If you want better character consistency
Choose Sterling Point. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for character consistency, with a 4.5 overall score.
DTF St. Louis Review
Bottom Line
Choose DTF St. Louis for daring performances, offbeat humor, and a surprisingly tender study of loneliness. Skip it if slow pacing, nonlinear storytelling, or a murder mystery that sometimes feels secondary will frustrate you.
Best for
Viewers who like character-first dark comedy, melancholy suburban noir, unconventional dialogue, and mysteries that are more interested in people than procedural answers.
Not for
Viewers who want a fast, conventional whodunit, consistently laugh-out-loud comedy, or straightforward chronology may find the pacing and tonal oddness frustrating.
Verdict
DTF St. Louis works best when its murder case becomes a doorway into loneliness, shame, desire, and the strange intimacy between Clark and Floyd. Reviewers are unusually consistent about the strength of the performances, especially David Harbour, while Jason Bateman and Linda Cardellini make the central triangle slippery and emotionally credible. The precise visuals, peculiar dialogue, and dry sexual humor give the series a personality few shows share. The tradeoff is structure: several critics find the early episodes slow, the nonlinear mystery less compelling than the character drama, or the tonal shifts forced. The finale wins strong praise for emotional force, though one critic argues its tragic resolution undercuts the season’s more nuanced ideas about male vulnerability.
Feature Scorecards
Summary
54 reviewed features-
Very positive 4.5-5.031 (57%)
-
Positive 3.5-4.412 (22%)
-
Neutral 2.5-3.48 (15%)
-
Negative 1.5-2.43 (6%)
Pros
-
The lead trio is the clearest point of agreement. Bateman, Harbour, and Cardellini are repeatedly described as excellent, nuanced, career-best, or central to why the strange material works.
-
The strongest praise centers on how Clark, Floyd, and Carol gain layers as new perspectives expose their loneliness, contradictions, and hidden needs. Reviews often describe the shift from pity or suspicion toward empathy.
-
This is the strongest consensus beyond the acting: reviewers repeatedly praise the exploration of loneliness, shame, midlife dissatisfaction, male vulnerability, desire, and the need for genuine connection.
-
The show is repeatedly described as moving, heartwarming, heartbreaking, devastating, and deeply poignant. Later reviews especially praise the finale for turning the mystery into a painful study of isolation.
-
The visual work is widely admired for careful framing, desaturated suburban spaces, sharp lighting contrasts, and compositions that reinforce the show’s emotional chill.
-
Most reviewers respond well to the dry, surreal, sexually awkward comedy, with several calling it hilarious. A minority finds the jokes muted, forced, or only mildly funny.
Cons
-
The broader story draws some of the harshest disagreement. Supporters see a fresh, well-written mystery about loneliness, while detractors think the crime framework stretches or obscures stronger character material.
-
Pacing is a recurring weakness. Several critics say the mystery scenes stall momentum or the early episodes take too long to click, although one review appreciates the deliberate slow-burn buildup.
-
One critic felt Floyd’s willingness to cheat clashes with the kindness established elsewhere, making that choice feel out of character.
-
One full-season reviewer felt several near-hour episodes contained too much material that did not advance the characters or mystery, making the runtime feel padded.
-
One reviewer found weekly viewing difficult and thought the series played better once all episodes were available to binge.
-
The nonlinear mystery becomes clearer after the first episode for some viewers, but the harshest review finds the narrative unable to cohere at all.
Cast & Creators
-
Floyd SmernitchHarbour receives the most uniformly enthusiastic acting praise, bringing Floyd empathy, physical comedy, vulnerability, and a soft earnestness that keeps the character sympathetic. Multiple critics call him the standout or describe the work as career-level.
-
CarolCardellini’s Carol is praised for deadpan precision, emotional reserve, and the ability to shift between femme-fatale opacity and genuine desperation. Reviewers repeatedly highlight the nuance beneath her cold or manipulative surface.
-
Clark ForrestBateman is repeatedly praised for turning Clark’s bland everyman surface into something anxious, selfish, sincere, and quietly sinister. Several critics call the performance among his best work, with only mild reservations about his range.
-
Writer/DirectorConrad’s writing and direction are mostly praised for precise visual control, unusual dialogue, empathetic character work, and the blend of comedy with melancholy. A few critics remain skeptical of the tonal shifts and mystery mechanics.
-
HomerJenkins is praised as a reliably terrific, dry straight man whose old-school detective becomes a strong comic and dramatic counterweight to the show’s sexual and emotional strangeness.
-
Jodie PlumbSunday earns praise for sharp screen presence and for working brilliantly against Jenkins, giving Jodie a more observant, modern energy that helps the detective pairing grow beyond its initial friction.
