Samsung Galaxy Buds 4

Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Earbuds Review

Brand: Samsung
Updated: 2 months ago
3.3
Overall review score Expert score: 3.7 Customer score: 2.9
670
Review insights
56
Scored features
129
Total reviews
12 expert / 117 customer

Bottom Line

Choose the Galaxy Buds 4 if open-fit earbuds stay secure in your ears and you want strong sound, easy Galaxy integration, and useful smart controls. Skip them if you need workout stability, dependable ANC, or long battery life.

Best for

Galaxy and Android users who already know AirPods-style open earbuds stay secure in their ears and want strong sound, deep Samsung integration, and extensive controls.

Not for

People who need a locked-in workout fit, strong passive isolation, dependable high-end ANC, or long uninterrupted battery life should look elsewhere.

Verdict

The Galaxy Buds 4 can sound excellent, pair effortlessly with Galaxy phones, and pack useful extras such as a 9-band EQ, head gestures, strong noise rejection for many calls, and Samsung-only hi-res playback. The tradeoff is the open, tipless fit. Many customers report constant slipping or outright falls, and that unstable seating can also thin the bass and weaken ANC. Battery life is another recurring weak point, with five to six hours often judged merely adequate and some buyers reporting much less. Comfort is highly ear-dependent, and call quality is not uniformly reliable. For people whose ears naturally hold this shape, the Buds 4 offer a polished, feature-rich Samsung experience; for everyone else, fit risk can overwhelm their audio strengths.

Feature Scorecards

Summary

56 reviewed features
  • Very positive 4.5-5.0
    11 (20%)
  • Positive 3.5-4.4
    21 (38%)
  • Neutral 2.5-3.4
    10 (18%)
  • Negative 1.5-2.4
    11 (20%)
  • Very negative below 1.5
    3 (5%)

Pros highlights

  • 4.0
    57 reviews low consensus
    Sound quality: 4.0, 57 reviews, low consensus
    Sound is one of the strongest parts of the Buds 4, with frequent praise for clarity, detail, vocals, and overall richness. The catch is fit: when the buds loosen, bass and balance can deteriorate sharply.
  • 3.5
    25 reviews low consensus
    Touch control responsiveness: 3.5, 25 reviews, low consensus
    Controls can be responsive, tactile, and easy to customize, but usability varies. Some users find the pinch-and-swipe system awkward, easy to trigger accidentally, or likely to disturb the already fragile fit.
  • 3.5
    19 reviews low consensus
    Microphone quality for calls: 3.5, 19 reviews, low consensus
    Call quality is mixed. Many reviewers heard crisp, clear speech and strong pickup, but others found voices muffled, too quiet, inconsistent, or badly degraded after a few months.
  • 4.6
    16 reviews strong consensus
    Design and Aesthetics: 4.6, 16 reviews, strong consensus
    The revised Buds 4 design gets strong marks for looking cleaner, sleeker, and more premium than the previous generation. The brushed-metal styling and simplified stems are recurring visual highlights.
  • 4.7
    15 reviews strong consensus
    Android compatibility: 4.7, 15 reviews, strong consensus
    Android use is a clear strength, especially on Galaxy phones where pairing and settings feel deeply integrated. Non-Samsung Android phones generally work well too, but some premium features remain Galaxy-only.
  • 4.9
    14 reviews strong consensus
    Software/setup simplicity: 4.9, 14 reviews, strong consensus
    Setup is one of the most consistent strengths. Galaxy pairing is usually immediate and seamless, while even Pixel and other Android users report quick, straightforward connection.

Cons highlights

  • 3.2
    109 reviews low consensus
    Overall satisfaction: 3.2, 109 reviews, low consensus
    Overall reactions are split: strong sound, easy Galaxy pairing, premium styling, and useful smart features earn real praise, but the open fit creates enough stability, ANC, and consistency problems to ruin the experience for many buyers.
  • 1.6
    56 reviews low consensus
    Stability: 1.6, 56 reviews, low consensus
    Stability is the dominant complaint. Dozens of buyers report slipping, loosening, or outright falls during walking, chewing, exercise, or even sitting still, although a minority say the buds stay secure in their ears.
  • 1.9
    35 reviews low consensus
    Eartips fit: 1.9, 35 reviews, low consensus
    Fit is highly polarizing but skews strongly negative. A minority find the open shape comfortable and secure, while many others cannot keep the buds properly seated even during ordinary movement.
  • 3.4
    32 reviews low consensus
    Comfort during long use: 3.4, 32 reviews, low consensus
    Comfort depends heavily on ear shape. The light, tipless design is excellent for some people and works well for long sessions, while others report pressure, irritation, or pain within minutes.
  • 2.4
    31 reviews low consensus
    Value for money: 2.4, 31 reviews, low consensus
    Value is contentious. Galaxy-focused features and strong sound justify the price for some, but many buyers say the poor fit, modest battery, or weak ANC makes cheaper or Pro alternatives a smarter purchase.
  • 2.6
    27 reviews low consensus
    Active noise cancellation: 2.6, 27 reviews, low consensus
    ANC is the biggest technical compromise of the open design. Many testers and buyers found it weak or unstable without a seal, though several users reported strong noise reduction when the buds stayed seated well.

