The Beauty, Season 1

The Beauty, Season 1 Review

Studio: FX
Released: January 21, 2026
Updated: 2 months ago
3.5
Overall review score
210
Review insights
42
Scored features
33
Expert reviews

Bottom Line

Choose it for stylish, gleefully grotesque body horror and a committed cast. Skip it if you want subtle satire, disciplined storytelling, or restrained sex and violence.

Best for

Best for adult viewers who enjoy maximalist body horror, camp, glossy visuals, and deliberately outrageous genre television.

Not for

Not for viewers sensitive to explicit sex, nudity, graphic violence, or gore, nor those seeking subtle social commentary and tightly controlled plotting.

Verdict

The Beauty has an immediately recognizable visual identity, committed performers, and enough gruesome invention to make its body-horror set pieces memorable. Several reviewers found it addictive, entertaining, and unexpectedly thoughtful when its many storylines connect. The larger consensus, however, is sharply qualified: its commentary on beauty, body image, power, and desire often stays at surface level, while the plotting and tone can feel chaotic or overextended. The explicit sex, nudity, violence, and transformation gore are central to the experience rather than occasional flourishes. Viewers already receptive to Ryan Murphy’s maximalist style may enjoy the audacity and camp; those looking for coherent satire or emotional depth are more likely to see an attractive production wrapped around half-developed ideas.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

42 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    2 (5%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    21 (50%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    14 (33%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    4 (10%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros highlights

  • 3.8
    21 reviews moderate consensus
    entertainment value: 3.8, 21 reviews, moderate consensus
    The entertainment value divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.8
    17 reviews low consensus
    story quality: 3.8, 17 reviews, low consensus
    The story quality divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.5
    16 reviews moderate consensus
    acting quality: 3.5, 16 reviews, moderate consensus
    The acting quality divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.7
    12 reviews low consensus
    sexual content level: 3.7, 12 reviews, low consensus
    The sexual content level divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.6
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    plot originality: 3.6, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    The plot originality divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    villain quality: 3.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    The villain quality divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.

Cons highlights

  • 3.3
    20 reviews low consensus
    theme depth: 3.3, 20 reviews, low consensus
    The theme depth divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.3
    11 reviews low consensus
    genre satisfaction: 3.3, 11 reviews, low consensus
    The genre satisfaction divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.3
    11 reviews low consensus
    writing quality: 3.3, 11 reviews, low consensus
    The writing quality divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 2.6
    10 reviews low consensus
    tonal consistency: 2.6, 10 reviews, low consensus
    The tone consistency divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.0
    6 reviews low consensus
    action sequence quality: 3.0, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The action quality divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.
  • 3.3
    6 reviews low consensus
    audience appeal: 3.3, 6 reviews, low consensus
    The audience appeal divides opinion: some moments work, while others feel uneven or overdone.

Cast & Creators

  • Actor
    5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Isabella Rossellini: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Isabella Rossellini's work is singled out as a strength, bringing energy or credibility to the series.
  • Jordan Bennett
    4.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Rebecca Hall: 4.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Rebecca Hall's work is singled out as a strength, bringing energy or credibility to the series.
  • Cooper Madsen
    3.8
    6 reviews strong consensus
    Evan Peters: 3.8, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Reactions to Evan Peters's contribution are divided, with both strengths and reservations.
  • The Assassin
    3.8
    5 reviews low consensus
    Anthony Ramos: 3.8, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Reactions to Anthony Ramos's contribution are divided, with both strengths and reservations.
  • Jeremy
    3.5
    4 reviews moderate consensus
    Jeremy Pope: 3.5, 4 reviews, moderate consensus
    Reactions to Jeremy Pope's contribution are divided, with both strengths and reservations.
  • The Corporation
    3.4
    5 reviews low consensus
    Ashton Kutcher: 3.4, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Reactions to Ashton Kutcher's contribution are divided, with both strengths and reservations.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other TV Shows, this product is above average in dialogue quality, humor, sexual content level, near average in entertainment value, story quality, below average in cultural representation, costume design, production design.

Comparison summary

42 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    6 (14%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    17 (40%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    19 (45%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
cultural representation 1.0 3.7 -2.7
costume design 2.0 4.3 -2.3
production design 2.0 4.3 -2.3
cliffhanger effectiveness 2.0 4.0 -2.0
acting quality 3.5 4.4 -0.9
world-building 3.0 4.2 -1.2
action sequence quality 3.0 4.0 -1.0
dialogue quality 4.4 3.4 +1.0

Consider This Instead

If you want better cliffhanger effectiveness

Choose Young Sherlock, Season 1. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for cliffhanger effectiveness, with a 4.0 overall score.

Compare

If you want better costume design

Choose Run Away, Season 1. It scores 5.0 vs 2.0 for costume design, with a 3.8 overall score.

Compare

If you want better tonal consistency

Choose The Beast In Me. It scores 5.0 vs 2.6 for tonal consistency, with a 3.8 overall score.

Compare

FAQ

Is The Beauty worth watching?

It depends heavily on your tolerance for excess. The visual ambition and body horror win praise, but the writing and satire divide critics.

Is it very graphic?

Yes. Reviews repeatedly describe explicit sexual content, nudity, brutal violence, gore, and prolonged transformation scenes.

Does the show have a deeper message?

It explores beauty standards, body image, desire, and corporate power, though many critics think those ideas remain underdeveloped.

How is the acting?

The experienced ensemble is often treated as a strength, although reactions to individual casting choices vary.

Is the story easy to follow?

The central investigation is clear enough, but multiple plotlines and tonal shifts make the season feel chaotic to some reviewers.

Will horror fans enjoy it?

Fans of body horror and camp may appreciate its commitment to grotesque spectacle; viewers wanting restrained or frightening horror may not.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top TV Shows to Consider

#1 Colin From Accounts, Season 3
4.8

Best for sharp adult humor, magnetic chemistry and a deeply satisfying farewell. Skip it if familiar will-they-won’t-they plotting or deliberately messy leads are dealbreakers.

Pros: humor, writing quality

#2 King of the Hill, Season 15
4.7

Choose Season 15 for warm, character-driven comedy, meaningful growth, and a finale that rewards longtime fans. Skip it if the short binge format, uneven replacement voices, or occasional clumsy commentary...

Pros: franchise connection, character development

#3 The Pitt, Season 2
4.7

Choose The Pitt Season 2 for a gripping, realistic medical drama with superb acting and emotional depth. Skip it if graphic procedures, unresolved arcs, or slower character-driven pacing bother you.

Pros: realism, emotional impact

#4 Furious, Season 1
4.6

Best for powerhouse performances, thorny character work, and a tense revenge mystery that grows richer as it goes. Skip it if abuse, trafficking, graphic violence, or deliberately messy moral questions...

Pros: main cast performance, character development

Cons: pilot episode quality