Compare Logitech G502 X Plus vs SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless

Logitech G502 X Plus

Logitech G502 X Plus

Overall score 3.9 / 5

Based on 23 scored reviews

vs
SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless

Overall score 4.0 / 5

Based on 28 scored reviews

How we score

Scorata scores summarize analyzed review evidence on a 1–5 scale; they are not laboratory measurements or a simple average of customer star ratings. Feature scores summarize the reviews covering that feature. The overall score averages feature scores within each review, then combines review averages. When both expert and customer evidence are available, those two groups receive equal weight. Products can have different review coverage, so small score gaps do not establish a winner.

Recommendations prioritize important features for the category, with a score of at least 3.5, a gap of at least 0.25 points and at least two supporting reviews per product. Features with widely varying scores or broad connectivity contexts are excluded from recommendations. These safeguards do not establish statistical significance.

Quick verdict

What each product is best for

The review evidence points to a tradeoff: fingertip grip comfort and RGB features versus Bluetooth support and weight. Choose according to which strengths matter more to you; the overall score alone does not settle that choice.

Choose Logitech G502 X Plus for fingertip grip comfort and RGB features.

Choose SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless for Bluetooth support and weight.

Why these recommendations?

Logitech G502 X Plus

Where It Has the Edge

  • fingertip grip comfort is 4.0 vs 2.0. Fingertip comfort was generally positive but size-dependent, with one reviewer warning fingertip users may prefer a less substantial...
  • RGB features is 4.1 vs 3.3. RGB was praised for style, customization, and vivid lighting, but several reviewers noted battery drain or questioned whether...
  • portability is 4.3 vs 3.5. Portability was positive in limited evidence, with reviewers liking receiver storage and easy bag carry.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless

Where It Has the Edge

  • Bluetooth support is 3.6 vs 2.0. Bluetooth was valued for versatility and secondary-device use, but several reviewers warned it is less suitable for serious...
  • weight is 4.4 vs 3.5. Weight was usually praised as light and agile, though a few reviewers felt it was only middling by...
  • claw grip comfort is 4.1 vs 3.5. Claw grip support was mostly positive, though a few reviews noted holes or reach issues that can bother...
Logitech G502 X Plus 3.9 overall score
SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless 4.0 overall score

Compare features

Scores are out of 5. Missing scores mean missing review evidence, not a missing feature.

Scored on both products

Battery and charging

Battery life
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.1

Battery life was mostly positive and often praised as long, but RGB drain and one poor real-world result kept opinions from being unanimous.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
3.6

Battery life was the most divisive area: some reviewers reported strong multi-session endurance, while others found real-world runtime far below claims.

Charging convenience
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.1

Charging convenience was generally positive thanks to USB-C and charge-while-playing, though one reviewer found the USB-C port fiddly.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.7

Charging convenience was a strength thanks to fast USB-C top-ups, charge-and-play support, and painless cable use.

Comfort and build

Fingertip grip comfort
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.0

Fingertip comfort was generally positive but size-dependent, with one reviewer warning fingertip users may prefer a less substantial mouse.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
2.0

Fingertip grip support was weak; reviewers found the mouse too large or better suited to other grip styles.

Materials quality
Logitech G502 X Plus
3.5

Materials quality was mixed: one review praised the plastics and rubber linings, while another disliked the slicker scroll-wheel material.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.5

Materials quality was praised for high-quality plastic, soft-touch/matte finishes, and a premium impression.

Claw grip comfort
Logitech G502 X Plus
3.5

Claw grip comfort was mixed, with one review saying it suits claw or hybrid grips and another saying claw users may want a smaller mouse.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.1

Claw grip support was mostly positive, though a few reviews noted holes or reach issues that can bother some claw users.

Long-session comfort
Logitech G502 X Plus
5.0

Long-session comfort was strongly positive where mentioned, with reviewers praising multi-hour and extended-use comfort.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.6

Long-session comfort was strong, with reviewers citing low fatigue, cool hands, and comfort across extended use.

Shape comfort
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.3

Shape comfort was broadly positive, especially for larger hands and G502 fans, though a few reviewers found it cramped or size-dependent.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.4

Shape comfort was broadly praised for a comfortable larger right-handed shape, though some found it big or less suited to small hands.

Palm grip comfort
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.3

Palm grip comfort was favorable, with reviewers saying the shape supports palm grip well.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.4

Palm grip comfort was consistently positive because the taller body and thumb area fit palm users well.

Ergonomic design
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.4

Ergonomic design was praised for refined comfort, natural hand fit, and better extended-use ergonomics.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.4

Ergonomics were generally praised for a comfortable right-handed shape suited to palm and claw grips.

