NCIS: New York, Season 1

NCIS: New York, Season 1 Feature Scores

Explore all 69 feature scores for NCIS: New York, Season 1, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

69 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    26 (38%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    29 (42%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    10 (14%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (6%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.4
    14 reviews strong consensus
    cast chemistry: 4.4, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    The central attraction is the easy connection between LL Cool J and Scott Caan, with Addy and Wyatt also showing promise. A few responses remain cautious about whether the new bonds can match Sam’s old partnerships.
  • 4.4
    9 reviews strong consensus
    friendship portrayal: 4.4, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Mutual respect and a welcoming attitude make Sam and Nick’s partnership appealing. Addy and Wyatt’s listening, teasing and growing trust are another promising bond.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    Location authenticity: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Recognizable neighborhoods and on-location views make New York a lively presence. The city often feels like part of the cast, though landmarks alone do not yet provide deep urban insight.
  • 4.7
    6 reviews strong consensus
    dialogue quality: 4.7, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The leads’ lively, sometimes spontaneous-feeling banter is a recurring strength. Their exchanges can also carry real consideration and emotion beyond the jokes.
  • 4.4
    8 reviews strong consensus
    character appeal: 4.4, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Nick’s generosity, Sam’s sociability and an intriguing supporting team offer reasons to keep watching. Addy and the initially prickly Sean both win particular interest.
  • 4.3
    12 reviews strong consensus
    renewal interest: 4.3, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    The new relationships and unresolved backstories leave many viewers eager to continue. That enthusiasm comes with expectations that the show will deepen the team and sustain its early strengths.
  • 4.5
    7 reviews strong consensus
    teamwork portrayal: 4.5, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Coordinated action and shared problem-solving make the team’s competence satisfying to watch. The agents’ mutual care is as appealing as their ability to divide the work.
  • 4.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    pilot episode quality: 4.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The premiere generally earns strong approval for introducing the team naturally and giving Sam a credible new beginning. Some see a solid launch rather than a major reinvention.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    workplace teamwork portrayal: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The office works best when colleagues share information, trust each other’s expertise and contribute to a common solution. Sean’s undervalued technical work complicates an otherwise supportive team culture.
  • 4.4
    6 reviews strong consensus
    setting shift execution: 4.4, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Sam’s move to New York largely feels natural and gives the show a distinctive home. The city also helps make his decision to reconnect emotionally persuasive.
  • 4.1
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    franchise connection: 4.1, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    Sam’s history and the familiar banter create a welcome connection to earlier NCIS shows for many viewers. One video reviewer feels the branding sits on a more generic cop drama.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    humor: 4.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Playful banter gives the show welcome levity, while Sean and an awkward encounter from Sam’s past add comic moments. Some height jokes are corny, but the overall humor usually works.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews strong consensus
    spin-off quality: 4.3, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The show is widely seen as a solid, sometimes better-than-expected extension, powered by its leads and setting. Its familiar cases keep it from feeling like a major leap forward.
  • 4.3
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Leadership portrayal: 4.3, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Wells’s care and authority and the contrasting approaches of Sam and Nick give the office useful texture. Sean’s feeling of being undervalued exposes a weakness in that supportive image.
  • 4.3
    5 reviews strong consensus
    main cast performance: 4.3, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    LL Cool J and Caan provide the charm and emotional substance that often lift the familiar material. Some viewers enjoy their work while still finding Caan’s persona too familiar.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    acting performance: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The acting is consistently well received, with the leads supplying both engaging chemistry and credible emotional restraint.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    nostalgia appeal: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The show’s banter, team bond and recognizable rhythm often recall the franchise’s earlier appeal. That familiar feeling is a major part of its enjoyment.
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    theme depth: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Belonging, moral disappointment and respectful disagreement give the procedural more to consider than catching a culprit. Sam’s return is strongest when it complicates his view of himself and others.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews strong consensus
    cinematography: 4.4, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Wide city views and the closing skyline image give the show a strong visual identity. The bridge-side conversation is another attractive use of the setting.
  • 4.2
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    emotional impact: 4.2, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    The flag presentation and Nick’s bridge-side appeal deliver some of the strongest feeling. Later Sam-centered material can land less effectively when it repeats situations longtime viewers already know.
  • 4.3
    4 reviews strong consensus
    supporting cast performance: 4.3, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    The supporting ensemble is solid, with Byers’s swagger, Harper’s fight work and Beals’s amusing authority standing out.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    ending satisfaction: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The pilot’s tribute gives its victim a warmly praised sense of closure. Episode 3 also benefits from the satisfaction of bringing endangered children to safety.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Grief portrayal: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Sam’s resistance to settling down carries credible vulnerability. Honoring his murdered friend gives the pilot a particularly satisfying moment of mourning and closure.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Justice and accountability: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The team’s desire to do good is part of the appeal, especially when agents save lives and show compassion to someone manipulated into crime.
  • 4.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Investigative procedure: 4.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Coordinated raids and useful computer work make the agents’ competence enjoyable to watch. Some case complications nevertheless feel designed mainly to keep the team busy.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Guilt and regret: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Missed obligations and an encounter with a former mentor complicate Sam’s return. His reassessment of the life he left behind adds emotional substance.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    opening sequence quality: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The overseas opening gives Sam an ambitious action introduction and a meaningful disruption when professional duty costs him personal availability.
  • 3.9
    4 reviews low consensus
    action sequence quality: 3.9, 4 reviews, low consensus
    The coordinated bar raid and Addy’s decisive intervention make the action a highlight. The training montage is less welcome and strikes one viewer as an unnecessary echo of earlier NCIS material.
  • 4.0
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    genre satisfaction: 4.0, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    The familiar procedural charm and suitable pace generally satisfy expectations. A dissenting response finds the cop-drama format less distinctive than the NCIS identity it wanted.
  • 3.5
    11 reviews strong consensus