View all 54 feature scores and cast & creators
Compared With Category Average
Compared with other TV Shows, this product is above average in sexual content level, continuity, editing quality, near average in visual style, series finale quality, below average in episode length, genre satisfaction, story quality.
Comparison summary
54 compared features-
Above average 0.4+ pts higher37 (69%)
-
Same as average within 0.3 pts8 (15%)
-
Below average 0.4+ pts lower9 (17%)
Largest category differences
| Attribute | This product | Category average | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| sexual content level | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 |
| continuity | 5.0 | 3.2 | +1.8 |
| editing quality | 5.0 | 3.4 | +1.6 |
| language level | 4.0 | 2.4 | +1.6 |
| realism | 5.0 | 3.4 | +1.6 |
| screenplay quality | 5.0 | 3.5 | +1.5 |
| product placement | 4.0 | 2.5 | +1.5 |
| character development | 5.0 | 3.8 | +1.2 |
Consider This Instead
If you want better pilot episode quality
Choose Paradise, Season 2. It scores 4.9 vs 2.8 for pilot episode quality, with a 4.1 overall score.
If you want better humor
Choose How to Get to Heaven from Belfast, Season 1. It scores 4.6 vs 4.3 for humor, with a 4.4 overall score.
If you want better dialogue quality
Choose Margo’s Got Money Troubles. It scores 5.0 vs 4.1 for dialogue quality, with a 4.4 overall score.
Compared in Reviews
Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.
American Beauty
- Similar: suburban ennui and off-kilter tone The review compares the central triangle to American Beauty filtered through a more off-kilter comic sensibility.
Black Rabbit
- Similar: crime-thriller tone and visual style The reviewer says Black Rabbit fans may recognize a similar tone and style here.
Fargo
- Similar: offbeat mystery tone and character style The review calls Fargo the closest analogue for DTF St. Louis’s purposeful weirdness and regional oddball tone.
FAQ
Is DTF St. Louis mainly a murder mystery?
It uses a death investigation as its framework, but many reviewers think the stronger material is the character study of loneliness, friendship, marriage, and desire.
Is DTF St. Louis funny?
Mostly, but in a dry, awkward, surreal way. Many critics find it very funny, while a minority says the jokes are too muted or forced.
How are the performances?
The acting is the clearest consensus strength. David Harbour draws especially strong praise, with Jason Bateman and Linda Cardellini also repeatedly singled out.
Does the show start slowly?
For several reviewers, yes. The premiere can feel disjointed or off-putting, and some mystery-heavy sections slow momentum, though others praise the patient buildup.
Does the finale work?
Most finale reactions are strongly positive and call the ending haunting or emotionally satisfying, but one critic argues the tragic resolution retreats into a harmful cliché.
Is it better to binge or watch weekly?
Multiple reviews describe the series as highly bingeable, and one full-season viewer specifically says it works better once the episodes can be watched together.
Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed
These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.
Video Reviews
YouTube - Atomic Cult Media
- Review score
- 5.0
Article Reviews
mrhipster.com
DTF St. Louis is not a show for everyone, but the original characters, writing and performances make for one of the more memorable series I...
- Review score
- 5.0
nytimes.com
The relationship between characters played by Jason Bateman and David Harbour went places that most TV shows avoid.
- Review score
- 4.2
indiewire.com
The DTF St. Louis finale not only crafts a satisfying explanation of what happened to poor Floyd Smernitch. It asks us all to reveal more of...
- Review score
- 5.0
newyorker.com
Vinson Cunningham reviews the new HBO comic whodunnit, with David Harbour and Linda Cardellini, in which Jason Bateman excels as the...
- Review score
- 4.8
theplaylist.net
‘DTF St. Louis,’ a grim noir mystery that uses a kinky murder case to explore the haunting reality of the male loneliness epidemic.
- Review score
- 5.0
Top TV Shows to Consider
Choose The Pitt Season 2 for a gripping, realistic medical drama with superb acting and emotional depth. Skip it if graphic procedures, unresolved arcs, or slower character-driven pacing bother you.
Pros: episode structure, main cast performance
Cons: age appropriateness, plot clarity
Best for powerhouse performances, thorny character work, and a tense revenge mystery that grows richer as it goes. Skip it if abuse, trafficking, graphic violence, or deliberately messy moral questions...
Pros: episode structure, supporting cast performance
Cons: cinematography, sexual content level
Best for sharp jokes, standout performances, and a warm, emotionally satisfying goodbye. Skip it if you most valued the pricklier Deborah-Ava conflict and biting Hollywood satire; the final season is...
Pros: plot originality, episode structure
Cons: season length, realism
Best for fast, darkly funny spy thrills, standout performances, and a tightly wound six-episode run. Skip it if the familiar formula, dense callbacks, or a major cliffhanger ending are likely...
Pros: season finale quality, character development
Cons: accent authenticity, product placement