Build quality
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.3

Build quality was rated highly, with reviewers calling it solid, sturdy, durable, and well-built.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.3

Build quality was consistently viewed as sturdy despite the honeycomb shell, with little flex, creaking, or fragility reported.

Durability over time
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.5

Durability over time had limited but positive long-term evidence from an 18-month owner who remained satisfied.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.5

Long-term durability evidence was limited but positive where reviewers described the shell as rigid or durable despite low weight.

Switch durability
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.0

Switch durability had limited evidence, but one reviewer reported no double-click issues during their testing period.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.0

Switch durability was supported by limited positive evidence around wear resistance and high-rated IP54 switches.

Performance

Click noise
Logitech G502 X Plus
2.5

Click noise had limited negative evidence, with one review saying the primary keys and especially the wheel were relatively loud.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.5

Click noise feedback was limited but positive, with one reviewer specifically liking the quiet, precise button actuation.

Sensor performance
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.8

Sensor feedback was strongly positive; reviewers described the HERO sensor as snappy, smooth, precise, and still among the best they had used.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.4

Sensor performance was mostly strong, with precise, reliable tracking, though a few reviewers considered it not top-tier.

Wireless performance
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.6

Wireless performance was a major strength, with reviewers repeatedly describing it as excellent, stable, responsive, or effectively wired-like.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.3

Wireless performance was generally reliable and responsive, though Bluetooth was often treated as the weaker mode.

Other features

Cable flexibility
Logitech G502 X Plus
2.5

Cable flexibility was criticized in one review because the included cable felt basic compared with flexible braided alternatives.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.4

The included USB-C cable was usually praised for being flexible, light, or well-sleeved enough for charging or wired play.

Surface compatibility
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.8

Surface compatibility evidence was positive, with reviewers noting smooth glide or hiccup-free performance across surfaces and environments.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.0

Surface compatibility was positive but lightly evidenced, with PTFE feet remaining usable across desk mats, wood, pads, and textured surfaces.

Weight
Logitech G502 X Plus
3.5

Weight opinions were mixed: some appreciated the lighter G502 refresh or balanced heft, while competitive-focused reviewers still found it heavy.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.4

Weight was usually praised as light and agile, though a few reviewers felt it was only middling by modern ultralight standards.

RGB features
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.1

RGB was praised for style, customization, and vivid lighting, but several reviewers noted battery drain or questioned whether the Plus model is worth it for RGB alone.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
3.3

RGB opinions were mixed: reviewers liked customization and glow, but often complained the lighting was hidden or underwhelming in use.

Scroll wheel quality
Logitech G502 X Plus
3.2

Scroll wheel quality was the most divisive feature, with some praising versatility and improved stability while others criticized stiffness, noise, wobble, backlash, or cheap feel.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.0

Scroll wheel quality was mostly positive for resistance and tactility, though one reviewer found scrolling underwhelming.

Portability
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.3

Portability was positive in limited evidence, with reviewers liking receiver storage and easy bag carry.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
3.5

Portability evidence was mixed, with lightweight design helping travel but slipperiness and size limiting it for some.

Polling rate
Logitech G502 X Plus
2.5

Polling rate was a limitation in one review because the mouse is capped at 1kHz with no higher-rate dongle option.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
3.2

Polling rate feedback was split: 1000Hz was praised, while Bluetooth or efficiency modes dropping to 125Hz were criticized.

MMO gaming suitability
Logitech G502 X Plus
3.5

MMO suitability was mixed, with enough controls for some MMO/RPG use but not enough buttons for dedicated MMO players.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.1

MMO suitability was positive for lighter MMO use, but reviewers noted it falls short of dedicated MMO mice with more buttons.

2.4GHz connectivity
Logitech G502 X Plus
3.5

2.4GHz connectivity was mixed: setup through the dongle was easy, but one review disliked the rattly dongle storage.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.1

Reviewers generally found the 2.4GHz dongle responsive and gaming-ready, though several disliked the USB-C dongle/adapter arrangement.

Click latency
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.3

Click latency and response were viewed positively overall, with reviewers praising snappier timing, low-latency response, and instant-feeling switches.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.8

Click latency feedback was positive where tested, with reviewers noting instant execution and no missed inputs.

Cross-platform compatibility
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.0

Cross-platform compatibility had limited positive evidence through onboard memory helping when using the mouse on multiple systems.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.5

Cross-platform use was supported by positive Xbox testing, though software features were more limited outside Windows.

Handedness options
Logitech G502 X Plus
1.5

Handedness options were poor in the available evidence because the mouse is designed for right-handed users only.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
2.0

Handedness was a weakness because reviewers treated the design as right-handed and not ambidextrous.

Lift-off distance
Logitech G502 X Plus
2.0

Lift-off distance tuning was a weakness in one review because adjustable lift-off distance was missing.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
2.5

Lift-off distance was mentioned negatively by reviewers who wanted adjustment or found the default higher than average.