    character development: 3.5, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    Sam receives meaningful emotional depth, but supporting characters often remain sketches with promising backstories. Later episodes broaden the relationships unevenly, leaving repeated calls for more attention beyond the lead.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Genre blending: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The buddy-comedy rapport lightens the investigations, while the slick presentation adds a spy-drama flavor. Both shifts are welcomed as enjoyable parts of the mix.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    visual style: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The slick, occasionally spy-like presentation and distinctive city backdrop help the new show stand apart visually.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Animal presence: 5.0, 1 review
    Sid, the office dog, adds a warmly welcomed touch of personality to the team’s headquarters.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    exposition repetition: 5.0, 1 review
    The premiere avoids the unnecessary introductory exposition that can make a new procedural feel stiff.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Masculinity portrayal: 5.0, 1 review
    The leads can be tough, funny and openly attentive to each other. Accepting companionship is presented as compatible with strength rather than a surrender of authority.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    soundtrack quality: 5.0, 1 review
    Empire State of Mind works beautifully with the closing city view, giving the pilot’s final image an effective musical lift.
  • 3.6
    6 reviews low consensus
    entertainment value: 3.6, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Most assessments find the show engaging and fun, often because of its team rather than its mysteries. The video response is more qualified, and an embedded commenter rejects it outright.
  • 3.8
    3 reviews low consensus
    writing quality: 3.8, 3 reviews, low consensus
    The writing earns praise when it shares meaningful work across the team and avoids automatic feuds. Recycled emotional beats and formulaic case material leave room for improvement.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    continuity: 4.5, 1 review
    Following up on Addy and Wyatt’s earlier conversation makes their growing trust feel sustained across episodes.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    cultural representation: 4.5, 1 review
    Having another woman lead the NCIS office is explicitly welcomed as an appealing part of the new team.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    drama quality: 4.5, 1 review
    Episode 4’s clashes over trust and leadership provide the personal tension needed to make the team’s relationships more engaging.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    episode pacing: 4.5, 1 review
    The premiere moves at a pace that suits its energetic crime-drama format.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    episode structure: 4.5, 1 review
    The pilot’s familiar procedural machinery runs smoothly, providing an efficient introduction to the new office.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Exile and belonging: 4.5, 1 review
    Sam’s invitation to stay becomes an appealing story about accepting connection. The partnership gives institutional belonging a convincing emotional pull.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    lighting quality: 4.5, 1 review
    The handsomely lit Queensboro Bridge gives Nick’s heartfelt speech an especially attractive setting.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    lore depth: 4.5, 1 review
    Bringing Sam into the new team gives the spinoff an established personal history to explore from its first episode.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    protagonist agency: 4.5, 1 review
    Sam becomes the pilot’s clear driving force, giving the new series a confident central character from the outset.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Self-discovery and fulfillment: 4.5, 1 review
    The new partnership gives Sam a persuasive reason to return home and a fresh sense of purpose in the city.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Veteran solidarity portrayal: 4.5, 1 review
    Sam’s determination to honor his murdered friend leads to a gratifying tribute to his service and the life he lived.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Family relationships: 4.0, 1 review
    The second episode finds real sadness in a young man whose loyalty to his brother is exploited. Family obligation becomes a destructive force rather than an easy source of support.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    incarceration portrayal: 4.0, 1 review
    Sean’s compulsory service adds a useful complication to the office’s warm image. His place on the team contrasts meaningfully with Sam’s invitation to belong.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    marketing appeal: 4.0, 1 review
    LL Cool J’s recognizable presence gives the new show an immediate draw and a clear connection for established viewers.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    Narrative stakes: 4.0, 1 review
    The death of Sam’s friend gives the opening investigation personal weight and makes his homecoming more than a change of assignment.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    romance quality: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Addy and Wyatt have enough chemistry to suggest a future pairing. For now, the appeal rests on a promising friendship rather than an already established romance.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    world-building: 3.5, 1 review
    Neighborhoods give the city visual distinction and emotional associations. The pilot has not yet developed an equally detailed picture of life within those places.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.5
    4 reviews low consensus
    originality: 2.5, 4 reviews, low consensus
    The show stays close to familiar procedural plotting, which can feel generic or repetitive. Nick’s welcoming approach offers a refreshing variation on the usual bickering partnership.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    narrative repetition: 2.0, 1 review
    A later Sam-centered emotional beat feels too much like material longtime viewers have already seen. Familiarity can weaken the intended resonance.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    plot clarity: 2.0, 1 review
    The pilot’s central investigation draws criticism for suspicious logic and a case that does not fully make sense.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    score quality: 2.0, 1 review
    The lack of a proper opening theme is a disappointment for a viewer who misses that part of the franchise presentation.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    title sequence quality: 2.0, 1 review
    The fleeting title card feels disappointing to a viewer who wants a fuller NCIS opening sequence.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    family friendliness: 2.5, 1 review
    Positive intentions do not erase the cautions around bloodshed and profanity. Content-conscious households may find the familiar crime-drama material a significant barrier.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    language level: 2.5, 1 review
    Occasional profanity is treated as a content concern that may diminish the show’s appeal for sensitive households.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    violence level: 2.5, 1 review
    Bloodshed is framed as a meaningful content concern. The agents’ pursuit of justice may not compensate for it for more sensitive viewers.
  • 2.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    joke originality: 2.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Height-based jokes can be ordinary or corny. The partnership has more appeal than those familiar gags alone.
  • 3.1
    5 reviews low consensus
    character screen time: 3.1, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Attention shifts unevenly across the team. The pilot and third episode earn praise for sharing the work, while Wells’s limited role and later emphasis on Sam prompt requests for more balance.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    plot twists: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Reactions differ sharply: the pilot surprises one viewer, while episode 3’s clues and accomplice seem too obvious to another.
  • 3.2
    5 reviews low consensus
    ensemble balance: 3.2, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Opinions depend on the episode: some find the pilot and third hour well shared, while others see supporting roles crowded out by Sam. Developing the rest of the team remains a recurring request.
  • 3.3
    7 reviews moderate consensus
    story quality: 3.3, 7 reviews, moderate consensus
    The character-led homecoming can be compelling, but the investigations draw complaints about crowded, formulaic or unconvincing plotting. Teamwork and relationships often carry the stronger interest.
  • 3.4
    5 reviews low consensus
    casting quality: 3.4, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Critics generally welcome the ensemble and see Caan as a strong complement to LL Cool J. Some audience comments object to casting him as a new character who feels much like his earlier roles.

