Slow Horses, Season 6

Slow Horses, Season 6 Feature Scores

Explore all 54 feature scores for Slow Horses, Season 6, organized into pros and cons.

Scores by Feature

Summary

54 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    42 (78%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    7 (13%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    3 (6%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    1 (2%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    1 (2%)

Pros

Sort
  • 5.0
    13 reviews strong consensus
    main cast performance: 5.0, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Gary Oldman and Jack Lowden remain major anchors, with reviewers praising Oldman’s lived-in comic menace and Lowden’s more vulnerable, physically demanding work. Both are repeatedly described as delivering some of their strongest material.
  • 4.9
    8 reviews strong consensus
    cast chemistry: 4.9, 8 reviews, strong consensus
    Returning pairings—especially Jack Lowden with Olivia Cooke—were a major highlight, while new character combinations also brought fresh energy. The ensemble’s ability to bounce between bickering, affection, and danger remains a core strength.
  • 5.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    action quality: 5.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The chase scenes, fights, and later set pieces were repeatedly described as inventive, breathless, and unusually cinematic. Several reviewers felt Season 6 pushed the action to a new high without losing the show’s grubby identity.
  • 5.0
    7 reviews strong consensus
    writing quality: 5.0, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    Despite the showrunner transition, the writing was broadly praised as sharp, polished, witty, and structurally confident. The strongest reviews felt the two-book adaptation was seamless, while a few critics missed some of the old comic bite.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    acting quality: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Most critics thought the ensemble was operating at a very high level, with several calling the cast’s work among the strongest the series has delivered. Even more mixed season reviews still tended to praise the performances.
  • 5.0
    6 reviews strong consensus
    tone consistency: 5.0, 6 reviews, strong consensus
    Most critics thought the show still balances brutality, grief, sarcasm, and absurd comedy remarkably well under the new showrunner. A few dissenters felt the humor had dulled, but the broader tonal identity remains intact.
  • 4.7
    8 reviews moderate consensus
    season pacing: 4.7, 8 reviews, moderate consensus
    Most full-season reviews found Season 6 exceptionally propulsive, particularly from the second episode onward. The biggest tradeoff is that the speed can crowd out quieter emotional scenes or make the middle harder to follow.
  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    release schedule: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Reviewers repeatedly celebrated the show’s unusually reliable yearly cadence. The fast turnaround is seen as a major advantage because the story and characters stay fresh in viewers’ minds.
  • 4.7
    7 reviews strong consensus
    suspense: 4.7, 7 reviews, strong consensus
    The assassins, constant pursuit, and uncertainty over who will survive create sustained tension across the season. Reviewers frequently described the run as gripping, anxiety-inducing, and hard to look away from.
  • 4.3
    12 reviews strong consensus
    story quality: 4.3, 12 reviews, strong consensus
    The broad consensus is that Season 6 tells a strong, often excellent story with personal stakes and relentless danger. More skeptical critics found the core chase repetitive or the underlying mystery merely solid rather than exceptional.
  • 4.3
    12 reviews low consensus
    humor: 4.3, 12 reviews, low consensus
    The caustic workplace comedy and Lamb’s insults still land for most critics, even against a much bleaker story. A few reviewers felt the one-liners were less sharp than in earlier seasons, so the comedy is not universally seen as peak form.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    season length: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Six episodes continue to feel like a sweet spot for this series. Critics praised the format for avoiding filler, preserving urgency, and still leaving room for plot and character beats.
  • 4.6
    5 reviews moderate consensus
    emotional impact: 4.6, 5 reviews, moderate consensus
    Grief, loss, and old relationships give Season 6 more emotional weight than a typical chase-driven thriller. Several reviewers found the deaths and River’s vulnerability genuinely affecting, though one felt the relentless pace left too little room for intimacy.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    cliffhanger effectiveness: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Most critics found the twists and cliffhangers extremely effective at keeping momentum high and setting up Season 7. A minority disliked the final cliffhanger as a send-off even while acknowledging its impact.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    plot twists: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Twists, returns, deaths, and reversals are among the season’s most consistently praised pleasures. Several critics described the run as unusually unpredictable and packed with major turns.
