The Only Living Pickpocket in New York

The Only Living Pickpocket in New York Feature Scores

Explore all 61 feature scores for The Only Living Pickpocket in New York, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

61 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    27 (44%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    21 (34%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    13 (21%)

Pros

Sort
  • 4.9
    34 reviews strong consensus
    lead performance: 4.9, 34 reviews, strong consensus
    Turturro makes Harry feel lived in through watchful eyes, small gestures, easy charm, and buried grief. Even several critics who find the story thin consider his performance the reason to watch.
  • 4.9
    35 reviews strong consensus
    acting performance: 4.9, 35 reviews, strong consensus
    Quiet, precise acting gives the film much of its weight. Turturro dominates, while veteran supporting players often make brief appearances count.
  • 4.7
    22 reviews strong consensus
    Location authenticity: 4.7, 22 reviews, strong consensus
    Real neighborhoods, pawnshops, diners, and subway rides give the city unusual specificity beyond Manhattan landmarks. New York often feels like a full participant in the story.
  • 4.5
    25 reviews strong consensus
    supporting cast performance: 4.5, 25 reviews, strong consensus
    The supporting ensemble supplies warmth, local flavor, and concentrated emotional impact. Buscemi, Esposito, and Maslany often stand out, though some characters have too little substance.
  • 4.7
    15 reviews strong consensus
    cinematography: 4.7, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Warm textures, attentive close-ups, and confident city framing make this a widely admired visual experience. The outer boroughs and final skyline images receive especially strong praise.
  • 4.4
    23 reviews strong consensus
    directing quality: 4.4, 23 reviews, strong consensus
    The film’s restraint, attention to ordinary behavior, and command of place win substantial praise. Its transition into higher-stakes thriller mechanics is a recurring reservation.
  • 4.7
    12 reviews strong consensus
    cast chemistry: 4.7, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    Turturro’s established rapport with Buscemi and Esposito gives their scenes an immediate shared history. His brief exchange with Maslany also generates exceptional emotional force.
  • 4.5
    21 reviews strong consensus
    character appeal: 4.5, 21 reviews, strong consensus
    Harry is charming, fallible, and easy to root for despite his profession. The most persuasive portraits keep his generosity and regret visible without excusing his theft or past failures.
  • 4.4
    19 reviews strong consensus
    emotional impact: 4.4, 19 reviews, strong consensus
    The caregiving and father-daughter scenes can carry substantial grief, regret, and tenderness. A minority feel detached from the wider journey despite recognizing the power of individual moments.
  • 4.6
    10 reviews strong consensus
    visual style: 4.6, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    The digital photography evokes the warmth and texture of older crime cinema without turning into a conspicuous imitation. Several critics admire how naturally the retro style fits a present-day setting.
  • 4.5
    11 reviews strong consensus
    classic cinema references: 4.5, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    The film draws warmly on street-level crime cinema of earlier decades. Many appreciate the homage for capturing a sensibility rather than simply copying familiar images.
  • 4.5
    10 reviews strong consensus
    Atmosphere: 4.5, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    A melancholy, street-level cool is one of the most consistent pleasures. The easygoing mood can remain appealing even when the crime story feels slight.
  • 4.3
    14 reviews strong consensus
    runtime: 4.3, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    The roughly 88-minute length is usually welcomed as lean and economical. One dissenting view finds the brevity leaves too little time to know the characters deeply.
  • 4.5
    10 reviews strong consensus
    nostalgia appeal: 4.5, 10 reviews, strong consensus
    Its affection for an older New York and older filmmaking styles is a major attraction. The wistfulness usually feels humane, although some detect a touch of romanticizing the past.
  • 4.6
    7 reviews strong consensus
    soundtrack quality: 4.6, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    New York-centered songs fit the film’s love and frustration with the city, with the LCD Soundsystem opener especially admired. The selections give the emotional tone an immediate identity.
  • 4.4
    9 reviews strong consensus
    aging commentary: 4.4, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    The film finds poignancy in a skilled older man discovering that the world has changed around him. Its strongest reflections connect obsolescence with regret, dignity, and dependence on others.
  • 4.2
    17 reviews strong consensus
    theme depth: 4.2, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    Its best ideas connect time, responsibility, regret, and the value of human relationships. Some find those reflections moving, while others want more depth or a less familiar treatment.
  • 4.3
    11 reviews strong consensus
    technological obsolescence commentary: 4.3, 11 reviews, strong consensus
    The clash between cash-era skills and digital crime gives the film humor and poignancy. It works best as a humane reflection on adaptation, although Harry’s technological ignorance can feel overstated.
  • 4.1
    18 reviews moderate consensus
    pacing: 4.1, 18 reviews, moderate consensus
    Many enjoy the short film’s deliberate, breezy rhythm or find it surprisingly brisk. Dissenters experience meandering stretches and too little urgency for a story built around a deadline.
  • 4.3
    9 reviews strong consensus
    entertainment value: 4.3, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Most find an engaging, breezy watch driven by performance and city atmosphere. More reserved responses enjoy individual elements without finding the whole film exceptional.
  • 4.2
    12 reviews strong consensus
    score quality: 4.2, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    The jazz-and-funk score is widely appreciated for its loose, old-school city mood. Its limited escalation during dangerous passages is the main musical complaint.
  • 4.4
    7 reviews strong consensus
    humor: 4.4, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Technology confusion, generational friction, and dry exchanges provide effective laughs. The humor generally supports the melancholy instead of overwhelming it.
  • 4.8