Use Cases

Best for

Sort
  • 4.1
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    Returning fan viewing: 4.1, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Fans seeking familiar banter, Sam Hanna and an old-school NCIS feel have plenty to enjoy. Some longtime viewers miss his earlier partnerships or find the new show too generic to capture the same identity.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Newcomer viewing: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The pilot supplies enough background to follow Sam’s new circumstances without watching his earlier shows. It also works as an appealing standalone introduction to the team.
  • 4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Character-driven crime drama viewing: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Sam’s homecoming and his emerging relationships give the procedural an appealing personal center. The characters can be a stronger draw than the case itself.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Comfort viewing: 4.5, 1 review
    The familiar formula and easy rapport make this a comfortable return to the NCIS world.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Mystery-solving viewing: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Puzzle appeal varies: one viewer welcomes an unexpected pilot twist, while another finds episode 3’s culprit and clues obvious. The teamwork is a steadier attraction than the guessing game.

Cast & Creators

  • Sam Hanna
    4.5
    7 reviews strong consensus
    LL Cool J: 4.5, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    LL Cool J gives Sam’s homecoming charm and believable emotional vulnerability. His strongest notices praise the opportunity to play deeper material without making it grandiose.
  • Nick Schaeffer
    3.9
    8 reviews low consensus
    Scott Caan: 3.9, 8 reviews, low consensus
    Caan’s relaxed humor, charm and chemistry with LL Cool J earn strong praise, with Nick’s maturity surprising some critics. Embedded audience comments are less forgiving, seeing another version of his familiar television cop.
  • Wyatt Sers
    4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Shane Harper: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Harper’s easy rapport with Byers strengthens the younger pairing, and his fight work supplies an additional highlight.
  • Addy Ross
    4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Jacqueline Byers: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Byers brings swagger to Addy and an easy chemistry with Harper. Her performance helps make the younger partnership engaging from the start.
  • Robyn Wells
    4.5
    1 review
    Jennifer Beals: 4.5, 1 review
    Beals fits Wells’s authority well and makes her exchanges with Sean amusing. Her performance is a welcome part of the ensemble.