  • 4.8
    3 reviews strong consensus
    visual style: 4.8, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Rain, muted gray-blue tones, wide surveillance-like compositions, and everyday locations give the season a colder, more cinematic look. Reviewers generally felt the visual shift suited the darker story.
  • 4.3
    6 reviews low consensus
    villain quality: 4.3, 6 reviews, low consensus
    Kyle Soller and MyAnna Buring’s assassins were widely praised as cold, menacing threats, and Hugo Weaving’s Frank remains formidable. One negative review argued that the killers are underwritten and occasionally made implausibly incompetent.
  • 4.4
    4 reviews low consensus
    episode pacing: 4.4, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Most reviewers thought individual episodes moved briskly and efficiently, especially once the season gets going. One premiere review found the opening chapter slower and more cumbersome than usual.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    cinematography: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The season’s imagery drew strong praise, from its rain-soaked London atmosphere to more cinematic framing and a cold blue-green palette. Reviewers saw the visuals as a meaningful part of the darker mood.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    continuity: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Season 6 leans heavily on the show’s history, bringing back old characters and unresolved consequences while preserving the established tone through a leadership change. Reviewers often saw that continuity as a strength.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    dialogue quality: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The quick, acerbic dialogue remains a standout, with razor-sharp exchanges and dry wit surviving the season’s darker turn. Reviewers especially praised how the banter keeps tension from becoming monotonous.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    directing quality: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Adam Randall’s direction was repeatedly credited with making the season feel more cinematic, darker, and more intense. His handling of action and visual atmosphere drew especially strong praise.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    rewatch value: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The dense plotting and brisk pace encouraged repeat viewing for some critics, including one who immediately watched the whole season again. Another called it the easiest season to rewatch so far.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    season finale quality: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The closing stretch drew some of the strongest praise of the season, with multiple critics calling the penultimate episode and finale gripping, brutal, and among the show’s best set pieces.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    violence level: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Season 6 is repeatedly described as the show’s bloodiest and most brutal run, yet positive reviewers felt the violence serves suspense and consequence rather than empty shock value.
  • 4.5
    3 reviews strong consensus
    entertainment value: 4.5, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Even reviews focused only on the premiere generally found it a strong, enjoyable return. Full-season critics repeatedly described the run as compelling, riveting, and easy to stay engaged with.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    episode structure: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The premiere earns praise for efficiently setting up several threats and emotional threads at once. Reviewers also noted that the show can juggle disparate material with surprising smoothness.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    accountability handling: 5.0, 1 review
    The season’s recurring focus on who accepts blame, who ducks it, and how institutions pass responsibility upward remains a satisfying part of the show’s cynical workplace machinery.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    bingeability: 5.0, 1 review
    At least one reviewer watched all six episodes in a single sitting, matching the broader sense that the compact, propulsive season is easy to tear through quickly.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    character consistency: 5.0, 1 review
    The established personalities still feel sharply defined, from River’s impulsiveness to Lamb’s abrasive competence and Roddy’s ego. Reviewers praised how well the cast understands those ingrained flaws and rhythms.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    character development: 5.0, 1 review
    Returning characters are pushed into new emotional and professional territory, with River’s grief and old relationships receiving particular attention. Reviewers generally welcomed the way the season develops familiar people without rewriting who they are.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    character likability: 5.0, 1 review