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Family relationships: 4.8, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Harry’s damaged family bonds supply some of the film’s most affecting moments. The brief daughter encounter reveals the lasting cost of his choices.
  • 4.5
    4 reviews strong consensus
    genre satisfaction: 4.5, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    It succeeds most consistently as an intimate crime drama with wit and an old-fashioned feel. Its caper pleasures work best when they remain connected to character.
  • 4.1
    8 reviews low consensus
    casting quality: 4.1, 8 reviews, low consensus
    The veteran ensemble and Turturro’s fit for the lead are widely admired. Price’s suitability as the threat and the casting of a late surprise role are more divisive.
  • 3.8
    16 reviews moderate consensus
    writing quality: 3.8, 16 reviews, moderate consensus
    The script can convey character and a changing city through small details rather than explanation. Convenient coincidences, familiar backstory, and a neatly engineered finale trouble several critics.
  • 3.8
    13 reviews low consensus
    character development: 3.8, 13 reviews, low consensus
    Many find a rich portrait in Harry’s routines, gestures, and relationships. Others think his contradictions and the supporting characters remain too thin, with the daughter scene hinting at depth the rest of the film rarely matches.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    drama quality: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The restrained personal drama is strongest when small gestures and quiet exchanges carry the feeling. Its human scale gives the story weight beyond the criminal predicament.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    eldercare portrayal: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Harry’s daily devotion to Rosie gives his choices a tender, personal dimension. The care is valued as a source of love and atonement rather than simply background motivation.
  • 3.8
    11 reviews moderate consensus
    story quality: 3.8, 11 reviews, moderate consensus
    The modest theft-and-retrieval premise works best as a vehicle for Harry’s character and relationships. Reactions weaken when the chase feels predictable, overcomplicated, or less compelling than the personal story.
  • 4.0
    6 reviews moderate consensus
    tonal consistency: 4.0, 6 reviews, moderate consensus
    The gentle, wistful mood often holds comedy and sadness together beautifully. Some find the later move toward family drama or thriller stakes less smooth.
  • 3.8
    9 reviews moderate consensus
    ending satisfaction: 3.8, 9 reviews, moderate consensus
    The ending can feel soulful, moving, and visually inspired. Others find its plotting overcalibrated or its surprise encounter less natural than the scenes before it.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    disability representation: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Rosie’s lack of speech and movement is handled with notable sensitivity. Small expressions and stillness preserve a sense of her inner life.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    editing quality: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Sharp inserts reveal how events happened without spelling everything out, and the joined locations preserve a convincing world. The editing helps make the compact story feel precise.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    opening sequence quality: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The opening efficiently introduces Harry through observation and carries a strong musical impact. It is praised for conveying character before much needs to be said.
  • 4.3
    3 reviews strong consensus
    heist execution: 4.3, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The pickpocketing has slick, satisfying precision, and the later caper mechanics can stay pleasantly breezy. Watching Harry work is often more rewarding than the conspiracy around him.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    costume design: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Harry’s understated coat gives him a dapper, sophisticated silhouette while helping him blend into the crowd. Its practical design fits the precision of his trade.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    friendship portrayal: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Old professional and personal connections feel convincingly lived in. The easy banter and mutual respect help make the friendships warmer than routine crime-story alliances.
  • 3.7
    6 reviews low consensus
    dialogue quality: 3.7, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Some admire the plainspoken exchanges and economical meaning, while others hear flat or recycled lines. The daughter scene is particularly divisive as writing, despite frequent praise for its acting.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    production value: 5.0, 1 review
    Shooting in real outer-borough locations adds tangible richness to the small-scale production.
  • 3.5
    8 reviews low consensus
    suspense: 3.5, 8 reviews, low consensus
    The ticking clock and uncertain consequences generate tension for some. Others remain too comfortable in the jazzy, unhurried atmosphere to feel much danger.
  • 3.6
    4 reviews low consensus
    celebrity cameos: 3.6, 4 reviews, low consensus
    The late surprise appearance gets enthusiastic praise from some and feels out of place or miscast to others. Its success depends on how naturally the final confrontation fits the preceding character study.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    accent authenticity: 4.5, 1 review
    Turturro’s New York accent is praised as an effective, natural part of bringing Harry to life.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    audience appeal: 4.5, 1 review
    One enthusiastic assessment finds the film easy and breezy enough to recommend widely.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    comic timing: 4.5, 1 review
    Turturro’s deft comic timing makes Harry’s small reactions and understated behavior especially effective.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    ensemble balance: 4.5, 1 review
    The small supporting roles make Harry’s world feel populated and alive, even with the lead at the center of nearly every scene.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    violence level: 4.5, 1 review
    The restraint is praised: violence works as pressure rather than spectacle. The crime story can retain force without leaning on bloodshed or gratuitous on-screen brutality.
  • 4.0
    1 review
    sound design: 4.0, 1 review
    The film’s overall sound presentation receives positive notice alongside its visuals and funky music.

