Rivals, Season 2

Rivals, Season 2 Review

Studio: Hulu
Released: May 15, 2026
Updated: 3 months ago
4.1
Overall review score
179
Review insights
48
Scored features
25
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for exuberant acting, sharp comedy, lavish 1980s style, and richer character drama. Skip it if crowded storylines, abundant sex, or a frustrating split-season release outweigh the fun.

Best for

Best for adults who enjoy glossy ensemble soaps, outrageous British comedy, tangled romance, 1980s style, and morally messy character drama.

Not for

Not ideal for viewers seeking restrained sexual content, realistic drama, simple plotting, or a complete season that can be watched without a long release interruption.

Verdict

Rivals Season 2 largely improves on its breakout first run by giving the ensemble more emotional depth without sacrificing the outrageous comedy, sex, glamour, and corporate scheming that define Rutshire. David Tennant, Alex Hassell, Emily Atack, Claire Rushbrook, and the broader cast earn strong praise, while the costumes, sets, soundtrack, and dialogue make the 1980s world feel vivid and distinctive. The main tradeoffs are structural: too many simultaneous relationships can blur together, several supporting stories feel rushed, and the split weekly release interrupts a naturally bingeable soap. Most critics embrace the excess, though one finds it vapid, and Monica’s midseason death draws serious criticism for mishandling queer representation.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

48 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    23 (48%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    16 (33%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    9 (19%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.3
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    character development: 4.3, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    Rupert, Monica, Maud, Taggie, Sarah, and several supporting women receive richer, more mature arcs. The season is strongest when it lets the glamorous surface give way to vulnerability and consequence.
  • 4.2
    11 reviews low consensus
    entertainment value: 4.2, 11 reviews, low consensus
    Most critics find the season irresistibly funny, glamorous, and addictive. A small minority sees the same excess as vapid, exhausting, or empty.
  • 4.6
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    acting quality: 4.6, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    The ensemble is widely praised for committing fully to the show’s heightened tone while keeping its characters human. One sharply negative take found some performances embarrassed by the material.
  • 4.1
    8 reviews low consensus
    story quality: 4.1, 8 reviews, low consensus
    The season is widely regarded as a confident, richer continuation that adds darker consequences and more complex relationships. A few critics find it looser or less substantial.
  • 4.8
    7 reviews strong consensus
    humor: 4.8, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The comedy ranges from sharp dialogue to full physical farce, with many critics highlighting the season’s relentless laughs and eccentric English silliness.
  • 4.3
    7 reviews strong consensus
    theme depth: 4.3, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Beneath the glossy debauchery, the season explores class, power, sexism, hidden sexuality, loyalty, consequences, and the fragility of love.

Cons highlights

  • 3.4
    9 reviews low consensus
    sexual content level: 3.4, 9 reviews, low consensus
    The abundant sex and nudity are central to the show’s comic identity and are often embraced as part of the fun. Some critics find the excess tiring, while others miss the first season’s freer erotic energy.
  • 2.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    plot clarity: 2.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The many affairs, business loyalties, family histories, and new characters can be difficult to track. The central Tony-Rupert-Cameron conflict remains clear enough to anchor the chaos.
  • 2.8
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    season pacing: 2.8, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    Story momentum is generally strong, but the hybrid weekly and split-season release pattern is repeatedly criticized as confusing and frustrating.