Compared With Category Average

Compared with other Earbuds, this product is above average in Software/setup simplicity, Head gestures, Codec support, near average in Sound quality, Touch control responsiveness, below average in Ear tip size options, Stability, Noise isolation (passive).

Comparison summary

56 compared features
  • Above average 0.4+ pts higher
    18 (32%)
  • Same as average within 0.3 pts
    11 (20%)
  • Below average 0.4+ pts lower
    27 (48%)

Largest category differences

Attribute This product Category average Difference
Ear tip size options 1.1 3.8 -2.7
Stability 1.6 4.1 -2.4
Noise isolation (passive) 1.4 4.1 -2.7
Warranty and support service 1.0 3.7 -2.7
Eartips fit 1.9 4.0 -2.1
Included accessories 1.5 3.7 -2.2
Glasses and hat compatibility 2.0 4.2 -2.2
Value for money 2.4 4.1 -1.7

Consider This Instead

If you want better Value for money

Choose EarFun Air Pro 4 Plus. It scores 4.5 vs 2.4 for Value for money, with a 3.9 overall score.

Compare

Compared in Reviews

Products reviewers directly compared with this model, grouped into quick takeaways.

  • Upgrade: overall usability The reviewer plans to return to the Buds3 after disliking battery, case size, and controls.
  • Better: sound and volume The previous Buds3 are judged louder and better sounding.
  • Better: battery life Sony offers much longer earbud battery life.
  • Better: battery life Sony offers dramatically longer earbud battery life.
  • Better: overall satisfaction The reviewer preferred the replacement Shokz open-ear buds.

FAQ

Do the Galaxy Buds 4 stay securely in the ear?

Fit is highly ear-dependent, but instability is the most repeated complaint. Many users report loosening or falls during walking, chewing, exercise, or even light movement.

How do the Galaxy Buds 4 sound?

Sound is generally a major strength, with clear vocals, good detail, and strong bass when the fit is right. If the buds shift, bass and tonal balance can drop quickly.

Is the noise cancellation good?

ANC is inconsistent because the open design does not create a reliable seal. Some users get useful reduction, while many others say outside noise remains obvious or ANC drops as the buds move.

How is battery life?

Expect roughly five to six hours in many tests, which several reviewers consider merely adequate. Customer reports range from very short runtimes to unusually long battery life, so experiences are mixed.

Are they good for phone calls?

They can be excellent at rejecting background noise and keeping voices clear, but call quality is not consistent across all users. Some report muffled, low, or degrading microphone performance.

Do they work best with Samsung phones?

Yes. Basic Android use is generally smooth, but Galaxy phones unlock deeper settings, Samsung codecs, hi-res playback, and the best automatic device switching experience.

Sample Expert Reviews We Analyzed

These are a few of the reviews included in our analysis.

Video Reviews

Article Reviews

Top Earbuds to Consider

#1 Activo Scoop
4.7

Best for detailed, natural wired sound, three connector options, and standout value around $99. Skip it if you need wireless features, stronger bass, softer treble, or a compact fit for...

Pros: Value for money, Multi-platform compatibility

#2 Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 5
4.5

Choose these for excellent, balanced sound, a comfortable redesign, deep EQ tools and uniquely replaceable batteries. Skip them if you need class-leading ANC, consistently great calls or the smoothest treble...

Pros: User-replaceable batteries, Overall satisfaction

Cons: Auracast support, Sensors

#3 Apple AirPods 5
4.4

Choose the AirPods 5 for strong open-ear ANC, clearer sound, easy Apple-device switching, and excellent value. Skip them if you need all-day battery, a very secure workout fit, or full...

Pros: Overall satisfaction, Sound quality

Cons: Battery, Eartips fit

#4 JBL Tour Pro 3 Earbuds
4.4

Choose the JBL Tour Pro 3 if you want feature-packed earbuds with strong sound, ANC, LDAC and a genuinely useful smart case. Skip them if you have smaller ears, want...

Pros: Sound quality, Carry case quality

Cons: Portability/foldability, Button control usability