Controls and connectivity
Age appropriateness
It Takes Two
3.0
The teen-oriented material is more mature than its bright art might imply, with strained family relationships and occasional coarse or unsettling moments.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Controls responsiveness
It Takes Two
4.9
Jumping, dashing, shooting, and using temporary gadgets generally feel immediate and natural. Their approachable design helps the game handle many different mechanics without cumbersome controls.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Protagonist appeal
It Takes Two
2.4
Cody and May can feel believable and sympathetic as their relationship evolves, but their frequent squabbling and selfish actions seriously alienate some players.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Other features
AI behavior
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
1.8
The creature’s pursuit and ability to pull players from hiding can feel arbitrary. Learning its behavior helps, but several accounts still find encounters unfair.
Animation quality
It Takes Two
5.0
Cartoon-like motion and lively expressions bring the dolls and cinematic moments to life. The exaggerated style suits the inventive setting.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Character development
It Takes Two
5.0
Several players appreciate how the bickering parents gradually learn to support each other. Others find the overall romance unconvincing despite the visible changes in their behavior.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Character roster
It Takes Two
4.0
The small cast is memorable for its lively supporting toys and central pair, although the protagonists can wear on players over time.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Collectibles
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
4.5
Documents and small secrets make thorough searching worthwhile. They add interest to the house’s backstory and invite close inspection.
Competitive balance
It Takes Two
3.0
Most optional versus games are entertaining, but a few give one character a slight advantage over the other.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Content completeness
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
2.5
The final section arrives too quickly for one completed playthrough. The reviewer wanted more in the vein of the first two areas.
Crash stability
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
1.5
In one test build, viewing cameras in the second level crashed the second player’s game. Workarounds changed how the pair experienced a substantial part of the adventure.
Cutscene skippability
It Takes Two
3.0
Cutscenes can be skipped if both players agree to hold a button, but their length still frustrates some viewers.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Cutscene visual quality
It Takes Two
2.0
Switch cutscenes lose much of the sharper console presentation, with visibly rough textures and distracting loading or resolution issues.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Death mechanics
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
2.3
Death preserves useful knowledge but forces substantial repetition. One account finds the next attempt motivating, while others find the loss of progress disruptive and discouraging.
Dialogue quality
It Takes Two
2.3
Relationship banter can feel honest and funny, but repeated arguments, awkward jokes, and mild profanity sometimes undercut the otherwise charming tone.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Economy and resource balance
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
4.0
Diverting danger can cost a surveillance camera for the rest of the attempt. That tradeoff gives immediate safety a meaningful information cost.
Family friendliness
It Takes Two
2.6
The cartoony appearance masks divorce arguments, some coarse language, and a notably upsetting toy-elephant sequence. Playing with younger family members may require more discretion than the visuals suggest.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Handheld play suitability
It Takes Two
4.0
Handheld Switch performance stays smooth and comparable to docked play, although arranging two suitable sets of controls is less convenient.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Horror tension
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
3.4
Separated viewpoints can turn incomplete information into powerful dread. Reactions range from genuine terror to mild scares or irritation at relentless chasing.
HUD clarity
It Takes Two
5.0
Contextual button prompts and visual highlights make it easy to identify which objects respond to a character’s tools.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Humor
It Takes Two
3.2
Playful banter and bizarre supporting characters generate plenty of laughs, but Dr. Hakim in particular is polarizing. Some enjoy his goofiness; others cringe at his delivery and interruptions.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Inventory management
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
4.0
Assigning inventory management to the Overseer is praised as a clever way to make the roles depend on each other. Its unfamiliar logic can initially catch players out.
Lore depth
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
4.5
The house’s backstory is praised as deep and carefully developed. Collecting documents adds substance to the mystery.
Minigame quality
It Takes Two
4.8
Hidden competitive diversions, from chess and whack-a-mole to racing and rhythm challenges, add welcome breaks from the campaign. They are fun to find, replay, and use for friendly rematches.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Monetization fairness
It Takes Two
5.0
The reasonably priced campaign and included online friend access are praised as consumer-friendly alternatives to multiplayer games built around add-on spending.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Movement feel
It Takes Two
5.0
Running, double-jumping, air-dashing, swinging, and sliding feel fluid and enjoyable. The movement remains a reliable foundation even as each chapter changes the surrounding rules.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Narrative tone consistency
It Takes Two
1.0
The shift between a child’s anguish, marital counseling comedy, and sudden cruelty feels jarring to some, making the story harder to embrace.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Platforming precision
It Takes Two
4.4
The jumping and air-dash toolkit is normally responsive and forgiving, offering reliable control over tricky gaps. A few players struggled with depth judgments, timing, or keeping pace with a stronger partner.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Polish
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
3.3
A hands-on demo account reports no issues, while a completed test-build playthrough identifies rough edges that need adjustment. The impressions apply to different stages of the game’s development.
Progression system
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
3.1
Progress relies heavily on what the pair learns rather than simply what they keep. That can make mastery rewarding, but retaining clues does not always compensate for replaying completed tasks.
Side character depth
It Takes Two
2.5
The colorful side cast supplies memorable comic relief, but Dr. Hakim divides opinion sharply. His antics are either a highlight or the biggest irritation in the entire story.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Solo play quality
It Takes Two
1.0
There is no solo campaign: every progression puzzle and set piece requires a second human player.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Split-screen quality
It Takes Two
5.0
A clear view of both players helps coordination during shared and separated tasks. The implementation remains functional and fluid even on less powerful hardware.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Stealth mechanics
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
2.5
Noise management and hiding can take time to understand. Several accounts find the rules or threat escalation too punishing, especially when a hiding place does not feel reliably safe.
Survival mechanics
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
2.3
Decoys offer a useful way to redirect the creature. More critical accounts find the escalating threat difficult to recover from and too harsh on small mistakes.
Violence level
It Takes Two
2.0
Most action is fantastical, but the deliberately distressing destruction of a pleading toy elephant struck some as more disturbing than the lighthearted art suggests.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Visual effects quality
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
2.0
Strong color effects on surveillance feeds can become uncomfortable to watch. That drawback matters because the Overseer relies on that display throughout play.
World interactivity
It Takes Two
5.0
Optional toys, instruments, dominoes, and small surprises reward curiosity beyond mandatory objectives. Exploring the environments is enjoyable largely because so many objects react.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Comfort and build
Boss design
It Takes Two
4.9
Inventive encounters regularly test each player’s new abilities together, sometimes in unexpected genres. Most find these fights fun and rewarding, often among the more demanding moments.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Controller ergonomics
It Takes Two
3.0
The Switch’s Joy-Cons function, but one player found them less comfortable or optimal for the busy two-stick control scheme.
Beyond the Dark: NightwatchNo score yet
Enemy design
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
4.0
The partly understood creature is praised as a compelling horror concept, letting uncertainty do some of the work.
Map and navigation design
It Takes TwoNo score yet
Beyond the Dark: Nightwatch
2.0
Very dark passages can make navigation feel like following walls by touch. Mood sometimes comes at the expense of reading the space clearly.