Best Smart Locks for Fingerprint

#1

Fingerprint access performed well in hands-on testing, with the reviewer saying the biometrics worked completely.

#2

Fingerprint access was one of the strongest areas, repeatedly described as fast, accurate, responsive, convenient, and the preferred unlock method.

#3

Fingerprint access was the strongest consensus feature: nearly every reviewer found it fast, accurate, reliable, or instantly responsive, with only occasional issues noted.

#4

Fingerprint unlocking was the strongest area of agreement, with reviewers repeatedly calling it fast, accurate, reliable, and often their preferred method.

#5

Fingerprint access was consistently praised as quick, accurate, consistent, or convenient, especially as a backup when UWB is unavailable.

#6

Fingerprint access is the strongest feature across reviews, described as fast, accurate, responsive, effective, and unusually good.

#7

Fingerprint recognition was one of the clearest strengths, repeatedly described as fast, accurate, easy to enroll, and nearly instant.

#8

Fingerprint access is one of the strongest themes, with reviewers repeatedly praising speed, accuracy, convenience, and the learning scanner, though one notes it is not perfect.

#9

Fingerprint access was the clearest strength, repeatedly praised as fast, accurate, convenient, and reliable, with only some limits around enrollment smoothness and two-finger capacity.

#10

Fingerprint access was one of the strongest areas, with most reviewers calling it fast, reliable, accurate, or flawless; the main caveat was angle sensitivity in one review.

#11

Fingerprint performance was strongly positive in most reviews, but one reviewer had repeated failed reads.

#12

Fingerprint access was one of the most praised areas, with many fast and accurate reports, though PCWorld found it hit-and-miss.

#13

Fingerprint-related security earned consistent praise because SecureScreen and coating features reduced the risk of visible touch patterns revealing codes.

#14

Fingerprint performance is generally good, but it is less effortless than palm scanning and one reviewer reported trouble registering a child’s fingerprint.

#15

Fingerprint performance was mostly strong, but not universal: several reviewers found it fast and accurate, while others disliked placement or had hit-and-miss scans.

#16

Fingerprint access was mostly fast and convenient, although one reviewer reported the scanner sometimes failed to respond.

#17

Fingerprint performance split sharply: several reviewers praised quick, accurate recognition, while one long-term reviewer reported persistent failures that undermined the feature.

#18

Fingerprint support was treated as a tradeoff: one review criticized the standard keypad for lacking it, while another called the optional fingerprint keypad convenient but pricier.

#19

The missing fingerprint reader was the biggest tradeoff versus the U100; some reviewers missed it, while others accepted it as part of the lower price.

#20

There is no fingerprint reader. Reviewers who regularly enter without a phone considered that a meaningful omission, while others accepted it in exchange for the smaller design.

#21

Fingerprint access was viewed as a missing convenience, with one reviewer explicitly wishing the keypad included a fingerprint scanner.

#22

Fingerprint unlocking was a notable missing feature, especially because reviewers compared it unfavorably with lower-priced competing locks that include it.

#23

Fingerprint entry was treated as a missing keyless feature rather than a strength of this lock.

#24

One reviewer specifically wished the lock added fingerprint recognition, so the lack of it counted as a limitation.