Profile switching
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.5

Profile switching had limited but positive evidence, with one reviewer appreciating quick profile cycling in loading screens.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.0

Profile switching was positively noted in Windows software, especially for creating and switching multiple profiles.

Premium feel
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.0

Premium feel was mostly positive, with reviewers describing premium, stylish, polished qualities, though one said it could feel cheap.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.5

Premium feel was praised where reviewers described the mouse as sturdy, high-quality, and premium in hand.

Weight tuning
Logitech G502 X Plus
2.3

Weight tuning was consistently viewed as a downgrade because the older adjustable weight system is gone.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
2.0

Weight tuning was a weakness because one reviewer noted competing mice offer weight adjustment that the Aerox 5 lacks.

Acceleration control
Logitech G502 X Plus
5.0

One review praised the lack of smoothing or acceleration, tying it directly to accurate, predictable tracking.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.8

Acceleration-related control was praised where reviewers discussed precise tuning or the sensor avoiding unwanted acceleration.

Balance and weight distribution
Logitech G502 X Plus
3.8

Weight balance evidence was limited and mixed-positive, with one reviewer noting back-heaviness and another saying balance improved.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.0

The rear-weighted balance drew limited but positive feedback for improving control in palm grip.

MOBA gaming suitability
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.3

MOBA suitability was positive in limited evidence, with reviewers saying the controls worked well for MOBA play.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.0

MOBA suitability was generally positive because the extra buttons helped in games like League of Legends, DOTA 2, and Dota 2.

Onboard memory
Logitech G502 X Plus
3.9

Onboard memory was useful for carrying profiles or avoiding software after setup, but one review criticized Logitech's implementation.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
3.7

Onboard memory was useful for saving profiles, but one reviewer criticized Bluetooth mode for not preserving some settings.

DPI range
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.3

DPI control was generally praised for its wide range and fine increments, though one reviewer questioned the practical value of ultra-high DPI.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.1

The 18,000 CPI range was useful for most reviewers, but some considered it merely middling against other high-end mice.

Grip texture
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.0

Grip texture was mostly praised for comfort, reliable hold, and premium-feeling rubber, though one reviewer disliked the sticky rubber sides.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
3.8

Grip texture was mixed-positive: the matte/coarse finish helped grip for many, while a few found it slippery or affected by holes.

Left and right click quality
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.3

Left and right click quality was positive overall, with praise for satisfying primary clicks and pleasant pressure points.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.5

Left and right click quality was praised for crispness, responsiveness, and strong tactile feel.

Glide smoothness
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.8

Glide smoothness was one of the strongest traits, with reviewers praising PTFE feet, low drag, and smooth movement on desks and pads.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.7

Glide smoothness was one of the strongest areas, with PTFE feet repeatedly described as effortless, smooth, or floating on surfaces.

Wireless latency
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.6

Wireless latency was strongly praised overall, though one review noted the 1kHz limit can feel subtly behind higher-polling mice in elite play.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.7

Wireless latency was praised overall, with reviewers repeatedly reporting no noticeable latency over the 2.4GHz connection.

Connection stability
Logitech G502 X Plus
5.0

Connection stability was excellent in the scored evidence, with reviewers reporting no hiccups or meaningful slip-ups.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.9

Connection stability was repeatedly praised, especially over the 2.4GHz dongle, with reviewers reporting no dropouts or lag.

Switch feel
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.6

Switch feel was one of the strongest areas, with reviewers repeatedly praising crisp, tactile, clicky, premium-feeling hybrid switches.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.5

Switch feel was frequently praised for crisp, tactile, consistent clicks.

FPS gaming suitability
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.0

FPS suitability was mixed: accuracy, buttons, and DPI helped some reviewers, while weight made others reject it for serious competitive FPS.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
3.9

FPS suitability was mixed: reviewers liked the lightness and precision for casual or fast FPS play, but competitive-focused reviewers found the size/buttons limiting.

Motion consistency
Logitech G502 X Plus
5.0

Motion consistency drew strong praise where tested, with reviewers reporting no stutter and true tracking during long use.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
5.0

Motion consistency was praised in testing, with movements registering without skipping or overshooting.

Controls and connectivity

Bluetooth support
Logitech G502 X Plus
2.0

Bluetooth support was a repeated weakness because reviewers noted the mouse lacks Bluetooth and is less versatile for multi-device use.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
3.6

Bluetooth was valued for versatility and secondary-device use, but several reviewers warned it is less suitable for serious gaming than 2.4GHz.

Tilt gesture controls
Logitech G502 X Plus
2.0

Tilt controls were criticized because side-scrolling could require extra force or cause accidental scroll-wheel side inputs.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
2.4

Tilt/flick gesture controls were widely criticized as stiff, awkward, or hard to use under pressure despite occasional novelty value.

