Earfun Wave Pro X Review

Brand: EarFun
Released: September 3, 2026
Updated: 6 days ago
4.1
Overall review score
915
Review insights
91
Scored features
25
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose these for long battery life, comfortable everyday wear, and unusually powerful EQ at a modest price. Skip them if you want refined stock sound, automatic wear detection, or consistently excellent calls in noise.

Best for

Budget-conscious commuters, office listeners, and tuning enthusiasts who want long endurance, comfortable fit, and flexible wired or wireless playback.

Not for

Listeners who demand polished stock tuning, automatic pause when removing headphones, or reliably excellent calls in crowds and wind. Rain and sweaty-workout use are also poor fits for the lack of an IP rating.

Verdict

The Wave Pro X makes its strongest case through comfort, endurance, and control. Lightweight construction and deep cushions support long listening sessions, while the broad codec selection and USB and analog options make it adaptable to work and travel. Its ten-band parametric EQ is the standout: several listeners turn an initially muddy or sharp presentation into sound they genuinely enjoy. Stock tuning is less dependable, with reactions ranging from balanced and detailed to boomy, recessed, or fatiguing. ANC generally handles steady engine noise well, but voices, wind, and maximum-strength pressure produce more variable results. Calls are similarly inconsistent outside quiet rooms. Missing wear detection and a bulky case are practical compromises. For buyers willing to tune, the overall package offers strong value without guaranteeing flagship refinement.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

91 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    25 (27%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    45 (49%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    15 (16%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    6 (7%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.6
    24 reviews strong consensus
    Comfort during long use: 4.6, 24 reviews, strong consensus
    Long-session comfort is one of the most consistent reasons to buy, with several reports of hours of wear without pain. Individual head size, heat sensitivity, and the need for occasional adjustment still matter.
  • 4.5
    24 reviews strong consensus
    Ear cup padding quality: 4.5, 24 reviews, strong consensus
    Deep, soft pads usually provide comfortable ear clearance, including for larger ears. Some listeners still make slight contact or find the synthetic covering warm and insufficiently breathable.
  • 4.7
    23 reviews strong consensus
    Equalizer customization: 4.7, 23 reviews, strong consensus
    The ten-band parametric EQ is a defining strength, allowing precise correction of bass, vocal presence, and narrow treble peaks. Its results are excellent for many listeners, but the interface and profile-saving workflow take patience.
  • 4.1
    23 reviews moderate consensus
    Sound quality: 4.1, 23 reviews, moderate consensus
    Sound quality ranges from exceptional value to disappointing stock performance, depending on the listener. The most common route to better results is reducing excess bass and adjusting vocal presence or treble with the powerful EQ.
  • 4.7
    22 reviews strong consensus
    Value for money: 4.7, 22 reviews, strong consensus
    The strongest value argument combines long endurance, comfort, extensive codecs, and unusually powerful EQ around the supplied $130 price. Sound refinement and convenience still trail premium alternatives for some listeners.
  • App
    4.4
    22 reviews strong consensus
    App: 4.4, 22 reviews, strong consensus
    The companion app earns broad praise for useful controls and unusually deep tuning. Personalized sound, account-gated tools, and awkward EQ profile editing are the main complaints.

Cons highlights

  • 3.1
    17 reviews low consensus
    Frequency response accuracy: 3.1, 17 reviews, low consensus
    Stock tonal balance is the main point of disagreement: some hear a balanced, restrained presentation, while others hear excessive bass or uneven treble. Fine tuning often improves vocal presence and cohesion substantially.
  • 3.1
    16 reviews low consensus
    Treble clarity: 3.1, 16 reviews, low consensus
    Treble opinions are sharply divided between clear, smooth detail and harshness or sibilance. Parametric EQ is especially helpful for taming narrow peaks while restoring lower-treble presence.
  • 3.3
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    Soundstage width: 3.3, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    The presentation is usually intimate rather than open-back expansive. Some hear a pleasant medium-room space, while others find it boxed in; EQ or disabling ANC can improve openness.
  • 3.3
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    Workout heat and sweat buildup: 3.3, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    Heat management depends on the wearer and conditions: some stay comfortable and dry for hours, while others find the synthetic pads warm or stuffy. Active use and warm weather make ventilation more consequential.
  • 3.4
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    Microphone noise reduction: 3.4, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Speech isolation can work well, but demanding noise exposes limits. Some tests hear background sound leaking through or compressed speech, especially when the wearer speaks quietly.
  • 2.5
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Auto-play/wear detection: 2.5, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Missing wear sensing is a recurring convenience complaint because removing the headphones does not pause playback. Some listeners accept the omission at this price, while others expect it in such a feature-rich model.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Over-Ear Headphones, this product is above average in AI translation, aptX, LDAC, near average in Design and Aesthetics, Battery, below average in Replaceable earpads, Replaceable pads/headband, Treble clarity.

