Sony ULT WEAR Review

Brand: Sony
Released: April 11, 2024
Updated: 6 days ago
3.8
Overall review score
1,245
Review insights
95
Scored features
56
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose for physical bass impact, effective ANC, and comfortable travel listening at a midrange price. Skip if you want balanced sound without EQ or dependable calls in noisy places.

Best for

Bass lovers who enjoy hip-hop, EDM, and physical low-end punch, plus commuters wanting effective ANC and a folding travel package. Those willing to adjust EQ can broaden its appeal.

Not for

Listeners seeking neutral, finely detailed sound straight out of the box or consistently clear outdoor calls. Heavy workouts are also a poor match for heat-trapping cushions and the lack of a water/sweat protection rating.

Verdict

Sony ULT WEAR makes a convincing case for listeners who enjoy bass with physical impact. Its noise cancellation, generally comfortable padding, folding design, and included case give it practical appeal beyond the ULT button. Battery endurance is another consistent strength. The tradeoff is sound balance: some enjoy the stock warmth, while others hear dull detail and recessed vocals. ULT 1 often adds satisfying punch; ULT 2 is much more likely to overwhelm the mix. EQ can improve clarity, although its limits and setup effort frustrate some users. Quiet-room calls are usually fine, but outdoor pickup is inconsistent. Plasticky construction and hinge complaints also deserve consideration. Value is strongest when bass enthusiasm outweighs the need for faithful, effortless reproduction.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

95 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    12 (13%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    61 (64%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    15 (16%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    5 (5%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    2 (2%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.3
    52 reviews strong consensus
    Active noise cancellation: 4.3, 52 reviews, strong consensus
    Noise cancellation consistently earns praise for commuting, office noise, and travel at this price. Flagship models usually suppress more chatter or higher frequencies, and some comparisons find stronger rivals.
  • 3.8
    48 reviews low consensus
    Sound quality: 3.8, 48 reviews, low consensus
    The sound can be punchy and enjoyable, especially after EQ, but stock tuning divides listeners sharply. Strong bass can blur nuance in acoustic, rock, or complex arrangements.
  • 4.0
    46 reviews moderate consensus
    Overall recommendation: 4.0, 46 reviews, moderate consensus
    Recommendations lean positive for bass lovers seeking ANC and features below flagship prices. Balanced-sound enthusiasts and frequent outdoor callers receive more cautious advice.
  • 4.3
    44 reviews strong consensus
    Comfort during long use: 4.3, 44 reviews, strong consensus
    Roomy padding and light weight make long listening comfortable for most. Heat, stronger clamp, or pressure from the narrow headband can limit comfort for particular heads.
  • 4.1
    40 reviews strong consensus
    Ear cup padding quality: 4.1, 40 reviews, strong consensus
    Large, soft ear cushions make room for bigger ears and often improve comfort. Some want deeper cups or more supple, supportive memory foam.
  • 4.3
    35 reviews strong consensus
    Battery: 4.3, 35 reviews, strong consensus
    Battery endurance is widely considered dependable for several days of use and travel. LDAC, volume, and listening modes affect runtime, while some merely regard endurance as average.

Cons highlights

  • 3.3
    53 reviews low consensus
    Bass performance: 3.3, 53 reviews, low consensus
    Deep rumble and physical punch are the main attraction for bass lovers. ULT 1 often earns more approval than ULT 2, which many find boomy, overwhelming, or tiring.
  • 3.3
    33 reviews low consensus
    Midrange clarity: 3.3, 33 reviews, low consensus
    Vocals can remain clear and present with restrained bass or suitable EQ. Heavy ULT settings often bury voices and midrange instruments.
  • 2.7
    29 reviews moderate consensus
    Microphone noise reduction: 2.7, 29 reviews, moderate consensus
    Background-noise suppression is a recurring weakness, with traffic, chatter, and wind leaking into calls or obscuring speech. A smaller group reports effective isolation and clear outdoor calls.
  • 3.3
    27 reviews low consensus
    Treble clarity: 3.3, 27 reviews, low consensus
    Smooth highs avoid harshness for some listeners, while others miss sparkle and fine detail. Treble boosts can help, though a few hear uneven or grating peaks.
  • 3.2
    20 reviews low consensus
    Detail retrieval: 3.2, 20 reviews, low consensus
    EQ and restrained bass can reveal clear instrumental and vocal detail. Stock tuning or excessive boost often hides subtle textures, leaving less resolution than premium alternatives.
  • 2.8
    18 reviews low consensus
    Workout heat and sweat buildup: 2.8, 18 reviews, low consensus
    Heat buildup is a common caveat for long sessions or workouts with the faux-leather cushions. Other users find the spacious pads cooler or sufficiently breathable.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in Customer support, Idle static noise, Handling noise through frame, near average in Active noise cancellation, Design and Aesthetics, below average in Durability over time, Dynamic performance, USB-C.