Side button quality
Logitech G502 X Plus
3.2

Side button feedback was mixed: some reviewers liked the improved shapes and placement, while many complained about accidental presses or squeaks.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
2.9

Side button quality was the most repeated ergonomic issue, especially the forward button and up/down rocker being hard to reach or actuate.

Software usability
Logitech G502 X Plus
3.8

Software usability split reviewers: some found G Hub easy or intuitive, while others called button programming complicated or the software poor.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
3.7

Software usability was mixed: some found SteelSeries GG clear and powerful, while others called it cluttered, bloated, or limited on macOS.

Programmable buttons
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.4

Programmable buttons were widely valued for genre flexibility, productivity, and accessible control layouts.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.5

Programmable buttons were a major strength, giving the mouse multi-genre flexibility and extra inputs beyond typical lightweight mice.

Software stability
Logitech G502 X Plus
2.0

Software stability had one negative report involving an apparent DPI-setting loop.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
2.1

Software stability was mixed-to-poor where reviewers reported inaccurate battery readings, bugs, or an unresponsive interface.

Button responsiveness
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.5

Button responsiveness was consistently strong, with tactile, well-built, satisfying clicks and quick in-game response.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.6

Button responsiveness was strongly praised, with reviewers describing immediate, satisfying, and reliable inputs.

Button customization
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.5

Button customization was a clear strength, with reviewers praising remapping, physical DPI-shift adjustability, and flexible control setups.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.5

Button customization was a major strength, with reviewers liking the broad remapping options and flexible software control.

Ownership and support

Value for money
Logitech G502 X Plus
2.9

Value for money was the biggest broad concern, with many reviewers calling the mouse expensive or questioning the Plus price premium.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
3.5

Value for money was mixed: sale pricing and feature density were praised, but many reviewers felt the launch price was too high.

Macro support
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.4

Macro support was positively received, with reviewers finding macro setup and assignment options useful despite broader software complaints.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.3

Macro support was positively received where reviewers noted broad macro assignment and useful extra-button workflows.

Tracking and training

Accuracy and tracking precision
Logitech G502 X Plus
5.0

Reviewers consistently praised tracking accuracy, saying the mouse stayed precise, true, and hiccup-free across gaming and everyday use.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.6

Tracking accuracy was widely praised, with reviewers repeatedly describing precise, consistent, or pixel-perfect cursor control.

Evidence available for one product

Controls and connectivity

Debounce customization
Logitech G502 X PlusNo score yet
SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
2.0

Debounce customization was only mentioned as a missing high-end feature, making it a weakness for advanced users.

Other features

Dock compatibility
Logitech G502 X Plus
3.9

Dock compatibility was useful when paired with Powerplay, but reviewers criticized the extra cost or missing included puck.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 WirelessNo score yet
Ecosystem integration
Logitech G502 X Plus
4.5

Ecosystem integration was a strength, with praise for shared receivers, G Hub device management, Lightsync, and Logitech peripheral syncing.

SteelSeries Aerox 5 WirelessNo score yet
Water and dust resistance
Logitech G502 X PlusNo score yet
SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
4.2

Water and dust resistance was generally viewed positively, reassuring reviewers about the honeycomb shell and spill/dust exposure.

Ownership and support

Firmware reliability
Logitech G502 X PlusNo score yet
SteelSeries Aerox 5 Wireless
2.5

Firmware or settings reliability drew limited criticism around settings resets or update-related pairing issues.

Other Top Gaming Mice to Consider

#1 ASUS ROG Harpe II Ace
4.6

Choose the ROG Harpe II Ace for ultralight FPS play, precise tracking, smooth glide, and web-based tuning. Skip it if you need palm-grip support, MMO buttons, onboard profiles, or long...

Pros: glide smoothness, weight

Cons: handedness options

#2 Razer Viper V4 Pro
4.4

Best for ultra-light, competition-focused speed, precise tracking, stable wireless, and long battery life. Skip it if you need quieter clicks, left-handed support, Bluetooth, more buttons, or better value for casual...

Pros: value for money, weight

Cons: click noise, RGB features

#3 Corsair Scimitar Elite Wireless SE
4.4

Choose it if you want a premium MMO/productivity mouse with 12 adjustable side buttons, strong battery life, and Stream Deck integration. Skip it if you need an ultralight FPS mouse,...

Pros: button customization, MMO gaming suitability

Cons: FPS gaming suitability

#4 MSI Versa 300 Wireless 8K
4.4

Best for precise wireless tracking, smooth glide, strong battery life, and unusually good 8K value. Skip it if you need polished software, quiet snappy clicks, true left-handed controls, or gentle...

Pros: software usability, sensor performance

Cons: RGB features, scroll wheel quality