Cons

Sort
  • 2.5
    5 reviews strong consensus
    character screen time: 2.5, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Several memorable actors have only a little material to work with. Critics who want deeper relationships especially regret how briefly the daughter and other supporting figures appear.
  • 2.8
    10 reviews moderate consensus
    Narrative stakes: 2.8, 10 reviews, moderate consensus
    A few critics find the deadline personal and tense, especially through Harry’s relationships. More skeptical responses find the villain unthreatening or the urgency too manufactured to feel real.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    rewatch value: 2.5, 1 review
    One dissatisfied response finds the emotional connection too weak to inspire revisiting or sharing the film.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    title accessibility: 2.5, 1 review
    One viewer repeatedly stumbles over the long title and finds it cumbersome to say.
  • 2.5
    1 review
    title appeal: 2.5, 1 review
    One viewer finds the long title cumbersome to say, making it a minor annoyance around an otherwise highly enjoyable film.
  • 3.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Genre blending: 3.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    The mix of reflective drama and crime thriller is not seamless for everyone. Some find the mechanics distract from the personal story or the danger never quite emerges from the relaxed mood.
  • 3.1
    9 reviews low consensus
    villain quality: 3.1, 9 reviews, low consensus
    The young antagonist is a major dividing point. His entitled unlikability works for some, while others see a thin, implausible, or insufficiently intimidating obstacle.
  • 3.2
    3 reviews strong consensus
    memorability: 3.2, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Strong atmosphere and performance leave a worthwhile impression for some. Others regard the film as pleasant but slight rather than a lasting standout.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    plot clarity: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    One assessment welcomes the story’s inviting directness, while another finds the cryptocurrency mechanics more complicated than necessary.
  • 3.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    plot twists: 3.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Some enjoy the film’s sleight of hand and eventual surprises. A dissenting view finds the plot telegraphs its moves too clearly.
  • 3.2
    9 reviews low consensus
    realism: 3.2, 9 reviews, low consensus
    The performances and ordinary interactions often feel naturally human. Extreme technological ignorance, convenient deadlines, and some late plot developments can strain credibility.
  • 3.3
    3 reviews moderate consensus
    family dynamics: 3.3, 3 reviews, moderate consensus
    The family material divides opinion: one view finds it superfluous or familiar, while another sees it as the beautiful emotional center of the film.
  • 3.3
    14 reviews moderate consensus
    originality: 3.3, 14 reviews, moderate consensus
    Its humane, contemporary take on an old-fashioned crime movie feels fresh to many. Others see a familiar framework whose pleasures come mostly from execution and performance.

Use Cases

Best for

Sort
  • 4.7
    3 reviews strong consensus
    New York audience viewing: 4.7, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Locals are particularly well placed to enjoy the neighborhood texture, borough travel, and recognizable city rhythms. The authentic setting can feel like a personal pleasure beyond the crime plot.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Theater viewing: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Enthusiastic recommendations call this a worthwhile cinema trip, with its performances and city photography helping justify seeing it on a screen.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Acting-focused viewing: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Especially rewarding for viewers who enjoy subtle performance and expressive detail. Turturro’s work can make the film worthwhile even when the story or thriller elements fall short.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Character-driven crime drama viewing: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    A strong fit for viewers who enjoy throwback crime stories built around personality, atmosphere, and reflection. The relaxed rhythm rewards interest in Harry more than a demand for constant action.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Cinephile viewing: 5.0, 1 review
    A recommendation for lovers of cinema emphasizes confident camerawork, excellent actors, and the feel of an earlier independent-film era.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Dad-friendly viewing: 5.0, 1 review
    An explicit recommendation highlights its old-school, character-driven crime story as especially appealing for dads, with enough charm for their children too.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    Older-audience viewing: 4.5, 1 review
    The reunion of familiar veteran actors gives the reflections on age and regret particular force for viewers with a longer memory of New York cinema.

