com
A TV comedy almost always takes a beat to find itself, for a series’ ensemble to gel with its writing staff. But ‘The Paper’ continues on in...
- Review score
- 2.0
techradar.com
Now I've seen all 10 episodes of The Paper season 2, its ending is by far my favorite thanks to one 'uncomfortable' moment.
- Review score
- 5.0
goldderby.com
Domhnall Gleeson and Chelsea Frei's office romance doesn't follow the same path as Jim and Pam.
- Review score
- 4.0
theguardian.com
This spin-off from the US Office is so brilliant that it might even eclipse its mother show. And as for the hilarious Sabrina Impacciatore –...
- Review score
- 4.8
cinemablend.com
The Paper Season 2 has been a great ride for Mare and Ned fans. We get to experience them together all season, and I wasn't expecting this so...
- Review score
- 4.6
Top TV Shows to Consider
Choose The Pitt Season 2 for a gripping, realistic medical drama with superb acting and emotional depth. Skip it if graphic procedures, unresolved arcs, or slower character-driven pacing bother you.
Pros: episode structure, main cast performance
Cons: age appropriateness, plot clarity
Best for powerhouse performances, thorny character work, and a tense revenge mystery that grows richer as it goes. Skip it if abuse, trafficking, graphic violence, or deliberately messy moral questions...
Pros: episode structure, supporting cast performance
Cons: cinematography, sexual content level
Best for sharp jokes, standout performances, and a warm, emotionally satisfying goodbye. Skip it if you most valued the pricklier Deborah-Ava conflict and biting Hollywood satire; the final season is...
Pros: plot originality, episode structure
Cons: season length, realism
Best for fast, darkly funny spy thrills, standout performances, and a tightly wound six-episode run. Skip it if the familiar formula, dense callbacks, or a major cliffhanger ending are likely...
Pros: season finale quality, character development
Cons: accent authenticity, product placement