    The Slow Horses remain a collection of abrasive, damaged misfits that viewers have nevertheless grown deeply attached to. That affection makes the season’s danger and deaths hit harder.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    critic appeal: 5.0, 1 review
    Early critical reaction was overwhelmingly positive, with roundup coverage describing Season 6 as one of the series’ strongest outings and highlighting its pace, writing, and performances.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    drama quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The season’s drama was widely praised for feeling tense, consequential, and emotionally charged. River’s grief and the threat against Slough House give the espionage plot a more personal edge.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    episode length: 5.0, 1 review
    The roughly 45-minute episodes were praised for feeling lean and fast without seeming starved of story. The runtime helps the season keep pressure on the plot while avoiding obvious filler.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    faithfulness to source material: 5.0, 1 review
    Although Season 6 combines and alters material from two Mick Herron novels, critics generally felt it preserves what makes the books and series distinctive. The adaptation changes were usually seen as thoughtful rather than damaging.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    franchise connection: 5.0, 1 review
    Season 6 pays off long-running threads, revives earlier characters, and pushes the larger series story forward. That stronger reliance on prior seasons rewards established viewers more than newcomers.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    genre satisfaction: 5.0, 1 review
    The season continues to stand out as a distinctive spy thriller by mixing bureaucratic drudgery, messy fieldwork, dark comedy, and grounded danger. Reviewers repeatedly framed that blend as something rival shows do not quite match.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    modern political framing: 5.0, 1 review
    Defense spending, institutional compromise, media influence, and financial irregularities give the spy plot a recognizable contemporary edge. Critics who highlighted this material found it persuasive rather than decorative.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    renewal interest: 5.0, 1 review
    Enthusiasm for more Slow Horses remains extremely high among positive reviewers, with some openly hoping the series continues for many more seasons.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    screenplay quality: 5.0, 1 review
    The scripts retain the series’ signature sarcasm, wit, and efficient plotting even after the lead-writer change. Reviewers who focused on the writing found the handover impressively smooth.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    supporting cast performance: 5.0, 1 review
    New and returning supporting players were widely praised, with several reviewers saying the additions strengthen the ensemble. Harry Lloyd, Lenny Rush, Kyle Soller, MyAnna Buring, and others drew especially positive notices.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    theme depth: 5.0, 1 review
    The season uses grief, disposability, loyalty, and institutional neglect to deepen its spy-story mechanics. River’s mourning and the fate of discarded agents give the thriller more emotional and thematic weight.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    world-building: 5.0, 1 review
    The season continues to expand the grimy MI5 ecosystem while keeping its institutional rules, rivalries, and history central to the plot. One review specifically praised the sharp world-building behind the character arcs.
  • 3.7
    3 reviews low consensus
    character balance: 3.7, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Several critics liked how Season 6 spreads plot and development around the ensemble, but others felt the large cast and returning favorites sometimes squeeze regular characters out of focus.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    media scrutiny portrayal: 4.5, 1 review
    The pressure created by a hostile media figure and Taverner’s public exposure fits naturally into the season’s political machinery. One reviewer specifically praised that political-media dimension for feeling tangible.
  • 4.5
    1 review
    production design: 4.5, 1 review
    The shabby, ordinary environments remain part of the show’s charm, and the premiere’s shipping-container setting received specific praise for its sad, lived-in detail.
  • 3.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    plot clarity: 3.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The central hunt is easy enough to follow, but combining two novels creates moments where several storylines compete for attention. Some reviewers found the middle stretch harder to track even though the season ultimately pulls the strands together.
  • 3.5
    1 review
    audience appeal: 3.5, 1 review
    Longtime devotees are still well served by the familiar rhythms, callbacks, and returning faces, though one critic warned that viewers less invested in the formula may crave something fresher.