Conditional or not ideal for

  • Thriller fan viewing
    2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Thriller fan viewing: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Viewers expecting a forceful, exciting thriller may find the relaxed mood underwhelming. The main attraction is a quiet character portrait rather than sustained adrenaline.
  • International-audience viewing
    3.0
    1 review
    International-audience viewing: 3.0, 1 review
    The film remains accessible, but one international perspective finds its city-specific culture more immediately rewarding for Americans and New Yorkers.

Cast & Creators

  • Harry Lehman
    4.9
    34 reviews strong consensus
    John Turturro: 4.9, 34 reviews, strong consensus
    His restrained physicality and expressive eyes convey a lifetime of regret without grand speeches. The performance repeatedly earns career-best or awards-worthy praise and often carries the weaker material.
  • Kelly
    4.7
    19 reviews strong consensus
    Tatiana Maslany: 4.7, 19 reviews, strong consensus
    Maslany makes a powerful impression in a single father-daughter encounter. Her wounded intensity and emotional precision frequently turn that brief exchange into the film’s standout scene.
  • Director
    4.5
    24 reviews strong consensus
    Noah Segan: 4.5, 24 reviews, strong consensus
    Segan earns praise for intimate observation, economical storytelling, and an authentic feel for New York. Some find his handling of thriller urgency and the final-act construction less assured.
  • Benny
    4.6
    17 reviews strong consensus
    Steve Buscemi: 4.6, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    Buscemi brings warmth, easy familiarity, and finely judged character detail to the pawnbroker. His rapport with Turturro makes their shared history feel immediate.
  • Warren
    4.5
    17 reviews strong consensus
    Giancarlo Esposito: 4.5, 17 reviews, strong consensus
    Esposito lends the detective steadiness, authority, and a relaxed connection with Harry. His veteran ease makes their exchanges feel like old acquaintances catching up.
  • Cinematographer
    4.7
    9 reviews strong consensus
    Sam Levy: 4.7, 9 reviews, strong consensus
    Levy’s framing, camera movement, and textured city images make streets and storefronts feel alive. His outer-borough views and harbor imagery draw particular admiration.
  • Composer
    4.4
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Gary Lionelli: 4.4, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The jazzy, funky score supplies old-school cool and a strong sense of place. A few critics wish it grew more urgent when the story becomes dangerous.
  • Actor
    4.4
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Jamie Lee Curtis: 4.4, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Her brief late appearance delights some with its memorable impact. Other assessments of the praised ensemble place more emphasis on how little room the supporting players receive.
  • Actor
    4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Lori Tan Chinn: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Chinn adds charm and a vivid, cantankerous presence to the Chinatown encounters.
  • Actor
    4.3
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Kelvin Han Yee: 4.3, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    His shopkeeper contributes effective character work and a distinctive piece of the film’s neighborhood texture.
  • Actor
    4.5
    1 review
    Echaka Agba: 4.5, 1 review
    Agba’s neighbor helps give the city portrait a distinctive, everyday human texture.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    James Murphy: 4.5, 1 review
    His trembling vocal delivery gives the opening song a raw vulnerability that strengthens its emotional impact.
  • Rosie
    4.5
    1 review
    Karina Arroyave: 4.5, 1 review
    Arroyave’s immobile, non-speaking performance is praised for sensitive handling of a demanding role.
  • Actor
    4.5
    1 review
    Mark Cayne: 4.5, 1 review
    His young pickpocket adds another lively human detail to the film’s portrait of New York.
  • Actor
    4.0
    1 review
    John Gallagher Jr.: 4.0, 1 review
    He contributes to an appreciated supporting ensemble, though the film gives its smaller roles limited room.
  • Dylan Diamond
    3.2
    9 reviews low consensus
    Will Price: 3.2, 9 reviews, low consensus
    Price divides opinion sharply: some admire the antagonist’s nuance or committed unlikability, while others find him miscast, exaggerated, or too lacking in menace to sustain the stakes.