Comparison summary

92 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    27 (29%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    41 (45%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    24 (26%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Durability over time 1.0 3.8 -2.8
Customer support 4.0 1.8 +2.2
Dynamic performance 2.0 4.0 -2.0
USB-C 2.3 3.9 -1.6
Idle static noise 5.0 3.2 +1.8
Microphone noise reduction 2.7 3.9 -1.2
Handling noise through frame 4.5 3.1 +1.4
Carry case quality 4.4 3.5 +0.9

Consider This Instead

If you want better Ear cup padding quality

Choose Nothing Headphone (a). It scores 5.0 vs 4.1 for Ear cup padding quality, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Integrated microphone

Choose JBL Live 780NC. It scores 5.0 vs 4.0 for Integrated microphone, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: Construction feel The plastics feel less premium than XM5.
  • Better: Accuracy and balance The ULT WEAR lacks the flagship’s balance and accuracy.
  • Worse: Comfort The roomier cushions and headband are more comfortable for this listener.

XB910N

  • Worse: Clarity Clarity is improved compared with the predecessor.
  • Worse: Clarity Sound clarity improves over the earlier model.
  • Worse: Stock sound balance ULT WEAR starts with a better-balanced sound than its predecessor.

FAQ

Is the bass boost overwhelming?

ULT 1 often adds enjoyable depth and punch. ULT 2 frequently draws complaints about muddy balance, buried detail, or fatigue, although dedicated bass lovers may enjoy it.

How good is the noise cancellation?

Most assessments find it effective for commuting, office noise, and travel. Premium models generally suppress more noise, particularly chatter or higher frequencies.

Can EQ improve the sound?

Many listeners recover clearer vocals and brighter treble with EQ. Others find the available adjustment range too limited or the setup too demanding.

Are they comfortable for long sessions?

Most praise the light weight and roomy cushions. Some experience heat buildup, clamping pressure, or discomfort at the top of the head.

How dependable are battery life and charging?

Battery life is generally praised, with many tests near the advertised 30 hours with ANC and 50 hours without it. Quick charging is useful, while full recharges can feel slow.

Can I use LDAC and multipoint together?

The supplied tests repeatedly report that enabling two-device multipoint disables LDAC. Compatible Android users must choose between that codec and simultaneous device pairing.

Are they good for calls and wired listening?

Quiet-room calls are usually clear, but traffic and wind can interfere outdoors. The 3.5mm connection is useful when the battery runs out, though passive sound divides listeners and USB-C audio is unavailable.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

soundguys.com

The new bassy headphones on the block, the Sony ULT WEAR, have really big shoes to fill. Are they everything they need to be?

Review score
3.1

Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider

#1 Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.5

Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...

Pros: Design and Aesthetics, Overall recommendation

Cons: Noise isolation (passive), Connectivity options

#2 Jabra Evolve3 85
4.5

Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...

Pros: Battery, Charging

Cons: Value for money, Codec support

#3 Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
4.5

Choose the Aventho 100 for standout battery life, portable retro styling, strong ANC, and flexible wired/wireless use. Skip it if you dislike on-ear pressure or want a wide, consistently neutral...

Pros: Battery, Design and Aesthetics

Cons: Clamping force comfort, Soundstage width

#4 Tribit QuietPlus 81
4.4

Best for exceptional battery life, useful ANC, flexible EQ, and strong budget value. Skip it if refined, detailed sound or polished controls matter more than price.

Pros: Value for money, Sound quality

Cons: Button control usability, App