Best HBO TV Shows for character development

character development Decision Dashboard

Best for character development

DTF St. Louis

5.0 attribute score

Highest scored product for this attribute based on supporting review evidence.

Safest pick

Hacks, Season 5

5.0 attribute score

Balances the attribute score, supporting reviews, and overall product strength.

Most evidence

Lanterns

24 supporting reviews

Has the broadest review evidence for this attribute.

Best overall product

The Pitt, Season 2

4.7 overall score

Strongest overall product among items with scored evidence for this attribute.

#1 DTF St. Louis
5.0

The strongest praise centers on how Clark, Floyd, and Carol gain layers as new perspectives expose their loneliness, contradictions, and hidden needs. Reviews often describe the shift from pity or...

Pros: main cast performance, humor

Cons: genre satisfaction, episode pacing

#2 Hacks, Season 5
5.0

The final season pays off years of growth, especially Deborah and Ava moving from combative codependence toward a more mature partnership. Supporting characters also get meaningful progress without losing their...

Pros: humor, finale satisfaction

Cons: realism, season pacing

#3 The Pitt, Season 2
4.8

Character development is one of Season 2’s clearest strengths, especially as returning rookies mature and Robby’s trauma becomes more complicated. Some complaints focus on supporting characters who still feel underused...

Pros: realism, emotional impact

#4 Rooster, Season 1
4.3

The strongest arcs deepen Greg, Katie, Sunny and the wider ensemble beyond their initial comic types. Several reviewers praise the way later episodes let wounded, messy characters grow without losing...

Pros: entertainment value, humor

Cons: story quality, modern political framing

#5 IT: Welcome To Derry
4.0

Many critics connect with the layered fears, grief, and friendships, although some reviews find portions of the ensemble underwritten.

Pros: genre satisfaction, acting quality

Cons: writing quality, CGI quality

#6 War
War
3.9

Characterization draws sharply divided reactions: several critics find the ensemble complex, grounded, and well shaded, while others call the leads thin or underdeveloped. The lawyers tend to receive stronger marks...

Pros: acting quality, entertainment value

Cons: finale satisfaction, realism

#7 Lanterns
3.8

The Hal-John character study and John’s upbringing often add real depth, but several relationships and motivations are criticized as underdeveloped or rushed.

Pros: character development, cast chemistry

Cons: faithfulness to source material, story quality

#8 The Seduction
3.8

Isabelle’s transformation is often praised as believable, magnetic, and morally complex, but the supporting cast draws much weaker reactions. Several critics say other characters lack dimension or that some developments...

Pros: visual style, character development

Cons: faithfulness to source material, season pacing

#9 Youth (2026)
3.7

The mother-son relationship grows in satisfying ways, but Ruari’s personal arc is also criticized as rushed and at times too simply resolved.

Pros: theme depth, humor

Cons: character consistency

#10 Monsters of God
3.6

The best interviews reveal enough contradiction to inspire both contempt and empathy, and the law-enforcement figures gain unexpected moral complexity. One critic, however, argues that the series never develops truly...

Pros: theme depth, story quality

Cons: season length, franchise connection

#11 Half Man, Season 1
3.2

Niall’s layered self-loathing and moral compromise are widely admired, but large time jumps and repetitive adult behavior make some later changes feel abrupt or insufficiently developed.

Pros: theme depth, emotional impact

Cons: audience appeal, writing quality

#12 A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms, Season 1
2.0

The short format limits how deeply some relationships and supporting arcs can grow. Dunk and Egg still develop meaningfully, but several secondary characters feel shortchanged.

Pros: story quality, entertainment value

Cons: violence level, editing quality