Cons

Sort
  • 1.0
    1 review
    accent authenticity: 1.0, 1 review
    Hugo Weaving’s American accent drew one of the sharpest individual complaints, with one reviewer calling it the worst they had heard from an Australian actor.
  • 2.0
    1 review
    product placement: 2.0, 1 review
    One reviewer found the recurring Sony game placement noticeable enough to become distracting rather than invisible background detail.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    finale satisfaction: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The final cliffhanger is divisive: some reviewers found it breathless and brilliantly effective, while another called it a cheap send-off. Its ability to create urgency for Season 7 is not in doubt.
  • 2.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    realism: 2.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    The season often earns praise for making violence feel painful, messy, and grounded, but one critic objected to assassins becoming implausibly ineffective when the plot needed the heroes to survive.
  • 2.8
    5 reviews low consensus
    plot originality: 2.8, 5 reviews, low consensus
    Opinions split sharply on freshness. Many critics loved the unpredictability and personal stakes, while dissenters thought the show was recycling familiar faces, chase mechanics, and a formula that has become predictable.

Cast & Creators

  • 5.0
    14 reviews strong consensus
    Gary Oldman: 5.0, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Oldman remains the show’s comic and dramatic anchor, with critics praising how effortlessly he mixes grotesque humor, intelligence, and flashes of buried loyalty. Several reviews rank this work among his strongest as Jackson Lamb.
  • 5.0
    13 reviews strong consensus
    Jack Lowden: 5.0, 13 reviews, strong consensus
    Lowden earns some of the season’s strongest notices, especially for River’s grief, physical strain, comic timing, and vulnerability. Multiple critics describe the work as among his best on the series.
  • 5.0
    5 reviews strong consensus
    Olivia Cooke: 5.0, 5 reviews, strong consensus
    Cooke’s return is one of the season’s most celebrated performances. Critics praise the emotional weight she brings back to Sid, her dry charm, and the easy chemistry she reestablishes with Jack Lowden.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Kristin Scott Thomas: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Scott Thomas is praised for making Diana Taverner controlled, intimidating, and visibly pressured without losing the character’s icy precision. Several critics single out her damage-control scenes and subtle reactions.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    Kyle Soller: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Soller is repeatedly praised as part of a cold, efficient assassin duo that gives the season real menace. Critics describe the pair as chilling, superb, and among the show’s most effective threats.
  • 5.0
    4 reviews strong consensus
    MyAnna Buring: 5.0, 4 reviews, strong consensus
    Buring is repeatedly praised alongside Kyle Soller for creating a chilling, calculating threat. Their calm brutality makes the assassins one of the season’s most memorable new elements.
  • 5.0
    3 reviews strong consensus
    Lenny Rush: 5.0, 3 reviews, strong consensus
    Rush makes an immediate impression as Reece, with reviewers praising his comic timing, sass, and ability to hold his own opposite the established cast. He is frequently singled out as a standout newcomer.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Adam Randall: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Randall’s direction is praised for pushing the season toward a darker, more cinematic look while keeping the action clear and forceful. Reviewers credit his return with helping Season 6 feel visually confident.
  • 5.0
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Gaby Chiappe: 5.0, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Chiappe’s transition into the lead-writing role is viewed as a success. Reviewers say the series remains in good hands and preserves its established voice despite the showrunner change.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Samuel West: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    West’s Peter Judd is praised as darkly funny and unsettlingly convincing. Reviewers enjoy how much comic bite he brings to a smug, manipulative political figure.
  • 4.8
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Tom Brooke: 4.8, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Brooke’s Coe gets more attention this season, and reviewers respond well to his deadpan, unsettling comic presence. His small reactions and dry delivery are singled out as unusually funny.
  • 4.2
    3 reviews low consensus
    Harry Lloyd: 4.2, 3 reviews, low consensus
    Lloyd generally lands as a sharp new addition, bringing polished menace to Damien Cantor. One critic felt the role never gives him enough room to make the impact his casting suggests.
  • 4.5
    2 reviews limited evidence
    Ruth Bradley: 4.5, 2 reviews, limited evidence
    Bradley benefits from more time alongside the Slough House crew, and reviewers enjoy the sharper ensemble dynamic that creates. Her principled, snarky presence is treated as a welcome strength.
  • 5.0
    1 review
    Saskia Reeves: 5.0, 1 review
    Reeves receives especially strong praise for Standish’s fragile, angry material, with one critic calling her first-rate. Her quieter emotional thread adds tension beneath the season’s louder action.
  • 3.5
    4 reviews low consensus
    Hugo Weaving: 3.5, 4 reviews, low consensus
    Weaving’s Frank Harkness divides opinion more than most performances: some critics find him formidable and chilling, while one strongly criticizes his American accent and lack of charisma.