Cast & Creators

  • Tony Baddingham
    4.8
    5 reviews strong consensus
    David Tennant: 4.8, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Tennant enthusiastically embraces Tony’s full villain turn, chewing scenery with enough charisma and humor to make the character’s cruelty entertaining.
  • Rupert Campbell-Black
    4.9
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Alex Hassell: 4.9, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Hassell is repeatedly singled out for making Rupert charismatic, vulnerable, and increasingly three-dimensional. His chemistry and emotional transparency turn the reformed-cad arc into a season highlight.
  • Monica Baddingham
    4.5
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Claire Rushbrook: 4.5, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Rushbrook’s Monica is widely praised as quietly moving, wounded, manipulative, and increasingly dangerous. Her controlled performance makes Monica one of the season’s standout supporting characters.
  • Sarah Stratton
    4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Emily Atack: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Atack receives some of the season’s strongest praise for making Sarah sympathetic, devastating, and hilarious, particularly during the dinner-party farce.
  • Author / Executive Producer
    5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Jilly Cooper: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Cooper’s influence is felt throughout the adaptation’s wit, sensuality, class detail, and character depth. The season is viewed as a fitting continuation of her world.
  • Taggie O’Hara
    4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Bella Maclean: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Maclean keeps Taggie as the show’s quiet heart while adding maturity and new shades to a previously passive character.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other TV Shows, this product is above average in season length, dialogue quality, episode structure, near average in entertainment value, sexual content level, below average in cliffhanger effectiveness, emotional impact, character consistency.

Comparison summary

48 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    25 (52%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    18 (38%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    5 (10%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
season length 4.5 2.9 +1.6
dialogue quality 4.8 3.4 +1.5
episode structure 4.7 3.6 +1.1
plot originality 4.5 3.4 +1.1
critic appeal 5.0 4.0 +1.0
humor 4.8 3.9 +0.9
writing quality 4.4 3.4 +0.9
cliffhanger effectiveness 3.0 4.0 -1.0

Consider This Instead

If you want better genre satisfaction

Choose Dark Winds, Season 4. It scores 4.9 vs 4.2 for genre satisfaction, with a 4.4 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

Succession

  • Compared: class conflict and comic style Its wealthy power struggle is framed as Succession filtered through broader British sex comedy.
  • Compared: tone and corporate rivalry The show is likened to Succession with a wilder, more comedic 1980s personality.

Bridgerton

  • Similar: split-season release schedule Its release pattern is compared with Bridgerton’s split-season approach, but judged less viewer-friendly.

Killing Eve

  • Compared: queer-character death trope The Monica storyline is compared with Killing Eve as another example of the criticized trope.

FAQ

Is Season 2 better than Season 1?

Most critics consider it at least as entertaining and often richer, with stronger character development and broader world-building. A few miss the first season’s lighter, more concentrated energy.

Is it still very sexually explicit?

Yes. Sex, nudity, and bawdy humor remain central to the show’s identity, although reactions range from enthusiastic approval to fatigue with the excess.

What are the strongest parts of the season?

The acting, witty dialogue, comic set pieces, period costumes, production design, soundtrack, and deeper character arcs receive the most consistent praise.

What are the main weaknesses?

The crowded ensemble can make relationships difficult to track, some supporting stories feel rushed, and the split weekly release schedule repeatedly frustrates critics.

Does it stay faithful to Jilly Cooper’s books?

It preserves Cooper’s sensuality, wit, class satire, and larger-than-life characters while making modernizing changes that several critics feel add useful depth.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

telltaletv.com

Corinium and Venturer's competition heats up the market and the sheets on Rivals Season 2 Episode 4. Read on for our review.

Review score
4.4

Top TV Shows to Consider

#1 Colin From Accounts, Season 3
4.8

Best for sharp adult humor, magnetic chemistry and a deeply satisfying farewell. Skip it if familiar will-they-won’t-they plotting or deliberately messy leads are dealbreakers.

Pros: humor, writing quality

#2 King of the Hill, Season 15
4.7

Choose Season 15 for warm, character-driven comedy, meaningful growth, and a finale that rewards longtime fans. Skip it if the short binge format, uneven replacement voices, or occasional clumsy commentary...

Pros: franchise connection, character development

#3 The Pitt, Season 2
4.7

Choose The Pitt Season 2 for a gripping, realistic medical drama with superb acting and emotional depth. Skip it if graphic procedures, unresolved arcs, or slower character-driven pacing bother you.

Pros: realism, emotional impact

#4 Furious, Season 1
4.6

Best for powerhouse performances, thorny character work, and a tense revenge mystery that grows richer as it goes. Skip it if abuse, trafficking, graphic violence, or deliberately messy moral questions...

Pros: main cast performance, character development

Cons: pilot episode quality