Reviewers see a satisfying arc from manufactured pop figure to self-directed artist, with key relationships helping her grow in confidence and creative control.
Pros: episode pacing, season finale quality
Cons: episode structure, season pacing
Best 2026 Netflix TV Shows for character development
Release year
Narrow by brand
Showing Netflix only. Switch back to all brands anytime.
The strongest arcs deepen parenthood, resilience and community bonds, with Mel, Jack, Lizzie and Denny receiving meaningful growth. Supporting characters often evolve more convincingly than the central romance.
Pros: supporting cast performance, acting quality
Cons: character consistency, screenplay quality
The adult friends are given meaningful midlife frustrations, old wounds, and evolving self-understanding, with Saoirse especially well developed. Some reviewers wanted more depth for Dara, Greta, and a few supporting...
Pros: character consistency, cast chemistry
Cons: cliffhanger effectiveness, season length
The second half earns praise for giving Benedict, Sophie, Violet, Francesca and several supporting characters more growth and emotional dimension.
Pros: rewatch value, supporting cast performance
Cons: CGI quality, continuity
Isla’s leadership, Ali’s professional self-worth, and several sibling arcs gain meaningful depth. Other takes argue that crowded plotting flattens Jackie and leaves some promising characters underdeveloped.
Pros: media scrutiny portrayal, season finale quality
Cons: cancellation satisfaction, product placement
Alex and André’s relationship gives the season its clearest arc, moving through grief, resentment, rebellion, and eventual understanding. The main pair are well developed, though one critic felt the secondary...
Pros: screenplay quality, critic appeal
Cons: plot twists, season pacing
The documentary makes founders feel like flawed people rather than marble monuments. Personal stories about figures like Washington and Adams help humanize the history.
Pros: production design, bingeability
Cons: modern political framing, plot originality
The show can sketch relationships and family dynamics clearly enough to make the stakes matter. Decider especially credited the first episode with building a good picture of Shawna and David's...
Pros: finale satisfaction, season finale quality
Cons: violence level, writing quality
Rafa gives a layered picture of Nadal as disciplined, anxious, resilient, and physically depleted. Some critics still wanted more access to his deepest motivations, but the strongest responses felt the...
Pros: genre satisfaction, soundtrack quality
Cons: writing quality, plot clarity
Character development was one of the show’s strongest selling points when reviewers focused on Sam, Wally, Judy, Art, and Renee. The dissenting view is that some arcs and backstories are...
Pros: main cast performance, acting quality
Cons: cancellation satisfaction, plot clarity
Character work is a real strength in the positive reviews, especially once stock-seeming roles gain history and emotional weight. The sharpest negative review saw the detective and reporter as familiar...
Pros: plot originality, emotional impact
Cons: humor, writing quality
The family gradually gains texture, especially Jules and Nell, but Nicky and several supporting figures remain too thin for a story built around relationship choices.
Pros: special effects quality, soundtrack quality
Cons: screenplay quality, series finale quality
Berlin and several emotional arcs gain meaningful texture, but critics disagree on whether the supporting characters truly grow or remain thin romantic functions.
Pros: main cast performance, bingeability
Cons: realism, season length
The protagonist is often praised as contradictory, messy, and psychologically rich, but several critics found Vladimir, Sid, and other supporting figures underdeveloped or flattened by her viewpoint.
Pros: cinematography, production design
Cons: cliffhanger effectiveness, character consistency
Character growth is uneven. Mike, Will, and the newer relationships receive some heartfelt development, but the fixed timeline also forces several arcs to repeat lessons the characters learn again later.
Pros: world-building, production design
Cons: plot clarity, realism
Character development is a major dividing line. A few reviewers found the ensemble layered and compelling, but many felt characters were thinly sketched, underexplored, or just vehicles for plot movement.
Pros: cinematography, drama quality
Cons: writing quality, plot clarity
Character work is the main divider. Supporters like Penelope, Fawn, and the friend group as messy but lovable; critics say Josh, Ray, and some arcs stay underdeveloped or reset too...
Pros: realism, cultural representation
Cons: age appropriateness, violence level
Jemma and a few cast members get some trajectory, but the broader ensemble often feels underdeveloped, interchangeable, or short on charisma.
Pros: world-building, costume design
Cons: family friendliness, age appropriateness