Comparison summary

90 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    31 (34%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    39 (43%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    20 (22%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Replaceable earpads 2.0 3.8 -1.8
Replaceable pads/headband 2.0 3.6 -1.6
AI translation 4.5 2.9 +1.6
aptX 4.4 3.1 +1.3
LDAC 4.5 3.2 +1.3
Codec support 4.8 3.7 +1.1
Equalizer customization 4.7 3.8 +0.8
LE Audio readiness 4.3 3.2 +1.2

Consider This Instead

If you want better Advanced software features

Choose Soundcore Anker Space One. It scores 4.7 vs 4.3 for Advanced software features, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

If you want better App

Choose JBL Live 780NC. It scores 4.8 vs 4.4 for App, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better Ear cup padding quality

Choose Nothing Headphone (a). It scores 5.0 vs 4.5 for Ear cup padding quality, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Better: price-relative ranking Soundcore leads the price-relative ranking, while EarFun is favored for parametric tuning.
  • Similar: ANC The reviewer puts cancellation on a similar level.
  • Better: comfort The Soundcore is slightly more comfortable and secure for this reviewer.

FAQ

Do they sound good without EQ?

Opinions differ sharply. Some listeners enjoy the stock balance, while others find muddy bass, recessed vocals, or sharp treble; the parametric EQ often makes a substantial improvement.

How long does the battery last?

The supplied claims are up to 90 hours without ANC and 50 hours with it. Everyday tests generally report long endurance, though some results fall short of those figures.

How effective is noise cancellation?

Steady engine, fan, and transit noise are the clearest strengths. Voices and unpredictable sounds are less consistently blocked, and one test reports walking pressure at maximum fixed strength that disappears in adaptive mode.

Can I listen through USB-C or a headphone cable?

Both USB audio and a 3.5mm analog connection are available, with ANC usable while powered. Multiple sources report that analog playback still requires a charged battery.

Can I connect two devices at once?

Yes, multipoint generally makes phone-and-computer switching convenient. Several sources report that LDAC must be disabled for dual-device use.

Are they good for calls and conversations?

Quiet-room calls are usually usable, but noisy and windy tests are inconsistent. Transparency often sounds natural, although some listeners hear hiss or processed tones.

Do they pause automatically or suit workouts?

They lack wear detection, so playback must be paused manually. Exercise fit and heat reports vary, and the lack of an IP rating limits confidence around sweat or rain.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

gsmarena.com

Features and comfort at an affordable price. The Wave Pro X is EarFun's latest headphones and its newest flagship model. They feature a new...

Review score
3.3

Top Over-Ear Headphones to Consider

#1 Meze Audio 105 Silva Headphones
4.5

Choose the 105 Silva for beautiful, repairable construction, superb comfort, easy driveability, and an engaging spacious sound. Skip it if you need isolation, balanced connectivity, heavy sub-bass, or consistently smooth...

Pros: Design and Aesthetics, Overall recommendation

Cons: Noise isolation (passive), Connectivity options

#2 Jabra Evolve3 85
4.5

Choose it if your workday revolves around calls and you want exceptional mic isolation, huge battery life, all-day comfort, and a slim travel-friendly design. Skip it if music fidelity, class-leading...

Pros: Battery, Charging

Cons: Value for money, Codec support

#3 Beyerdynamic Aventho 100
4.5

Choose the Aventho 100 for standout battery life, portable retro styling, strong ANC, and flexible wired/wireless use. Skip it if you dislike on-ear pressure or want a wide, consistently neutral...

Pros: Battery, Design and Aesthetics

Cons: Clamping force comfort, Soundstage width

#4 Tribit QuietPlus 81
4.4

Best for exceptional battery life, useful ANC, flexible EQ, and strong budget value. Skip it if refined, detailed sound or polished controls matter more than price.

Pros: Value for money, Sound quality

Cons: Button control usability, App